Publications by Year: 2016

2016

Marshall, John, Shoshana J Herzig, Michael D Howell, Stephen H Le, Chris Mathew, Julia S Kats, and Jennifer P Stevens. (2016) 2016. “Antipsychotic Utilization in the Intensive Care Unit and in Transitions of Care.”. Journal of Critical Care 33: 119-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.12.017.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to quantify the rate at which newly initiated antipsychotic therapy is continued on discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) and describe risk factors for continuation post-ICU discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients receiving an antipsychotic in the ICUs of a large academic medical center from January 1, 2005, to October 31, 2011. Medical record review was conducted to ascertain whether a patient was newly started on antipsychotic therapy and whether therapy was continued post-ICU discharge.

RESULTS: A total of 39,248 ICU admissions over the 7-year period were evaluated. Of these, 4468 (11%) were exposed to antipsychotic therapy, of which 3119 (8%) were newly initiated. In the newly initiated cohort, 642 (21%) were continued on therapy on discharge from the hospital. Type of drug (use of quetiapine vs no use of quetiapine: odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-4.0; P < .0001 and use of olanzapine: odds ratio, 2.4, 95% confidence interval, 2.0-3.1; P ≤ .0001) was a significant risk factor for continuing antipsychotics on discharge despite adjustment for clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic use is common in the ICU setting, and a significant number of newly initiated patients have therapy continued upon discharge from the hospital.

Stevens, Jennifer P, Kathy Baker, Michael D Howell, and Robert B Banzett. (2016) 2016. “Prevalence and Predictive Value of Dyspnea Ratings in Hospitalized Patients: Pilot Studies.”. PloS One 11 (4): e0152601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152601.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea (breathing discomfort) can be as powerfully aversive as pain, yet is not routinely assessed and documented in the clinical environment. Routine identification and documentation of dyspnea is the first step to improved symptom management and it may also identify patients at risk of negative clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of dyspnea and of dyspnea-associated risk among hospitalized patients.

DESIGN: Two pilot prospective cohort studies.

SETTING: Single academic medical center.

PATIENTS: Consecutive patients admitted to four inpatient units: cardiology, hematology/oncology, medicine, and bariatric surgery.

MEASUREMENTS: In Study 1, nurses documented current and recent patient-reported dyspnea at the time of the Initial Patient Assessment in 581 inpatients. In Study 2, nurses documented current dyspnea at least once every nursing shift in 367 patients. We describe the prevalence of burdensome dyspnea, and compare it to pain. We also compared dyspnea ratings with a composite of adverse outcomes: 1) receipt of care from the hospital's rapid response system, 2) transfer to the intensive care unit, or 3) death in hospital. We defined burdensome dyspnea as a rating of 4 or more on a 10-point scale.

RESULTS: Prevalence of burdensome current dyspnea upon admission (Study 1) was 13% (77 of 581, 95% CI 11%-16%). Prevalence of burdensome dyspnea at some time during the hospitalization (Study 2) was 16% (57 of 367, 95% CI 12%-20%). Dyspnea was associated with higher odds of a negative outcome.

CONCLUSIONS: In two pilot studies, we identified a significant symptom burden of dyspnea in hospitalized patients. Patients reporting dyspnea may benefit from a more careful focus on symptom management and may represent a population at greater risk for negative outcomes.

Herzig, Shoshana J, Michael B Rothberg, Jamey R Guess, Jennifer P Stevens, John Marshall, Jerry H Gurwitz, and Edward R Marcantonio. (2016) 2016. “Antipsychotic Use in Hospitalized Adults: Rates, Indications, and Predictors.”. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 64 (2): 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13943.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate patterns and predictors of use of antipsychotics in hospitalized adults.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: Academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 18 and older hospitalized from August 2012 to August 2013, excluding those admitted to obstetrics and gynecology or psychiatry or with a psychotic disorder.

MEASUREMENTS: Use was ascertained from pharmacy charges. Potentially excessive dosing was defined using guidelines for long-term care facilities. A review of 100 records was performed to determine reasons for use.

RESULTS: The cohort included 17,775 admissions with a median age 64; individuals could have been admitted more than once during the study period. Antipsychotics were used in 9%, 55% of which were initiations. The most common reasons for initiation were delirium (53%) and probable delirium (12%). Potentially excessive dosing occurred in 16% of admissions exposed to an antipsychotic. Of admissions with antipsychotic initiation, 26% were discharged on these medications. Characteristics associated with initiation included age 75 and older (relative risk (RR) = 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-1.7), male sex (RR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4), black race (RR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.6-0.96), delirium (RR = 4.8, 95% CI = 4.2-5.7), dementia (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.7-2.6), admission to a medical service (RR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4), intensive care unit stay (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.8-2.4), and mechanical ventilation (RR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.7-2.4). In individuals who were initiated on an antipsychotic, characteristics associated with discharge on antipsychotics were age 75 and older (RR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.7), discharge to any location other than home (RR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.8-3.3), and class of in-hospital antipsychotic exposure (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.3 for atypical vs typical; RR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.9-3.8 for both vs typical).

CONCLUSION: Antipsychotic initiation and use were common during hospitalization, most often for delirium, and individuals were frequently discharged on these medications. Several predictors of use on discharge were identified, suggesting potential targets for decision support tools that would be used to prompt consideration of ongoing necessity.