Publications

STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is strong evidence that sleep disturbances are an independent risk factor for the development of chronic pain conditions. The mechanisms underlying this association, however, are still not well understood. We examined the effect of experimental sleep disturbances (ESDs) on three pathways involved in pain initiation/resolution: (1) the central pain-inhibitory pathway, (2) the cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway, and (3) the endocannabinoid (eCB) pathway.

METHODS: Twenty-four healthy participants (50% females) underwent two 19-day long in-laboratory protocols in randomized order: (1) an ESD protocol consisting of repeated nights of short and disrupted sleep with intermittent recovery sleep; and (2) a sleep control protocol consisting of nights with an 8-hour sleep opportunity. Pain inhibition (conditioned pain modulation, habituation to repeated pain), COX-2 expression at monocyte level (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]-stimulated and spontaneous), and eCBs (arachidonoylethanolamine, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, docosahexaenoylethanolamide [DHEA], eicosapentaenoylethanolamide, docosatetraenoylethanolamide) were measured every other day throughout the protocol.

RESULTS: The central pain-inhibitory pathway was compromised by sleep disturbances in females, but not in males (p < 0.05 condition × sex effect). The COX-2 pathway (LPS-stimulated) was activated by sleep disturbances (p < 0.05 condition effect), and this effect was exclusively driven by males (p < 0.05 condition × sex effect). With respect to the eCB pathway, DHEA was higher (p < 0.05 condition effect) in the sleep disturbance compared to the control condition, without sex-differential effects on any eCBs.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that central pain-inhibitory and COX mechanisms through which sleep disturbances may contribute to chronic pain risk are sex specific, implicating the need for sex-differential therapeutic targets to effectively reduce chronic pain associated with sleep disturbances in both sexes.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02484742: Pain Sensitization and Habituation in a Model of Experimentally-induced Insomnia Symptoms. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02484742.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances, as manifested in insomnia symptoms of difficulties falling asleep or frequent nighttime awakenings, are a strong risk factor for a diverse range of diseases involving immunopathology. Low-grade systemic inflammation has been frequently found associated with sleep disturbances and may mechanistically contribute to increased disease risk. Effects of sleep disturbances on inflammation have been observed to be long lasting and remain after recovery sleep has been obtained, suggesting that sleep disturbances may not only affect inflammatory mediators, but also the so-called specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) that actively resolve inflammation. The goal of this investigation was to test for the first time whether the omega-3 fatty acid-derived D- (RvD) and E-series (RvE) resolvins are impacted by prolonged experimental sleep disturbance (ESD).

METHODS: Twenty-four healthy participants (12 F, age 20-42 years) underwent two 19-day in-hospital protocols (ESD/control), separated by > 2 months. The ESD protocol consisted of repeated nights of short and disrupted sleep with intermittent nights of undisturbed sleep, followed by three nights of recovery sleep at the end of the protocol. Under the control sleep condition, participants had an undisturbed sleep opportunity of 8 h/night throughout the protocol. The D- and E-series resolvins were measured in plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS: The precursor of the D-series resolvins, 17-HDHA, was downregulated in the ESD compared to the control sleep condition (p <.001 for condition), and this effect remained after the third night of recovery sleep has been obtained. This effect was also observed for the resolvins RvD3, RvD4, and RvD5 (p <.001 for condition), while RvD1 was higher in the ESD compared to the control sleep condition (p <.01 for condition) and RvD2 showed a mixed effect of a decrease during disturbed sleep followed by an increase during recovery sleep in the ESD condition (p <.001 for condition*day interaction). The precursor of E-series resolvins, 18-HEPE, was downregulated in the ESD compared to the control sleep condition (p <.01 for condition) and remained low after recovery sleep has been obtained. This effect of downregulation was also observed for RvE2 (p <.01 for condition), while there was no effect for RvE1 (p >.05 for condition or condition*day interaction). Sex-differential effects were found for two of the D-series resolvins, i.e., RvD2 and RvD4.

CONCLUSION: This first investigation on the effects of experimental sleep disturbance on inflammatory resolution processes shows that SPMs, particularly resolvins of the D-series, are profoundly downregulated by sleep disturbances and remain downregulated after recovery sleep has been obtained, suggesting a longer lasting impact of sleep disturbances on these mediators. These findings also suggest that sleep disturbances contribute to the development and progression of a wide range of diseases characterized by immunopathology by interfering with processes that actively resolve inflammation. Pharmacological interventions aimed at promoting inflammatory resolution physiology may help to prevent future disease risk as a common consequence of sleep disturbances.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02484742.

Epidemiological studies have repeatedly shown that insomnia disorder or symptoms of insomnia are prospectively associated with increased risks for developing a diverse range of medical conditions affecting multiple biological systems. Specifically, insomnia-related disease risks include cardiovascular diseases (Javaheri and Redline, 2017), metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome (Anothaisintawee et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2016), Alzheimer’s disease (Shi et al., 2018), pain (Afolalu et al., 2018), autoimmune diseases (Kok et al., 2016), and cancer (Shi et al., 2020). Insomnia is associated with changes in the regulation of immune, neuroendocrine, and metabolic systems among other physiological consequences, which are thought to mechanistically link insomnia with increased risk for these diseases. The exact pathophysiological mechanisms through which such physiological changes promote disease risk are now intensively studied for some conditions, such as type 2diabetes(Cedernaes et al., 2015; Depner et al., 2014), but less so for others, such as pain or autoimmune conditions (Haack et al., 2020; Zielinski et al., 2019). There is some evidence, however, suggesting that the physiological consequences are most pronounced in insomnia with objective short sleep duration, generally defined as less than 6 h of sleep per night (Vgontzas et al., 2013). For example, the risks of low-grade systemic inflammation, hypertension, or diabetes are greatest in individuals who have insomnia in combination with short sleep (Fernandez-Mendoza et al., 2017; Vgontzas et al., 2013), suggesting that this insomnia phenotype is a biologically more severe form of the disorder.
Fig. 1 depicts immune, neuroendocrine, and metabolic consequences associated with insomnia disorder and their potential role in mediating increased disease risk, which will be reviewed in the following. Autonomic consequences of insomnia (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate variability) will not be discussed here; the interested reader is referred to recent comprehensive reviews (Grimaldi et al., 2019; Nano et al., 2017).

Despite the growing research base examining the benefits and physiological mechanisms of slow-paced breathing (SPB), mindfulness (M), and their combination (as yogic breathing, SPB + M), no studies have directly compared these in a "dismantling" framework. To address this gap, we conducted a fully remote three-armed feasibility study with wearable devices and video-based laboratory visits. Eighteen healthy participants (age 18-30 years, 12 female) were randomized to one of three 8-week interventions: slow-paced breathing (SPB, N = 5), mindfulness (M, N = 6), or yogic breathing (SPB + M, N = 7). The participants began a 24-h heart rate recording with a chest-worn device prior to the first virtual laboratory visit, consisting of a 60-min intervention-specific training with guided practice and experimental stress induction using a Stroop test. The participants were then instructed to repeat their assigned intervention practice daily with a guided audio, while concurrently recording their heart rate data and completing a detailed practice log. The feasibility was determined using the rates of overall study completion (100%), daily practice adherence (73%), and the rate of fully analyzable data from virtual laboratory visits (92%). These results demonstrate feasibility for conducting larger trial studies with a similar fully remote framework, enhancing the ecological validity and sample size that could be possible with such research designs.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how nocturnal timing of sleep restriction affects vigilant attention and mood in healthy controls with normal sleep-wake patterns.

METHODS: A convenience sample from two controlled sleep restriction protocols were used to investigate the difference between 4 hours of sleep early in the night, versus 4 hours late in the night. Volunteers stayed in a hospital setting and were randomized to one of the three conditions: a control (8 hours of sleep each night), an early short sleep (ESS, 2300-0300 hours), and a late short sleep (LSS, 0300-0700 hours). Participants were evaluated with psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) and mood ratings via visual analog scales.

RESULTS: Short sleep conditions led to greater performance decrements than control on PVT. LSS performance impairments were greater than control (lapses, p = 0.011; median RT, p = 0.029; fastest 10%, p = 0.038; reciprocal RT, p = 0.014; and reciprocal 10%, p = 0.005), but had higher positive mood ratings (p = 0.005). LSS also had higher positive mood ratings compared with ESS (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: The data underscore the negative mood impact of waking at an adverse circadian phase, for healthy controls. In addition, the paradoxical relationship between mood and performance seen in LSS raises concerns that staying up late and waking at the usual rise time may be rewarding in terms of mood, but nonetheless have performance consequences that may not be fully recognized.

CHAPTER HIGHLIGHTS

• That sleep is altered during sickness has been known for millennia. Yet, systematic and controlled studies aimed at elucidating the extent to which sleep is altered in response to immune challenge have only been conducted during the last 30 years.

• Substances historically viewed as components of the innate immune system are now known to be involved in the regulation or modulation of physiological sleep-wake behavior, in the absence of immune challenge. Changes in sleep during immune challenge are actively driven and result from amplification of these physiological mechanisms.
   
• Although the precise changes in sleep-wake behavior depend on the pathogen, route of infection, timing of infection, host species, and other factors, altered sleep during immune challenge is generally characterized by periods of increased non-rapid eye movements (NREM) sleep, increased delta power during NREM sleep, and suppressed REM sleep. Infection-induced alterations in sleep are often accompanied by fever or hypothermia.
   
• Altered sleep has been studied in humans during pathologies and/or infections with pathogens including HIV/AIDS, rhinovirus (common cold), streptococci, trypanosomes, prions, and sepsis. Laboratory animal models include sepsis, influenza and other viruses (gammaherpes virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, rabies, feline immunodeficiency virus), several bacterial species, trypanosomes, and several prion diseases.
   
• Mechanisms that link sleep to innate immunity involve a biochemical brain network composed of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, transcription factors, neurotransmitters, enzymes and their receptors.  Each of these substances and receptors is present in neurons, although interactions with glia are critical for host defense responses to immune challenge. Redundancy, feed-forward, and feed-back loops are characteristic of this biochemical network. These attributes provide stability and flexibility to the organismal response to immune challenge.

Sleep disturbances, including disrupted sleep and short sleep duration, are highly prevalent and are prospectively associated with an increased risk for various widespread diseases, including cardiometabolic, neurodegenerative, chronic pain, and autoimmune diseases. Systemic inflammation, which has been observed in populations experiencing sleep disturbances, may mechanistically link disturbed sleep with increased disease risks. To determine whether sleep disturbances are causally responsible for the inflammatory changes reported in population-based studies, we developed a 19-day in-hospital experimental model of prolonged sleep disturbance inducing disrupted and shortened sleep. The model included delayed sleep onset, frequent nighttime awakenings, and advanced sleep offset, interspersed with intermittent nights of undisturbed sleep. This pattern aimed at providing an ecologically highly valid experimental model of the typical sleep disturbances often reported in the general and patient populations. Unexpectedly, the experimental sleep disturbance model reduced several of the assessed proinflammatory markers, namely interleukin(IL)-6 production by monocytes and plasma levels of IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), presumably due to intermittent increases in the counterinflammatory hormone cortisol. Striking sex differences were observed with females presenting a reduction in proinflammatory markers and males showing a predominantly proinflammatory response and reductions of cortisol levels. Our findings indicate that sleep disturbances causally dysregulate inflammatory pathways, with opposing effects in females and males. These results have the potential to advance our mechanistic understanding of the pronounced sexual dimorphism in the many diseases for which sleep disturbances are a risk factor.

Epidemiological studies have reported strong association between sleep loss and hypertension with unknown mechanisms. This study investigated macrovascular and microcirculation changes and inflammatory markers during repetitive sleep restriction. Sex differences were also explored. Forty-five participants completed a 22-day in-hospital protocol. Participants were assigned to, (1) eight-hour sleep per night (control), or (2) sleep restriction (SR) condition: participants slept from 0300 to 0700 h for three nights followed by a recovery night of 8-h sleep, repeated four times. Macrocirculation assessed by flow mediated dilation (FMD) and microcirculation reactivity tests were performed at baseline, last day of each experimental block and during recovery at the end. Cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory marker levels were measured in blood samples. No duration of deprivation (SR block) by condition interaction effects were found for FMD, microcirculation, norepinephrine, cell adhesion molecules, IL-6 or IL-8. However, when men and women were analyzed separately, there was a statistical trend (p = 0.08) for increased IL-6 across SR blocks in women, but not in men. Interestingly, men showed a significant progressive (dose dependent) increase in skin vasodilatation (p = 0.02). A novel and unexpected finding was that during the recovery period, men that had been exposed to repeated SR blocks had elevated IL-8 and decreased norepinephrine. Macrocirculation, microcirculation, cell adhesion molecules, and markers of inflammation appeared to be resistant to this model of short-term repetitive exposures to the blocks of shortened sleep in healthy sleepers. However, men and women responded differently, with women showing mild inflammatory response and men showing more vascular system sensitivity to the repetitive SR.

Sleep is one of the pillars of health. Experimental models of acute sleep loss, of chronic partial sleep deprivation, and of sleep fragmentation in healthy sleepers are helpful models of sleep deficiency produced by insufficient sleep duration, sleep timing, and sleep disorders. Sleep deficiency is associated with changes in markers associated with risk for disease. These include metabolic, inflammatory, and autonomic markers of risk. In addition, sleep disruption and sleep deficits lead to mood instability, lack of positive outlook, and impaired neurobehavioral functioning. On a population level, insufficient sleep is associated with increased risk for hypertension and diabetes. Sleep disturbance is very common, and about half the population will report that they have experienced insomnia at some time in their lives. Approximately 10% of the population describe daytime impairment due to sleep disturbance at night, consistent with a diagnosis of insomnia disorder. The hypothalamic neuropeptides, orexin-A and orexin-B, act through G-protein-coupled receptors (orexin-1 and orexin-2 receptors). Dual and selective orexin-2 receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in inducing sleep in men and women with insomnia disorder by accelerating sleep onset and improving sleep efficiency and total sleep time. Further study comparing these medications, in short- and longer-term use models, is recommended. Greater understanding of comparative effects on mood, neurobehavioral, and physiological systems will help determine the extent of clinical utility of dual versus selective orexin receptor antagonists.

Pain can be both a cause and a consequence of sleep deficiency. This bidirectional relationship between sleep and pain has important implications for clinical management of patients, but also for chronic pain prevention and public health more broadly. The review that follows will provide an overview of the neurobiological evidence of mechanisms thought to be involved in the modulation of pain by sleep deficiency, including the opioid, monoaminergic, orexinergic, immune, melatonin, and endocannabinoid systems; the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis; and adenosine and nitric oxide signaling. In addition, it will provide a broad overview of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for the management of chronic pain comorbid with sleep disturbances and for the management of postoperative pain, as well as discuss the effects of sleep-disturbing medications on pain amplification.