Publications by Year: 2008

2008

Kaur, Ramneet, Xin Yuan, Michael L Lu, and Steven P Balk. (2008) 2008. “Increased PAK6 Expression in Prostate Cancer and Identification of PAK6 Associated Proteins.”. The Prostate 68 (14): 1510-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20787.

BACKGROUND: PAK6 is a member of the p21-activated kinase (PAK) family of serine/threonine kinases that was originally cloned from prostate cancer (PCa) cells as an androgen receptor interacting protein, but its cellular distribution and functions have not been established.

METHODS: An affinity purified rabbit anti-PAK6 antiserum was generated to assess PAK6 protein expression. PAK6 associated proteins were identified by immunopurification of 3xFlag-tagged PAK6 followed by LC/MS/MS.

RESULTS: We confirmed that PAK6 protein is expressed in prostate and breast cancer cell lines. PAK6 expression in LNCaP PCa cells was not directly androgen regulated, but was markedly increased when the cells were cultured for 6-8 weeks in steroid hormone depleted medium. By immunohistochemistry, PAK6 was weakly expressed in normal prostate epithelium. Its expression was increased in primary and metastatic PCa, and was further increased in tumors that relapsed after androgen deprivation therapy. LC/MS/MS identified IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 1 (IQGAP1) and protein phosphatase 1B (PP1B) as candidate PAK6 interacting proteins, and these findings were confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation.

CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that PAK6 contributes to PCa development and progression after androgen deprivation therapy, and that it may play roles in the regulation of motility and in stress responses.

Hodgson, Myles C, Howard C Shen, Anthony N Hollenberg, and Steven P Balk. (2008) 2008. “Structural Basis for Nuclear Receptor Corepressor Recruitment by Antagonist-Liganded Androgen Receptor.”. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 7 (10): 3187-94. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0461.

Androgen receptor (AR) recruitment of transcriptional corepressors NCoR and SMRT can be enhanced by antagonists such as mifepristone. This study shows that enhanced NCoR binding to the mifepristone-liganded AR is mediated by the NCoR COOH-terminal N1 CoRNR box and that this selectivity is due to charged residues unique to the COOH-terminal CoRNR boxes of NCoR and SMRT. Significantly, these residues are on a helical face adjacent to oppositely charged residues in helix 4 of the AR ligand-binding domain. Mutagenesis of these AR residues in helix 4, as well as mutation of lysine 720 in helix 3 (predicted to interact with the CoRNR box), markedly impaired AR recruitment of NCoR, indicating that N1 CoRNR box binding is being stabilized by these ionic interactions in the AR ligand-binding domain coactivator/corepressor binding site. Finally, results using a helix 12-deleted AR indicate that mifepristone induces allosteric changes in addition to helix 12 displacement that are critical for NCoR binding. These findings show that AR antagonists can enhance corepressor recruitment by stabilizing a distinct antagonist conformation of the AR coactivator/corepressor binding site and support the development of additional antagonists that may be able to further enhance AR recruitment of corepressors.

Taplin, Mary-Ellen, Judith Manola, William K Oh, Philip W Kantoff, Glenn J Bubley, Matthew Smith, Diana Barb, Christos Mantzoros, Edward P Gelmann, and Steven P Balk. (2008) 2008. “A Phase II Study of Mifepristone (RU-486) in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, With a Correlative Assessment of Androgen-Related Hormones.”. BJU International 101 (9): 1084-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07509.x.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mifepristone (RU-486) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), with a correlative assessment of serum androgens and androgen metabolites

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The androgen receptor (AR) is critical in the development and progression of prostate cancer, but available antiandrogens incompletely abrogate AR signalling. Mifepristone is a potent AR antagonist that functions by competing with androgen, preventing AR coactivator binding and by enhancing binding of AR corepressors. Patients with CRPC were treated with mifepristone 200 mg/day oral until disease progression. Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), androstenedione, dihydroepiandrosterone sulphate and the testosterone metabolite 3 alpha-diol G, were measured at baseline and during therapy.

RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled between April and August 2005; they were treated for a median (range) of 85 (31-338) days. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at enrollment was 22.0 (3.0-937.2) ng/mL. No patient had a PSA response (>50% reduction in PSA). Six patients had stable disease for a median of 5.5 months. After 1 month, adrenal androgens were increased and testosterone and DHT increased by 91% and 80%, respectively, compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION: Mifepristone had limited activity in patients with CRPC, and stimulated a marked increase in adrenal androgens, testosterone and DHT. We hypothesise that inhibition of glucocorticoid receptor by mifepristone resulted in an increase in adrenocorticotropic hormone and subsequent increase in adrenal androgens, and that their conversion by tumour cells to testosterone and DHT probably limited the efficacy of mifepristone. These data emphasize the continued importance of alternative androgen sources in AR signalling in CRPC.