Research
Study Design
Outcomes
Community Functioning. The Social Adjustment Scale (SAS-II) distinguishes adjustment in different roles (e.g., work, school), social and leisure activities, intimaterelationships, and overall adjustment. It has been validated with patient self-reports of social and community functioning.
Quality of Life. Heinrich's Quality of Life Scale is an interview-based measure with 21 questions about social functioning, role functioning, and motivation. Specific questions ask about sense of purpose, curiosity, inner drive, and related issues.
Neuropsychological Assessment. The National Institutes of Health NIH Toolbox provides measures in 6 test domains: Auditory Verbal Learning Test, List Sorting Working Memory, 9-Hole Pegboard Dexterity (motor), Pattern Comparison Processing Speed and Oral Digit Symbol Test (Speed of Processing), Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention, Dimensional Change Card (executive functioning/reasoning & problem-solving).
Social Cognition and Skills. The Managing Emotions subscale of the Meyer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) is sensitive to treatment-related change in social cognition and social functioning in schizophrenia. Social skills are assessed with the Social Skills Performance Assessment (SSPA), a role play test that is administered by local RAs and audio-recorded, and then rated for different dimensions of social skill by blinded raters at MMHC. A short, validated version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6, 6 items) is used to assess symptoms at each interview.
Qualitative Interviews
Two randomly selected treatment participants are selected from each treatment group during month-2 of treatment delivery at each site for a qualitative interview. The interview uses an open-ended interview schedule designed to elicit information about the treatment experience and reactions to the treatment program. This process is repeated using a similar open-ended interview schedule for two randomly selected participants from each treatment group in the 11th month of their treatment.
Engagement Data
Treatment Fidelity. Ten group sessions audiotaped at each site in the first year, with 6 sessions in the first three months used for feedback and training and 4 at random intervals after that. In year 2, six sessions are audiotaped at random intervals (although sites that are still delivering treatments in the third year will have these 6 audiotaped sessions distributed across years 2 and 3). The year 1 fidelity process involving ten audiotaped sessions will be repeated if a treating clinician is replaced during the project.
Treatment Engagement. Treating clinicians at each site maintain records of sessions delivered, patient attendance, and session highlights. These records also include participation in all individual and group sessions (CET, SST), homework completion (CET, SST), lunches (SST), community trips (SST), and makeup sessions (CET, SST). The site PIs maintain these records and submit them to the project research team each quarter.
Treatment Experience. Each treating clinician is interviewed annually to identify treatment difficulties and reactions to the treatment experience.
Client Satisfaction. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) is sent by email to each treatment participant each month.
Service Utilization. The Service Use and Resource Form (SURF-A) is completed by participants during each assessment session. These data are used to provide a comprehensive record of patient participation in other types of health services, both at the treatment site and at other venues.
Participant Characteristics
Participant characteristics assessed at baseline include age, gender, race and ethnicity, diagnosis, prior service use, family status, and living situation.
Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholders are people with an interest in the project. Many stakeholders are people with lived experience of serious mental illness. Some stakeholders work in mental health services.
A project Stakeholder Committee meets quarterly each year during the project and may respond to emailed questions. Some committee members participate in a working group that reviews project findings and provides input on project articles.
Stakeholders provide feedback about project operations and suggest improvements in project procedures. Stakeholders also suggest implications of findings for programs and policies.