Publications

Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation rates have increased in recent decades. Venous obstruction of the subclavian, brachiocephalic, or superior vena cava veins represents an important complication of implanted leads. These forms of venous obstruction can result in significant symptoms as well as present a barrier to the implantation of additional device leads. The risk factors for the development of these complications remain poorly understood, and diagnosis relies on clinical recognition and cross-sectional imaging. Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment, and thrombus debulking, lead extraction, venoplasty, and stenting are all important therapeutic interventions. This review provides a multidisciplinary-based approach to the evaluation and management of cardiac implantable electronic device lead-associated venous obstruction.

Background: Baseline impedance, radiofrequency current, and impedance drop during radiofrequency catheter ablation are thought to predict effective lesion formation. However, quantifying the contributions of local versus remote impedances provides insights into the limitations of indices using those parameters. Methods: An in silico model of left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation was used based on human thoracic measurements and solved for (1) initial impedance (Z), (2) percentage of radiofrequency power delivered to the myocardium and blood (3) total radiofrequency current, (4) impedance drop during heating, and (5) lesion size after a 25 W−30 s ablation. Remote impedance was modeled by varying the mixing ratio between skeletal muscle and fat. Local impedance was modeled by varying insertion depth of the electrode (ID). Results: Increasing the remote impedance led to increased baseline impedance, lower system current delivery, and reduced lesion size. For ID = 0.5 mm, Z ranged from 115 to 132 Ω when fat percentage varied from 20 to 80%, resulting in a decrease in the RF current from 472 to 347 mA and a slight decrease in lesion size from 5.6 to 5.1 mm in depth, and from 9.2 to 8.0 mm in maximum width. In contrast, increasing the local impedance led to lower system current but larger lesions. For a 50% fat−muscle mixture, Z ranged from 118 to 138 Ω when ID varied from 0.3 to 1.9 mm, resulting in a decrease in the RF current from 463 to 443 mA and an increase in lesion size, from 5.2 up to 7.5 mm in depth, and from 8.4 up to 11.6 mm in maximum width. In cases of nearly identical Z but different contributions of local and remote impedance, markedly different lesions sizes were observed despite only small differences in RF current. Impedance drop better predicted lesion size (R2 > 0.93) than RF current (R2 < 0.1). Conclusions: Identical baseline impedances and observed RF currents can lead to markedly different lesion sizes with different relative contributions of local and remote impedances to the electrical circuit. These results provide mechanistic insights into the advantage of measuring local impedance and identifies potential limitations of indices incorporating baseline impedance or current to predict lesion quality.

Percutaneous epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation can decrease implanted cardioverter defibrillator shocks and hospitalizations; proper patient selection and procedural technique are imperative to maximize the benefit-risk ratio. The best candidates for epicardial ventricular tachycardia will depend on history of prior ablation, type of cardiomyopathy, and specific electrocardiogram and cardiac imaging findings. Complications include hemopericardium, hemoperitoneum, coronary vessel injury, and phrenic nerve injury. Modern epicardial mapping techniques provide new understandings of the 3-dimensional nature of reentrant ventricular tachycardia circuits across cardiomyopathy etiologies. Where epicardial access is not feasible, alternative techniques to reach epicardial ventricular tachycardia sources may be necessary.

BACKGROUND: Drugs belonging to diverse therapeutic classes can prolong myocardial refractoriness or slow conduction. These drugs may be effective and well-tolerated, but the risk of sudden cardiac death from torsades de pointes (TdP) remains a major concern. The corrected QT interval has significant limitations when used for risk stratification. Measurement of global electrical heterogeneity (GEH) could help identify the substrate vulnerable to drug-induced ventricular arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to improve risk stratification for drug-induced TdP by measuring GEH on the electrocardiogram (ECG).

METHODS: We analyzed ECG data from a case-control study of patients with a history of drug-induced TdP as well as age- and sex-matched controls. Vectorcardiograms were constructed from ECGs. GEH was measured via the spatial ventricular gradient (SVG) vector (magnitude, azimuth, and elevation). Log odds coefficients for TdP were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS: Among 17 cases (47% male; age 58.9 ± 12.5 years) and 17 controls (29% male; age 61.0 ± 12.2 years), 34 ECGs were analyzed. SVG azimuth was significantly different between cases and controls (3.4 vs 22.0 degrees, respectively; P = 0.02). After adjusting for sex and QTc interval, odds of TdP increased by a factor of 3.2 for each 1 SD change in SVG azimuth from the control group mean (95% confidence interval 1.07-9.14; P = .04). QTc was not significant in the multivariable analysis (P = .20).

CONCLUSION: SVG azimuth is correlated with a history of drug-induced TdP independent of QTc. GEH measurement may help identify patients at high risk for drug-induced arrhythmias.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a complex disease that can manifest as a diverse array of arrhythmias. CS patients may be at higher risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD), and, in some cases, SCD may be the first presenting symptom of the underlying disease. As such, identification, risk stratification, and management of CS-related arrhythmia are crucial in the care of these patients. Left untreated, CS carries significant arrhythmogenic morbidity and mortality. Cardiac manifestations of CS are a consequence of an inflammatory process resulting in the myocardial deposition of noncaseating granulomas. Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis; however, biopsy yield is limited by the patchy distribution of the granulomas. As such, recent guidelines have improved clinical diagnostic pathways relying on advanced cardiac imaging to help in the diagnosis of CS. To date, corticosteroids are the best studied agent to treat CS but are associated with significant risks and limited benefits. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have an important role in SCD risk reduction. Catheter ablation in conjunction with antiarrhythmics seems to reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden. However, the appropriate selection of these patients is crucial as ablation is likely more helpful in the setting of a myocardial scar substrate versus arrhythmia driven by active inflammation. Further studies investigating CS pathophysiology, the pathway to diagnosis, arrhythmogenic manifestations, and SCD risk stratification will be crucial to reduce the high morbidity and mortality of this disease.

Catheter-based ultrasonography is a widely used tool in cardiac electrophysiology practice, and intracardiac echocardiography is supplanting other forms of imaging to become the dominant imaging modality. Given advances in pericardial access, intrapericardial echocardiography can be performed using ultrasound catheters as well. Intrapericardial echocardiography and echocardiography from the coronary sinus, also an epicardial structure, allows interventionalists to obtain unique views from virtually any vantage point, compared with other forms of echocardiography. Both intrapericardial echocardiography and coronary sinus echocardiography are safe and important alternatives that can be used during complex procedures in the electrophysiology laboratory.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) to guide percutaneous epicardial puncture for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A preprocedural CT was used to plan the site, angle, and depth of needle insertion during epicardial access in 10 consecutive patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. Adjacent structures (right ventricle, diaphragm, liver, colon, internal mammary artery) were visualized and the course of the needle was planned avoiding these structures. During epicardial access, a protractor was used to guide the angle of needle entry into the subxiphoid space. Postprocedural CT was performed to calculate the deviation between the planned and executed access and to assess for any collateral damage. Percutaneous epicardial access was obtained successfully in all the patients using anterior (n = 4) and inferior (n = 6) approaches. The planned site and angle of puncture was more caudal (2.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7 cm, p = .021) and acute (61.7 ± 5.8 vs. 49.0 ± 5.4°, p = .011) for an anterior approach compared to an inferior approach, respectively. Postprocedure CT revealed minimal deviation of the puncture site (5.4 ± 1.0 mm), angle (5.4 ± 1.2°), and length of needle insertion (0.5 ± 0.2 cm). With regard to the site of entry in the pericardial space, there was a deviation of 5.9 ± 1.1, 6.1 ± 1.1, and 5.8 ± 1.4 mm in the x, y, and z dimensions, respectively. In eight patients with minimal deviation between planned and executed access, there was no collateral injury to adjacent viscera or vessels. In two patients with increased deviation of angle and length of needle insertion, there was entry through the diaphragm during inferior access.

CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing pre-procedural CT planning may aid in the success and safety of percutaneous epicardial access during VT ablation.

Heterogeneity in depolarization and repolarization among regions of cardiac cells has long been recognized as a major factor in cardiac arrhythmogenesis. This fundamental principle has motivated development of noninvasive techniques for quantification of heterogeneity using the surface electrocardiogram (ECG). The initial approaches focused on interval analysis such as interlead QT dispersion and Tpeak -Tend difference. However, because of inherent difficulties in measuring the termination point of the T wave and commonly encountered irregularities in the apex of the T wave, additional techniques have been pursued. The newer methods incorporate assessment of the entire morphology of the T wave and in some cases of the R wave as well. This goal has been accomplished using a number of promising vectorial approaches with the resting 12-lead ECG. An important limitation of vectorcardiographic analyses is that they require exquisite stability of the recordings and are not inherently suitable for use in exercise tolerance testing (ETT) and/or ambulatory ECG monitoring for provocative stress testing or evaluation of the influence of daily activities on cardiac electrical instability. The objectives of the present review are to describe a technique that has been under clinical evaluation for nearly a decade, termed "interlead ECG heterogeneity." Preclinical testing data will be briefly reviewed. We will discuss the main clinical findings with regard to sudden cardiac death risk stratification, heart failure evaluation, and myocardial ischemia detection using standard recording platforms including resting 12-lead ECG, ambulatory ECG monitoring, ETT, and pharmacologic stress testing in conjunction with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.