Background: Over-the-counter (OTC) lightening agents are commonly used to treat hyperpigmentation disorders. Objective: We sought to determine the characteristics, trends, and preferences of patients with hyperpigmentation disorders seeking OTC agents in the United States. Design: The study was a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with a disorder of hyperpigmentation seen in a United States-based outpatient dermatology clinic. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with the use of OTC lightening agents. Setting: The study setting was an outpatient US-based dermatology clinic in Boston, Massachusetts. Results: Of the 406 patients studied, the majority were women (88.9%) with Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV to VI (64.5%). The most frequent diagnoses were melasma (42.9%) and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH, 33.9%). Of our responders, 51.0 percent reported use of OTC agents and 44.9 percent reported use of prescription lightening products. Hydroquinone was the most commonly used cream (59.1%), followed by triple combination cream (fluocinolone acetonide, hydroquinone, and tretinoin, 16.3%). Of the cohort, 28.9 percent felt that the greater expense of the product correlated with greater efficacy. After multivariable adjustment, factors associated with a greater odds of using an OTC lightening agent included having a diagnosis of melasma (odds ratio [OR] 5.36; 95% CI: 2.98, 9.63; P<0.01) or PIH (OR 2.38; 95% CI: 1.25, 4.53; P≤0.01). Conclusion: The use of OTC lightening agents is widespread among those patients with hyperpigmentation disorders who reside in the United States. Those with melasma and PIH were more likely to use an OTC lightening cream. The majority of patients believed that OTC creams were safe to use without physician supervision. In those who had also tried prescription products, triple combination was deemed most effective compared to other lightening agents.
Publications
2018
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: More than 9% of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) carry a concomitant indication for long-term anticoagulation (OAC). The optimal combination of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for these patients remains uncertain.
RECENT FINDINGS: Numerous studies have demonstrated that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of stent-related events. Nonetheless, OAC therapy is more efficacious than DAPT at reducing thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. The combination of DAPT and OAC, known as triple therapy, portends as much as a threefold increased risk of fatal and nonfatal bleeding compared to warfarin monotherapy. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety of shorter durations of triple therapy with subsequent transition to a P2Y12 inhibitor in combination with an OAC. Here, we review the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of dual therapy with OAC in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor versus triple therapy among recently stented patients with a long-term requirement for OAC.
BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest high rates of unplanned rehospitalization after endovascular and surgical revascularization for peripheral arterial disease. However, the overall burden of readmissions has not been comprehensively explored.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate nationwide readmissions after peripheral arterial revascularization for peripheral arterial disease and to assess whether readmission risk varies among hospitals.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: 1085 U.S. acute care hospitals participating in the Nationwide Readmissions Database.
PATIENTS: 61 969 unweighted hospitalizations of patients with peripheral arterial disease who had peripheral arterial revascularization and were discharged alive between 1 January and 30 November 2014.
MEASUREMENTS: 30-day readmission rates, causes, and costs of unplanned rehospitalizations after peripheral arterial revascularization; 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs), calculated using hierarchical logistic regression, to assess for heterogeneity of readmission risk between hospitals.
RESULTS: Among 61 969 hospitalizations of patients with peripheral arterial disease who were discharged alive after peripheral arterial revascularization, the 30-day nonelective readmission rate was 17.6%. The most common cause of readmission was procedural complications (28.0%), followed by sepsis (8.3%) and complications due to diabetes mellitus (7.5%). Among rehospitalized patients, 21.0% underwent a subsequent peripheral arterial revascularization or lower extremity amputation, 4.6% died, and the median cost of a readmission was $11 013. Thirty-day RSRRs varied from 10.0% to 27.3% (interquartile range, 16.6% to 18.8%).
LIMITATION: Inability to distinguish out-of-hospital deaths after discharge and potential misclassification bias due to use of billing codes to ascertain diagnoses and interventions.
CONCLUSION: More than 1 in 6 patients with peripheral arterial disease who undergo peripheral arterial revascularization have unplanned readmission within 30 days, with high associated mortality risks and costs. Procedure- and patient-related factors were the primary reasons for readmission. Readmission rates varied moderately between institutions after hospital case mix was accounted for, suggesting that differences in hospital quality may only partially account for readmission.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Determining the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention is a complex decision. Randomized controlled trials have shown that while shorter durations of DAPT may lower the risk of bleeding, longer durations of DAPT can reduce the risk of late stent thrombosis and ischemia-related events. In this review article, we will discuss the current guidelines, review contemporary trial data that have evaluated short and extended durations of DAPT, and address common clinical questions. Ultimately, the determination of the optimal duration of DAPT is an individualized decision that requires clinicians to assess each patient's risk for bleeding and recurrent ischemic events.
2017
BACKGROUND: Practice patterns in anticoagulant strategies used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States for patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and the comparative outcomes between bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) have not been well described.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Trends in anticoagulant use were examined among 553 562 PCIs performed by 9254 operators at 1538 hospitals for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from 2009 to 2014 within the CathPCI Registry. To compare bivalirudin with UFH, propensity score matching and instrumental variable (IV) methods with operator preference for bivalirudin as the instrument were used. To determine whether differences in outcomes were because of differences in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) use, a test of mediation was performed using the IV. Outcomes were in-hospital bleeding and mortality. Bivalirudin use increased from 2009 to 2013 but declined during 2014. GPI use was 50.5% during UFH PCIs and 12.0% during bivalirudin PCIs. Before GPI adjustment, bleeding reductions with bivalirudin ranged from 2.04% (IV: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81%, 2.27%) to 2.29% (propensity score: 95% CI: 2.14%, 2.44%) and mortality reductions ranged from 0.16% (IV: 95% CI: 0.03%, 0.28%) to 0.25% (propensity score: 95% CI: 0.17%, 0.33%). After GPI adjustment in the IV, more than half the bleeding reduction with bivalirudin was because of the lower use of GPIs (risk difference, -0.84%; 95% CI: -1.11%, -0.57%), and no survival benefit was apparent (risk difference, -0.10%; 95% CI: -0.24%, 0.05%). Bleeding reductions with bivalirudin were largest for transfemoral PCI (GPI-adjusted risk difference, -1.11%; 95% CI: -1.43%, -0.80%) and negligible for transradial PCI (GPI-adjusted risk difference, 0.09%; 95% CI: -0.32%, 0.50%).
CONCLUSIONS: In the largest comparative analysis of bivalirudin versus UFH for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction to date, bivalirudin was associated with lower in-hospital bleeding and mortality given current practices with respect to GPI use and access site. Bleeding differences were, in part, explained by the greater use of GPIs with UFH. Reductions in bleeding were largest among those undergoing transfemoral PCI, whereas no bleeding benefit was observed for those treated with transradial PCI.
This study examines the variability in color identification and perception of skin lesions in the context of background color and room illumination.