Publications

2020

Nawaz, Uzma, Ivy Lee, Adan Beermann, Shaun M. Eack, Matcheri Keshavan, and Roscoe O. Brady Jr. (2020) 2020. “Individual Variation in Functional Brain Network Topography Is Linked to Schizophrenia Symptomatology”. Schizophrenia Bulletin 47 (1): 180-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa088.

Resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) demonstrates that the brain is organized into distributed networks. Numerous studies have examined links between psychiatric symptomatology and network functional connectivity. Traditional rsfMRI analyses assume that the spatial organization of networks is invariant between individuals. This dogma has recently been overturned by the demonstration that networks show significant variation between individuals. We tested the hypothesis that previously observed relationships between schizophrenia-negative symptom severity and network connectivity are actually due to individual differences in network spatial organization. Forty-four participants diagnosed with schizophrenia underwent rsfMRI scans and clinical assessments. A multivariate pattern analysis determined how whole-brain functional connectivity correlates with negative symptom severity at the individual voxel level. Brain connectivity to a region of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex correlates with negative symptom severity. This finding results from individual differences in the topographic distribution of 2 networks: the default mode network (DMN) and the task-positive network (TPN). Both networks demonstrate strong (r = ~0.49) and significant (P < .001) relationships between topography and symptom severity. For individuals with low symptom severity, this critical region is part of the DMN. In highly symptomatic individuals, this region is part of the TPN. Previously overlooked individual variation in brain organization is tightly linked to differences in schizophrenia symptom severity. Recognizing critical links between network topography and pathological symptomology may identify key circuits that underlie cognitive and behavioral phenotypes. Individual variation in network topography likely guides different responses to clinical interventions that rely on anatomical targeting (eg, transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS]).

Lutz, Olivia, Paulo Lizano, Suraj Sarvode Mothi, Victor Zeng, Rachal R Hegde, Dung T Hoang, Philip Henson, et al. (2020) 2020. “Do Neurobiological Differences Exist Between Paranoid and Non-Paranoid Schizophrenia? Findings from the Bipolar Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes Study.”. Schizophrenia Research 223: 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.02.011.

Subtypes of schizophrenia, constructed using clinical phenomenology to resolve illness heterogeneity, have faced criticism due to overlapping symptomatology and longitudinal instability; they were therefore dropped from the Diagnostic Statistical Manual-5. Cognitive and imaging findings comparing paranoid (P-SZ) and non-paranoid (disorganized, residual and undifferentiated; NP-SZ) schizophrenia have been limited due to small sample sizes. We assessed P-SZ and NP-SZ using symptomatology, cognition and brain structure and predicted that there would be few neurobiological differences. P-SZ (n = 237), NP-SZ (n = 127) and controls (n = 430) were included from a multi-site study. In a subset of this sample, structural imaging measures (P-SZ, n = 133; NP-SZ, n = 67; controls, n = 310) were calculated using Freesurfer 6.0. Group contrasts were run using analysis of covariance, controlling for age, sex, race and site, p-values were corrected using False Discovery Rate (FDR) and were repeated excluding the residual subtype. Compared to NP-SZ (with and without the residual subtype), P-SZ displayed fewer negative symptoms, faster speed of processing, larger bilateral hippocampus, right amygdala and their subfield volumes. Additionally, NP-SZ (with residual subtype) displayed fewer depressive symptoms and higher left transverse temporal cortical thickness (CT) but NP-SZ without residual subtype showed lower GAF scores and worse digit sequencing compared to P-SZ. No differences in positive symptoms and functioning (global or social) were detected. Subtle but significant differences were seen in cognition, symptoms, CT and subcortical volumes between P-SZ and NP-SZ. While the magnitude of these differences is not large enough to justify them as distinct categories, the paranoid- nonparanoid distinction in schizophrenia merits further investigation.

Wang, Danhong, Meiling Li, Meiyun Wang, Franziska Schoeppe, Jianxun Ren, Huafu Chen, Dost Öngür, Roscoe O Brady, Justin T Baker, and Hesheng Liu. (2020) 2020. “Individual-Specific Functional Connectivity Markers Track Dimensional and Categorical Features of Psychotic Illness.”. Molecular Psychiatry 25 (9): 2119-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0276-1.

Neuroimaging studies of psychotic disorders have demonstrated abnormalities in structural and functional connectivity involving widespread brain networks. However, these group-level observations have failed to yield any biomarkers that can provide confirmatory evidence of a patient's current symptoms, predict future symptoms, or predict a treatment response. Lack of precision in both neuroanatomical and clinical boundaries have likely contributed to the inability of even well-powered studies to resolve these key relationships. Here, we employed a novel approach to defining individual-specific functional connectivity in 158 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (n = 49), schizoaffective disorder (n = 37), or bipolar disorder with psychosis (n = 72), and identified neuroimaging features that track psychotic symptoms in a dimension- or disorder-specific fashion. Using individually specified functional connectivity, we were able to estimate positive, negative, and manic symptoms that showed correlations ranging from r = 0.35 to r = 0.51 with the observed symptom scores. Comparing optimized estimation models among schizophrenia spectrum patients, positive and negative symptoms were associated with largely non-overlapping sets of cortical connections. Comparing between schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorder patients, the models for positive symptoms were largely non-overlapping between the two disorder classes. Finally, models derived using conventional region definition strategies performed at chance levels for most symptom domains. Individual-specific functional connectivity analyses revealed important new distinctions among cortical circuits responsible for the positive and negative symptoms, as well as key new information about how circuits underlying symptom expressions may vary depending on the underlying etiology and illness syndrome from which they manifest.

Dichtel, Laura E, Linda L Carpenter, Maren Nyer, David Mischoulon, Allison Kimball, Thilo Deckersbach, Darin D Dougherty, et al. (2020) 2020. “Low-Dose Testosterone Augmentation for Antidepressant-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder in Women: An 8-Week Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.”. The American Journal of Psychiatry 177 (10): 965-73. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19080844.

OBJECTIVE: Low-dose testosterone has been shown to improve depression symptom severity, fatigue, and sexual function in small studies in women not formally diagnosed with major depressive disorder. The authors sought to determine whether adjunctive low-dose transdermal testosterone improves depression symptom severity, fatigue, and sexual function in women with antidepressant-resistant major depression. A functional MRI (fMRI) substudy examined effects on activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region important in mood regulation.

METHODS: The authors conducted an 8-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive testosterone cream in 101 women, ages 21-70, with antidepressant-resistant major depression. The primary outcome measure was depression symptom severity as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary endpoints included fatigue, sexual function, and safety measures. The primary outcome of the fMRI substudy (N=20) was change in ACC activity.

RESULTS: The participants' mean age was 47 years (SD=14) and their mean baseline MADRS score was 26.6 (SD=5.9). Eighty-seven (86%) participants completed 8 weeks of treatment. MADRS scores decreased in both study arms from baseline to week 8 (testosterone arm: from 26.8 [SD=6.3] to 15.3 [SD=9.6]; placebo arm: from 26.3 [SD=5.4] to 14.4 [SD=9.3]), with no significant difference between groups. Improvement in fatigue and sexual function did not differ between groups, nor did side effects. fMRI results showed a relationship between ACC activation and androgen levels before treatment but no difference in ACC activation with testosterone compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive transdermal testosterone, although well tolerated, was not more effective than placebo in improving symptoms of depression, fatigue, or sexual dysfunction. Imaging in a subset of participants demonstrated that testosterone did not result in greater activation of the ACC.

2019

Brady, Roscoe O., Jr., Irene Gonsalvez, Ivy Lee, Dost Öngür, Larry J. Seidman, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Shaun M. Eack, Matcheri S. Keshavan, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, and Mark A. Halko. (2019) 2019. “Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Cerebellar-Prefrontal Network Underlies Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia”. The American Journal of Psychiatry 176. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040429.

Objective:

The interpretability of results in psychiatric neuroimaging is significantly limited by an overreliance on correlational relationships. Purely correlational studies cannot alone determine if behavior-imaging relationships are causal to illness, functionally compensatory processes, or purely epiphenomena. Here we take a two-step approach to identifying and then empirically testing a brain network model of schizophrenia symptoms. Negative symptoms (e.g. anhedonia, amotivation, and expressive deficits) are refractory to current medications and are one of the foremost causes of disability in this illness.

Method:

We used two-stage method: In the first cohort (n=44), we used a data-driven resting state functional connectivity analysis to identify a network whose connectivity corresponds to negative symptom severity. Then in a second cohort (n=11) we modulated this network connectivity with 5 days of twice daily transcranial magnetic stimulation to the cerebellar midline (vermis VIIb).

Results:

A breakdown of connectivity in a specific dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to cerebellum network directly corresponds to negative symptom severity. Restoration of network connectivity with TMS corresponds to amelioration of negative symptoms, showing a strong relationship of functional connectivity change to negative symptom change (r=0.809,p=0003).

Conclusion:

Our results demonstrate that a connectivity breakdown between the cerebellum and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is associated with negative symptom severity and that correction of this breakdown ameliorates negative symptom severity. Our results support a novel network hypothesis for medication refractory negative symptoms and indicates network manipulation may establish causal relationships between network markers and clinical phenomena.

Baker, Justin T, Daniel G Dillon, Lauren M Patrick, Joshua L Roffman, Roscoe O Brady, Diego A Pizzagalli, Dost Öngür, and Avram J Holmes. (2019) 2019. “Functional Connectomics of Affective and Psychotic Pathology.”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (18): 9050-59. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820780116.

Converging evidence indicates that groups of patients with nominally distinct psychiatric diagnoses are not separated by sharp or discontinuous neurobiological boundaries. In healthy populations, individual differences in behavior are reflected in variability across the collective set of functional brain connections (functional connectome). These data suggest that the spectra of transdiagnostic symptom profiles observed in psychiatric patients may map onto detectable patterns of network function. To examine the manner through which neurobiological variation might underlie clinical presentation, we obtained fMRI data from over 1,000 individuals, including 210 diagnosed with a primary psychotic disorder or affective psychosis (bipolar disorder with psychosis and schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder), 192 presenting with a primary affective disorder without psychosis (unipolar depression, bipolar disorder without psychosis), and 608 demographically matched healthy comparison participants recruited through a large-scale study of brain imaging and genetics. Here, we examine variation in functional connectomes across psychiatric diagnoses, finding striking evidence for disease connectomic "fingerprints" that are commonly disrupted across distinct forms of pathology and appear to scale as a function of illness severity. The presence of affective and psychotic illnesses was associated with graded disruptions in frontoparietal network connectivity (encompassing aspects of dorsolateral prefrontal, dorsomedial prefrontal, lateral parietal, and posterior temporal cortices). Conversely, other properties of network connectivity, including default network integrity, were preferentially disrupted in patients with psychotic illness, but not patients without psychotic symptoms. This work allows us to establish key biological and clinical features of the functional connectomes of severe mental disease.