Publications by Year: 2026

AIM: The "2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults" is a de novo guideline that provides comprehensive recommendations for the evaluation, management, and follow-up of adult patients (≥18 years of age) with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A key feature of this guideline is the introduction of the AHA/ACC Acute Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Categories, which enhance the precision of severity classification, prognosis assessment, and evidence-based therapeutic decision-making.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from February 2024 to October 2024 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Select key studies published until April 2025 were added by the guideline writing committee as appropriate.

STRUCTURE: The focus of this clinical practice guideline is an evidence-based and patient-centered approach for acute PE evaluation and management of the adult patient. This guideline encompasses the period from the onset of symptoms through clinical follow-up, focusing on risk outcomes assessment, clinical diagnosis of acute PE, appropriate use of adjunctive cardiovascular testing, and management in both the acute and early post-acute phases of PE. It addresses evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies (including pharmacological therapies, advanced interventional therapies, and in-hospital support) for acute PE and associated outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The real-world uptake of the 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) blood pressure (BP) guideline, which lowered the systolic BP target to <120 mmHg for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), is poorly understood. We examined the adoption of the 2021 KDIGO systolic BP target in clinical practice and its association with clinical outcomes.

METHODS: The study was based on data from the Mass General Brigham healthcare network, an integrated healthcare system spanning primary to tertiary care in New England. In serial cross-sectional analysis, we identified ∼50 000 patients with CKD stage 3-4 in each year from 2020 to 2024 and assessed the annual proportion of patients within the 2021 KDIGO systolic BP target. In longitudinal analysis, we identified 18 996 patients with incident CKD stage 3-4 in 2014-2019 and evaluated the association between systolic BP above vs. within the target and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS: In serial cross-sectional analysis, 18.3% of patients with CKD had systolic BP within the 2021 KDIGO target in 2020 (pre-guideline). The proportion changed only marginally after the guideline's publication-18.0% in 2021 (absolute difference, -0.3% [95% CI, -1.2 to 1.3]), 19.3% in 2022 (absolute difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -0.1 to 2.0]), 20.0% in 2023 (absolute difference, 1.7% [95% CI, 0.2 to 3.1]), and 21.9% in 2024 (absolute difference, 3.6% [95% CI, 1.9 to 5.3]). In longitudinal analysis, patients with systolic BP above the 2021 KDIGO target exhibited higher risks of cardio-kidney end points, lower risk of hypotension, and no differences in other safety end points compared to those within the target.

CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of the 2021 KDIGO BP guideline remained limited in real-world practice. As of 2024, nearly 4 in 5 patients with CKD had systolic BP above the new guideline target.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based interventions for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have transformed the therapeutic landscape over the past decade despite a lack of high-quality, randomized data demonstrating clinical benefit. In addition, multicenter data describing their real-world diffusion, patient selection, and outcomes remain limited.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize national trends, patient and imaging characteristics, and institutional variation in the use of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) across the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) Consortium Registry from 2016 to 2024.

METHODS: The authors analyzed 2,958 patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE treated with advanced therapies from 48 U.S. institutions in the prospective PERT registry. Temporal trends in use of systemic thrombolysis, CDT, and MT were evaluated using mixed-effects Poisson models; factors associated with MT vs CDT were identified using mixed-effects logistic regression with site-level random intercepts. Patients were stratified by the European Society of Cardiology 2019 risk categories. The Composite Pulmonary Embolism Score (CPES) was used to further assess patient acuity.

RESULTS: Of the 2,958 patients who received advanced therapies, 75.9% had intermediate-risk PE and 24.1% high-risk PE. The use of MT increased by 18% per year (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14-1.23), surpassing CDT use by 2021, whereas the use of CDT and systemic thrombolysis declined by 13% and 12% per year, respectively. MT was independently associated with older age (≥70 years; OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.04-1.81), male sex (OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.19-1.99), vasopressor use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and saddle embolus or clot in transit, whereas CDT was more often used in younger female patients and in the presence of cardiorespiratory symptoms. The proportion of high-risk patients treated increased as did the mean CPES over the study period, reflecting treatment of progressively higher-acuity patients with catheter-based intervention.

CONCLUSIONS: Over the past decade, MT has rapidly replaced CDT as predominant catheter-based therapy for acute PE, reflecting both technological innovation and evolving operator confidence. The PERT registry captures this diffusion of innovation across institutions and patient profiles, revealing a shift toward treating sicker patients and greater procedural integration across specialties. These findings highlight the need for randomized evidence to define optimal patient selection and comparative outcomes across device classes.

BACKGROUND: The mainstay of treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), late-stage peripheral arterial disease, is prompt revascularization. However, contemporary data on sex differences in CLTI-related endovascular revascularization rates and outcomes remain limited.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a 100% sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2016 to 2023. We identified patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular revascularizations. Male and female sex was the exposure. Population rates of CLTI-related endovascular revascularization were calculated by sex. Baseline characteristics were compared using standardized mean differences. The primary outcome, a composite of major amputation and death, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, revascularization modality, disease severity, and other mediators. Nondeath outcomes included major amputation, minor amputation, repeat revascularization, and worsening of ambulatory status.

RESULTS: Among 333,173 patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI from 2016 to 2023, 146,644 (44.0%) were female. Females were older (75.7 years vs 73.3 years) and more likely to be Black and from socioeconomically distressed communities. Compared with males, female patients had a lower adjusted risk of mortality or major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92; P < .0001), major amputation (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.84; P < .0001), and mortality (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.94; P < .0001). However, female patients were more likely to experience restriction in ambulatory function after revascularization (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Females underwent CLTI revascularization at lower rates than males and experienced lower risks of mortality and major amputation, with higher rates of ambulatory decline. Continued investigation into modifiable drivers of sex differences can improve the quality of vascular care for both men and women with peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is a cornerstone for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), yet the optimal device strategy remains uncertain.

AIMS: Our objective was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes between plain balloon angioplasty±bare metal stents (PBA±BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCBs)±BMS, and drug-eluting stents (DES) in a national real-world CLTI cohort.

METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years who underwent femoropopliteal revascularisation for CLTI between 2016 and 2023 were included. Patients were grouped by index device. Outcomes included a composite of all-cause mortality or major amputation, as well as major adverse limb events (MALE) and reintervention. Patients were followed from the index procedure until death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study period. Time-to-event and cost outcomes were analysed using multivariable Cox and gamma regression models, respectively.

RESULTS: Among 108,304 CLTI patients, 52.5% received PBA±BMS, 30.7% DCBs, and 16.8% DES. At 2 years, the composite outcome occurred in 50.54% (PBA±BMS), 43.08% (DCB±BMS), and 43.71% (DES); at 5 years, it occurred in 75.69%, 71.19%, and 71.71%, respectively. Compared with PBA±BMS, DCB±BMS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-0.93) and DES (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95) were associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome. DCBs were associated with reduced major amputation (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.91), mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.94), MALE (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), and reintervention (HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) compared with PBA±BMS. The proportion of BMS use was 10.1% in the PBA±BMS group and 3.1% in the DCB±BMS group.

CONCLUSIONS: In this national CLTI cohort, drug-coated devices were associated with reduced amputation and mortality. Data from this study suggest that DCBs may offer consistent benefit without increased costs.

BACKGROUND: Despite improving abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) outcomes in the United States, significant disparities exist. Smaller studies found that women experienced worse outcomes after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), yet few larger analyses have confirmed this. This study aimed to characterize sex-related differences in outcomes among patients who underwent infrarenal EVAR.

METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries ⩾ 66 years old who underwent infrarenal EVAR for intact AAA between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was a composite of late aneurysm rupture, aortic reintervention, conversion to open repair, or all-cause mortality. Cox regression and Fine-Gray models were used.

RESULTS: Among 111,381 patients, the mean age was 76.63 ± 6.60 years, 92.88% were White, and 21.19% were women. The maximum follow-up was 3283 days. The hazard of the primary outcome was higher in women in the adjusted model (p = 0.013). When mortality was excluded, the association with sex persisted (p < 0.0010 [adjusted subdistribution model]; p < 0.0010 [adjusted cause-specific model]). Women experienced a lower frequency of postprocedural office visits, but a higher frequency of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions.

CONCLUSION: Women undergoing EVAR had a greater risk of adverse outcomes and unexpected healthcare utilization. Further investigation is warranted to determine the drivers of these outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Resistant hypertension is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. In the past decade, management guidelines have shifted to target lower blood pressures (BP). Current prevalence and prescribing patterns among adults with resistant hypertension are not well characterized.

METHODS: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2003 to 2020. Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) was defined as patients on a diuretic, either with a systolic BP ≥130 or diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg while on 3 medications or those on ≥4 medications regardless of BP. Medications were identified through pill bottle review.

RESULTS: Of 24 579 adults with hypertension, 1939 had aTRH (42.4% male, 19.9% Black), corresponding to a weighted total of 6 989 821 US patients. Among hypertensive adults, the prevalence of aTRH was 6.41% (95% CI, 5.97%-6.88%) and remained stable over time. Over the study duration, aTRH prevalence among adults on treatment decreased from 17.7% to 12.6%. The overall prevalence of hypertension rose from 50.1% to 54.0%, while the prevalence of uncontrolled BP decreased from 75.0% to 68.7%. Over time, use of 3 drug regimens for aTRH decreased (57.8%-42.9%), while 4 drug regimens increased (34.0%-51.8%). aTRH was most strongly associated with older patients, those of Black race, higher body mass index, and more advanced cardiovascular comorbidities.

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of aTRH has remained stable over the past 2 decades despite the rising incidence of hypertension. Use of multidrug treatment regimens has increased, aligning with national guidelines. However, uncontrolled hypertension remains high.

Background: Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (Angio-FFR) is an emerging tool for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Its uptake and outcomes compared to pressure wire (PW)-based assessment in the US are unknown. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of US Medicare beneficiary data from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2024. Propensity score matching (1:3) of Angio-FFR to PW was performed in patients who underwent PCI during the same procedure, and separately among those who did not undergo PCI during the same procedure. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) through 2 years, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization. Secondary outcomes included individual MACE components, 30-day acute kidney injury and 30-day major bleeding. Falsification endpoints (hospitalization for pneumonia and hip fracture) were used to assess unmeasured confounding. Results: Of 466,535 angiograms that included intra-procedural physiologic assessment, 1.00% (N=4,672) used Angio-FFR. Annual use increased from 0.47% in 2019 to 3.85% in 2024. Among PCI patients, 1,591 Angio-FFR and 4,773 PW matched PCI patients had similar MACE rates through 2 years (24.8% vs 23.5%; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 - 1.20). Secondary outcomes and falsification endpoints were not significantly different. In non-PCI patients, 2,532 Angio-FFR and 7,596 PW matched patients also had similar MACE through 2 years (24.1% vs 23.9%; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.11). Conclusions: Angio-FFR usage in the US is modest but increasing. Angio-FFR guidance during angiography versus PW was associated with comparable outcomes through 2 years.

AIM: The "2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults" is a de novo guideline that provides comprehensive recommendations for the evaluation, management, and follow-up of adult patients (≥18 years of age) with acute pulmonary embolism (acute PE). A key feature of this guideline is the introduction of the AHA/ACC Acute Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Categories, which enhance the precision of severity classification, prognosis assessment, and evidence-based therapeutic decision-making.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from February 2024 to October 2024 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Select key studies published until April 2025 were added by the guideline writing committee as appropriate.

STRUCTURE: The focus of this clinical practice guideline is an evidence-based and patient-centered approach for acute PE evaluation and management of the adult patient. This guideline encompasses the period from the onset of symptoms through clinical follow-up, focusing on risk outcomes assessment, clinical diagnosis of acute PE, appropriate use of adjunctive cardiovascular testing, and management in both the acute and early post-acute phases of PE. It addresses evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies (including pharmacological therapies, advanced interventional therapies, and in-hospital support) for acute PE and associated outcomes.