Publications

Procedural guidance during structural heart disease (SHD) interventions is achieved with both two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography as well as real-time fluoroscopic imaging. Although both image the cardiac anatomy, they are based on different principles of image acquisition. In the era of multimodality imaging with coregistration of anatomic landmarks and simultaneous real-time display, it is essential to have cross-disciplinary imaging knowledge. Besides improving communication, it also enhances patient care and, possibly, outcomes. In this study, the authors used a novel fluoroscopic phantom cardiac model with enhanced structural markers to display the basic fluoroscopic images used during SHD interventions. The projected images enhance the understanding of the orientation and relationship among intracardiac structures as seen on fluoroscopy. In this study, the authors present the basic fluoroscopic views for SHD interventions and the anatomic relationship for intracardiac structures using a custom-made phantom fluoroscopic heart model.

The use of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has grown exponentially in recent years. Three-dimensional TEE technology has evolved to allow for real-time display of 3D images and, thus, has become the standard of care for the evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function. Its use has provided a new dimension of clinical insight when managing patients for cardiac surgery or structural heart interventions. While the intraoperative utility of 3D TEE has expanded, there has been a slower advancement in the area of training and, specifically, simulator-based training in 3D TEE. This training is essential, as the skill set involved in acquiring 3D data sets differs from that of two-dimensional (2D) TEE and requires users to be able to appreciate how 3D anatomic display differs from that of tomographic cross-sectional 2D imaging. This added skill set requires mental reconstruction and spatial reorientation to appreciate the added elevational dimension in frustum-based imaging and is best achieved in a simulation environment rather than the busy operating room. In this review article, the authors evaluate the functionality of a 3D TEE simulator and how simulators such as this can establish preclinical proficiency in novices in the expanding area of advanced 3D TEE imaging.

With advancements in technology and progress in interventional procedures, left-sided structural heart disease (SHD) interventions have become part of everyday clinical practice. One of the most important steps for a successful left-sided structural heart intervention is the transseptal puncture (TSP). Appropriate transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance of TSP requires extensive supervised hands-on experience prior to attaining proficiency. Whereas some TEE skills are acquired during cardiac anesthesia fellowships, continuous procedural guidance during SHD interventions requires substantial hands-on experience. Several studies have emphasized the value of advanced training in imaging for SHD interventions; however, the pathways and advanced training to ensure proficiency in interventional echocardiography have not yet been clearly established. In an effort to achieve a uniform and consistent approach to TSP imaging that is homogeneous and complementary to the component steps of the TSP procedure from an interventional point-of-view, the authors have developed a protocol for providing image guidance for TSP - the PITLOC protocol (Practice, Identification of septal puncture needle, Tracking of needle tip, Localization of needle tip in fossa ovalis, Optimizing septal indentation, and, finally, Crossing the interatrial septum under direct vision). This protocol aims to standarize image guidance for TSP while complementing the the steps of the procedure as performed and described by interventionalists.

Arterial line cannulations frequently are performed in various clinical settings to facilitate hemodynamic monitoring and metabolic assessments. Palpation-guided technique generally is performed due to the superficial nature of the peripheral arteries; however, this approach may be challenging in patients with obesity, edema, and hypotension. Difficult line placements are a significant contributor of reduced operating room efficiency due to time delays seen in procedural workflow. Real-time ultrasound guidance is shown to improve success rates of arterial cannulation and reduction in multiple attempts, leading to time efficiency and less likelihood of arterial spasms or hematoma formation. In this report, the authors demonstrate the workflow of ultrasound-guided arterial line cannulation, outline the features of their institutional multi-modal training project for quality improvement, and evaluate the possible effect of the initiative on surgical delays seen with difficult line placements.

PURPOSE: To prospectively validate electromagnetic hand motion tracking in interventional radiology to detect differences in operator experience using simulation.

METHODS: Sheath task: Six attending interventional radiologists (experts) and 6 radiology trainees (trainees) placed a wire through a sheath and performed a "pin-pull" maneuver, while an electromagnetic motion detection system recorded the hand motion. Radial task: Eight experts and 12 trainees performed palpatory radial artery access task on a radial access simulator. The trainees repeated the task with the nondominant hand. The experts were classified by their most frequent radial artery access technique as having either palpatory, ultrasound, or overall limited experience. The time, path length, and number of movements were calculated. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the groups, and P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS: Sheath task: The experts took less time, had shorter path lengths, and used fewer movements than the trainees (11.7 seconds ± 3.3 vs 19.7 seconds ± 6.5, P < .01; 1.1 m ± 0.3 vs 1.4 m ± 0.4, P < .01; and 19.5 movements ± 8.5 vs 31.0 movements ± 8.0, P < .01, respectively). Radial task: The experts took less time, had shorter path lengths, and used fewer movements than the trainees (24.2 seconds ± 10.6 vs 33.1 seconds ± 16.9, P < .01; 2.0 m ± 0.5 vs 3.0 m ± 1.9, P < .001; and 36.5 movements ± 15.0 vs 54.5 movements ± 28.0, P < .001, respectively). The trainees had a shorter path length for their dominant hand than their nondominant hand (3.0 m ± 1.9 vs 3.5 m ± 1.9, P < .05). The expert palpatory group had a shorter path length than the ultrasound and limited experience groups (1.8 m ± 0.4 vs 2.0 m ± 0.4 and 2.3 m ± 1.2, respectively, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic hand motion tracking can differentiate between the expert and trainee operators for simulated interventional tasks.

OBJECTIVE: Primary and secondary lower extremity amputation, performed for patients with lower extremity arterial disease, is associated with increased post-operative morbidity. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of regional anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on post-operative pulmonary complications.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 45 492 patients undergoing lower extremity amputation between 2005 and 2018 was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Safety Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to assess differences in primary outcome of post-operative pulmonary complications (pneumonia or respiratory failure requiring re-intubation) within 48 hours and 30 days after surgery between patients receiving regional (RA) or general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes included post-operative blood transfusion, septic shock, re-operation, and post-operative death within 30 days.

RESULTS: Of 45 492 patients, 40 026 (88.0%) received GA and 5 466 (12.0%) RA. Patients who received GA had higher odds of developing pulmonary complications at 48 hours (2.1% vs. 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 - 1.78; p = .007) and within 30 days (6.3% vs. 5.9%; aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.78; p = .039). The odds of blood transfusions (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.21; p = .017), septic shock (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.60; p = .025) and re-operation (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.53; p = .023) were also higher for patients who received GA vs. patients who received RA. No difference in mortality rate was observed between patients who received GA and those who received RA (5.7% vs. 7.1%; odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.07).

CONCLUSION: A statistically significant reduction in pulmonary complications was observed in patients who received RA for lower extremity amputation compared with GA.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) resulting in paraplegia is a devastating complication associated with thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) whose incidence has significantly declined over time. In this review, we present our experience with a multidisciplinary clinical protocol for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drain management in patients undergoing TEVAR. Furthermore, we aimed to characterize complications of CSF drain placement in a large, single center experience of patients who underwent TEVAR.

METHODS: This retrospective review is of patients undergoing TEVAR with and without CSF drain placement between January 2014 and December 2019 at a single institution. Patient demographics, hospital course, and drain-related complications were analyzed to assess the incidence of CSF drain-related complications.

RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were included in this study, of which 85 received CSF drains. Eighty patients (94.1%) were placed by anesthesiologists, while 5 (5.9%) were placed under fluoroscopic guidance by interventional neurosurgery. The most common level of placement was L3-L4 in 38 (44.7%) cases followed by L4-L5 in 36 (42.4%) cases. The mean duration of CSF drain was 1.9 ± 1.4 days. Complications due to CSF drainage occurred in 5 (5.9%) patients and included partial retainment of catheter, subdural edema, epidural hematoma, headache, and bleeding near the drain site. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 5.5% and did not differ between those who received a CSF drain and those who did not (P = 0.856). The overall incidence of SCI resulting in paraplegia was 1.7% in the studied patients.

CONCLUSIONS: A protocol-based CSF drainage program for spinal cord protection involves a multifaceted approach in identification and selection of patients meeting criteria for prophylactic drain placement, direct closed loop communication, and perioperative management by an experienced team. Despite the inherent advantages of CSF drain placement, it is not without complications, thus risk and benefit need to be weighed in context of the procedure and the patient with close communication and team approach.

Despite the valuable use of modern applications of perioperative ultrasound across multiple disciplines, there have been limitations to its implementation, restricting its impact on patient-based clinical outcomes. Point-of-care ultrasound evaluation of hypoxia and hypotension is an important tool to assess the underlying undifferentiated etiologies in a timely manner. However, there is a lack of consensus on the formal role of ultrasound during evaluation of perioperative hypoxia or hypotension. The previous ultrasound algorithms have adopted a complex technique that possibly ignore the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the conditions presenting in a similar fashion. The authors here propose a simple, sequential and focused multiorgan approach, applicable for the evaluation of perioperative hypotension and hypoxia in emergency scenarios. The authors believe this approach will enhance the care provided in the postanesthesia care unit, operating room, and intensive care unit.