Products
LV diastolic function assessment
ASE 2025 guidelines — interactive clinical decision tool | For clinical use by qualified practitioners only
LAP estimation algorithm (sinus rhythm)
Apply to patients in sinus rhythm. Not for: AF, heart transplant, non-cardiac PH, pericardial constriction, LVAD, severe primary MR, any MS, or moderate/severe MAC.
1
2
3
Step 1 — Mitral annular e' velocity
Step 2 — LAP markers
Step 3 — Supplemental parameters
Used when primary variables are unavailable or give mixed results.
Diastolic dysfunction diagnosis (Figure 2)
Diagnosis requires: an index of LV relaxation (e') + markers of LA/LV remodeling and elevated LAP.
Step 1 — LV relaxation (e' velocity)
Step 2 — LAP/remodeling markers
Special population assessment
Atrial fibrillation — LAP estimation
Use average values from several representative cardiac cycles at the average heart rate.
Moderate/severe MAC — LAP estimation (Figure 4)
Pulmonary hypertension — LAP estimation (Figure 6)
Use lateral E/e' (not average) in PH — septal flattening may affect septal velocities.
Restrictive cardiomyopathy — severity grading
HCM — diastolic function assessment
Constriction vs. restriction differentiation (Figure 7)
Heart transplant recipients — LAP estimation (Figure 5)
Mitral regurgitation — filling pressure markers
HFpEF diagnosis — stepwise algorithm (Figure 9)
Requires: symptoms/signs of HF + LVEF ≥ 50% + exclusion of other cardiac/non-cardiac causes.
Clinical prerequisites
Echocardiographic findings
Natriuretic peptides
H2FPEF score calculator
Validated score (0–9) for patients with unexplained dyspnea. Developed from invasive exercise hemodynamic testing in 414 patients (Reddy et al., Circulation 2018).
0
H2FPEF score (out of 9)
Score 0 — Low probability
H2FPEF score 0–1: HFpEF unlikely. Consider non-cardiac causes of dyspnea.
Normal reference ranges by age (Table 5)
Fifth–95th percentile limits from population-based studies in subjects free of cardiovascular disease or risk factors. Normal ranges are not necessarily equivalent to "optimal" values.
Mitral annular e' cutoffs for impaired LV relaxation (Table 6)
| Age | Septal e' (cm/s) | Lateral e' (cm/s) | Average e' (cm/s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20–39 y | < 7 | < 10 | < 9 |
| 40–65 y | < 6 | < 8 | < 7 |
| > 65 y | < 6 | < 7 | < 6.5 |
Invasive criteria for diastolic dysfunction / HFpEF (Table 1)
| Parameter | Abnormal value |
|---|---|
| Time constant of LV relaxation (τ), ms | > 48 |
| LV chamber stiffness constant | > 0.015 |
| Rest mean PCWP, mmHg | > 15 |
| Rest LVEDP, mmHg | > 16 |
| Exercise mean PCWP, mmHg | ≥ 25 |
| Exercise LVEDP, mmHg | ≥ 23 |
| PCWP/CO slope during supine exercise, mmHg·L⁻¹·min | > 2 |
Based on: Nagueh et al. ASE 2025 guidelines, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2025;38:537–69. For clinical use by qualified practitioners only. Not a substitute for professional medical judgment.