Publications

2020

de Margerie-Mellon, Constance, Ritu R Gill, Antonio C Monteiro Filho, Benedikt H Heidinger, Allison Onken, Paul A VanderLaan, and Alexander A Bankier. (2020) 2020. “Growth Assessment of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas Manifesting As Subsolid Nodules on CT: Comparison of Diameter-Based and Volume Measurements.”. Academic Radiology 27 (10): 1385-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.028.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the performances of diameter-based measurements, either using diameters, or by calculating diameter-based volumes, as compared to volume measurements in assessing growth of pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules on CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved, retrospective study, 74 pulmonary adenocarcinomas presenting as subsolid nodules and resected in 69 patients (21 men, 48 women, mean age 70 ± 9 years) were included. Three CTs were available for each patient. Nodule size on each CT was assessed with diameter measurements, calculated volume based on diameter measurements, and measured volume. Nodule growth was defined as an increase of measured volume ≥25% between two sequential CTs. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of diameter-based measurements for growth assessment were calculated. Nodule characteristics were compared with nonparametric tests and analysis of variance.

RESULTS: There were fewer growing nodules during CT1-CT2 interval (n = 22, 30%) than during CT2-CT3 interval (n = 33, 45%, p =.060). Specificity and negative predictive value of diameter-based measurements for growth assessment ranged respectively from 52 to 77% and 81 to 83% between CT1 and CT2, and from 66 to 76% and 79 to 90% between CT2 and CT3. Nongrowing nodules tended to be larger, regardless how size was measured, and some of these differences in size were statistically significant (p =.002 to .046).

CONCLUSION: For pulmonary adenocarcinomas presenting as subsolid nodules on CT, diameter-based assessment of nodule volume is reasonably accurate at confirming a lack of nodule growth but may overestimate actual growth, as compared to growth assessment based on measured volume.

Niu, Bonnie T, Savvas Nicolaou, Deborah Levine, Pina C Sanelli, Hani Abujudeh, Javed Siddiqi, Bruce B Forster, and Faisal Khosa. (2020) 2020. “Trends in Gender and Racial Profiles of US Academic Radiology Faculty.”. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 17 (10): 1337-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.019.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gender and racial profiles of US academic radiology faculty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the American Association of Medical College database of radiology faculty members from 2006 to 2017 by academic rank, chair position, race or ethnicity, and gender. The data were described with annual proportions and average annual counts and fit to a Poisson regression model. Comparison data were taken from American Association of Medical College on matriculants at US medical schools and from ACGME on radiology residents.

RESULTS: Women increased significantly in the ranks of professor by 4.5%, associate professor by 4.8%, and assistant professor by 4.8% (P < .05). Asian and multiple race non-Hispanic radiologists increased in the rank of professor by 5.9% and 3.1%, respectively (P < .05). Among department chairs, only women and Asian faculty increased by 6.4% and 7.5%, respectively (P < .05). The proportion of women chairs increased from 10.0% (19 of 191) in 2006 to 17.4% (39 of 224) in 2017. Black and Hispanic chairs collectively represented less than 10% of the total chairs every year.

DISCUSSION: The significant percent annual increase in women faculty in academic ranks and chair positions suggests that the radiology faculty is becoming more diverse. However, the decreasing proportion of women with increasing academic ranks within each year of the study period suggests attrition or lack of promotion of women radiology faculty. The disparity in black and Hispanic faculty members and chairs suggests that emphasis should continue to be placed on tailored recruitment.

Phillips, William W, Kathleen D Weiss, Christopher S Digesu, Ritu R Gill, Emanuele Mazzola, Hisashi Tsukada, Lana Y Schumacher, and Yolonda L Colson. (2020) 2020. “Finding the ‘True’ N0 Cohort: Technical Aspects of Near-Infrared Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.”. Annals of Surgery 272 (4): 583-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004176.

OBJECTIVE: To examine technical-, patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors associated with NIR guided SLN identification.

BACKGROUND: Missed nodal disease correlates with recurrence in early stage NSCLC. NIR-guided SLN mapping may improve staging and outcomes through identification of occult nodal disease.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 2 phase I clinical trials investigating NIR-guided SLN mapping utilizing ICG in patients with surgically resectable NSCLC.

RESULTS: In total, 66 patients underwent NIR-guided SLN mapping and lymphadenectomy after peritumoral ICG injection. There was significantly increased likelihood of SLN identification with injection dose ≥1 mg compared to <1 mg (65.2% vs 35.0%, P = 0.05), lung ventilation after injection (65.2% vs 35.0%, P = 0.05), and albumin dissolvent (68.1%) compared to fresh frozen plasma (28.6%) and sterile water (20.0%) (P = 0.01). In patients receiving the optimized ICG injection, there was significantly increased likelihood of SLN identification with radiologically solid nodules compared to sub-solid nodules (77.4% vs 33.3%, P = 0.04) and anatomic resection compared to wedge resection (88.2% vs 52.2%, P = 0.04). Disease-free and overall survival are 100% in those with a histologically negative SLN identified (n = 25) compared to 73.6% (P = 0.02) and 63.6% (P = 0.01) in patients with node negative NSCLC established via routine lymphadenectomy alone (n = 22).

CONCLUSIONS: SLN(s) are more reliably identified with ICG dose ≥1 mg, albumin dissolvent, post-injection lung ventilation, radiologically solid nodules, and anatomic resections. To date, N0 status when established via NIR SLN mapping seems to be associated with decreased recurrence and improved survival after surgery for NSCLC.

Aid, Malika, Kathleen Busman-Sahay, Samuel J Vidal, Zoltan Maliga, Stephen Bondoc, Carly Starke, Margaret Terry, et al. (2020) 2020. “Vascular Disease and Thrombosis in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Rhesus Macaques.”. Cell 183 (5): 1354-1366.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.005.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to extensive morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Clinical features that drive SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis in humans include inflammation and thrombosis, but the mechanistic details underlying these processes remain to be determined. In this study, we demonstrate endothelial disruption and vascular thrombosis in histopathologic sections of lungs from both humans and rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. To define key molecular pathways associated with SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis in macaques, we performed transcriptomic analyses of bronchoalveolar lavage and peripheral blood and proteomic analyses of serum. We observed macrophage infiltrates in lung and upregulation of macrophage, complement, platelet activation, thrombosis, and proinflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein, MX1, IL-6, IL-1, IL-8, TNFα, and NF-κB. These results suggest a model in which critical interactions between inflammatory and thrombosis pathways lead to SARS-CoV-2-induced vascular disease. Our findings suggest potential therapeutic targets for COVID-19.

de Margerie-Mellon, Constance, Long H Ngo, Ritu R Gill, Antonio C Monteiro Filho, Benedikt H Heidinger, Allison Onken, Mayra A Medina, Paul A VanderLaan, and Alexander A Bankier. (2020) 2020. “The Growth Rate of Subsolid Lung Adenocarcinoma Nodules at Chest CT.”. Radiology 297 (1): 189-98. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192322.

Background Confirming that subsolid adenocarcinomas show exponential growth is important because it would justify using volume doubling time to assess their growth. Purpose To test whether the growth of lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules at chest CT is accurately represented by an exponential model. Materials and Methods Patients with lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules surgically resected between January 2005 and May 2018, with three or more longitudinal CT examinations before resection, were retrospectively included. Overall volume (for all nodules) and solid component volume (for part-solid nodules) were measured over time. A linear mixed-effects model was used to identify the growth pattern (linear, exponential, quadratic, or power law) that best represented growth. The interactions between nodule growth and clinical, CT morphologic, and pathologic parameters were studied. Results Sixty-nine patients (mean age, 70 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 48 women) with 74 lung adenocarcinomas were evaluated. Overall growth and solid component growth were better represented by an exponential model (adjusted R2 = 0.89 and 0.95, respectively) than by a quadratic model (r2 = 0.88 and 0.93, respectively), a linear model (r2 = 0.87 and 0.92, respectively), or a power law model (r2 = 0.82 and 0.93, respectively). Faster overall volume growth was associated with a history of lung cancer (P < .001), a baseline nodule volume less than 500 mm3 (P = .03), and histologic findings of invasive adenocarcinoma (P < .001). The median volume doubling time of noninvasive adenocarcinoma was significantly longer than that of invasive adenocarcinoma (939 days [interquartile range, 588-1563 days] vs 678 days [interquartile range, 392-916 days], respectively; P = .01). Conclusion The overall volume growth of adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules at chest CT was best represented by an exponential model compared with the other tested models. This justifies the use of volume doubling time for the growth assessment of these nodules. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kuriyama and Yanagawa in this issue.

Imaging, Expert Panel on Breast, Samantha L Heller, Ana P Lourenco, Bethany L Niell, Nicolas Ajkay, Ann Brown, Elizabeth H Dibble, et al. (2020) 2020. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.”. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 17 (11S): S403-S414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.009.

Mastectomy may be performed to treat breast cancer or as a prophylactic approach in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer. In addition, mastectomies may be performed with or without reconstruction. Reconstruction approaches differ and may be autologous, involving a transfer of tissue (skin, subcutaneous fat, and muscle) from other parts of the body to the chest wall. Reconstruction may also involve implants. Implant reconstruction may occur as a single procedure or as multistep procedures with initial use of an adjustable tissue expander allowing the mastectomy tissues to be stretched without compromising blood supply. Ultimately, a full-volume implant will be placed. Reconstructions with a combination of autologous and implant reconstruction may also be performed. Other techniques such as autologous fat grafting may be used to refine both implant and flap-based reconstruction. This review of imaging in the setting of mastectomy with or without reconstruction summarizes the literature and makes recommendations based on available evidence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Imaging, Expert Panel on GYN and OB, Jennifer W Uyeda, Elizabeth George, Caroline Reinhold, Esma A Akin, Susan M Ascher, Olga R Brook, et al. (2020) 2020. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Postpartum Hemorrhage.”. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 17 (11S): S459-S471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.011.

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) can be categorized as primary or early if occurring in the first 24 hours after delivery, whereas late or delayed PPH occurs between 24 hours and 6 weeks. Most of the causes of PPH can be diagnosed clinically, but imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of many causes of PPH. Pelvic ultrasound (transabdominal and transvaginal with Doppler) is the imaging modality of choice for the initial evaluation of PPH. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis and CT angiogram of the abdomen and pelvis may be appropriate to determine if active ongoing hemorrhage is present, to localize the bleeding, and to identify the source of bleeding. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Ljuboja, Damir, Jeffrey L Weinstein, Muneeb Ahmed, and Ammar Sarwar. (2020) 2020. “Extrahepatic Transarterial Radioembolization to Treat Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Report.”. Radiology Case Reports 15 (12): 2613-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2020.09.043.

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FL-HCC) is a rare primary liver tumor that typically presents at an advanced stage in early adolescents and adults with no underlying liver disease. Surgical resection is the first-line treatment, and patients who are not surgical candidates face limited treatment options with poor long-term outcomes. Herein we report the first documented, technically successful treatment of FL-HCC with extrahepatic spread using transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in a 16-year-old male patient with surgically unresectable disease. Subsequent imaging revealed tumor necrosis and a 20% reduction in size, and the patient survived 20 months post-treatment, a marked improvement relative to historical data in the literature. Further research should examine the potential role of yttrium-90 TARE in the treatment of FL-HCC patients with metastatic disease.

Imaging, Expert Panel on GYN and OB, Jessica B Robbins, Elizabeth A Sadowski, Katherine E Maturen, Esma A Akin, Susan M Ascher, Olga R Brook, et al. (2020) 2020. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.”. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 17 (11S): S336-S345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.008.

This publication summarizes the relevant literature for the imaging of patients with symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding, including initial imaging, follow-up imaging when the original ultrasound is inconclusive, and follow-up imaging when surveillance is appropriate. For patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, combined transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound of the pelvis with Doppler is the most appropriate initial imaging study. If the uterus is incompletely visualized with the initial ultrasou2nd, MRI of the pelvis without and with contrast is the next appropriate imaging study, unless a polyp is suspected on the original ultrasound, then sonohysterography can be performed. If the patient continues to experience abnormal uterine bleeding, assessment with ultrasound of the pelvis, sonohysterography, and MRI of the pelvis without and with contrast would be appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.