Publications

2025

Wiskel, Tess, Nathaniel Matthews-Trigg, Kristin Stevens, Thomas T Miles, Caleb Dresser, and Aaron Bernstein. (2025) 2025. “Frontline Clinic Administrator Perspectives on Extreme Weather Events, Clinic Operations, and Climate Resilience.”. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000519.

Climate-sensitive extreme weather events are increasingly impacting frontline clinic operations. We conducted a national, cross-sectional survey of 284 self-identified administrators and other staff at frontline clinics determining their attitudes toward climate change and the impacts, resilience, and preparedness of clinics for extreme weather events. Most respondents (80.2%) reported that humans are causing climate change, and nearly half (45.9%) reported concerns about extreme weather impacting their job, with barriers to preparedness including financing and knowledge and resources. Over a third (41.8%) of respondents reported taking steps to protect their clinic infrastructure from extreme weather, including by addressing power and improving ventilation.

2024

Dresser, Caleb, Zachary Johns, Avery Palardy, Sarah McKINNON, Suellen Breakey, Ana M Viamonte Ros, and Patrice K Nicholas. (2024) 2024. “Toward a Climate-Ready Health Care System: Institutional Motivators and Workforce Engagement.”. The Milbank Quarterly 102 (2): 302-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12687.

Policy Points The US health care system faces mounting pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change; motivated institutions and an engaged health care workforce are essential to the development, implementation, and maintenance of a climate-ready US health care system. Health care workers have numerous profession-specific and role-specific opportunities to address the causes and impacts of climate change. Policies must address institutional barriers to change and create incentives aligned with climate readiness goals. Institutions and individuals can support climate readiness by integrating content on the health care implications of climate change into educational curricula.

Wiskel, Tess, Thomas T Miles, Mariel Fonteyn, Kristin Stevens, Chelsea Heberlein, Nathaniel Matthews-Trigg, Caleb Dresser, and Aaron Bernstein. (2024) 2024. “Frontline Clinic Perspectives on Climate Change, Human Health, and Resilience: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.”. BMC Primary Care 25 (1): 399. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02622-y.

BACKGROUND: Frontline clinics - primary care clinics that predominantly serve low-income and socially disadvantaged communities - are facing increasing impacts from climate-related extreme events. This study evaluated staff perspectives at frontline clinics on the health risks of climate change, the impacts of extreme events on their clinics and patients, and their motivators to improve climate resiliency.

METHODS: A national, cross-sectional survey was conducted of staff working at frontline clinics including administrators, case workers, and providers across the United States. Survey questions assessed clinic and respondent attributes, knowledge of health risks of climate change, preferences for climate change educational and operational resources, and clinic and patient climate impacts and resilience. The survey was distributed electronically to a convenience sample of primary care clinics and to the National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) and National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics (NAFC) listservs. Data was collected from September to November of 2021. Respondents were current staff who consented to the survey. Responses were collected via Qualtrics, and the statistical analysis was completed using Stata.

RESULTS: A total of 430 surveys were completed representing clinics in 43 states. Most (82.0%) respondents reported human activities were causing climate change. Over half (52.8%) of respondents reported an operational disruption to their clinic from extreme events in the past 3 years, and another 54.4% had plans in place to address risks from extreme events. The most useful resources identified to improve operational resilience were checklists and planning guidance. Over half (52.0%) of respondents reported they were motivated to use these resources to improve clinic preparedness. Most (84.4%) providers and case workers reported that climate change impacted patient health, however only 36.2% discussed health risks with patients, with barriers including more pressing topics and time available. Another 55.7% of respondents reported they were motivated to learn ways to help patients prepare for extreme events.

CONCLUSIONS: Climate-related extreme events were reported to impact patient health and disrupt frontline clinic operations. Overcoming gaps in knowledge about climate change impacts on health and providing climate educational resources can engender motivation to improve clinic and patient resilience to climate change.