Publications

Imaging of mesothelioma plays a role in all aspects of patient management, including disease detection, staging, evaluation of treatment options, response assessment, pre-surgical evaluation, and surveillance. Imaging in this disease impacts a wide range of disciplines throughout the healthcare enterprise. Researchers and clinician-scientists are developing state-of-the-art techniques to extract more of the information contained within these medical images and to utilize it for more sophisticated tasks; moreover, image-acquisition technology is advancing the inherent capabilities of these images. This paper summarizes the imaging-based topics presented orally at the 2021 International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig), which was held virtually from May 7-9, 2021. These topics include an update on the mesothelioma staging system, novel molecular targets to guide therapy in mesothelioma, special considerations and potential pitfalls in imaging mesothelioma in the immunotherapy setting, tumor measurement strategies and their correlation with patient survival, tumor volume measurement in MRI and CT, CT-based texture analysis for differentiation of histologic subtype, diffusion-weighted MRI for the assessment of biphasic mesothelioma, and the prognostic significance of skeletal muscle loss with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate breast radiologists' practices related to recording sex and gender in the electronic medical record, knowledge and attitudes about breast cancer screening recommendations for transgender individuals, and experience and willingness to enter screening mammography data from transgender patients into databases that document service provision and outcomes of cancer detection protocols.

METHODS: A 19-question anonymous survey was distributed by e-mail to all active physician members of the Society of Breast Imaging. Response characteristics were assessed as frequencies and percentages and compared between groups using the Fisher exact test or χ2 test. The degree of agreement between questions was assessed using the McNemar test.

RESULTS: Four hundred one radiologists across the United States and Canada responded (response rate 18%). Recording birth-assigned sex distinct from gender identity was reported by 44 of 352 respondents (13%). Depending on geographic region, 38% to 62% of breast radiologists followed screening guidelines for transgender women, and 226 of 349 (65%) did not provide screening recommendations for transgender men. Of 400, 324 (81%) believed that the evidence base for screening transgender individuals is incomplete, and 247 of 352 (70%) were either unsure of or had no Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer competency training. A majority (247 of 401 [62%]) of respondents reported that they would enroll transgender patients in existing or novel national databases.

CONCLUSIONS: In the practice of breast imaging, there is a substantial need to record transgender and other gender-nonconforming information. Breast radiologists differ in their practice and knowledge regarding screening of transgender women and men but expressed interest in contributing data to facilitate longitudinal databases needed to inform cancer screening guidelines.

PURPOSE: This study sought to define gender-related differences in attitudes, perceptions, and aspirations among trainees interested in interventional radiology (IR) and to analyze their experiences in research and mentorship.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among the members of the Society of Interventional Radiology Resident, Fellow, and Student section and Medical Student section in the summer of 2020. The anonymous, internally validated 27-item survey assessed demographics, research attitudes and experiences, mentorship, and career aspirations. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Fisher exact analyses and Student t-tests. The institutional review board approved the protocols for this study.

RESULTS: Of 105 respondents who indicated their gender, 30% were women and 70% were men. Although both genders reported similar levels of research experience, female trainees were less likely to feel valued and encouraged by their institution to engage in research (2.79 out of 4 vs 3.16 out of 4, P = .02) and were less likely to indicate that their program required them to participate in research (2.47 vs 3.06, P = .01). Female residents and fellows reported more difficulty in finding a mentor (2.88 vs 3.28, P = .04) and received less mentorship relating to IR education (29% vs 64%, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS: This work provides a perspective on the perceived obstacles faced by female trainees in pursuing research and finding effective mentorship in the field of IR. These data may guide future interventions to boost interest and engagement in IR research and residency programs in a way that promotes gender diversity and equity in the field.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether there is an association between β-globin (HBB) pathogenic variants and fetal fraction (FF), and whether the association has a clinically relevant impact on non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).

METHOD: A whole-genome sequencing NIPS laboratory database was retrospectively queried for women who underwent NIPS and carrier screening of both HBB and the α-globin genes (HBA1/HBA2). Women affected with either condition were excluded from the study, yielding a cohort size of 15,853. A "corrected FF" was obtained via multivariable linear regression adjusted for the systematic impacts of maternal age, gestational age and BMI. Corrected FF distributions of HBB and HBA1/HBA2 carriers were each compared to non-carriers using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

RESULTS: In this cohort, 291 women were carriers for HBB alone, and 1016 were carriers for HBA1/HBA2 alone. The HBB carriers had a lower corrected FF when compared to non-carriers (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in corrected FF among carriers and non-carriers of HBA1/HBA2.

CONCLUSION: Carriers of pathogenic variants in the HBB gene, but not the HBA1/HBA2 genes, are more likely to have lower FF when compared to women with structurally normal hemoglobin. This decrease in FF could result in an elevated test-failure rate if FF thresholds were used.

BACKGROUND. Heart failure (HF) is an uncommon complication after TIPS placement; its development represents a poor prognostic factor. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the frequency, risk factors, and association with survival of HF developing within 90 days after TIPS placement in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included patients with cirrhosis who underwent nonemergent covered-stent TIPS placement from June 2003 to December 2018 and who underwent echocardiography within 2 months before TIPS placement and had at least 90 days of post-TIPS follow-up. Development of HF within 90 days after TIPS was recorded. Frequency of TIPS reduction for post-TIPS HF was determined. Univariable logistic regression analysis and ROC curve analysis were performed to assess potential risk factors for post-TIPS HF. Association of post-TIPS HF and 1-year survival was assessed by the log rank test. RESULTS. The study sample included 107 patients (71 men and 36 women; median age, 58 years). Post-TIPS HF developed in 11 of 107 (10%) patients; median time to development of HF was 16 days (range, 2-62 days). Of these 11 patients, three (27%) required TIPS reduction to achieve resolution of HF symptoms after unsuccessful diuretic therapy. Pre-TIPS right atrium size (odds ratio [OR], 3.26 [95% CI, 1.22-10.16]; p = .03], left ventricle (LV) end-systolic dimension (OR, 5.43 [95% CI, 1.44-24.50], p = .02), LV end-diastolic dimension (OR, 4.12 [95% CI, 1.51-13.47]; p = .009), and estimated peak pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.12-1.50]; p = .001) were associated with post-TIPS HF. AUC of right atrium size, LV end-systolic dimension, LV end-diastolic dimension, and estimated peak PASP for development of post-TIPS HF were 0.71, 0.74, 0.72, and 0.83, respectively. At a cutoff of 31 mm Hg, PASP achieved sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 86% for post-TIPS HF. Patients with post-TIPS HF and those without post-TIPS HF had 1-year survival of 46% versus 73% (p = .06). CONCLUSION. Multiple pre-TIPS echocardiographic variables predict the development of post-TIPS HF in patients with cirrhosis. CLINICAL IMPACT. Preprocedural echocardiography may guide risk stratification in patients with cirrhosis being considered for TIPS placement.

Graduate medical education is predominantly based on a time-based apprenticeship model, with implied acquisition of proficiency after a pre-set amount of clinical exposure. While motion metrics have been used previously to measure skill performance indicators, these assessments have largely been performed on a summative scale to describe the performance of complete tasks or procedures. By segmenting performances of interest and assessing the essential elements individually, a more comprehensive understanding of the aspects in need of improvement for a learner can be obtained. The purpose of this review is to discuss technologies applicable to motion tracking, their benefits and limitations, approaches to data processing, and potential applications based on recent improvements in this technology. Objective analysis of motion metrics may improve educational standards of learning and efficiency by both standardizing the feedback process for trainees and reducing the volume of instructors required to facilitate practice sessions. With rigorous validation and standardization, motion metric assessment may also prove useful to demonstrate competency in technical procedures as part of a comprehensive certification process.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of 1) CT-derived bone lesion quality (classification of vertebral bone metastases [BM]) and 2) computed CT-measured volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) for evaluating the strength and stiffness of cadaver vertebrae from donors with metastatic spinal disease.

METHODS: Forty-five thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were obtained from cadaver spines of 11 donors with breast, esophageal, kidney, lung, or prostate cancer. Each vertebra was imaged using microCT (21.4 μm), vBMD, and bone volume to total volume were computed, and compressive strength and stiffness experimentally measured. The microCT images were reconstructed at 1-mm voxel size to simulate axial and sagittal clinical CT images. Five expert clinicians blindly classified the images according to bone lesion quality (osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed, or healthy). Fleiss' kappa test was used to test agreement among 5 clinical raters for classifying bone lesion quality. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to test the difference in vertebral strength and stiffness based on bone lesion quality. Multivariable regression analysis was used to test the independent contribution of bone lesion quality, computed vBMD, age, gender, and race for predicting vertebral strength and stiffness.

RESULTS: A low interrater agreement was found for bone lesion quality (κ = 0.19). Although the osteoblastic vertebrae showed significantly higher strength than osteolytic vertebrae (p = 0.0148), the multivariable analysis showed that bone lesion quality explained 19% of the variability in vertebral strength and 13% in vertebral stiffness. The computed vBMD explained 75% of vertebral strength (p < 0.0001) and 48% of stiffness (p < 0.0001) variability. The type of BM affected vBMD-based estimates of vertebral strength, explaining 75% of strength variability in osteoblastic vertebrae (R2 = 0.75, p < 0.0001) but only 41% in vertebrae with mixed bone metastasis (R2 = 0.41, p = 0.0168), and 39% in osteolytic vertebrae (R2 = 0.39, p = 0.0381). For vertebral stiffness, vBMD was only associated with that of osteoblastic vertebrae (R2 = 0.44, p = 0.0024). Age and race inconsistently affected the model's strength and stiffness predictions.

CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic vertebral fracture occurs when the metastatic lesion degrades vertebral strength, rendering it unable to carry daily loads. This study demonstrated the limitation of qualitative clinical classification of bone lesion quality for predicting pathologic vertebral strength and stiffness. Computed CT-derived vBMD more reliably estimated vertebral strength and stiffness. Replacing the qualitative clinical classification with computed vBMD estimates may improve the prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Our purpose is to understand patient preferences towards contrast-enhanced imaging such as CEM or MRI for breast cancer screening.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous survey was offered to all patients having screening mammography at a single academic institution from December 27 th 2019 to March 6 th 2020. Survey questions related to: (1) patients' background experiences (2) patients' concern for aspects of MRI and CEM measured using a 5-point Likert scale, and (3) financial considerations.

RESULTS: 75% (1011/1349) patients completed the survey. 53.0% reported dense breasts and of those, 47.6% had additional screening. 49.6% had experienced a callback, 29.0% had a benign biopsy, and 13.7% had prior CEM/MRI. 34.7% were satisfied with mammography for screening. A majority were neutral or not concerned with radiation exposure, contrast allergy, IV line placement, claustrophobia, and false positive exams. 54.7% were willing to pay at least $250-500 for screening MRI. Those reporting dense breasts were less satisfied with mammography for screening (p<0.001) and willing to pay more for MRI (p<0.001). If patients had prior CEM/MRI, there was less concern for an allergic reaction (p<0.001), IV placement (p=0.025), and claustrophobia (p=0.006). There was less concern for false positives if they had a prior benign biopsy (p=0.029) or prior CEM/MRI (p=0.005) and less concern for IV placement if they had dense breasts (p=0.007) or a previous callback (p=0.013).

CONCLUSION: The screening population may accept CEM or MRI as a screening exam despite its risks and cost, especially patients with dense breasts and patients who have had prior CEM/MRI.