Publications

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS is increasingly used to evaluate patients with liver disease, but its role in assessing hepatic steatosis has not been reported. The goal of our study was to assess the accuracy of EUS for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.

METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling at our institution. All digitally stored EUS liver images were reviewed by a single radiologist, who rated the severity of liver echogenicity using a 4-point US scale. Liver biopsy specimens for all study patients were reviewed by a single liver pathologist, who rated them for steatosis and fibrosis using Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network criteria. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EUS for hepatic steatosis for all patients and in a subgroup analysis for obese and nonobese patients.

RESULTS: During the study period, 76 patients underwent EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling. The average age of study patients was 56.5 years, 50% were women, and 43.2% were obese. The accuracy for EUS for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis was .8 (95% confidence interval [CI], .7-.89). The accuracy of EUS for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in obese patients was .93 (95% CI, .8-.99) and in nonobese patients was .69 (95% CI, .54-.83). For obese patients, EUS had a positive predictive value of 89.7% and a negative predictive value of 75%. The finding of course echotexture on EUS had an accuracy of 79% for the diagnosis of grade 3 fibrosis or cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS: EUS is a useful tool for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, particularly in obese patients in whom abdominal US has modest accuracy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal cord compression (SCC) requires rapid diagnosis in the emergent setting; however, current MRI protocols may be cumbersome for patients and clinicians. We sought to validate an abbreviated total spine MRI (TS-MRI) protocol using standard non-contrast sequences in the detection of SCC and other clinically significant findings (OCSF).

METHODS: Two hundred six TS-MRI scans obtained over a 30-month period for SCC were included. Sagittal T2 (T2sag), sagittal T1 (T1sag), and sagittal STIR (IRsag), as well as axial T2 (T2ax) images, were individually assessed independently by 2 reviewers for SCC, cauda equina compression (CEC), and OCSF. A protocol consisting of all the sequences was considered the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity of single and combined MRI sequences for SCC/CEC and OCSF were determined and were tested for noninferiority relative to standard non-contrast sequences using a 5% noninferiority margin.

RESULTS: An abbreviated protocol of IRsag + T2ax provided the best performance with sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95%CI, 96.0-100.0) and 98.6% (95%CI, 95.6-99.7) for SCC/CEC and 100.0% (95%CI, 96.7-100.0), and 99.3% (95%CI, 96.6-99.9) for OCSF. The mean difference of sensitivity and specificity between IRsag + T2ax and standard protocol was 0.0% (95%CI, 0.0-4.0) and - 2.1% (95%CI, - 5.4 to - 0.6) for SCC/CEC and 0.0% (95%CI, 0.0-3.3) and - 1.5% (95%CI, - 4.8 to - 0.3) for OCSF, all within the noninferiority margin of 5%.

CONCLUSIONS: An abbreviated TS-MRI protocol of IRsag + T2ax is noninferior to the standard non-contrast protocol, potentially allowing for faster emergent imaging diagnosis and triage.

PURPOSE: As men age, the prostate continues to grow on average 2.5% per year. While the variable growth rate of the total prostate gland is recognized, the growth rate of different prostate zones remains largely unclear. We evaluated the growth patterns of the prostate zones and identified clinical parameters contributing to the zonal growth rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and clinical information were obtained retrospectively on 156 patients who had at least 3 prostate MRIs between 2003 and 2018. Different prostate zonal volumes were measured and analyzed. The outcome was analyzed using linear regression.

RESULTS: We observed that prostate growth rates vary depending on body mass index (BMI), transition zone index (TZI), the prostate zone and 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5ARI) use. The peripheral zone volume growth rates increased with age and peaked at 60-70 years of age (p=0.047), while the transition zone volume demonstrates continuous growth without a peak through all ages. BMI and TZI are associated with the growth rate of the peripheral zone (p=0.026, p <0.001, respectively) but not the transition zone growth rate. 5ARI use is significantly associated with the reduction in the transition zone growth rate (p=0.033), not the peripheral zone. In addition, patients with TZI greater than 60% had the most significant reduction in the transition zone growth rate while taking 5ARI (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Transition and peripheral zones of the prostate grow at variable rates. BMI and TZI affect peripheral zone growth rate, while 5ARI use reduces the transition zone growth rate.

BACKGROUND. Heart failure (HF) is an uncommon complication after TIPS placement; its development represents a poor prognostic factor. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the frequency, risk factors, and association with survival of HF developing within 90 days after TIPS placement in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included patients with cirrhosis who underwent nonemergent covered-stent TIPS placement from June 2003 to December 2018 and who underwent echocardiography within 2 months before TIPS placement and had at least 90 days of post-TIPS follow-up. Development of HF within 90 days after TIPS was recorded. Frequency of TIPS reduction for post-TIPS HF was determined. Univariable logistic regression analysis and ROC curve analysis were performed to assess potential risk factors for post-TIPS HF. Association of post-TIPS HF and 1-year survival was assessed by the log rank test. RESULTS. The study sample included 107 patients (71 men and 36 women; median age, 58 years). Post-TIPS HF developed in 11 of 107 (10%) patients; median time to development of HF was 16 days (range, 2-62 days). Of these 11 patients, three (27%) required TIPS reduction to achieve resolution of HF symptoms after unsuccessful diuretic therapy. Pre-TIPS right atrium size (odds ratio [OR], 3.26 [95% CI, 1.22-10.16]; p = .03], left ventricle (LV) end-systolic dimension (OR, 5.43 [95% CI, 1.44-24.50], p = .02), LV end-diastolic dimension (OR, 4.12 [95% CI, 1.51-13.47]; p = .009), and estimated peak pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.12-1.50]; p = .001) were associated with post-TIPS HF. AUC of right atrium size, LV end-systolic dimension, LV end-diastolic dimension, and estimated peak PASP for development of post-TIPS HF were 0.71, 0.74, 0.72, and 0.83, respectively. At a cutoff of 31 mm Hg, PASP achieved sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 86% for post-TIPS HF. Patients with post-TIPS HF and those without post-TIPS HF had 1-year survival of 46% versus 73% (p = .06). CONCLUSION. Multiple pre-TIPS echocardiographic variables predict the development of post-TIPS HF in patients with cirrhosis. CLINICAL IMPACT. Preprocedural echocardiography may guide risk stratification in patients with cirrhosis being considered for TIPS placement.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Boston Puerto Rican Health Study (BPRHS) is a longitudinal study following self-identified Puerto Rican older adults living in the Greater Boston area. Studies have shown higher prevalence of hypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) within this ethnic group compared to age-matched non-Hispanic White adults. In this study, we investigated the associations of HTN and T2D comorbidity on brain structural integrity and cognitive capacity in community-dwelling Puerto Rican adults and compared these measures with older adult participants (non-Hispanic White and Hispanic) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) databases.

METHODS: BPRHS participants who underwent brain MRI and cognitive testing were divided into 4 groups based on their HTN and T2D status: HTN-/T2D-, HTN+/T2D-, HTN-/T2D+, and HTN+/T2D+. We assessed microstructural integrity of white matter (WM) pathways using diffusion MRI, brain macrostructural integrity using hippocampal volumes, and brain age using T1-weighted MRI and cognitive test scores. BPRHS results were then compared with results from non-Hispanic White and Hispanic participants from the ADNI and NACC databases.

RESULTS: The prevalence of HTN was almost 2 times (66.7% vs 38.7%) and of T2D was 5 times (31.8% vs 6.6.%) higher in BPRHS than in ADNI non-Hispanic White participants. Diffusion MRI showed clear deterioration patterns in major WM tracts in the HTN+/T2D+ group and, to a lesser extent, in the HTN+/T2D- group compared to the HTN-/T2D- group. HTN+/T2D+ participants also had the smallest hippocampal volume and larger brain aging deviations. Trends toward lower executive function and global cognitive scores were observed in HTN+/T2D+ relative to HTN-/T2D- individuals. MRI measures and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores from the HTN+/T2D+ BPRHS group resembled those of ADNI White participants with progressive mild cognitive impairment (MCI), while the BPRHS HTN-/T2D- participants resembled participants with stable MCI. The BPRHS was not significantly different from the ADNI + NACC Hispanic cohort on imaging or MMSE measures.

DISCUSSION: The effects of T2D and HTN comorbidity led to greater brain structural disruptions than HTN alone. The high prevalence of HTN and T2D in the Puerto Rican population may be a key factor contributing to health disparities in cognitive impairment in this group compared to non-Hispanic White adults in the same age range.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01231958.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (HP-13C MRSI) for quantitative measurement of early changes in glycolytic metabolism and its ability to predict response to pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Pan-TKI) therapy in gastric cancer (GCa).

PROCEDURES: Pan-TKI afatinib-sensitive NCI-N87 and resistant SNU16 human GCa cells were assessed for GLUT1, hexokinase-II (HKII), lactate dehydrogenase (LDHA), phosphorylated AKT (pAKT), and phosphorylated MAPK (pMAPK) at 0-72 h of treatment with 0.1 μM afatinib. Subcutaneous NCI-N87 tumor-bearing nude mice underwent [18F]FDG PET/MRI and HP-13C MRSI at baseline and 4 days after treatment with afatinib 10 mg/kg/day or vehicle (n = 10/group). Changes in PET and HP-13C MRSI metabolic parameters were compared between the two groups. Imaging findings were correlated with tumor growth and histopathology over 3 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS: In vitro analysis showed a continuous decrease in LDHA, pAKT, and pMAPK in NCI-N87 compared to SNU16 cells within 72 h of treatment with afatinib, without a significant change in GLUT1 and HKII in either cell type. [18F]FDG PET of NCI-N87 tumors showed no significant change in PET measures at baseline and day 4 of treatment in either treatment group (SUVmean day 4/day 0: 2.7 ± 0.42/2.34 ± 0.38, p = 0.57 in the treated group vs. 1.73 ± 0.66/2.24 ± 0.43, p = 0.4 in the control group). HP-13C MRSI demonstrated significantly decreased lactate-to-pyruvate ratio (L/P) in treated tumors (L/P day 4/day 0: 0.83 ± 0.30/1.10 ± 0.20, p = 0.012 vs. 0.94 ± 0.20/0.98 ± 0.30, p = 0.75, in the treated vs. control group, respectively). Response to afatinib was confirmed with decreased tumor size over 3 weeks (11.10 ± 16.50 vs. 293.00 ± 79.30 mm3, p < 0.001, treated group vs. control group, respectively) and histopathologic evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS: HP-13C MRSI is a more representative biomarker of early metabolic changes in response to pan-TKI in GCa than [18F]FDG PET and could be used for early prediction of response to targeted therapies.

Liver imaging plays a vital role in the management of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, progress in the field is challenged by nonuniform and inconsistent terminology in the published literature. The Steering Committee of the American College of Radiology (ACR)'s Liver Imaging Reporting And Data System (LI-RADS), in conjunction with the LI-RADS Lexicon Writing Group and the LI-RADS International Working Group, present this consensus document to establish a single universal liver imaging lexicon. The lexicon is intended for use in research, education, and clinical care of patients at risk for HCC (i.e., the LI-RADS population) and in the general population (i.e., even when LI-RADS algorithms are not applicable). We anticipate that the universal adoption of this lexicon will provide research, educational, and clinical benefits. KEY POINTS: •To standardize terminology, we encourage authors of research and educational materials on liver imaging to use the standardized LI-RADS Lexicon. •We encourage reviewers to promote the use of the standardized LI-RADS Lexicon for publications on liver imaging. •We encourage radiologists to use the standardized LI-RADS Lexicon for liver imaging in clinical care.

PURPOSE: The current undergraduate radiology education predominantly integrates radiology with other disciplines during preclerkship years and is often taught by nonradiologists. Early exposure to radiology and profound understanding of scientific fundamentals of imaging modalities and techniques are essential for a better understanding and interest in the specialty. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic-related impact on in-person medical education aggravated the need for alternative virtual teaching initiatives to provide essential knowledge to medical students.

METHODS: The authors designed an online 7-session course on the principles of imaging modalities for medical students and fresh graduates in the United States and abroad. The course was delivered online and taught by radiologists from different US institutions. Pretests and posttests were delivered before and after each session, respectively, to assess change in knowledge. At the end of the course, a survey was distributed among students to collect their assessment and feedback.

RESULTS: A total of 162 students and interns initially enrolled in the program by completing a sign-up interest form. An average of 65 participants attended each live session, with the highest attendance being 93 live attendees. An average of 44 attendees completed both the pretest and posttest for each session. There was a statistically significant increase in posttest scores compared with pretest scores ( P < 0.01) for each session; on average, the posttest scores were 48% higher than the pretest scores. A total of 84 participants answered the end-of-course survey. A total of 11% of the respondents described themselves as first year, 17% as second year, 18% as third year, 21% as fourth year, and 33% as "other." Attendees were enrolled in medical schools across 21 different countries with 35% of the respondents studying medicine in the United States. More than 76% of the respondents stated that they "strongly agree" that the program increased their understanding of radiology, increased their interest in radiology, and would be useful in their clinical practice in the future. Eighty-three percent of the respondents stated that they "strongly agree" that "this course was a worthwhile experience." Particularly, more than 84% of the respondents stated that among the most important components in enhancing their understanding of radiology were "the interpretation of normal imaging" and "interpretation of clinical cases." Ninety-two percent of the respondents stated that "the amount of effort to complete the requirements for this program was just right." Participants were also asked to rate each of the 8 sessions using the following scale: poor = 1 point, fair = 2, good = 3, and excellent = 4. The average rating for all 8 sessions was 3.61 points (SD = 0.55), which translates to 96% of the sessions being rated good or excellent. Eighty percent of the participants reported that the topics presented in the program were "excellent and clinically important to learn," and 20% of the participants reported that the topics presented were "good and somewhat important to learn." The participants were asked to evaluate their confidence regarding basic radiology skills before and after the program using the following scale: not confident at all = 1 point, somewhat confident = 2, moderately confident = 3, and very confident = 4. Figure 2 summarizes the responses of the participants.

CONCLUSIONS: An online course to teach the fundamentals of imaging modalities could be delivered through a webinar format to medical students and interns in several countries to address the potential gaps in radiology education, therefore increasing their understanding of the different imaging modalities and their proper use in medicine.