Publications

BACKGROUND: The incidence of psychiatric disorders, particularly major depressive disorder, is increasingly observed among patients undergoing plastic surgery procedures. This trend has raised concerns about the impact of serotonergic antidepressants on postoperative complications, especially the incidence of hematomas.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of developing postoperative hematoma after abdominoplasty in patients who did or did not use serotonergic antidepressants before surgery.

METHODS: Data from TriNetX was utilized to identify female patients who underwent abdominoplasty. Patients were classified in 2 cohorts: the exposure cohort included patients with serotonergic antidepressant use, and the control cohort included patients who did not take these medications. Propensity score-matching analyses were performed to adjust for bleeding risk factors. Hematoma diagnosis was the primary outcome; other outcomes included seroma, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, blood transfusion, and hematoma/seroma evacuation. All outcomes were assessed at 7, 15, and 30 days following surgery.

RESULTS: After matching for the 7-day outcomes analysis, each group contained 5882 individuals. Patients who were taking serotonergic antidepressants had a significantly increased risk of hematoma (risk ratio [RR] 1.95, P < .001), transfusion (RR 1.57, P = .007), and hematoma/seroma evacuation (RR 1.65, P = .004) within 7 days postsurgery. Similar results were observed at 15 and 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients who took serotonergic antidepressants before surgery had an increased risk of hematoma and other related complications after abdominoplasty. These findings underscore the need for preoperative counseling and risk assessment in this population.

Background/Objectives: The amniotic membrane, which is widely available and inexpensive, has received recent attention for its potential applications in wound healing. This is the first study to use a large database to examine the efficacy of amniotic membrane grafting compared to other skin substitutes. Methods: The TriNetX electronic health database was queried in October 2024 for patients with burns or chronic skin ulcers. Patients were stratified by treatment with amniotic membrane grafts or another skin substitute. These patients were then 1:1 propensity score-matched based on age, demographics, and comorbidities. Group differences were assessed with risk ratios and p-values. Results: A total of 557 patients remained in each group after propensity score matching. Patients who were treated with amniotic membrane grafts had significantly decreased hypertrophic scarring (1.7% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.0001), local skin infections (17.4% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.0001), and acute postoperative pain (3.7% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.003). Additionally, subsequent split-thickness skin grafting was utilized significantly less after amniotic membrane grafts. When compared to skin substitutes for large wounds (>100 cm2), the advantages of amniotic membrane were even more pronounced. Conclusions: This multi-institutional study supports amniotic membranes as a viable alternative to conventional bioengineered skin substitutes. Further research should evaluate amniotic membranes in wound beds of different sizes to better characterize their use in preparation for or as an alternative to skin grafting itself.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the accessibility of online health resources for nipple reconstruction in English and Spanish to identify areas of improving information access.

METHODS: A deidentified Google search was conducted using the search phrase "nipple reconstruction" in English and "reconstrucción del pezón" in Spanish. The first ten websites in English and Spanish were included. A quality assessment of these websites was performed using the Patient Education and Materials Assessment Tool, Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook to evaluate understandability and actionability, cultural sensitivity, and readability, respectively. Unpaired t-tests and Chi-square tests were used to analyze differences between the groups.

RESULTS: English sites scored similarly to Spanish sites on understandability (70.1% versus 71.0%, P = 0.82) and actionability (46.3% versus 37.5%, P = 0.27), although actionability scores were below the acceptable threshold (70%) in both groups. English sites were significantly more culturally sensitive than Spanish sites (60% versus 10%, P < 0.001). English sites had a statistically significant higher average reading grade level compared to Spanish sites (12.3 versus 10.4, P = 0.005); however both groups exceeded recommended reading grade levels for online health resources. For websites from the same organization, English websites tended to be difficult to read; however, more culturally sensitive, compared to Spanish ones.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest areas of improvement for culturally competent care for reconstruction patients. Improving the readability of online health resources for nipple reconstruction is essential in enabling patients to create informed decisions about their reconstructed breast.

BACKGROUND: Decreased nipple sensation following reduction mammoplasty can negatively affect a variety of patient-centered outcomes. This observational study examined the impact of dermoglandular pedicle type on subjective postoperative nipple sensation.

METHODS: A total of 178 women who underwent a bilateral reduction mammoplasty at a single institution from 2017 to 2023 and completed an 11-item survey assessing subjective postoperative nipple sensitivity across various tactile modalities were included. Patient-reported nipple sensations were compared across pedicle type and subgrouped by resection volume.

RESULTS: Of the included survey respondents, 72% (128) underwent reduction with an inferior pedicle and 28% (50) with a superior or superomedial pedicle. Over 92% of patients reported the preservation of postoperative nipple sensation. Compared to the inferior pedicle, the superior pedicle cohort reported decreased nipple sensitivity to light touch (56% vs 30%, respectively) and temperature (30% vs 15%). In resection weights greater than 500 grams, the superior pedicle cohort was less satisfied with postoperative nipple sensation (84% vs. 58%), reported decreased sensation in light touch (58% vs 24%), pressure (50% vs 21%), and experienced more numbness and tingling (17% vs 1.4%) (all p-values ≤0.05).

CONCLUSION: The majority of patients maintain some sensation after reduction mammoplasty; however, approximately 10% reported a relative decrease in subjective nipple sensation. Pedicle choice did not significantly affect sensory recovery in resection weights of less than 500 grams. When a greater resection weight is anticipated, the inferior pedicle may be associated with more favorable nipple sensation outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Heparin is frequently used to mitigate the risk of thrombosis in microsurgical free tissue transfer. Although rare, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe, life-threatening complication that can arise in patients exposed to heparin products. This systematic review aims to examine patterns in demographics, flap characteristics, diagnostic approaches, and treatment protocols for HIT following free flap reconstruction.A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search terms included "heparin-induced thrombocytopenia," "HIT syndrome," "free flaps," "microsurgery," "plastic surgery," and "reconstructive surgery." Case reports or series written in English that presented patients developing HIT following free flap procedures were included. Eligibility criteria are accessible on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42025650125).A total of 15 articles were included, encompassing a total of 23 free flap reconstruction cases. The median patient age was 52 years, with male predominance (69.6). Lower extremity reconstruction was most common (47.8%), primarily using anterolateral thigh flaps (39.1%). Median 4T score was 6, median time to HIT diagnosis was 6 days, and median nadir platelet count was 72 × 103/μL. Thrombotic complications were common, with venous thrombosis (34.8%) predominating. Argatroban (26.1%) was the most frequently used alternative anticoagulant, while warfarin (30.4%) was the most common discharge medication. Overall flap survival was 43.5%. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in flap survival between anticoagulation strategies (95% CI: 0.38-2.63, p = 1.000).HIT represents a rare but devastating complication in free flap reconstruction, with approximately half of the affected flaps failing despite intervention. Although no single anticoagulation strategy demonstrated superior outcomes, expeditious diagnosis and treatment may improve flap salvage rates. This review provides a foundation for developing standardized protocols for HIT management in microsurgical patients.

Introduction: The current literature exploring the association between facial and intracranial injuries is limited, as it primarily focuses on the association with facial fractures. This study aims to broaden the epidemiologic association between facial and intracranial trauma by expanding the scope of studied facial injuries. The secondary aim of this study will be to identify the most common setting of injury, diagnosis, and mechanism of injury. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database, which captures consumer goods-related injuries, was queried from 2019 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included encounters with cranial, facial, and both cranial and facial injuries. Outcome variables included the number of encounters, diagnosis, location of injury, associated consumer products, and patient disposition. Predictor variables included patient demographic information. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and all analyses were done on weighted national estimates. Results: A total of 10 939 340 weighted encounters were analyzed. Facial injuries had concurrent cranial injuries in approximately 1 in 4 encounters, and cranial injuries had concurrent facial injuries in approximately 1 in 6 encounters. Intracranial head injuries occurred with lower acuity facial injuries and without facial fractures in 91.1% of the encounters. The most common location across all groups was at home (66.9%), and building structures (28.8%) were the most common products resulting in injury. Conclusion: There is an understudied burden of associated intracranial injuries with lower acuity facial trauma across all ages, specifically in the home setting. Thus, in evaluating facial trauma, providers should consistently assess for potential head trauma, even when not immediately evident.

BACKGROUND:  Postoperative free tissue transfer reexploration procedures are relatively infrequent but associated with increased overall failure rates. This study examines the differences between flaps requiring takeback versus no takeback, as well as trends in reexploration techniques that may increase the odds of successful salvage.

METHODS:  A retrospective review was conducted on all free tissue transfers performed at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Patients who underwent flap reexploration within 30 days of the original procedure were compared with a randomly selected control group who underwent free flap procedures without reexploration (1:2 cases to controls). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS:  From 1,213 free tissue transfers performed in the study period, 187 patients were included in the analysis. Of the total flaps performed, 62 (0.05%) required takeback, and 125 were randomly selected as a control group. Free flap indication, flap type, reconstruction location, and number of venous anastomoses differed significantly between the two groups. Among the reexplored flaps, 8 (4.3% of the total) had a subsequent failure while 54 (87.10%) were salvaged, with significant differences in cause of initial flap failure, affected vessel type, and salvage technique.

CONCLUSION:  Free tissue transfers least prone to reexploration involved breast reconstruction in patients without predisposition to hypercoagulability or reconstruction history. When takeback operations were required, salvage was more likely in those without microvascular compromise or with an isolated venous injury who required a single exploratory operation.

ObjectiveThe incidence of lipedema is poorly described due to its confusion with lymphedema. Patient education is crucial for treatment and prevention strategies but also for improving healthcare outcomes. This study assessed and compared the quality of English and Spanish online resources for patients suffering from lipedema using a multimetric approach.MethodsA deidentified Google search using the terms "lipedema" and "lipedema español" was conducted. The first 10 academic/organizational websites in each language were selected. Quality assessment was performed using the Patient Education and Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (CSAT), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and facticity criteria to evaluate understandability and actionability, cultural sensitivity, readability, and factual quality, respectively.ResultsEnglish webpages scored 73.70% for understandability and 35.0% for actionability, while Spanish webpages scored 75.05% and 21.0%, respectively; no significant differences were found between languages in understandability (p = .970) and actionability (p = .895). A significantly higher proportion of Spanish resources was found to be culturally sensible than English resources (90% vs 70%; p < .001). However, no significant differences were found in the cultural sensitivity score (English 2.87 vs Spanish 3.01; p = .677). The grade reading level for Spanish materials was significantly lower compared to English materials (11.08 vs 13.45; p = .006). Factual quality was low across both languages according to the facticity framework, though English materials scored higher than Spanish (2.20 vs 1.00; p = .051).ConclusionOur results suggest that online English and Spanish materials on lipedema have inadequate actionability, facticity, and reading grade levels for patients. Nonetheless, the levels of understandability and cultural sensitivity are acceptable. Enhancing the quality of online health literature for lipedema patients presents an opportunity to alleviate psychosocial burdens and address misconceptions.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate epidemiologic characteristics and postoperative complications among nonbinary, transgender, and cisgender adults undergoing mastectomy or breast augmentation. Comparable postoperative complication rates were observed between gender modality cohorts undergoing breast augmentation, but higher complication rates were observed among cisgender patients following mastectomy, likely due to variations in clinical indications and technique. These results underscore the safety of chest surgery for gender-diverse patients.

BACKGROUND:  Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount.

METHODS:  Herein we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of preventive surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (3) surgical mitigation techniques, and (4) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized.

RESULTS:  Although multiple risk mitigation methods have demonstrated clear benefits, including prophylactic surgical procedures and earlier involvement of plastic surgery, their use is widely variable across institutions. Many current risk assessment tools are suboptimal for supporting more algorithmic approaches to reduce surgical risk.

CONCLUSION:  Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.