Publications

PURPOSE: After a slow and challenging transition period, peer learning and improvement (PLI) is now being more widely adopted by practices as an option for continuous personal and practice performance improvement. In addition to gaps that exist in the understanding of what PLI is and how it should be practiced, wide variation exists in how the process is implemented, administered, how outcomes are measured, and what strategies are employed to engage radiologists. This report aims to describe lessons learned from our 20-year experience with the design, implementation, and continuous improvements of a PLI program in a large academic program.

METHODS: Since initial implementation in 2004, an oversight team prospectively documented iterative process improvements and data submission trends in our PLI process. Process data included strategies for engaging radiologists in the PLI process (fostering case submission, PLI meeting participation), steps for achieving regulatory compliance, and template content for facilitating the value and impact of PLI meetings (case analysis, review of contributing factors, identification of improvement opportunities).

RESULTS: Submission trends, submitted case content, and improvement opportunities varied by clinical section. Process improvements that fostered engagement included closing the loop with participants, expanding criteria for case submission beyond interpretive disagreements (e.g., great pickups, near misses), minimizing impacts to workflow, and using evidence-based templates for case and contributor categorization, bias analysis, and identification of improvement opportunities.

CONCLUSION: Implementing an effective PLI program requires sustained communication, education, and continuous process improvement. While PLI can certainly lead to process and individual performance improvement, the program requires trained champions, designated time, effort, resources, education, and patience to be effectively implemented.

Approach to imaging ischemia in women Coronary artery disease in women tends to have a worse short- and long-term prognosis relative to men and remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Both clinical symptoms and diagnostic approach remain challenging in women due to lesser likelihood of women presenting with classic anginal symptoms on one hand and underperformance of conventional exercise treadmill testing in women on the other. Moreover, a higher proportion of women with signs and symptoms suggestive of ischemia are more likely to have nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) that requires additional imaging and therapeutic considerations. New imaging techniques such as coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, CT myocardial perfusion imaging, CT functional flow reserve assessment, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging carry substantially better sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease in women. Familiarity with various clinical subtypes of ischemic heart disease in women and with the major advantages and disadvantages of advanced imaging tests to ensure the decision to select one modality over another is one of the keys to successful diagnosis of CAD in women. This review compares the 2 major types of ischemic heart disease in women - obstructive and nonobstructive, while focusing on sex-specific elements of its pathophysiology.

BACKGROUND. Imaging reports that consistently document all disease sites with a potential to increase surgical complexity or morbidity can facilitate ovarian cancer treatment planning. OBJECTIVE. The aims of this study were to compare simple structured reports and synoptic reports from pretreatment CT examinations in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in terms of completeness of documenting involvement of clinically relevant anatomic sites as well as to evaluate physician satisfaction with synoptic reports. METHODS. This retrospective study included 205 patients (median age, 65 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT before primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2022. A total of 128 reports generated on or before March 31, 2020, used a simple structured report (free text organized into sections); 77 reports generated on or after April 1, 2020, used a synoptic report (a list of 45 anatomic sites relevant to ovarian cancer management, each of which was classified in terms of disease absence versus presence). Reports were reviewed for completeness of documentation of involvement of the 45 sites. For patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on diagnostic laparoscopy findings or underwent primary debulking surgery with suboptimal resection, the EMR was reviewed to identify surgically established sites of disease that were unresectable or challenging to resect. Gynecologic oncology surgeons were electronically surveyed. RESULTS. The mean report turnaround time was 29.8 minutes for simple structured reports versus 54.5 minutes for synoptic reports (p < .001). A mean of 17.6 of 45 sites (range, four to 43 sites) were mentioned by simple structured reports versus 44.5 of 45 sites (range, 39-45) for synoptic reports (p < .001). Forty-three patients had surgically established unresectable or challenging-to-resect disease; involvement of anatomic site(s) with such disease was mentioned in 37% (11/30) of simple structured reports versus 100% (13/13) of synoptic reports (p < .001). All eight surveyed gynecologic oncology surgeons completed the survey. CONCLUSION. A synoptic report improved completeness of pretreatment CT reports in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, including for established sites of unresectable or challenging-to-resect disease. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings indicate the role of disease-specific synoptic reports in facilitating referrer communication and potentially guiding clinical decision-making.

PURPOSE: To develop guidelines by international experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer restaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts).

RESULTS: Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed.

CONCLUSION: These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI.

MR imaging is the modality of choice for the pre-treatment evaluation of patients with gynecologic malignancies, given its excellent soft tissue contrast and multi-planar capability. However, it is not without pitfalls. Challenges can be encountered in the assessment of the infiltration of myometrium, vagina, cervical stroma, and parametria, which are crucial prognostic factors for endometrial and cervical cancers. Other challenges can be encountered in the distinction between solid and non-solid tissue and in the identification of peritoneal carcinomatosis for the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass.

The surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is often challenging. There are a variety of techniques and management options described in the literature ranging from uterine sparing to cesarean hysterectomy. Following the inaugural meeting of the Pan-American Society for Placenta Accreta Spectrum a multidisciplinary group collaborated to describe collective recommendations for the surgical management of PAS. In this manuscript, we outline individual components of the procedure and provide suggested direction at key points of a cesarean hysterectomy in the setting of PAS. KEY POINTS: · The surgical management of PAS requires careful planning and expertise.. · Multidisciplinary team care for pregnancies complicated by PAS can decrease morbidity and mortality.. · Careful surgical techniques can minimize risk of significant hemorrhage by avoiding pitfalls..

PURPOSE: Peer learning (PL) programs seek to improve upon the limitations of score-based peer review and incorporate modern approaches to improve patient care. The aim of this study was to further understand the landscape of PL among members of the ACR in the first quarter of 2022.

METHODS: Members of the ACR were surveyed to evaluate the incidence, current practices, perceptions, and outcomes of PL in radiology practice. The survey was administered via e-mail to 20,850 ACR members. The demographic and practice characteristics of the 1,153 respondents (6%) were similar to those of the ACR radiologist membership and correspond to a normal distribution of the population of radiologists and can therefore be described as representative of that population. Therefore, the error range for the results from this survey is ±2.9% at a 95% confidence level.

RESULTS: Among the total sample, 610 respondents (53%) currently use PL, and 334 (29%) do not. Users of PL are younger (mode age ranges, 45-54 years for users and 55-64 years for nonusers; P < .01), more likely to be female (29% vs 23%, P < .05), and more likely to practice in urban settings (52% vs 40%, P = .0002). Users of PL feel that it supports an improved culture of safety and wellness (543 of 610 [89%]) and fosters continuous improvement initiatives (523 of 610 [86%]). Users of PL are more likely than nonusers to identify learning opportunities from routine clinical practice (83% vs 50%, P < .00001), engage in programming inclusive of more team members, and implement more practice improvement projects (P < .00001). PL users' net promoter score of 65% strongly suggests that users of PL are highly likely to recommend the program to colleagues.

CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists across a breadth of radiology practices are engaged in PL activities, which are perceived to align with emerging principles of improving health care and enhance culture, quality, and engagement.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States and Europe, with an increasing incidence rate in high-income countries. MR imaging is recommended for treatment planning because it provides critical information on the extent of myometrial and cervical invasion, extrauterine spread, and lymph node status, all of which are important in the selection of the most appropriate therapy. This article highlights the added value of imaging, focused on MR imaging, in the assessment of endometrial cancer and summarizes the role of MR imaging for endometrial cancer risk stratification and management.