Publications by Year: 2004

Prostate cancers respond to treatments that suppress androgen receptor (AR) function, with bicalutamide, flutamide, and cyproterone acetate (CPA) being AR antagonists in clinical use. As CPA has substantial agonist activity, it was examined to identify AR coactivator/corepressor interactions that may mediate androgen-stimulated prostate cancer growth. The CPA-liganded AR was coactivated by steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) but did not mediate N-C terminal interactions or recruit beta-catenin, indicating a nonagonist conformation. Nonetheless, CPA did not enhance AR interaction with nuclear receptor corepressor, whereas the AR antagonist RU486 (mifepristone) strongly stimulated AR-nuclear receptor corepressor binding. The role of coactivators was further assessed with a T877A AR mutation, found in LNCaP prostate cancer cells, which converts hydroxyflutamide (HF, the active flutamide metabolite) into an agonist that stimulates LNCaP cell growth. The HF and CPA-liganded T877A ARs were coactivated by SRC-1, but only the HF-liganded T877A AR was coactivated by beta-catenin. L-39, a novel AR antagonist that transcriptionally activates the T877A AR, but still inhibits LNCaP growth, similarly mediated recruitment of SRC-1 and not beta-catenin. In contrast, beta-catenin coactivated a bicalutamide-responsive mutant AR (W741C) isolated from a bicalutamide-stimulated LNCaP subline, further implicating beta-catenin recruitment in AR-stimulated growth. Androgen-stimulated prostate-specific antigen gene expression in LNCaP cells could be modulated by beta-catenin, and endogenous c-myc expression was repressed by dihydrotestosterone, but not CPA. These results indicate that interactions between AR and beta-catenin contribute to prostate cell growth in vivo, although specific growth promoting genes positively regulated by AR recruitment of beta-catenin remain to be identified.

PURPOSE: Androgen receptor (AR) has a pivotal role in the growth and proliferation of prostate cancer (PCa). Even in advanced stages of PCa AR continues to be expressed and appears to be functional. Since the mechanisms of AR activation in androgen independent PCa have yet to be clearly defined, the decrease in AR protein by antisense compounds is an attractive therapeutic option. In this study we evaluated a novel antisense phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) targeting the translational start site of AR mRNA in vitro and in vivo in a PCa xenograft and murine prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: AR antisense PMOs targeting the AR initiation AUG were tested in vitro and in LNCaP cells, and in vivo in LAPC-4 xenografts and normal mouse prostate. Effects on AR protein and PSA expression were assessed.

RESULTS: AR antisense PMOs specifically down-regulated AR protein levels in a plasmid based screening system and also decreased endogenous AR levels in androgen responsive LNCaP cells in culture compared to control nonspecific PMOs. Pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies in the LAPC-4 xenograft model demonstrated that the antisense AR PMO administered intraperitoneally specifically decreased AR protein levels and serum PSA. Analysis of tissue distribution of the AR PMO by high performance liquid chromatography based methodology showed significant PMO levels in tumor tissue and mouse prostate, and there was a dose dependent decrease in AR protein levels in murine AR antisense PMO treated mouse prostates.

CONCLUSIONS: An AR antisense PMO with unique chemical properties administered once daily can decrease AR protein levels and PSA in vivo. The reduction of AR protein with an antisense PMO may be an effective method of interfering with AR mediated growth in advanced human PCa.

Despite earlier detection and recent advances in surgery and radiation, prostate cancer is second only to lung cancer in male cancer deaths in the United States. Hormone therapy in the form of medical or surgical castration remains the mainstay of systemic treatment in prostate cancer. Over the last 15 years with the clinical use of prostate specific antigen (PSA), there has been a shift to using hormone therapy earlier in the disease course and for longer duration. Despite initial favorable response to hormone therapy, over a period of time these tumors will develop androgen-independence that results in death. The androgen receptor (AR) is central to the initiation and growth of prostate cancer and to its response to hormone therapy. Analyses have shown that AR continues to be expressed in androgen-independent tumors and AR signaling remains intact as demonstrated by the expression of the AR regulated gene, PSA. Androgen-independent prostate cancers have demonstrated a variety of AR alterations that are either not found in hormone naïve tumors or found at lower frequency. These changes include AR amplification, AR point mutation, and changes in expression of AR co-regulatory proteins. These AR changes result in a "super AR" that can respond to lower concentrations of androgens or to a wider variety of agonistic ligands. There is also mounting evidence that AR can be activated in a ligand independent fashion by compounds such as growth factors or cytokines working independently or in combination. These growth factors working through receptor tyrosine kinase pathways may promote AR activation and growth in low androgen environments. The clinical significance of these AR alterations in the development and progression of androgen-independent prostate cancer remains to be determined. Understanding the changes in AR signaling in the evolution of androgen-independent prostate cancer will be key to the development of more effective hormone therapy.

Sex steroid hormones play a central role in the development and progression of prostate and breast cancers. The biological functions of these and other steroid hormones are mediated by a family of closely related steroid hormone receptors (SHRs), with the androgen receptor (AR) mediating the effects of testosterone and related androgens, and the classical estrogen receptor (ERalpha) mediating the effects of estradiol. Recent studies have begun to elucidate the complex pathways through which SHRs regulate gene expression, and their interaction with other cellular pathways. These studies have also begun to reveal molecular mechanisms underlying the diverse spectrum of effects mediated by steroid hormone analogues in different tissues. A major advance has been the finding that certain drugs induce unique conformational changes in SHRs that alter their interactions with transcriptional coactivator and corepressor proteins, resulting in cell type specific responses. These unique conformational changes appear responsible for the tissue specific effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) in breast cancer. SHRs are clearly well established therapeutic targets in cancer, and drug development has continued to focus on agents that either block steroid hormone production or bind to and modulate their receptors. The identification of multiple proteins and pathways that mediate the downstream functions of SHRs may eventually provide additional therapeutic targets. This review outlines the basic biology of SHR structure and function, with a focus on AR and ERalpha. Hormonal therapies in prostate and breast cancer that directly target AR and ERalpha, respectively, are then presented and possible novel drug targets in the SHR pathway are discussed.