Publications

2022

Katsiampoura, Anastasia, Syed Hamza Mufarrih, Aidan Sharkey, Ruma Bose, Sohail K Mahboobi, Robina Matyal, and Feroze Mahmood. (2022) 2022. “A Sequential Approach for Echocardiographic Guidance of Transseptal Puncture: The PITLOC Protocol.”. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 36 (8 Pt B): 3257-64. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.12.025.

With advancements in technology and progress in interventional procedures, left-sided structural heart disease (SHD) interventions have become part of everyday clinical practice. One of the most important steps for a successful left-sided structural heart intervention is the transseptal puncture (TSP). Appropriate transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance of TSP requires extensive supervised hands-on experience prior to attaining proficiency. Whereas some TEE skills are acquired during cardiac anesthesia fellowships, continuous procedural guidance during SHD interventions requires substantial hands-on experience. Several studies have emphasized the value of advanced training in imaging for SHD interventions; however, the pathways and advanced training to ensure proficiency in interventional echocardiography have not yet been clearly established. In an effort to achieve a uniform and consistent approach to TSP imaging that is homogeneous and complementary to the component steps of the TSP procedure from an interventional point-of-view, the authors have developed a protocol for providing image guidance for TSP - the PITLOC protocol (Practice, Identification of septal puncture needle, Tracking of needle tip, Localization of needle tip in fossa ovalis, Optimizing septal indentation, and, finally, Crossing the interatrial septum under direct vision). This protocol aims to standarize image guidance for TSP while complementing the the steps of the procedure as performed and described by interventionalists.

Fatima, Huma, Aidan Sharkey, Nada Qureshi, Feroze Mahmood, Syed Hamza Mufarrih, Vincent Baribeau, Robina Matyal, and Ruma R Bose. (2022) 2022. “Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Simulator: New Learning Tool for Advanced Imaging Techniques.”. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 36 (7): 2090-97. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.05.050.

The use of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has grown exponentially in recent years. Three-dimensional TEE technology has evolved to allow for real-time display of 3D images and, thus, has become the standard of care for the evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function. Its use has provided a new dimension of clinical insight when managing patients for cardiac surgery or structural heart interventions. While the intraoperative utility of 3D TEE has expanded, there has been a slower advancement in the area of training and, specifically, simulator-based training in 3D TEE. This training is essential, as the skill set involved in acquiring 3D data sets differs from that of two-dimensional (2D) TEE and requires users to be able to appreciate how 3D anatomic display differs from that of tomographic cross-sectional 2D imaging. This added skill set requires mental reconstruction and spatial reorientation to appreciate the added elevational dimension in frustum-based imaging and is best achieved in a simulation environment rather than the busy operating room. In this review article, the authors evaluate the functionality of a 3D TEE simulator and how simulators such as this can establish preclinical proficiency in novices in the expanding area of advanced 3D TEE imaging.

Fatima, Huma, Feroze Mahmood, Syed Hamza Mufarrih, John D Mitchell, Vanessa Wong, Rabia Amir, Ting Hai, et al. (2022) 2022. “Preclinical Proficiency-Based Model of Ultrasound Training.”. Anesthesia and Analgesia 134 (1): 178-87. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005510.

BACKGROUND: Graduate medical education is being transformed from a time-based training model to a competency-based training model. While the application of ultrasound in the perioperative arena has become an expected skill set for anesthesiologists, clinical exposure during training is intermittent and nongraduated without a structured program. We developed a formal structured perioperative ultrasound program to efficiently train first-year clinical anesthesia (CA-1) residents and evaluated its effectiveness quantitatively in the form of a proficiency index.

METHODS: In this prospective study, a multimodal perioperative ultrasound training program spread over 3 months was designed by experts at an accredited anesthesiology residency program to train the CA-1 residents. The training model was based on self-learning through web-based modules and instructor-based learning by performing perioperative ultrasound techniques on simulators and live models. The effectiveness of the program was evaluated by comparing the CA-1 residents who completed the training to graduating third-year clinical anesthesia (CA-3) residents who underwent the traditional ultrasound training in the residency program using a designed index called a "proficiency index." The proficiency index was composed of scores on a cognitive knowledge test (20%) and scores on an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to evaluate the workflow understanding (40%) and psychomotor skills (40%).

RESULTS: Sixteen CA-1 residents successfully completed the perioperative ultrasound training program and the subsequent evaluation with the proficiency index. The total duration of training was 60 hours of self-based learning and instructor-based learning. There was a significant improvement observed in the cognitive knowledge test scores for the CA-1 residents after the training program (pretest: 71% [0.141 ± 0.019]; posttest: 83% [0.165 ± 0.041]; P < .001). At the end of the program, the CA-1 residents achieved an average proficiency index that was not significantly different from the average proficiency index of graduating CA-3 residents who underwent traditional ultrasound training (CA-1: 0.803 ± 0.049; CA-3: 0.823 ± 0.063, P = .307).

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the implementation of a formal, structured curriculum allows CA-1 residents to achieve a level of proficiency in perioperative ultrasound applications before clinical exposure.

Baribeau, Vincent, Jeffrey Weinstein, Vanessa T Wong, Aidan Sharkey, Derek N Lodico, Robina Matyal, Feroze Mahmood, and John D Mitchell. (2022) 2022. “Motion-Tracking Machines and Sensors: Advancing Education Technology.”. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 36 (1): 303-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.07.036.

Graduate medical education is predominantly based on a time-based apprenticeship model, with implied acquisition of proficiency after a pre-set amount of clinical exposure. While motion metrics have been used previously to measure skill performance indicators, these assessments have largely been performed on a summative scale to describe the performance of complete tasks or procedures. By segmenting performances of interest and assessing the essential elements individually, a more comprehensive understanding of the aspects in need of improvement for a learner can be obtained. The purpose of this review is to discuss technologies applicable to motion tracking, their benefits and limitations, approaches to data processing, and potential applications based on recent improvements in this technology. Objective analysis of motion metrics may improve educational standards of learning and efficiency by both standardizing the feedback process for trainees and reducing the volume of instructors required to facilitate practice sessions. With rigorous validation and standardization, motion metric assessment may also prove useful to demonstrate competency in technical procedures as part of a comprehensive certification process.

Quraishi, Ibrahim, Syed Hamza Mufarrih, Feroze Mahmood, Robina Matyal, and John D Mitchell. (2022) 2022. “In Response.”. Anesthesia and Analgesia 134 (2): e6-e7. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005720.
Montealegre-Gallegos, Mario, Robina Matyal, Ronny Muñoz-Acuña, Clare Eichinger, and Daniel P Walsh. (2022) 2022. “A Retrocardiac Echolucency.”. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 36 (3): 915-17. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.037.
Bose, Ruma, Mario Montealegre-Gallegos, John D Mitchell, Aidan Sharkey, Sankalp Sehgal, Megan L Krajewski, Mark J Robitaille, et al. (2022) 2022. “Curriculum for Subspecialty Anesthesia Training in Adult Structural Heart Disease Imaging: A Single-Center Experience.”. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 36 (9): 3469-74. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.04.047.

Intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography imaging is an integral part of percutaneous structural heart disease (SHD) interventions. The rapid growth in the number, scope, and complexity of SHD interventions has outpaced the efforts to develop training and proficiency standards in periprocedural imaging. At the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, the authors have developed a 6-month duration fellowship in interventional echocardiography for SHD to address this issue. The purpose of this fellowship is to train cardiac anesthesiologists to address the unique challenges of interventional echocardiography. In this paper, the authors describe the rationale for and specific features of this training program. Their fellowship curriculum follows a multimodal integrative approach to training in SHD imaging, which includes simulation sessions, online modules, deliberate practice in the clinical setting, and interdisciplinary team-based training. In the next several years, there will be an increased need for echocardiographers who are proficient in intraprocedural SHD imaging. In this article, the authors describe their experience with a competency-based curriculum for subspecialty anesthesia training in SHD imaging.

Sharkey, Aidan, John D Mitchell, Huma Fatima, Ruma R Bose, Ibrahim Quraishi, Sara E Neves, Robert Isaak, Vanessa T Wong, Feroze Mahmood, and Robina Matyal. (2022) 2022. “National Delphi Survey on Anesthesiology Resident Training in Perioperative Ultrasound.”. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 36 (11): 4022-31. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.07.019.

OBJECTIVE: To establish agreement among nationwide experts through a Delphi process on the key components of perioperative ultrasound and the recommended minimum number of examinations that should be performed by a resident upon graduation.

DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING: A survey on multiinstitutional academic medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS: Anesthesiology residency program directors and/or experts in perioperative ultrasound.

INTERVENTIONS: A list of components and examinations recommended for anesthesiology resident training in perioperative ultrasound was developed based on guidelines and 2 survey rounds among a steering committee of 10 experts. A questionnaire asking for a rating of each component on a 5-point Likert scale subsequently was sent to an expert panel of 120 anesthesiology residency program directors across the United States. An agreement of at least 70% of participants, rating a component as 4 or 5, was compulsory to list a component as essential for anesthesiology resident training in perioperative ultrasound.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The nationwide survey's response rate was 62.5%, and agreement was reached after 2 Delphi rounds. The final list included 44 essential components for basic ultrasound physics and knobology, cardiac ultrasound, lung ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided vascular access. Agreement was not reached for abdominal ultrasound, gastric ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided airway assessment. Agreement for the recommended minimum number of examinations that should be performed by a resident upon graduation included 50 each for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and 20 each for lung ultrasound, ultrasound-guided central line, and ultrasound-guided arterial line placements.

CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations outlined in this survey can be used to establish standardized training for perioperative ultrasound by anesthesiology residency programs.

Sharkey, Aidan, Nikita Ovtchinnikov, Feroze Mahmood, and Ruma Bose. (2022) 2022. “Sub-Aortic Membrane - A Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Perspective.”. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) 39 (8): 1146-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15413.

INTRODUCTION: Subaortic membrane is an uncommon cause of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

DISCUSSION: Whereas traditionally described of as a membrane, it is in fact a discreet circumferential shelf of raised endocardium in the left ventricular outflow tract, causing a fixed outflow obstruction. The circumferential nature of subaortic membranes is poorly appreciated on 2-dimensional imaging.

CONCLUSION: Using a three-dimensional imaging and recently available on-cart rendition techniques of acquired images, we were able to better visualize the true extent of a sub-aortic membrane while also gaining insight into its origin and structure.