Publications by Year: 2022

OBJECTIVES: To understand the prevalence of malnutrition and its association with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) outcomes; to clarify the differential impact of revascularization methods on outcomes; to assess the ability of the CLTI Frailty Risk Score (CLTI-FRS) to predict adverse events in patients hospitalized with CLTI.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the management of CLTI, a majority still undergo major amputation, and a minority heal within 6 months. There is a lack of validated assessment tools for the identification and management of frailty and malnutrition in these patients.

METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from January 2012 to September 2015, we identified all patients with CLTI using International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition Clinical Modification codes. The cohort was divided into three groups according to nutritional status. Multivariable regression analysis was used to analyze the interaction between malnutrition and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS: Of 1,414,080 CLTI-related hospitalizations, 163,835 (11.6%) were malnourished, 332,855 (23.5%) patients were frail, 917,390 (64.9%) were well-nourished. In-hospital mortality, major amputation, the average length of stay, and hospital costs were highest among malnourished or frail patients and lowest in well-nourished patients (p < 0.001). Malnourished and frail patients were observed to have lower rates of mortality with endovascular revascularization as compared to surgical (adjusted odds ratios: 0.675 [0.533-0.854; p = 0.001]).

CONCLUSION: Many patients with CLTI are malnourished or frail, and this is associated with mortality and amputation. Both malnourished and frail patients were observed to have a mortality benefit with a less invasive approach to revascularization. Better assessment of nutritional and frailty status of CLTI patients may guide therapy and help prevent amputation and death.

OBJECTIVES: The study describes the evolution of optical coherence tomography (OCT) adoption and performance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following implementation of a standardized LightLab (LL) workflow.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the LL Clinical Initiative was to evaluate the impact of a standardized workflow on physician efficiency, decision making, and image quality.

METHODS: The LL Clinical Initiative is a multicenter, prospective, observational clinical program. Data were collected from 48 physicians at 17 U.S. centers from 01/21/19 to 06/08/21. The study included 401 OCT-guided PCIs during the baseline phase and 1898 during the LL workflow phases. The baseline phase consisted of physicians utilizing OCT at their discretion. After completing the baseline phase, the workflow progressed through multiple phases culminating in the expansion phase, which focused on addressing greater procedural complexity. The LL workflow utilized OCT to assess plaque Morphology, lesion Length, and vessel Diameter before PCI, and optimized results by treating Medial edge dissection, stent mal-Apposition, and stent under-eXpansion (MLD MAX). High-level summary statistics were generated to elucidate trends.

RESULTS: After program implementation, there was a rise in the number of PCIs where the LL workflow was utilized compared to the baseline phase (68% during the expansion phase vs. 41% at baseline; p for trend <0.0001). Adoption of the LL workflow was associated with progressively greater procedural and lesion complexity when OCT was performed pre- and post-PCI (87% vs. 52%, p < 0.0001; 55% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In addition, the quality of OCT imaging obtained improved after LL workflow introduction, with over 95% of pre- and post-PCI pullback quality considered usable during the expansion phase. Finally, there was a reduction in time spent on OCT interpretation, both pre-PCI (4.6 min vs. 7.5 min, p < 0.0001) and post-PCI (2.9 min vs. 5.3 min, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: After completion of the standardized OCT-guided workflow, there was greater uptake of OCT imaging, incorporation in more complex procedures, procedural efficiency, and image quality.

BACKGROUND: There are increasing treatment options for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), though many are only available at tertiary care centers. Patients with acute pulmonary embolism with high-risk features are often transferred for consideration of such therapies. There are limited data describing outcomes in patients transferred with acute pulmonary embolism.

METHODS: We evaluated patients with acute pulmonary embolism at our tertiary care center from August 2012 through August 2018 and compared clinical characteristics, pulmonary embolism features, management, and outcomes in those transferred for acute pulmonary embolism to those that were not transferred.

RESULTS: Of 2050 patients with pulmonary embolism included in the study, 432 (21.1%) were transferred from an outside hospital with a known diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Patients transferred had a lower rate of malignancy (22.2% vs 33.3%; P < .001) and median Charlson comorbidity index (3 vs 4; P < .001). A higher percentage of patients transferred were classified as intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (62.5% vs 43.0%; P <.001) and more frequently received advanced therapy beyond anticoagulation alone (12.5% vs 3.2%, P < .001). Overall survival to discharge was similar between groups, though definite pulmonary embolism-related mortality was higher in the transferred group (38.5% vs 9.4%, P = .004).

CONCLUSION: More than 1 in 5 patients treated for acute pulmonary embolism at a tertiary care center were transferred from an outside facility. Transferred patients had higher risk pulmonary embolism features, more often received advanced therapy, and had higher definite pulmonary embolism-related mortality. There are opportunities to further optimize outcomes of patients transferred for management of acute pulmonary embolism.

Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation rates have increased in recent decades. Venous obstruction of the subclavian, brachiocephalic, or superior vena cava veins represents an important complication of implanted leads. These forms of venous obstruction can result in significant symptoms as well as present a barrier to the implantation of additional device leads. The risk factors for the development of these complications remain poorly understood, and diagnosis relies on clinical recognition and cross-sectional imaging. Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment, and thrombus debulking, lead extraction, venoplasty, and stenting are all important therapeutic interventions. This review provides a multidisciplinary-based approach to the evaluation and management of cardiac implantable electronic device lead-associated venous obstruction.

This review details the utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the management of peripheral artery and venous disease. The purpose of this document is to provide an update in the use of IVUS in peripheral arterial and venous pathology and demonstrate the use of IVUS as a practical diagnostic imaging procedure to evaluate and treat peripheral vascular disorders. IVUS, a diagnostic tool that relies on sound waves to produce precise images of the vessel being evaluated, was originally introduced to the medical community for the purposes of peripheral artery imaging, though it was quickly adapted for coronary interventions with positive outcomes. The utility of IVUS includes vessel measurement, pre- and post-procedural planning, treatment optimisation, and detection of thrombus, dissection or calcium severity. While angiography remains the standard imaging approach during peripheral intervention, multiple observational studies and small prospective trials have shown that in comparison, IVUS provides more accurate imaging detail, which may improve procedural outcomes. IVUS can also address limitations of angiography, including the need to administer contrast medium and eliminate the ambiguity associated with other forms of imaging. This review provides contemporary examples of where IVUS is being used during peripheral intervention as well as representative imaging to serve as a resource for the practising clinician.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Calcified atheroma is frequently encountered in peripheral vascular intervention. Standard treatment with balloon and/or stenting alone does poorly in these cases due to vessel recoil, suboptimal luminal gain, and inadequate stent expansion. In light of the above challenges with angioplasty and stenting for PAD, endovascular atherectomy has emerged as a novel technology for atheroma treatment and removal, offering the benefits of surgical endarterectomy in a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. This review outlines the endovascular atherectomy devices available in clinical practice to date, compares and contrasts their mode of action, summarizes the relevant published data on indication and role of atherectomy over other treatment modalities for PAD, and discusses the future prospective on this emerging technology.

RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, there are host of peripheral atherectomy devices available with unique mechanism of action and relative advantages and disadvantages. Despite these recent technological advancements, there remains a paucity of data from well-designed studies regarding the superiority of atherectomy as an adjunctive treatment versus standard treatment with balloon and stenting. Emerging data have supported its use to improve patency rates in conjunction with drug-coated balloons. Although associated risks, including distal embolization and perforation, are often marginal, the cost of these devices to the healthcare system necessitates further investment in to establishing level 1 data to support their use. Peripheral atherectomy has the potential to improve limb-related outcomes, potentially through reduced need for bail-out scaffolds and improved drug uptake. Nonetheless, further investment in the evidence foundation supporting these devices versus standard practices is required.