Publications

2018

Mihatov N, Secemsky EA, Elmariah S. Triple Therapy: When, if Ever?. Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine. 2018;20(7):61. PMID: 29968198

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: More than 9% of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) carry a concomitant indication for long-term anticoagulation (OAC). The optimal combination of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for these patients remains uncertain.

RECENT FINDINGS: Numerous studies have demonstrated that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of stent-related events. Nonetheless, OAC therapy is more efficacious than DAPT at reducing thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. The combination of DAPT and OAC, known as triple therapy, portends as much as a threefold increased risk of fatal and nonfatal bleeding compared to warfarin monotherapy. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety of shorter durations of triple therapy with subsequent transition to a P2Y12 inhibitor in combination with an OAC. Here, we review the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of dual therapy with OAC in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor versus triple therapy among recently stented patients with a long-term requirement for OAC.

Secemsky EA, Schermerhorn M, Carroll BJ, Kennedy KF, Shen C, Valsdottir LR, Landon B, Yeh RW. Readmissions After Revascularization Procedures for Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study.. Annals of internal medicine. 2018;168(2):93–99. PMID: 29204656

BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest high rates of unplanned rehospitalization after endovascular and surgical revascularization for peripheral arterial disease. However, the overall burden of readmissions has not been comprehensively explored.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate nationwide readmissions after peripheral arterial revascularization for peripheral arterial disease and to assess whether readmission risk varies among hospitals.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: 1085 U.S. acute care hospitals participating in the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

PATIENTS: 61 969 unweighted hospitalizations of patients with peripheral arterial disease who had peripheral arterial revascularization and were discharged alive between 1 January and 30 November 2014.

MEASUREMENTS: 30-day readmission rates, causes, and costs of unplanned rehospitalizations after peripheral arterial revascularization; 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs), calculated using hierarchical logistic regression, to assess for heterogeneity of readmission risk between hospitals.

RESULTS: Among 61 969 hospitalizations of patients with peripheral arterial disease who were discharged alive after peripheral arterial revascularization, the 30-day nonelective readmission rate was 17.6%. The most common cause of readmission was procedural complications (28.0%), followed by sepsis (8.3%) and complications due to diabetes mellitus (7.5%). Among rehospitalized patients, 21.0% underwent a subsequent peripheral arterial revascularization or lower extremity amputation, 4.6% died, and the median cost of a readmission was $11 013. Thirty-day RSRRs varied from 10.0% to 27.3% (interquartile range, 16.6% to 18.8%).

LIMITATION: Inability to distinguish out-of-hospital deaths after discharge and potential misclassification bias due to use of billing codes to ascertain diagnoses and interventions.

CONCLUSION: More than 1 in 6 patients with peripheral arterial disease who undergo peripheral arterial revascularization have unplanned readmission within 30 days, with high associated mortality risks and costs. Procedure- and patient-related factors were the primary reasons for readmission. Readmission rates varied moderately between institutions after hospital case mix was accounted for, suggesting that differences in hospital quality may only partially account for readmission.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Vidula MK, Secemsky EA, Yeh RW. Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Stented Patients: An Update for the Clinician.. Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2018;60(4-5):491–499. PMID: 29409813

Determining the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention is a complex decision. Randomized controlled trials have shown that while shorter durations of DAPT may lower the risk of bleeding, longer durations of DAPT can reduce the risk of late stent thrombosis and ischemia-related events. In this review article, we will discuss the current guidelines, review contemporary trial data that have evaluated short and extended durations of DAPT, and address common clinical questions. Ultimately, the determination of the optimal duration of DAPT is an individualized decision that requires clinicians to assess each patient's risk for bleeding and recurrent ischemic events.

2017

Secemsky EA, Kirtane A, Bangalore S, Jovin IS, Patel D, Ferro EG, Wimmer NJ, Roe M, Dai D, Mauri L, Yeh RW. Practice Patterns and In-Hospital Outcomes Associated With Bivalirudin Use Among Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.. Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2017;10(9). PMID: 28855222

BACKGROUND: Practice patterns in anticoagulant strategies used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States for patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and the comparative outcomes between bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) have not been well described.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Trends in anticoagulant use were examined among 553 562 PCIs performed by 9254 operators at 1538 hospitals for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from 2009 to 2014 within the CathPCI Registry. To compare bivalirudin with UFH, propensity score matching and instrumental variable (IV) methods with operator preference for bivalirudin as the instrument were used. To determine whether differences in outcomes were because of differences in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) use, a test of mediation was performed using the IV. Outcomes were in-hospital bleeding and mortality. Bivalirudin use increased from 2009 to 2013 but declined during 2014. GPI use was 50.5% during UFH PCIs and 12.0% during bivalirudin PCIs. Before GPI adjustment, bleeding reductions with bivalirudin ranged from 2.04% (IV: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81%, 2.27%) to 2.29% (propensity score: 95% CI: 2.14%, 2.44%) and mortality reductions ranged from 0.16% (IV: 95% CI: 0.03%, 0.28%) to 0.25% (propensity score: 95% CI: 0.17%, 0.33%). After GPI adjustment in the IV, more than half the bleeding reduction with bivalirudin was because of the lower use of GPIs (risk difference, -0.84%; 95% CI: -1.11%, -0.57%), and no survival benefit was apparent (risk difference, -0.10%; 95% CI: -0.24%, 0.05%). Bleeding reductions with bivalirudin were largest for transfemoral PCI (GPI-adjusted risk difference, -1.11%; 95% CI: -1.43%, -0.80%) and negligible for transradial PCI (GPI-adjusted risk difference, 0.09%; 95% CI: -0.32%, 0.50%).

CONCLUSIONS: In the largest comparative analysis of bivalirudin versus UFH for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction to date, bivalirudin was associated with lower in-hospital bleeding and mortality given current practices with respect to GPI use and access site. Bleeding differences were, in part, explained by the greater use of GPIs with UFH. Reductions in bleeding were largest among those undergoing transfemoral PCI, whereas no bleeding benefit was observed for those treated with transradial PCI.

O’Brien C, Valsdottir L, Wasfy JH, Strom JB, Secemsky EA, Wang Y, Yeh RW. Comparison of 30-Day Readmission Rates After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Men Versus Women.. The American journal of cardiology. 2017;120(7):1070–1076. PMID: 28781023

Readmission after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) significantly contributes to preventable morbidity and health-care costs. Outcomes after AMI vary by sex but the relationship of sex to readmissions warrants further exploration. Using the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI and stratified all-cause 30-day readmissions by sex and age. Of 214,824 patients, 44% were 18 to 64 years of age, 56% were ≥65 years, and 28% and 45%, respectively, were female. For patients 18 to 64 years, the readmission rate was 14% for women and 10% for men (p <0.001). For patients ≥65 years, the readmission rate was 18% for women and 16% for men (p <0.001). After adjusting for co-morbidities, women had a significantly higher risk of 30-day readmission compared with men, an effect that was strongest in younger women (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.39, for ages 18 to 44; OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.18, for ages 45 to 64; OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.19, for ages 65 to 74, interaction p <0.001). The procedure rates during the index hospitalization were significantly lower for women. The most common readmission diagnoses were recurrent AMI, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure. Costs associated with readmissions after AMI totaled $447,506,740, of which $176,743,622 were attributed to readmissions of women. In conclusion, women are at higher risk of short-term readmission after an AMI hospitalization than men, particularly younger women. Sex-specific strategies to reduce these readmissions may be warranted.