Cubria, Maria B, Sebastian Suarez, Aidin Masoudi, Ramin Oftadeh, Pramod Kamalapathy, Amanda J Dubose, Michael R Erdos, et al. 2020. “Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Phenotype of the G608G Progeria Mouse Model With Lonafarnib, Pravastatin, and Zoledronic Acid As Treatment Groups”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (22).
Publications
2020
Shore, Benjamin J, Matt Hall, Travis H Matheney, Brian D Snyder, Cameron C Trenor, and Jay G Berry. 2020. “Incidence of Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism After Elective Spine and Lower-Extremity Surgery in Children With Neuromuscular Complex Chronic Conditions: Do We Need Prophylaxis?”. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 40 (5).
Anilkumar, Parambath, Taylor B Lawson, Srinivas Abbina, Janne TA Mäkelä, Robert C Sabatelle, Lily E Takeuchi, Brian D Snyder, Mark W Grinstaff, and Jayachandran N Kizhakkedathu. 2020. “Mega Macromolecules As Single Molecule Lubricants for Hard and Soft Surfaces”. Nature Communications 11 (1).
2019
McClung, Michael R, Michelle L O Donoghue, Socrates E Papapoulos, Henry Bone, Bente Langdahl, Kenneth G Saag, Ian R Reid, et al. 2019. “Odanacatib for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Results of the LOFT Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial and LOFT Extension Study”. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 7 (12): 899-911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30346-8.
Summary Background Odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. Previous work has shown that odanacatib increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods The Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study at 388 outpatient clinics in 40 countries. Eligible participants were women aged at least 65 years who were postmenopausal for 5 years or more, with a femoral neck or total hip bone mineral density T-score between −2·5 and −4·0 if no previous radiographic vertebral fracture, or between −1·5 and −4·0 with a previous vertebral fracture. Women with a previous hip fracture, more than one vertebral fracture, or a T-score of less than −4·0 at the total hip or femoral neck were not eligible unless they were unable or unwilling to use approved osteoporosis treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oral odanacatib (50 mg once per week) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done using an interactive voice recognition system after stratification for previous radiographic vertebral fracture, and treatment was masked to study participants, investigators and their staff, and sponsor personnel. If the study completed before 5 years of double-blind treatment, consenting participants could enrol in a double-blind extension study (LOFT Extension), continuing their original treatment assignment for up to 5 years from randomisation. Primary endpoints were incidence of vertebral fractures as assessed using radiographs collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months, yearly, and at final study visit in participants for whom evaluable radiograph images were available at baseline and at least one other timepoint, and hip and non-vertebral fractures adjudicated as being a result of osteoporosis as assessed by clinical history and radiograph. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The adjudicated cardiovascular safety endpoints were a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. Individual cardiovascular endpoints and death were also assessed. LOFT and LOFT Extension are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00529373) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT number 2007-002693-66). Findings
2018
Finkel, Richard S., Eugenio Mercuri, Oscar H. Meyer, Anita K. Simonds, Mary K. Schroth, Robert J. Graham, Janbernd Kirschner, et al. 2018. “Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Part 2: Pulmonary and Acute Care; Medications, Supplements and Immunizations; Other Organ Systems; And Ethics”. Neuromuscular Disorders 28 (3): 197-207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2017.11.004.
This is the second half of a two-part document updating the standard of care recommendations for spinal muscular atrophy published in 2007. This part includes updated recommendations on pulmonary management and acute care issues, and topics that have emerged in the last few years such as other organ involvement in the severe forms of spinal muscular atrophy and the role of medications. Ethical issues and the choice of palliative versus supportive care are also addressed. These recommendations are becoming increasingly relevant given recent clinical trials and the prospect that commercially available therapies will likely change the survival and natural history of this disease.
Mercuri, Eugenio, Richard S. Finkel, Francesco Muntoni, Brunhilde Wirth, Jacqueline Montes, Marion Main, Elena S. Mazzone, et al. 2018. “Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for Diagnosis, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic and Nutritional Care”. Neuromuscular Disorders 28 (2): 103-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2017.11.005.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe neuromuscular disorder due to a defect in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. Its incidence is approximately 1 in 11,000 live births. In 2007, an International Conference on the Standard of Care for SMA published a consensus statement on SMA standard of care that has been widely used throughout the world. Here we report a two-part update of the topics covered in the previous recommendations. In part 1 we present the methods used to achieve these recommendations, and an update on diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and spinal management; and nutritional, swallowing and gastrointestinal management. Pulmonary management, acute care, other organ involvement, ethical issues, medications, and the impact of new treatments for SMA are discussed in part 2.
2017
Finkel, Richard S., Thomas Sejersen, Eugenio Mercuri, E. Bertini, K. Chen, T.O. Crawford, V. Dubowitz, et al. 2017. “218th ENMC International Workshop:: Revisiting the Consensus on Standards of Care in SMA Naarden, The Netherlands, 19–21 February 2016”. Neuromuscular Disorders 27 (6): 596-605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2017.02.014.
2016
Gordon, Leslie B., Monica E. Kleinman, Joe Massaro, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Heather Shappell, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Leslie B. Smoot, et al. 2016. “Clinical Trial of the Protein Farnesylation Inhibitors Lonafarnib, Pravastatin, and Zoledronic Acid in Children With Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome”. Circulation 134 (2): 114-25. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022188.
Lakin, Benjamin A., Harsh Patel, Conor Holland, Jonathan D. Freedman, Joshua S. Shelofsky, Brian D. Snyder, Kathryn S. Stok, and Mark W. Grinstaff. 2016. “Contrast-Enhanced CT Using a Cationic Contrast Agent Enables Non-Destructive Assessment of the Biochemical and Biomechanical Properties of Mouse Tibial Plateau Cartilage”. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 34 (7): 1130-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23141.
ABSTRACT Mouse models of osteoarthritis (OA) are commonly used to study the disease s pathogenesis and efficacy of potential treatments. However, measuring the biochemical and mechanical properties of articular cartilage in these models currently requires destructive and time-consuming histology and mechanical testing. Therefore, we examined the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to rapidly and non-destructively image and assess the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content. Using three ex vivo C57BL/6 mouse tibial plateaus, we determined the time required for the cationic contrast agent CA4+ to equilibrate in the cartilage. The whole-joint coefficient of friction (μ) of 10 mouse knees (some digested with Chondroitenase ABC to introduce variation in GAG) was evaluated using a modified Stanton pendulum. For both the medial and lateral tibial plateau cartilage of these knees, linear regression was used to compare the equilibrium CECT attenuations to μ, as well as each side s indentation equilibrium modulus (E) and Safranin-O determined GAG content. CA4+ equilibrated in the cartilage in 30.9 ± 0.95 min (mean ± SD, tau value of 6.17 ± 0.19 min). The mean medial and lateral CECT attenuation was correlated with μ (R2 = 0.69, p 0.05), and the individual medial and lateral CECT attenuations correlated with their respective GAG contents (R2 ≥ 0.63, p 0.05) and E (R2 ≥ 0.63, p 0.05). In conclusion, CECT using CA4+ is a simple, non-destructive technique for three-dimensional imaging of ex vivo mouse cartilage, and significant correlations between CECT attenuation and GAG, E, and μ are observed. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1130–1138, 2016.
2015
Lakin, B.A., D.J. Ellis, J.S. Shelofsky, J.D. Freedman, M.W. Grinstaff, and B.D. Snyder. 2015. “Contrast-Enhanced CT Facilitates Rapid, Non-Destructive Assessment Of cartilage and Bone Properties of the Human Metacarpal”. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 23 (12): 2158-66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.033.
Summary Objective The aim of this work is to establish the human metacarpal as a new whole joint surface early-stage osteoarthritis (OA) model that enables comparisons of articular cartilage and subchondral bone through high resolution contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) imaging, mechanical testing, and biochemical analysis. Design The fourth metacarpal was obtained from 12 human cadaveric donors and baseline μCT imaging was followed by indentation testing. The samples were then immersed in anionic (Ioxaglate) and cationic (CA4+) iodinated contrast agent solutions followed by CECT. Cartilage GAG content and distribution was measured using the 1,9 dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay and Safranin-O histology staining. Linear regression was performed to compare cartilage and subchondral bone properties. Results