Publications

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Medical errors can result in significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of our study is to evaluate correlation between shift volume and errors made by attending neuroradiologists at an academic medical center, using a large data set.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT and MRI reports from our Neuroradiology Quality Assurance database (years 2014 - 2020) were searched for attending physician errors. Data were collected on shift volume, category of missed findings, error type, interpretation setting, exam type, clinical significance.

RESULTS: 654 reports contained diagnostic error. There was a significant difference between mean volume of interpreted studies on shifts when an error was made compared with shifts in which no error was documented (46.58 (SD=22.37) vs 34.09 (SD=18.60), p<0.00001); and between shifts when perceptual error was made compared with shifts when interpretive errors were made (49.50 (SD=21.9) vs 43.26 (SD=21.75), p=0.0094). 59.6% of errors occurred in the emergency/inpatient setting, 84% were perceptual and 91.1% clinically significant. Categorical distribution of errors was: vascular 25.8%, brain 23.4%, skull base 13.8%, spine 12.4%, head/neck 11.3%, fractures 10.2%, other 3.1%. Errors were detected most often on brain MRI (25.4%), head CT (18.7%), head/neck CTA (13.8%), spine MRI (13.7%).

CONCLUSION: Errors were associated with higher volume shifts, were primarily perceptual and clinically significant. We need National guidelines establishing a range of what is a safe number of interpreted cross-sectional studies per day.

Background: Secondary upper extremity lymphedema occurs after an insult such as surgery. One theory suggests underlying lymphatic dysfunction predisposing certain patients into developing secondary lymphedema. We aim to determine the rate of incidental edema in the contralateral upper extremity of patients with secondary unilateral lymphedema. Methods and Results: MRI of the upper extremities were obtained in patients with lymphedema who were referred by a lymphedema clinic from 2017 to 2019. Axial short-tau inversion recovery MR images of the symptomatic and contralateral arms were retrospectively reviewed and edema severity was graded. Interobserver agreement was calculated. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography was compared against MRI stage in symptomatic and contralateral. Age, symptom duration, body mass index (BMI), and history of chemotherapy were compared between patients with and without contralateral limb lymphedema. ICG severity was compared against MRI stage. Seventy-eight patients were analyzed. The MRI stages of symptomatic versus contralateral arms were 1.7 ± 1.1 versus 0.1 ± 0.4 (p < 0.00001). Interobserver agreement was 0.86 (0.79-0.94). Of the patients with MRI Stage 1 or above in the symptomatic arm (n = 64), 55 (82.1%) patients demonstrated no abnormality in the contralateral arm. Nine patients (14.1%) demonstrated asymptomatic edema (MRI Stage 1). The mean ICG lymphography stage of symptomatic versus contralateral arms was 1.83 ± 0.96 versus 0.04 ± 0.25 (p < 0.00001). There was no difference in the age, symptom duration, BMI, or history of chemotherapy between patients with or without edema in the contralateral arm. Conclusion: Asymptomatic contralateral edema was detected in 14.1% of patients with unilateral secondary upper extremity lymphedema using MRI modality.

Off-resonance radio frequency irradiation can induce the ordering of proton spins in the dipolar fields of their neighbors, in molecules with restricted mobility. This dipolar order decays with a characteristic relaxation time, T1D , that is very different from the T1 and T2 relaxation of the nuclear alignment with the main magnetic field. Inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) imaging is a refinement of magnetization transfer (MT) imaging that isolates the MT signal dependence on dipolar order relaxation times within motion-constrained molecules. Because T1D relaxation is a unique contrast mechanism, ihMT may enable improved characterization of tissue. Initial work has stressed the high correlation between ihMT signal and myelin density. Dipolar order relaxation appears to be much longer in membrane lipids than other molecules. Recent work has shown, however, that ihMT acquisitions may also be adjusted to emphasize different ranges of T1D . These newer approaches may be sensitive to other microstructural components of tissue. Here, we review the concepts and history of ihMT and outline the requirements for further development to realize its full potential.

BACKGROUND. CT guidance may be used for biopsy of indeterminate bone lesions detected by MRI or PET/CT that are not visible (i.e., occult) on CT owing to equipment-, patient-, and operator-related factors. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess diagnostic yield (DY) and diagnostic performance of CT-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) of occult nonspinal bone lesions and to identify the most common benign and malignant diagnoses for occult lesions undergoing CNB. METHODS. This retrospective study included 1033 adult patients who underwent CT-guided nonspinal bone CNB between January 2004 and December 2020. Lesions were classified as occult or visible on CT; biopsies of occult lesions were performed by targeting anatomic landmarks using prebiopsy MRI or PET/CT. Pathologic results of CNB were classified as diagnostic or nondiagnostic to calculate DY of CNB. For nondiagnostic CNBs, final diagnoses were established by subsequent pathologic, clinical, and imaging follow-up. RESULTS. The sample included 70 patients with occult lesions (mean age, 56.8 years; 38 women, 32 men) and 963 patients with visible lesions (mean age, 59.6 years; 475 women, 488 men). Malignancy rate was lower for occult than for visible lesions (42.9% vs 60.9%, p = .004). DY was lower for occult than for visible lesions (37.1% vs 76.9%, p < .001). Diagnostic performance for detecting malignancy on the basis of final diagnoses was lower for occult than for visible lesions in terms of sensitivity (76.7% vs 93.7%, p = .003), specificity (7.9% vs 56.5%, p < .001), and accuracy (38.2% vs 80.0%, p < .001). Final diagnoses among malignant occult and visible lesions included metastasis (frequencies of 63.3% vs 65.4%), leukemia/lymphoma (33.3% vs 11.6%), and myeloma (3.3% vs 10.4%); final diagnoses among benign occult and visible lesions included red marrow (34.2% vs 8.2%), reactive marrow (26.3% vs 11.8%), and fracture (18.4% vs 3.8%). Occult lesions detected by MRI versus PET/CT had lower malignancy rate (39.3% vs 68.0%, p = .03) and lower DY (30.4% vs 60.0%, p = .01). CONCLUSION. At CT-guided CNB, malignancy rate and DY are lower for occult than for visible lesions. Leukemia/lymphoma and red marrow are more common among occult than visible lesions. CLINICAL IMPACT. Understanding these characteristics can help guide radiologists', referring providers', and patients' expectations when CNB of occult bone lesions is requested and performed.

BACKGROUND. Imaging reports that consistently document all disease sites with a potential to increase surgical complexity or morbidity can facilitate ovarian cancer treatment planning. OBJECTIVE. The aims of this study were to compare simple structured reports and synoptic reports from pretreatment CT examinations in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in terms of completeness of documenting involvement of clinically relevant anatomic sites as well as to evaluate physician satisfaction with synoptic reports. METHODS. This retrospective study included 205 patients (median age, 65 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT before primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2022. A total of 128 reports generated on or before March 31, 2020, used a simple structured report (free text organized into sections); 77 reports generated on or after April 1, 2020, used a synoptic report (a list of 45 anatomic sites relevant to ovarian cancer management, each of which was classified in terms of disease absence versus presence). Reports were reviewed for completeness of documentation of involvement of the 45 sites. For patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on diagnostic laparoscopy findings or underwent primary debulking surgery with suboptimal resection, the EMR was reviewed to identify surgically established sites of disease that were unresectable or challenging to resect. Gynecologic oncology surgeons were electronically surveyed. RESULTS. The mean report turnaround time was 29.8 minutes for simple structured reports versus 54.5 minutes for synoptic reports (p < .001). A mean of 17.6 of 45 sites (range, four to 43 sites) were mentioned by simple structured reports versus 44.5 of 45 sites (range, 39-45) for synoptic reports (p < .001). Forty-three patients had surgically established unresectable or challenging-to-resect disease; involvement of anatomic site(s) with such disease was mentioned in 37% (11/30) of simple structured reports versus 100% (13/13) of synoptic reports (p < .001). All eight surveyed gynecologic oncology surgeons completed the survey. CONCLUSION. A synoptic report improved completeness of pretreatment CT reports in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, including for established sites of unresectable or challenging-to-resect disease. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings indicate the role of disease-specific synoptic reports in facilitating referrer communication and potentially guiding clinical decision-making.

PURPOSE: To develop guidelines by international experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer restaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts).

RESULTS: Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed.

CONCLUSION: These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI.

MR imaging is the modality of choice for the pre-treatment evaluation of patients with gynecologic malignancies, given its excellent soft tissue contrast and multi-planar capability. However, it is not without pitfalls. Challenges can be encountered in the assessment of the infiltration of myometrium, vagina, cervical stroma, and parametria, which are crucial prognostic factors for endometrial and cervical cancers. Other challenges can be encountered in the distinction between solid and non-solid tissue and in the identification of peritoneal carcinomatosis for the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass.