Publications

OBJECTIVES: The study authors hypothesized that a combination of previously used (path length, translational motions, and time) and novel (rotational sum) motion metrics could be used to analyze learning curves of anesthesiology interns (postgraduate year 1) practicing central venous catheter placement in the simulation setting. They also explored the feasibility of using segmented motion recordings to inform deliberate practice.

DESIGN: A prospective cohort study.

SETTING: A single academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Anesthesiology interns (postgraduate year 1).

INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesiology interns underwent a 2-day training course in which they performed 9 central venous catheter placements, while attached to motion sensors on the dorsum of their dominant hand and ultrasound probe.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Motion metrics were analyzed using generalized estimating equations for both the overall procedure and predefined segments. Five attending anesthesiologists performed 3 trials each for comparison. Overall, there was a negative trend in path length, translational motions, rotational sum, and time (p < 0.001), with the exception of translational motions of the ultrasound probe. Interns reached within 1 standard deviation of the attending anesthesiologists by trials 7-to-8 for most metrics. Segmentation identified specific components of the procedure that were either significantly improved upon or required deliberate practice. The novel metric of rotational sum exhibited a moderate-to-strong positive correlation with other metrics (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive series of motion metrics was able to describe the learning curves of novices training to perform central venous catheter placement in the simulation setting. Furthermore, it was determined that segmentation may provide additional insight into skill acquisition and inform deliberate practice.

BACKGROUND: Routine management after abscess drainage includes CT or fluoroscopic imaging to assess for residual abscess cavity prior to catheter removal. It is unclear whether this practice is necessary in patients without residual infection signs and symptoms.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety of abscess catheter removal without follow-up imaging in patients without residual clinical or laboratory signs of infection and catheter output < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant, retrospective study, consecutive patients that underwent percutaneous CT-guided drainage of a single abdominal or pelvic abscess between 01/2015 and 12/2017 in a single tertiary academic institution with or without follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal were included. In our institution, catheters are routinely removed without imaging if there are no clinical (fever, pain) or laboratory (elevated WBC count) signs of infection and catheter output is < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days. Patients' and abscess's characteristics, repeat imaging data, and need for re-interventions were obtained through medical records review. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test for independent data and Student's t-test for comparison of group means.

RESULTS: 310 consecutive patients (age 56 ± 16 years, 48% female) were included in the study. In 265/310 (85%) patients, no routine follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal was obtained. In 2/265 (0.8%, 95% CI 0.02-0.27%) patients without routine pre-removal imaging, repeat abscess drainage was required 6 and 15 days after catheter removal in patient with perforated appendicitis and after laparoscopic renal cyst decortication, respectively. No patients, 0/45 (0%, 95% CI 0-0.07), that underwent routine imaging without clinical or laboratory signs infection needed to undergo a repeat abscess drainage.

CONCLUSION: There is a low rate (0.8%) of abscess recurrence if percutaneous abscess catheter is removed at the time cessation of drainage without routine imaging in clinically well patient.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-user mouse control over images (Collaborate), and the telephone. Our aim was to assess overall satisfaction with and perceived effectiveness of these virtual readout methods to optimize best practices for the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-exempt survey was electronically distributed to 64 trainees and 76 attendings at one tertiary-care institution via Survey Monkey. Questions focused on overall satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, technical difficulties, and continued future use of the three virtual readout strategies. Answers were collected with Likert scales, tick boxes, and open-ended questions.

RESULTS: 32/64 trainees (50%) and 32/76 attendings (42%) completed the survey. Trainees and attendings were more satisfied with screen sharing (Starleaf) and perceived it more effective than control sharing (Collaborate) or the telephone (p < 0.0001). Respondents experienced more technical difficulties with control sharing versus screen sharing (p = 0.0004) with a negative correlation between level of technical difficulties and satisfaction with screen sharing (r = -0.50, p < 0.0001) and control sharing (r = -0.38, p = 0.0006). Trainees and faculty supported a combination of in-person and virtual readouts in the future (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Platforms mirroring in-person readouts, such as Starleaf, are preferred by both trainees and attendings over non-screen sharing platforms such as the telephone. However, technical stability determines satisfaction between similar platforms. Both trainees and attendings support incorporation of virtual readout methods in combination with traditional in-person readouts in the post-COVID-19 era.

BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional (4D) CT localization allows minimally invasive parathyroidectomy as treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), but false positive localization is frequent. We sought to characterize the ability of 4D CT to predict four-gland hyperplasia (HP) based on the size of candidate lesions.

STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed patients with PHPT who underwent 4D CT imaging and parathyroidectomy between 2014 and 2020 from a prospectively collected institutional database. The cohort was stratified into two groups, HP vs single adenoma (SA) and double adenoma (DA), based on operative findings and pathology. Logistic regression models assessed the association between the greatest diameter of the dominant candidate lesion on 4D CT and the outcomes of four-gland hyperplasia vs SA and DA.

RESULTS: Among a cohort of 240 patients, 41 were found to have HP, and 199 had adenomas (SA = 155, DA = 44). Patients with HP were less likely to have a preoperative calcium level greater than 1 mg/dL above the upper limit of normal compared with patients with adenomas (63% vs 81%, p = 0.02) and more likely to report symptoms (61% vs 43%, p = 0.04). After adjusting for BMI, we found an estimated 13% reduction in odds of HP for every 1-mm increase in the greatest diameter of dominant candidate lesions identified on 4D CT scan (odds ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS: A smaller size of the dominant lesion on 4D CT scan is associated with an increased risk of HP in PHPT. Use of 4D CT imaging localization may provide evidence for differentiating HP from adenomas.

The purpose of this article is to present algorithms for the diagnostic management of solitary bone lesions incidentally encountered on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MRI) in adults. Based on review of the current literature and expert opinion, the Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards Committee of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) proposes a bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) for incidentally encountered solitary bone lesions on CT and MRI with four possible diagnostic management recommendations (Bone-RADS1, leave alone; Bone-RADS2, perform different imaging modality; Bone-RADS3, perform follow-up imaging; Bone-RADS4, biopsy and/or oncologic referral). Two algorithms for CT based on lesion density (lucent or sclerotic/mixed) and two for MRI allow the user to arrive at a specific Bone-RADS management recommendation. Representative cases are provided to illustrate the usability of the algorithms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computed tomography angiographies are frequently performed in the emergency department (ED) for the assessment of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) due to the high risk of associated morbidity, but their diagnostic utility is not fully evaluated. We assessed the radiological outcomes and clinical correlates of CTAs performed for suspected CeAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: CTAs for all indications (IndicationALL) over a 10-year period were evaluated to identify those with CeAD. A subgroup of CTAs performed for suspected CeAD (IndicationDISSECTION) was identified and further assessed for clinical findings predictive of CeAD. Magnetic resonance angiography/fat-saturated images (MRA/FSI) performed after CTA were also assessed.

RESULTS: Nine-thousand-two-hundred-four CTAs were performed by our ED for IndicationALL of which 850 (9.2%) were for IndicationDISSECTION. CeAD was noted in 1.5% (142/9204) among IndicationALL and in 6.1% (53/850) of IndicationDISSECTION CTAs. The most common radiological findings were mural thrombus and eccentric lumen. In the IndicationDISSECTION group, new headache (OR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.2-5.7) and partial Horner syndrome (OR: 14.4, 95%CI: 4.2-49.9) predicted carotid dissection and cervical fracture (OR: 5.5, 95%CI: 2.1-14.6) predicted vertebral artery dissections. MRA/FSI confirmed CeAD in all positive cases, but in 2 CTAs read as negative, MRA/FSI was positive for vertebral artery dissection.

CONCLUSION: Although the yield of CTAs for clinically suspected CeAD is low, the paucity of reliable clinical predictors, high risk of morbidity, availability in ED, and comparable performance to MRA/FSI justifies its widespread utilization for initial diagnosis of CeAD.

OBJECTIVE: We report a series of 355 consecutive patients treated over 9 years in a single institution with intended PDC.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for MPM has shifted from extra-pleural pneumonectomy to PDC with the goal of MCR.

METHODS: Clinical and outcome data were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier estimators and log rank test were used to compare the overall survival, and logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS: MCR was achieved in 304. There were 223 males, median age was 69 and histology was epithelioid in 184. The 30 and 90-day mortality were 3.0% and 4.6%.Most complications were low grade. Prolonged air leak in 141, deep venous thrombosis in 64, Atrial fibrillation in 42, chylothorax in 24, Empyema in 23, pneumonia in 21, Hemothorax in 12 and pulmonary embolus in 8. Median/5-year survival were 20.7 months/17.9% in the intent-to-treat cohort and 23.2months/21.2% in the MCR group. The survivals were best for patients with Tlstage and epithelioid histology (69.8months/54.1%). In a multivariable analysis, factors that were found to be associated with longer patient overall survival included epithelioid histology, T stage, quantitative clinical stage/tumor volume staging, adjuvant chemotherapy, intraoperative heated chemo, female sex, and length of stay shorter than 14 days.

CONCLUSIONS: PDC is feasible with low mortality and is associated with manageable complication rates. 5-year survival of patients undergoing PDC with MCR in multi-modality setting is approaching 25% depending on quantitative and clinical stage, sex and histological subtype and is better than PDC without- MCR.

PURPOSE: MRI is currently the gold standard imaging modality in the diagnosis of lumbar spine discitis/osteomyelitis. However, even with supportive clinical and laboratory data, the accuracy of MRI remains limited by several degenerative and inflammatory mimics, such that it continues to represent a challenge for radiologists. This study reports a new quantitative imaging marker of lumbar paraspinal soft tissue edema which shows significant accuracy for spondylodiscitis.

METHODS: Thirty-five patients with equivocal MRI findings of lumbar discitis/osteomyelitis vs endplate degenerative changes were reviewed over a 24-month period. Patients with a history of surgery, fractures/recent trauma, signs of advanced infection such as abscesses, phlegmon or severe osseous destruction were excluded. Two ABR board certified neuroradiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis evaluated a new marker; the superior-inferior paraspinal edema ratio (SI-PER). The SI-PER was obtained by measuring the superior-inferior extent of increased signal/edema in the paraspinal soft tissues on the paraspinal inversion recovery images divided by the vertebral body height measured at midpoint. Cases positive for spondylodiscitis were those confirmed by biopsy, aspiration/drainage, surgery, or clinical improvement following antibiotic treatment. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SI-PER were determined by Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS: In 23/35 (66%) patients, the diagnosis of discitis/osteomyelitis was confirmed. The SI-PER showed a significant association with a positive MRI diagnosis (p = 0.001). Inter-observer correlation for SI-PER was 0.92. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.84. A SI-PER of 2.5 was 96% sensitive and 75% specific for the diagnosis of discitis/osteomyelitis, with a PPV of 88% and a NPV of 90%.

CONCLUSION: In this study, the superior inferior paraspinal edema ratio (SI-PER), a newly defined MRI marker, was found to have high sensitivity for differentiating spondylodiscitis from endplate degenerative changes on lumbar spine MRI.