Publications by Type: Journal Article

PURPOSE: The choice of pedicle in reduction mammaplasty is highly variable with prior studies demonstrating high patient satisfaction in most cases. This study aimed to examine the impact of pedicle type on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty.

METHODS: A total of 588 patients underwent bilateral reduction mammaplasty with Wise pattern or modified Robertson incision by 13 surgeons at a single institution. Clinical outcomes were compared according to the pedicle type in all patients and BREAST-Q responders (32% response rate). Survey respondents were sub-grouped by resection volume, and the BREAST-Q satisfaction scores were compared.

RESULTS: Among all included reduction mammoplasties, 439 (75%) were performed using inferior pedicles, and 149 (25%) using superior or superomedial pedicles. Responders and non-responders were similar in preoperative characteristics including age, body measurements, and comorbidities. Although a higher incidence of infection occurred among the responders, clinical outcomes were comparable across all pedicle types. A total of 187 patients completed the BREAST-Q. Compared to the superior pedicle group, respondents in the inferior pedicle group reported higher nipple satisfaction, even when adjusted for resection weight over 500 g. In contrast, the superior pedicle group had better sexual well-being scores, which persisted in resection weight less than 500 g (all p values <0.05).

CONCLUSION: Inferior pedicles were associated with greater nipple satisfaction and superior pedicles were associated with greater sexual satisfaction. Our findings suggest that those with resections less than 500 g were more satisfied with superior pedicles whereas those with greater resections were more satisfied with inferior pedicles.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is being integrated into surgical practice at a significant pace, from preprocedural planning to procedure simulation. 3DP is especially useful in surgical education, where printed models are highly accurate and customizable. The aim of this study was to evaluate how 3DP is being integrated most recently into surgical residency training.

METHODS: We performed a structured literature search of the OVID/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PUBMED databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Articles published from 2016 to 2023 that met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Data extracted included surgical subspecialty using 3DP, application of 3DP, and any reported satisfaction measures of trainees. A thorough analysis of pooled data was performed to evaluate satisfaction rates among studies.

RESULTS: A total of 85 studies were included. The median number of participants was 18 (interquartile range 10-27). Fourteen surgical disciplines were represented, with ear, nose, and throat/otolaryngology having the highest recorded utilization of 3DP models among residents and medical students (22.0%), followed by neurosurgery (14.0%) and urology (12.0%). 3DP models were created most frequently to model soft tissue (35.3%), bone (24.7%), vessel (14.1%), mixed (16.4%), or whole organs (6.66%) (Fig.1). Feedback from trainees was overwhelmingly positive regarding the fidelity of the models and their support for integration into their training programs. Among trainees, the combined satisfaction rate with their use in the curriculum was 95% (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.97), and the satisfaction rate with the model fidelity was 90% (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the surgical specialties utilizing 3DP models in training. These models are effective in increasing trainee comfort with both common and rare scenarios and are associated with a high degree of resident support and satisfaction. Plastic surgery programs may benefit from the integration of this technology, potentially strengthening future surgical curricula. Objective evaluations of their pedagogic effects on residents are areas of future research.

BACKGROUND: Before and after (B&A) photographs are a sensitive part of patients' medical records, and the use of smartphones may pose risks to confidentiality and comfort. The purpose of this study was to assess patient comfort depending on the circumstances under which these photographs being taken.

METHODS: Amazon's Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing service and REDCap's survey manager were used to recruit survey participants. An anonymous survey was distributed to ascertain demographics and comfort in various B&A scenarios using a five-point Likert scale. T tests and ANOVA testing were used to compare groups.

RESULTS: There were 411 respondents with an average age of 36.1 years old. Of them, 46% were female and the majority were White (90%) and non-Hispanic (64%). Nearly one-third had previously undergone plastic surgery, with 80% receiving B&A photography. Surgeons took these photographs 51% of the time with similar rates of smartphone cameras use (47%) versus professional cameras (52%). The public had similar levels of comfort when a nurse or a surgeon took the clinical photographs (p = 0.08). Patients were significantly less comfortable when non-medically trained office staff captured their photographs (p = 0.0041). The public had similar comfort levels with the use of smartphones and professional cameras when dressed but were significantly less comfortable with the use of a smartphone when unclothed (p = < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: To ensure the best patient experience, B&A photography should be taken by a medical professional. If photographs are to be taken when the patient is unclothed, the use of a professional-grade camera may help ease patient discomfort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Management of burn injuries is complex, with highly variable outcomes occurring among different populations. This meta-analysis aims to assess the outcomes of burn therapy in North American and European adults, specifically mortality and complications, to guide further therapeutic advances. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane was performed. Random-effect meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to assess the overall prevalence of the defined outcomes. In total, 54 studies were included, pooling 60 269 adult patients. A total of 53 896 patients were in North America (NA, 89.4%), and 6373 were in Europe (10.6%). Both populations experienced similar outcomes. The overall pooled prevalence of mortality was 13% (95% CI, 8%-19%) for moderate burns, 20% (95% CI, 12%-29%) for severe burns in the NA region, and 22% (95% CI, 16%-28%) for severe burns in Europe. Infectious complications were the most common across both regions. European studies showed an infection rate for patients with moderate and severe burns at 8% and 76%, respectively, while NA studies had rates of 35% and 54%. Acute kidney injury (39% vs 37%) and shock (29% vs 35%) were the next most common complications in European and NA studies, respectively. The length of stay was 27.52 days for patients with severe burns in Europe and 31.02 days for patients with severe burns in NA. Burn outcomes are similar between Western populations. While outcomes are reasonably good overall, infectious complications remain high. These findings encourage the development of further therapeutic strategies disclosing respective costs to enable cost/efficiency evaluations in burn management.

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by cardiometabolic abnormalities such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. This study aims to evaluate the association of MetS on the postoperative outcomes of ventral, umbilical, and epigastric hernia repair using component separation.

METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent ventral, umbilical, and epigastric hernia repair with component separation between 2015 and 2021. MetS status was defined as patients receiving medical treatment for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2. Propensity matching was performed to generate two balanced cohorts with and without MetS. T-tests and Fisher's Exact tests assessed group differences. Logistic regression models evaluated complications between the groups.

RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 3930 patients were included in the analysis, with 1965 in each group (MetS versus non-MetS). Significant differences were observed in the severity and clinical presentation of hernias between the groups. The MetS cohort had higher rates of incarcerated hernia (39.1% versus 33.2%; P < 0.001), and recurrent ventral hernia (42.7% versus 36.5%; P < 0.001) compared to the non-MetS cohort. The MetS group demonstrated significantly increased rates of renal insufficiency (P = 0.026), unplanned intubation (P = 0.003), cardiac arrest (P = 0.005), and reoperation rates (P = 0.002) than the non-MetS cohort. Logistic regression models demonstrated higher likelihood of postoperative complications in the MetS group, including mild systemic complications (OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.030-1.518; P = 0.024), severe systemic complications (OR 1.63; 95%CI 1.248-2.120; P < 0.001), and reoperation (OR 1.47; 95%CI 1.158-1.866; P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the rates of 30-d wound complications between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The presence of metabolic derangement appears to be associated with adverse postoperative medical outcomes and increased reoperation rates after hernia repair with component separation. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing preoperative comorbidities as surgeons counsel patients with MetS.

BACKGROUND: The literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) discussing dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) and component dorsal hump reduction (CDHR) is scarce. This study aims to fill the gap in PROs between these techniques.

METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to investigate PROs of DPR and CDHR. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted using Stata statistical software.

RESULTS: A total of 25 studies met our inclusion criteria, pooling 1706 participants, with 13 studies on CDHP and 12 studies on DPR. Overall satisfaction rates were high, varying from 84% to 100% across studies. A subgroup analysis revealed that both techniques exhibited equally high satisfaction with no statistical differences (P = 0.18). A random-effects model revealed that about two of 100 treated patients underwent revisions across our cohort (95% interquartile range: 0-4). Notably, the CDHR technique was associated with a significant 53.7-point reduction in the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS)-cosmetic domain [95% confidence interval (CI): -62.7 to -44.8, P < 0.001], along with a meaningful improvement in SCHNOS-obstructive scores by -27.3 points (95% CI: -50.5 to -4.04, P = 0.02). Conversely, the DPR was linked to a 55.3-point reduction in the SCHNOS-cosmetic domain (95% CI: -60.7 to -49.9, P < 0.001), and a -19.5 point change in the SCHNOS-obstructive domain (95% CI: -27.9 to -11.1, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Although PROs are comparable, the literature suggests that CDHR outcomes may be better than DPR in alleviating obstructive symptoms, potentially offering an evidence-based choice for addressing functional concerns in rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Laser therapy has emerged as a promising treatment modality for improving the appearance and symptoms associated with hypertrophic and keloid scars. In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different laser types in treating hypertrophic and keloid scars.

METHODS: A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up until July 2023. Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data in a network meta-analysis (NMA) model, using R software.

RESULTS: A total of 18 studies, comprising 550 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooling our data showed that fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was superior to control in terms of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), pliability score, and thickness; [MD = - 5.97; 95% CI (- 7.30; - 4.65)], [MD = - 2.68; 95% CI (- 4.03; - 1.33)], [MD = - 2.22; 95% CI (- 3.13; - 1.31)], respectively. However, insignificant difference was observed among FCO2 plus 5-FU compared to control group in terms of erythema, vascularity, redness and perfusion, and pigmentation [MD = - 0.71; 95% CI (- 2.72; 1.30)], [MD = - 0.44; 95% CI (- 1.26; 0.38)], respectively.

CONCLUSION: Our NMA found that the FCO2 plus 5-FU was the most effective intervention in decreasing the VSS and thickness, while FCO2 plus CO2 was the most effective intervention in decreasing the pliability score. Further research is needed to determine the optimal laser parameters and long-term efficacy of laser therapy in hypertrophic and keloid scars.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hand and wrist amputations are rare but debilitating injuries. Surgical replantation of the hand provides a unique alternative to revision surgery but requires appropriate access to necessary medical resources. This study aims to understand the national practice of replantation of traumatic hand amputation and to determine whether disparities exist in accessing surgical treatment.

METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for replantation and revision amputation surgeries were used to gather data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Summary statistics were calculated on demographic, hospital, and outcome variables, with subanalysis performed for effect on replantation and revision rates.

RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were identified. The average patient was 35 years old with a strong male predominance (90%). The racial distribution of the cohort roughly mirrored the demographic proportions of race in the US population. Fifteen (21%) patients underwent replantation. This rate was similar between sexes, races, and income brackets. Hand replantation was primarily performed at large bed size (87%), private not-for-profit (73%), and urban teaching hospitals (94%). The most common insurance status for these patients was private, followed by Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Forty-seven patients underwent revision amputation (65%) with no association between demographic characteristics. The patients remained hospitalized for significantly longer periods (P = .0188) and paid significantly more (P = .0014) if replanted. The patients were most frequently discharged home (65%), followed by skilled nursing facilities (18%).

CONCLUSION: This study describes the current state of hand amputation management and finds no evidence of sociodemographic factors influencing the surgical care provided.