Publications

The use of dietary supplements by patients with chronic liver disease is prevalent and rising. Despite the known risks of dietary supplements, including hepatotoxicity, adulteration, and contamination, patients with chronic liver disease often turn to dietary supplements to support their liver and/or overall health but are not necessarily empowered with the information or guidance from their liver practitioner to do so. This article provides practitioners with a framework for balancing the risks and benefits of dietary supplements in patients with chronic liver disease, offering examples of independent resources and certifications to use this framework in clinical practice. We offer 3 common clinical scenarios to highlight how the use of this framework can improve communication and decision-making in clinical practice. By adapting principles from Integrative Medicine, this article advocates for a patient-centered approach to dietary supplements in patients with chronic liver disease, encouraging open dialogue between clinicians and their patients to facilitate informed decision-making and personalized care.

IMPORTANCE: Although trial data support the omission of axillary surgery and radiation therapy (RT) in women aged 70 years or older with T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, potential overtreatment in older adults with frailty persists.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how much geospatial variation in locoregional therapy may be attributed to region vs patient factors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included women aged 70 years or older who were diagnosed with HR+/ERBB2-negative (ERBB2-) breast cancer from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017. Data came from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare. Hierarchical multivariable modeling was used to evaluate the variance in deescalated care attributable to 4 domains, ie, (1) random, (2) region (health service area [HSA]), (3) patient factors, and (4) unexplained. Patient factors included age, frailty (validated claims-based measure), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and socioeconomic status (Yost index). Analyses were performed from January to October 2023.

EXPOSURE: HSA.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Deescalated care, defined as omission of axillary surgery, RT, or both. Standard therapy was defined as lumpectomy, axillary surgery, and RT or mastectomy with axillary surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with deescalated care receipt.

RESULTS: Of 9173 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.5 [5.2] years), 2363 (25.8%) were aged 80 years or older, 705 (7.7%) had frailty, and 419 (4.6%) had a CCI of 2 or greater. While 4499 (49.1%) underwent standard therapy, 4674 (50.9%) underwent deescalated therapy (1193 [13.0%] of the population omitted axillary surgery and 4342 [55.5%] of patients undergoing lumpectomy omitted RT). Of the total variance, random variation explained 27.3%, region/HSA explained 35.3%, patient factors explained 2.8%, and 34.5% was unexplained. In adjusted models, frailty and increased age were associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing deescalated therapy (frailty: odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.43-2.02; age, by 1-year increment: OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11), but CCI was not. Patients in rural areas compared with those in urban areas (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99) and Asian and Pacific Islander patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.85) had a lower likelihood of undergoing deescalated therapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this retrospective cross-sectional study of women aged 70 years or older diagnosed with T1N0 HR+/ERBB2- breast cancer, region/HSA contributed more to the variation in deescalated therapy use than patient factors. Unexplained variation may be attributed to unmeasured characteristics, such as multidisciplinary environment and patient preference. Decision support efforts to address overtreatment should target regions with low rates of evidence-based deescalation.

BACKGROUND: Wide pulse pressure (PP) is associated with cardiovascular events and the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to kidney failure. PP naturally widens with age, but it is unclear whether the risks associated with greater PP are the same across all ages.

METHODS: We used Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association of PP with (i) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events or death and (ii) a 50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate or kidney failure in the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC). We evaluated the association of time-updated PP with these outcomes, accounting for time-updated confounders using inverse probability weighting.

RESULTS: Among 5,621 participants with CKD, every 10-mmHg greater PP was associated with a 6% higher risk of an ASCVD event or death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, 95% CI 1.04, 1.08) and 17% higher risk of the composite kidney outcome (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.16, 1.18). Greater PP was associated with a higher risk of ASCVD events or death among participants in the lowest age tertile (21-61 years), but a higher risk of the composite kidney outcome in the oldest age tertile (71-79 years). While wide PP in participants that experienced the primary outcomes was predominantly driven by elevated SBP, PP remained significantly associated with the composite kidney outcome across all ages and with ASCVD events or death in the first age tertile when SBP was added to the Cox regression model.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the mechanism by which PP is associated with adverse outcomes may differ by age.

Dynamic teaming is required whenever people must coordinate with one another in a fluid context, particularly when the fundamental structures of a team, such as membership, priorities, tasks, modes of communication, and location are in near-constant flux. This is certainly the case in the contemporary ambulatory care diagnostic process, where circumstances and conditions require a shifting cast of individuals to coordinate dynamically to ensure patient safety. This article offers an updated perspective on dynamic teaming commonly required during the ambulatory diagnostic process. Drawing upon team science, it clarifies the characteristics of dynamic diagnostic teams, identifies common risk points in the teaming process and the practical implications of these risks, considers the role of providers and patients in averting adverse outcomes, and provides a case example of the challenges of dynamic teaming during the diagnostic process. Based on this, future research needs are offered as well as clinical practice recommendations related to team characteristics and breakdowns, team member knowledge/cognitions, teaming dynamics, and the patient as a team member.

The ambulatory diagnostic process is potentially complex, resulting in faulty communication, lost information, and a lack of team coordination. Patients and families have a unique position in the ambulatory diagnostic team, holding privileged information about their clinical conditions and serving as the connecting thread across multiple healthcare encounters. While experts advocate for engaging patients as diagnostic team members, operationalizing patient engagement has been challenging. The team science literature links improved team performance with shared mental models, a concept reflecting the team's commonly held knowledge about the tasks to be done and the expertise of each team member. Despite their proven potential to improve team performance and outcomes in other settings, shared mental models remain underexplored in healthcare. In this manuscript, we review the literature on shared mental models, applying that knowledge to the ambulatory diagnostic process. We consider the role of patients in the diagnostic team and adapt the five-factor model of shared mental models to develop a framework for patient-clinician diagnostic shared mental models. We conclude with research priorities. Development, maintenance, and use of shared mental models of the diagnostic process amongst patients, families, and clinicians may increase patient/family engagement, improve diagnostic team performance, and promote diagnostic safety.

BACKGROUND: Immigrants are disproportionately affected by cardiovascular disease burden. Heart health screenings, including blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and blood cholesterol screenings, can help identify cardiovascular disease risk. Evidence on heart health screenings among diverse immigrant groups is still limited. This study examined the disparities in heart health screenings among the immigrant population compared with US-born White adults.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross-sectional design was used to analyze data from the 2011 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey. Generalized linear models with Poisson distribution were applied to compare the prevalence of annual blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and blood cholesterol screenings among Latino, Black, and Asian immigrants and US-born White adults. The analysis included 145 149 adults (83.60% US-born White adults, 9.55% Latino immigrants, 1.89% Black immigrants, and 4.96% Asian immigrants), with a mean age of 50 years and 53.62% women. Latino (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.91-0.93]) and Asian (aOR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.92-0.94]) immigrants were less likely to have blood pressure screening than US-born White adults. Latino (aOR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.19-1.25]), Black (aOR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09-1.21]), and Asian (aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.08-1.15]) immigrants were more likely to have fasting blood glucose screening, and Latino (aOR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.13]), Black or (aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09-1.16]), and Asian (aOR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]) immigrants were more likely to have blood cholesterol screening than US-born White adults.

CONCLUSIONS: Latino and Asian immigrants have lower odds of annual blood pressure screenings than US-born White adults. More studies exploring facilitators and barriers to the accessibility and use of heart health screenings are needed.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines advise automated office blood pressure (AOBP) with an initial 5-minute delay and multiple measurements at least 60 seconds apart. Recent studies suggest that AOBP may be accurate with shorter delays or intervals, but evidence in clinical settings is limited.

METHODS: Patients referred to one hypertension (HTN) center underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and one of four non-randomized, unattended AOBP protocols: a 3- or 5-minute delay with a 30 or 60-second interval, i.e., 3 min/30 sec/30 sec, 3/60/60, 5/30/30 and 5/60/60 protocols. HTN was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg.

RESULTS: We compared differences in mean blood pressure and HTN classification between average AOBP and awake-time ABPM by t-tests and Fisher's exact test. Among 212 participants (mean 58.9 years, 61% women, 25% Black), there was substantial overlap in the probability distributions of awake-time ABPM and each of the three AOBP measures. Systolic blood pressure means were similar between the 5/60/60 and 3/30/30 protocols and 5/30/30 and 3/60/60 protocols. The 5/30/30 was associated with a higher proportion of systolic HTN, while the 3/60/60 protocol was associated with a higher proportion of diastolic HTN. There were no significant differences in systolic or diastolic HTN between 5/60/60 and 3/30/30 protocols with respect to awake-time ABPM.

CONCLUSIONS: In this quality improvement study, the shortest AOBP protocol did not differ significantly from the longest protocol. The time savings of shorter protocols may improve AOBP adoption in clinical practice without meaningfully compromising accuracy.

Delirium and dementia are common causes of cognitive impairment in older adults. They are distinct but interrelated. Delirium, an acute confusional state, has been linked to the chronic and progressive loss of cognitive ability seen in dementia. Individuals with dementia are at higher risk for delirium, and delirium itself is a risk factor for incident dementia. Additionally, delirium in individuals with dementia can hasten underlying cognitive decline. In this review, we summarize recent literature linking these conditions, including epidemiological, clinicopathological, neuroimaging, biomarker, and experimental evidence supporting the intersection between these conditions. Strategies for evaluation and diagnosis that focus on distinguishing delirium from dementia in clinical settings and recommendations for delirium prevention interventions for patients with dementia are presented. We also discuss studies that provide evidence that delirium may be a modifiable risk factor for dementia and consider the impact of delirium prevention interventions on long-term outcomes.

Orthostatic hypotension (orthostatic hypotension) is a highly prevalent medical condition that is an independent risk factor for falls and mortality. It reflects a condition in which autonomic reflexes are impaired or intravascular volume is depleted, causing a significant reduction in blood pressure upon standing. This disorder is frequently unrecognized until later in its clinical course. Symptoms like orthostatic dizziness do not reliably identify patients with orthostatic hypotension, who are often asymptomatic, lending further to the difficulty of this diagnosis. We summarize 7 clinically important misconceptions about orthostatic hypotension.

BACKGROUND: Following acute coronary syndrome (ACS), up to 40% of patients report elevated depressive symptoms which is associated with a two-fold increase in mortality risk due to behavioral and biological mechanisms. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) delivered via synchronous group videoconferencing could help reduce depressive symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To guide MBCT adaptation for ACS patients for a future clinical trial, this qualitative study aimed to explore ACS patients' (1) symptoms after ACS, (2) needs for behavioral health treatment, (3) perspectives on mindfulness intervention and group videoconference delivery, and (4) willingness to self-collect dried blood spots in a research study.

METHODS: We compared ACS patients with and without depressive symptoms to highlight particularly relevant treatment topics for patients developing depression following ACS experience. From 2/2019-11/2019, we conducted semi-structured individual telephone interviews with N = 23 patients after ACS (N = 13 with and N = 10 without elevated depressive symptoms; 63.4 (SD = 8.5) years, 87% male, 96% non-Hispanic white, 7.1 (SD = 7.5) years since ACS). In qualitative content analyses, four independent coders coded each interview.

RESULTS: Participants with depressive symptoms experienced emotional, physical, social, and health behavior problems, while those without depressive symptoms made positive health behavior changes and struggled with anxiety symptoms. Both groups were interested in a behavioral health treatment for emotional and social support. Most were willing to participate in a mindfulness group via videoconferencing; some preferred in-person, but accessibility and convenience outweighed these cons. Almost all were willing to self-collect dried blood spots and some were already familiar with this technique.

CONCLUSION: ACS patients, especially those with depressive symptoms, need help managing a multitude of quality of life concerns that can be targeted with an adapted MBCT approach. A videoconference-delivered MBCT approach is of interest. Suggestions for adapting MBCT to target the needs of ACS patients are discussed.