Publications

In this review article, we summarized the current advances in rescue management for reperfusion therapy of acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). It is estimated that 24-47% of patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion have underlying ICAS and superimposed in situ thrombosis. These patients have been found to have longer procedure times, lower recanalization rates, higher rates of reocclusion and lower rates of favorable outcomes than patients with embolic occlusion. Here, we discuss the most recent literature regarding the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, angioplasty alone, or angioplasty with stenting for rescue therapy in the setting of failed recanalization or instant/imminent reocclusion during thrombectomy. We also present a case of rescue therapy post intravenous tPA and thrombectomy with intra-arterial tirofiban and balloon angioplasty followed by oral dual antiplatelet therapy in a patient with dominant vertebral artery occlusion due to ICAS. Based on the available literature data, we conclude that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa is a reasonably safe and effective rescue therapy for patients who have had a failed thrombectomy or have residual severe intracranial stenosis. Balloon angioplasty and/or stenting may be helpful as a rescue treatment for patients who have had a failed thrombectomy or are at risk of reocclusion. The effectiveness of immediate stenting for residual stenosis after successful thrombectomy is still uncertain. Rescue therapy does not appear to increase the risk of sICH. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to prove the efficacy of rescue therapy.

BACKGROUND: "Telescoping" multiple overlapping Pipeline Embolization Devices (PEDs; Medtronic) has increased their utility by allowing for more impermeable coverage and providing the ability to off-set landing zone sites and extend treatment constructs.

OBJECTIVE: To consider the technical nuances and challenges of telescoping PEDs for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS: Databases from 3 U.S. academic neurovascular centers were retrospectively queried to identify patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with multiple PED constructs. Data on patient and aneurysm characteristics, as well as outcomes including Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, modified Rankin Scale score, and complications, were gathered.

RESULTS: Forty-six patients had 48 intracranial aneurysms treated, including 16 (33%) in whom placement of telescoping PEDs was planned. Fourteen (30%) patients presented with a ruptured aneurysm. Twenty-one aneurysms (44%) were treated with proximal extension, 13 (27%) with distal extension, and 14 (29%) with PED placement inside one another. Thirty (70%) patients had complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up. Two (4%) patients had to be retreated. Three patients with unruptured and 1 with ruptured aneurysm had a permanent intraprocedural complication. We present descriptive cases illustrating PEDs that were placed inside one another, proximally, distally, and to improve wall apposition because of vessel tortuosity.

CONCLUSION: Our data indicate a higher than expected complication rate that is likely because of the technical complexity of these cases. The case illustrations presented demonstrate the indications and challenging aspects of telescoping PEDs.

Intracranial aneurysm treatment has been revolutionized over the last decade with the development of flow diversion technology. The use of this technology has evolved rapidly and has proven that cerebrovascular disease treatment remains one of the forefront innovation areas in neurosurgery. The good results on the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms up to the communicating segment have motivated the use of flow diversion beyond the circle of Willis and in the posterior circulation. Further advances and innovations of flow-diverting devices are underway and intended to improve the safety and efficacy of this therapy. This review article provides a detailed discussion about the origin, mechanism of action, initial experience, complications, types of devices, and future perspectives of flow diversion technology.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a pain syndrome that is defined by sharp electrical shock-like pain that radiates in the sensory distribution of the trigeminal nerve. The classical cause of this syndrome is vascular compression, but other causes, such as stroke, have also been described. Instances of post-ischemic trigeminal pain have been described as meeting the classic description, and are termed trigeminal neuropathy. The treatment paradigms for trigeminal neuralgia versus neuropathy differ significantly, especially with the consideration of surgical management.We present a case of a 78-year-old man with post-ischemic trigeminal neuropathy that was successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation after failure of conservative management.We also summarize three previous cases of post-ischemic trigeminal neuropathy that were also successfully treated with percutaneous surgical treatment, showing that percutaneous surgical management should be considered in patients with post-ischemic trigeminal neuropathy that fail conservative management.

The techniques used for treatment of intracranial aneurysms have progressed dramatically over the decades. The introduction of modern endovascular techniques and the continued refinement of progressively less invasive neurosurgical approaches have contributed to steadily improving clinical outcomes. Moreover, innovations such as flow-diverting stents have achieved dramatic success and have gained rapid widespread adoption. Particularly in lesions for which the application of conventional treatment techniques is difficult, flow diversion technology has revolutionized aneurysm management. This review provides a discussion on the morbidity and mortality encountered in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the modern era. Common adverse events faced in the management of these lesions with open surgery and various endovascular techniques are highlighted.

OBJECTIVE: Pathological bony abnormalities of the craniocervical region in children sometimes require surgical intervention as part of their management. Rarely, abnormal skeletal or vascular anatomy can render traditional surgical techniques ineffective because of the risk of injury to the vertebral artery. To mitigate these risks, a combined endovascular and skull base approach was devised. The authors describe their experience using vertebral artery sacrifice as an adjunctive surgical method to reduce the risk of inadvertent vertebral artery injury during surgical correction of pediatric craniocervical deformity.

METHODS: Three patients underwent vertebral artery sacrifice for structural craniocervical pathologies (1 male, 2 females; ages 12, 14, and 3 years). One patient presented with basilar invagination odontogenic brainstem compression, and the other 2 patients presented with congenital cervical fusion. All patients underwent endovascular left vertebral artery sacrifice after passing balloon test occlusion.

RESULTS: No adverse effects from the vertebral artery sacrifice were observed. At the last follow-ups (35, 30, and 32 months), all 3 patients had a satisfactory outcome with no adverse effects as a result of their sacrificed artery.

CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular vertebral artery sacrifice followed by skull base approaches can be used to effectively and safely treat craniocervical pathology from a variety of pediatric skeletal abnormalities.

Traumatic internal carotid artery injuries can produce direct carotid-cavernous fistulas as well as giant internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms. Clinical sequelae can include headaches, cranial nerves palsies, proptosis, chemosis and optic neuropathy with visual loss as the most dangerous complication. Herein, we present a case of one of the largest reported internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms associated with a direct carotid cavernous fistula. We describe the techniques and pitfalls of treatment with parent vessel occlusion.

Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured wide-necked aneurysms presents well-known challenges because of the desire to avoid intracranial stenting with attendant dual antiplatelet therapy requirements. Balloon-assisted coiling (BAC) has been well described for this purpose, most commonly using a 2-microcatheter technique, with a balloon microcatheter protecting the aneurysm neck and a coiling microcatheter used to embolize the aneurysm.1,2 However, the availability of advanced double-lumen balloon microcatheters with coiling markers allows for the use of a single-microcatheter technique in select instances.3 We present the case of a patient presenting with a ruptured wide-necked posterior communicating artery aneurysm with a large posterior communicating artery arising from the neck. The aneurysm dome had sufficient height to allow BAC using a single balloon microcatheter, which was used to protect the posterior communicating artery at the neck and deploy coils in the aneurysm dome. The aneurysm was intentionally subtotally coiled and the patient was retreated with a flow-diverting stent later during the same hospitalization (Video 1). Partial coiling followed by later flow diversion is a pragmatic strategy in wide-necked ruptured aneurysms,4 and use of a single balloon microcatheter for BAC can be useful in certain situations.