Publications

2016

Woods, Nancy Fugate, Chancellor Hohensee, Janet S Carpenter, Lee Cohen, Kristine Ensrud, Ellen W Freeman, Katherine A Guthrie, Hadine Joffe, Andrea Z LaCroix, and Julie L Otte. (2016) 2016. “Symptom Clusters Among MsFLASH Clinical Trial Participants.”. Menopause (New York, N.Y.) 23 (2): 158-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000516.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify symptom clusters using standardized measures completed by participants in the Menopausal Strategies: Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health clinical trial at baseline, including hot flash interference, and sleep, depressive, anxiety, and pain symptoms.

METHODS: Data from all women randomized to interventions and controls from Menopausal Strategies: Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health studies 1, 2, and 3 (N = 899) were included; 797 with complete data were used in the analyses. Scores from standardized measures obtained at baseline included the following: Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 measure of depressed mood, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Brief Pain Inventory PEG scores (pain intensity [P], interference with enjoyment of life [E], and interference with daily activity [G]). Latent class analysis was used to identify symptom clusters using standardized scale scores and their established cut points.

RESULTS: We identified five classes using the Bayesian Information Criterion and the Akaike Information Criterion. Women in classes 1 and 2 had high hot flash interference levels relative to the others, and class 1 (10.5% of total) included severe hot flash interference, severe sleep symptoms, and moderately severe pain symptoms (hot flash, sleep, pain). In class 2 (14.1%), severe hot flash interference was paired with the severe sleep symptoms, and moderate to severe depressed and anxious mood symptoms and pain (hot flash, sleep, mood, pain). In class 3 (39.6%), women reported moderately severe sleep symptoms with moderate hot flash interference, and low severity mood and pain symptoms (hot flash, sleep). Those in class 4 (7.0%) reported moderate hot flash interference with severe levels of anxiety and depressed mood symptoms, but low levels of other symptoms (hot flash, mood). Women in class 5 (28.7%) reported the lowest levels of all the five symptoms (low severity symptoms).

CONCLUSIONS: Women meeting hot flash frequency criteria for inclusion in clinical trials exhibited multiple co-occurring symptoms that clustered into identifiable groups according to symptom interference and severity. Variability of symptom profiles between the classes was evident, indicating that the classes were composed of differing symptom types and not simply differing severity levels. These symptom clusters may be useful phenotypes for differentiating treatment effects or evaluating associations with biomarkers or genes.

Taylor, Alexander P, Hang Lee, Matthew L Webb, Hadine Joffe, and Joel S Finkelstein. (2016) 2016. “Effects of Testosterone and Estradiol Deficiency on Vasomotor Symptoms in Hypogonadal Men.”. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 101 (9): 3479-86. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-1612.

CONTEXT: The hormonal basis of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in hypogonadal men is incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contributions of testosterone and estradiol deficiency to VMS in hypogonadal men.

DESIGN: Two randomized trials were conducted sequentially between September 2004 and April 2011. Controls were recruited separately.

SETTING: A single-site academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Healthy men ages 20-50, with normal serum testosterone levels.

INTERVENTION: Cohort 1 (n = 198, 81% completion) received goserelin acetate every 4 weeks to suppress gonadal steroids and were randomized to placebo or 1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 g of testosterone gel daily for 16 weeks. Cohort 2 (n = 202, 78% completion) received the same regimen as cohort 1 plus anastrozole to block aromatization of testosterone. Controls (n = 37, 89% completion) received placebos for goserelin acetate and testosterone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of visits with VMS. This was a preplanned secondary analysis.

RESULTS: VMS were reported at 26% of visits in cohort 1, and 35% of visits in cohort 2 (P = .02), demonstrating an effect of estradiol deficiency. When adjacent estradiol level groups in cohort 1 were compared, the largest difference in VMS incidence was observed between the 5-9.9 and 10-14.9 pg/mL groups (38% vs 16%, P < .001). In cohort 2, the 10-g testosterone group differed significantly from placebo (16% vs 43%, P = .048) after adjustment for small differences in estradiol levels, indicating that high testosterone levels may suppress VMS.

CONCLUSIONS: Estradiol deficiency is the key mediator of VMS in hypogonadal men. At high levels, testosterone may have a suppressive effect.

Bianchi, Matt T, Semmie Kim, Thania Galvan, David P White, and Hadine Joffe. (2016) 2016. “Nocturnal Hot Flashes: Relationship to Objective Awakenings and Sleep Stage Transitions.”. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine : JCSM : Official Publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 12 (7): 1003-9. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5936.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: While women report sleep interruption secondary to nighttime hot flashes, the sleep disrupting impact of nocturnal hot flashes (HF) is not well characterized. We utilized a model of induced HF to investigate the relationship of nighttime HF to sleep architecture and sleep-stage transitions.

METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy, premenopausal volunteers received the depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) leuprolide to rapidly induce menopause, manifesting with HF. Sleep disruption was measured on 2 polysomnograms conducted before and after 4-5 weeks on leuprolide, when HF had developed.

RESULTS: 165 HF episodes were recorded objectively during 48 sleep studies (mean 3.4 HF/night). After standardizing to sleep-stage time distribution, the majority of HF were recorded during wake (51.0%) and stage N1 (18.8%). Sixty-six percent of HF occurred within 5 minutes of an awakening, with 80% occurring just before or during the awakening. Objective HF were not associated with sleep disruption as measured by increased transitions to wake or N1, but self-reported nocturnal HF correlated with an increase from pre- to post-leuprolide in the rate of transitions to wake (p = 0.01), and to N1 (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS: By isolating the effect of HF on sleep in women without the confound of age-related sleep changes associated with natural menopause, this experimental model shows that HF arise most commonly during N1 and wake, typically preceding or occurring simultaneously with wake episodes. Perception of HF, but not objective HF, is linked to increased sleep-stage transitions, suggesting that sleep disruption increases awareness of and memory for nighttime HF events.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01116401.

McCurry, Susan M, Katherine A Guthrie, Charles M Morin, Nancy F Woods, Carol A Landis, Kristine E Ensrud, Joseph C Larson, et al. (2016) 2016. “Telephone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A MsFLASH Randomized Clinical Trial.”. JAMA Internal Medicine 176 (7): 913-20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1795.

IMPORTANCE: Effective, practical, nonpharmacologic therapies are needed to treat menopause-related insomnia symptoms in primary and women's specialty care settings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) vs menopause education control (MEC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-site, randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 1, 2013, to August 31, 2015, in western Washington State among 106 perimenopausal or postmenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years with moderate insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] score, ≥12) and 2 or more daily hot flashes. Blinded assessments were conducted at baseline, 8, and 24 weeks postrandomization. An intent-to-treat analysis was conducted.

INTERVENTIONS: Six CBT-I or MEC telephone sessions in 8 weeks. Participants submitted weekly electronic sleep diaries and received group-specific written educational materials. The CBT-I sessions included sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene education, cognitive restructuring, and behavioral homework; MEC sessions provided information about menopause and women's health.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was scores on the ISI (score range, 0-28; scores ≥15 indicate moderate to severe insomnia). Secondary outcome was scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (score range, 0-21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality). Additional outcomes included sleep and hot flash diary variables and hot flash interference.

RESULTS: At 8 weeks, ISI scores had decreased 9.9 points among 53 women receiving CBT-I (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [3.5] years) and 4.7 points among 53 women receiving MEC (age, 54.7 [4.7] years), a mean between-group difference of 5.2 points (95% CI, -6.1 to -3.3; P < .001). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores decreased 4.0 points in women receiving CBT-I and 1.4 points in women receiving MEC, a mean between-group difference of 2.7 points (95% CI, -3.9 to -1.5; P < .001). Significant group differences were sustained at 24 weeks. At 8 and 24 weeks, 33 of 47 women (70%) and 37 of 44 (84%) in the CBT-I group, respectively, had ISI scores in the no-insomnia range compared with 10 of 41 (24%) and 16 of 37 (43%) in the MEC group, respectively. The CBT-I group also had greater improvements in diary-reported sleep latency, wake time, and sleep efficiency. There were no between-group differences in frequency of daily hot flashes, but hot flash interference was significantly decreased at 8 weeks for the CBT-I group (-15.7; 95% CI, -20.4 to -11.0) compared with the MEC group (-7.1; 95% CI, -14.6 to 0.4) (P = .03), differences that were maintained at 24 weeks for the CBT-I group (-22.8; 95% CI, -28.6 to -16.9) and MEC group (-11.6; 95% CI, -19.4 to -3.8) (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Telephone-based CBT-I improved sleep in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with insomnia and hot flashes. Results support further development and testing of centralized CBT-I programs for treating menopausal insomnia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01936441.

Joffe, Hadine, Sybil L Crawford, Marlene P Freeman, David P White, Matt T Bianchi, Semmie Kim, Nicole Economou, Julie Camuso, Janet E Hall, and Lee S Cohen. (2016) 2016. “Independent Contributions of Nocturnal Hot Flashes and Sleep Disturbance to Depression in Estrogen-Deprived Women.”. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 101 (10): 3847-55.

CONTEXT: Women are at increased risk for mood disturbance during the menopause transition. Hot flashes (HFs), sleep disruption, and fluctuating estradiol levels correlate with menopause-associated depression but co-occur, making cause and effect relationships difficult to disentangle.

OBJECTIVE: Using a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) experimental model, we investigated whether depressive symptoms are associated with HFs and/or are explained by concomitant sleep fragmentation in the absence of estradiol fluctuation.

DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Depressive symptoms, objective polysomnographic sleep parameters, subjective sleep quality, serum estradiol, and HFs were assessed before and 4 weeks after open-label depot GnRHa (leuprolide 3.75-mg) administration.

SETTING: Academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine healthy nondepressed premenopausal volunteers (mean age, 27.3 years).

RESULTS: Serum estradiol was rapidly and uniformly suppressed. HFs developed in 69% of the subjects. On univariate analysis, worsening of mood was predicted by increases in time in light sleep (stage N1), number of transitions to wake, non-REM arousals, subjective sleep quality, and reductions in perceived sleep efficiency (all P < .045), as well as the number of nighttime (P = .006), but not daytime (P = .28), HFs reported. In adjusted models, the number of nighttime HFs reported, increases in non-REM arousals, time in stage N1, transitions to wake, and reduced sleep quality remained significant predictors of mood deterioration (P ≤ .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms emerged after estradiol withdrawal in association with objectively and subjectively measured sleep disturbance and the number of nighttime, but not daytime, HFs reported. Results suggest that sleep disruption and perceived nighttime HFs both contribute to vulnerability to menopause-associated depressive symptoms in hypoestrogenic women.

Tepper, Ping G, Maria M Brooks, John F Randolph, Sybil L Crawford, Samar R El Khoudary, Ellen B Gold, Bill L Lasley, et al. (2016) 2016. “Characterizing the Trajectories of Vasomotor Symptoms across the Menopausal Transition.”. Menopause (New York, N.Y.) 23 (10): 1067-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000676.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the heterogeneity of temporal patterns of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) over the menopausal transition and identify factors associated with these patterns in a diverse sample of women.

METHODS: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation is a multisite longitudinal study of women from five racial/ethnic groups transitioning through the menopause. The analytic sample included 1,455 women with nonsurgical menopause and a median follow-up of 15.4 years. Temporal patterns of VMS and associations with serum estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and demographic and psychosocial factors were examined using group-based trajectory modeling.

RESULTS: Four distinct trajectories of VMS were found: onset early (11 years before the final menstrual period) with decline after menopause (early onset, 18.4%), onset near the final menstrual period with later decline (late onset, 29.0%), onset early with persistently high frequency (high, 25.6%), and persistently low frequency (low, 27.0%). Relative to women with persistently low frequency of VMS, women with persistently high and early onset VMS had a more adverse psychosocial and health profile. Black women were overrepresented in the late onset and high VMS subgroups relative to white women. Obese women were underrepresented in the late onset subgroup. In multivariable models, the pattern of estradiol over the menopause was significantly associated with the VMS trajectory.

CONCLUSIONS: These data distinctly demonstrate heterogeneous patterns of menopausal symptoms that are associated with race/ethnicity, reproductive hormones, premenopause body mass index, and psychosocial characteristics. Early targeted intervention may have a meaningful impact on long-term VMS.

Bromberger, Joyce T, Howard M Kravitz, Ada Youk, Laura L Schott, and Hadine Joffe. (2016) 2016. “Patterns of Depressive Disorders across 13 Years and Their Determinants Among Midlife Women: SWAN Mental Health Study.”. Journal of Affective Disorders 206: 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.005.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the course of depression in midlife women. This study aims to identify factors that distinguish risk factors for persistent or recurrent depression from those of a milder course across 13-years of follow-up.

METHODS: 297 Black and White premenopausal women aged 42-52 were enrolled at the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation Pittsburgh site. Psychiatric interviews obtained information on lifetime psychiatric diagnoses at baseline and occurrences of depression annually. We identified four depression patterns: 91(31%) had Persistent/recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD), 27(9%) Single Episode MDD, 35(12%) Minor Depression (minD) only, 144(48%) No Depression. We compared baseline risk factors for the Persistent/recurrent MDD group with each of the other three.

RESULTS: A lifetime history of major or minor depression (p-values =.001-.08) and 2+ very upsetting life events in the previous year (p-values=.003-.04) were more likely to be reported by women in the Persistent/recurrent group than in the other three. The Persistent/recurrent group was more likely to report a family history of depression (p=.03) than the MinD group, and to report current sleep problems (p=.002) at baseline than the Single Episode MDD group.

LIMITATIONS: Small numbers of women with minD or a Single Episode MDD. Childhood maltreatment and family depression history were retrospectively reported.

CONCLUSIONS: A Persistent/recurrent depression course is common during midlife. In addition to personal and family histories of depression, providers of midlife health care should recognize that current sleep problems and recent very upsetting events are strong risk factors for a pernicious depression course.

Jackson, Elizabeth A, Samar R El Khoudary, Sybil L Crawford, Karen Matthews, Hadine Joffe, Claudia Chae, and Rebecca C Thurston. (2016) 2016. “Hot Flash Frequency and Blood Pressure: Data from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation.”. Journal of Women’s Health (2002) 25 (12): 1204-9.

BACKGROUND: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are highly prevalent among midlife women and have been associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association between VMS frequency and risk factors such as hypertension (HTN) remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined VMS frequency and blood pressure (BP) among 2839 participants of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a multiethnic, prospective, study of women enrolled from seven U.S. sites between November 1995 and October 1997. Women were age 42-52, with no history of CVD, and not postmenopausal at baseline. VMS was defined by the number of days a woman reported VMS over the 2-week period before each annual visit. Frequent VMS was defined as ≥6 days of VMS; less frequent VMS was defined 1-5 days of symptoms with asymptomatic women the reference group. BP was measured at each visit in addition to demographic and clinic factors.

RESULTS: At baseline, 298 women reported frequent VMS, 794 less frequent VMS and 1747 no VMS. More frequent baseline VMS was associated with higher BP. Compared to no VMS, baseline VMS was associated with HTN (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.14-1.88 for infrequent VMS, and OR 1.40, (95% CI; 0.97-2.02 for frequent VMS). Risk for incident pre-HTN or HTN during follow-up was increased among women with frequent VMS (hazard ratio of 1.39, 95% CI; 1.09-1.79) after adjustment for multiple covariates.

CONCLUSION: Women with VMS may be more likely to develop HTN compared to women without VMS. Further research related to VMS including frequency of symptoms is warranted.

2015

Ensrud, Kristine E, Katherine A Guthrie, Chancellor Hohensee, Bette Caan, Janet S Carpenter, Ellen W Freeman, Andrea Z LaCroix, et al. (2015) 2015. “Effects of Estradiol and Venlafaxine on Insomnia Symptoms and Sleep Quality in Women With Hot Flashes.”. Sleep 38 (1): 97-108. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4332.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Determine effects of low-dose estradiol and low-dose venlafaxine on self-reported sleep measures in menopausal women with hot flashes.

DESIGN: 3-arm double-blind randomized trial. Participants assigned in a 2:2:3 ratio to 17β estradiol 0.5 mg/day (n = 97), venlafaxine XR 75 mg/day (n = 96), or placebo (n = 146) for 8 weeks.

SETTING: Academic research centers.

PARTICIPANTS: 339 community-dwelling perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with ≥2 bothersome hot flashes per day.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) at baseline, week 4 and 8; 325 women (96%) provided ISI data and 312 women (92%) provided PSQI data at baseline and follow-up. At baseline, mean (SD) hot flash frequency was 8.1/day (5.3), mean ISI was 11.1 (6.0), and mean PSQI was 7.5 (3.4). Mean (95% CI) change from baseline in ISI at week 8 was -4.1 points (-5.3 to -3.0) with estradiol, -5.0 points (-6.1 to -3.9) with venlafaxine, and -3.0 points (-3.8 to -2.3) with placebo (P overall treatment effect vs. placebo 0.09 for estradiol and 0.007 for venlafaxine). Mean (95% CI) change from baseline in PSQI at week 8 was -2.2 points (-2.8 to -1.6) with estradiol, -2.3 points (-2.9 to -1.6) with venlafaxine, and -1.2 points (-1.7 to -0.8) with placebo (P overall treatment effect vs. placebo 0.04 for estradiol and 0.06 for venlafaxine).

CONCLUSIONS: Among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with hot flashes, both low dose oral estradiol and low-dose venlafaxine compared with placebo modestly reduced insomnia symptoms and improved subjective sleep quality.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01418209 at www.clinicaltrials.gov.