Publications

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is a cornerstone for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), yet the optimal device strategy remains uncertain.

AIMS: Our objective was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes between plain balloon angioplasty±bare metal stents (PBA±BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCBs)±BMS, and drug-eluting stents (DES) in a national real-world CLTI cohort.

METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years who underwent femoropopliteal revascularisation for CLTI between 2016 and 2023 were included. Patients were grouped by index device. Outcomes included a composite of all-cause mortality or major amputation, as well as major adverse limb events (MALE) and reintervention. Patients were followed from the index procedure until death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study period. Time-to-event and cost outcomes were analysed using multivariable Cox and gamma regression models, respectively.

RESULTS: Among 108,304 CLTI patients, 52.5% received PBA±BMS, 30.7% DCBs, and 16.8% DES. At 2 years, the composite outcome occurred in 50.54% (PBA±BMS), 43.08% (DCB±BMS), and 43.71% (DES); at 5 years, it occurred in 75.69%, 71.19%, and 71.71%, respectively. Compared with PBA±BMS, DCB±BMS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-0.93) and DES (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95) were associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome. DCBs were associated with reduced major amputation (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.91), mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.94), MALE (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), and reintervention (HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) compared with PBA±BMS. The proportion of BMS use was 10.1% in the PBA±BMS group and 3.1% in the DCB±BMS group.

CONCLUSIONS: In this national CLTI cohort, drug-coated devices were associated with reduced amputation and mortality. Data from this study suggest that DCBs may offer consistent benefit without increased costs.

AIM: The "2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults" is a de novo guideline that provides comprehensive recommendations for the evaluation, management, and follow-up of adult patients (≥18 years of age) with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A key feature of this guideline is the introduction of the AHA/ACC Acute Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Categories, which enhance the precision of severity classification, prognosis assessment, and evidence-based therapeutic decision-making.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from February 2024 to October 2024 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Select key studies published until April 2025 were added by the guideline writing committee as appropriate.

STRUCTURE: The focus of this clinical practice guideline is an evidence-based and patient-centered approach for acute PE evaluation and management of the adult patient. This guideline encompasses the period from the onset of symptoms through clinical follow-up, focusing on risk outcomes assessment, clinical diagnosis of acute PE, appropriate use of adjunctive cardiovascular testing, and management in both the acute and early post-acute phases of PE. It addresses evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies (including pharmacological therapies, advanced interventional therapies, and in-hospital support) for acute PE and associated outcomes.

AIM: The "2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults" is a de novo guideline that provides comprehensive recommendations for the evaluation, management, and follow-up of adult patients (≥18 years of age) with acute pulmonary embolism (acute PE). A key feature of this guideline is the introduction of the AHA/ACC Acute Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Categories, which enhance the precision of severity classification, prognosis assessment, and evidence-based therapeutic decision-making.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from February 2024 to October 2024 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Select key studies published until April 2025 were added by the guideline writing committee as appropriate.

STRUCTURE: The focus of this clinical practice guideline is an evidence-based and patient-centered approach for acute PE evaluation and management of the adult patient. This guideline encompasses the period from the onset of symptoms through clinical follow-up, focusing on risk outcomes assessment, clinical diagnosis of acute PE, appropriate use of adjunctive cardiovascular testing, and management in both the acute and early post-acute phases of PE. It addresses evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies (including pharmacological therapies, advanced interventional therapies, and in-hospital support) for acute PE and associated outcomes.

Rule-based natural language processing (NLP) tools can identify pulmonary embolism (PE) via radiology reports. However, their external validity remains uncertain.In this cross-sectional study, 1,712 hospitalized patients (with and without PE) at Mass General Brigham (MGB) hospitals (2016-2021) were analyzed. Two previously published NLP algorithms were applied to radiology reports to identify PE. Chart review by two physicians was the reference standard. We tested three approaches: (A) NLP applied to all patients; (B) NLP limited to radiology reports of patients with principal or secondary International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) PE discharge codes; and (C) NLP applied to patients with PE discharge codes or a Present-on-Admission (POA) indicator ("Y") for PE. All others were assumed PE-negative in Approaches B and C to minimize NLP false positives. Weighted estimates were derived from the MGB hospitalized cohort (n = 381,642) to calculate F1 scores (as the harmonic mean of sensitivity and positive predictive value [PPV]).In Approach A, both NLP tools showed high sensitivity (82.5%, 93.0%) and specificity (98.9%, 98.7%) but low PPV (60.3%, 59.6%). Approach B improved PPV (95.2%, 94.9%) but reduced sensitivity (74.1%, 76.2%), while Approach C preserved both high sensitivity (82.5%, 93.0%) and PPV (95.6%, 95.8%). Approach C demonstrated the best performance, yielding significantly higher F1 scores for both NLP tools (88.6%, 94.4%) compared with Approach A (69.7%, 72.6%) and Approach B (83.3%, 84.5%) (P < 0.001).The accuracy of PE detection improves when rule-based NLP algorithms are operationalized using administrative claims data in addition to radiology reports.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control remains a major cardiovascular disease risk factor. Whether genetically predicted BP independently predicts long-term BP control is unknown. We examined the associations of BP polygenic scores (PGSs) with long-term BP control and treatment-resistant hypertension.

METHODS: We identified 22 456 Mass General Brigham Biobank participants with hypertension. Longitudinal BP control was defined as the percentage of time above-target systolic BP (SBP) ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥80 mm Hg over 5 years. Using multivariable regression, we assessed the associations of BP PGS with duration above-target BP and lifetime treatment-resistant hypertension incidence. Incremental prognostic utility of BP PGSs was assessed based on the discrimination C-index, Brier score, and net reclassification index. Validation was performed in the population-based UK Biobank cohort using the SBP/DBP ≥140/90 mm Hg threshold.

RESULTS: Among 10 853 (48.3%) were female, the mean SBP/DBP (SD) at index date was 132 (18)/75 (11) mm Hg, and 4126 (18.4%) developed treatment-resistant hypertension over lifetime. In reference to the low (<20th percentile) PGS group, the high (≥80th percentile) BP PGS was associated with 8.01 (95% CI, 6.68%-9.34%) longer duration with above-target SBP and 6.19 (95% CI, 5.05%-7.33%) with high DBP. Each high SBP and DBP PGS conferred 2.36 (95% CI, 2.07-2.68) and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.55-1.99)-fold higher odds of treatment-resistant hypertension. Adding BP PGSs to traditional risk factors improved treatment-resistant hypertension prediction from C-index (95% CI), 0.74 (0.73-0.75) to 0.78 (0.77-0.79). BP PGSs consistently predicted longitudinal BP management to a comparable extent in the UK Biobank.

CONCLUSIONS: Harnessing BP PGSs may inform anticipated trends in BP control to warrant vigilant monitoring and augment prioritization of intensive therapy.

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) affects nearly 7% of adults over age 65 and is associated with increased cardiovascular and renal morbidity. Although early observational studies suggested benefit from renal artery stenting, subsequent randomized trials failed to show improvement in major clinical endpoints, contributing to substantial declines in procedural use. To characterize contemporary practice, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years who underwent renal artery stenting for atherosclerotic RAS between 2016 and 2020. Using Medicare claims data, we evaluated baseline characteristics, temporal utilization, and postprocedural outcomes, stratified by race, geographic region, and dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollment status. Among 19,130 patients, the mean age was 76.0 years (±6.4), 59.2% were female, and 90.3% were White; 84.2% had chronic kidney disease and 48.7% had heart failure. Procedural rates declined by 41.1% over the study period. Compared with White patients, Black patients had higher adjusted risks of hypertensive crisis hospitalization (aHR 1.45, 95% CI, 1.24-1.70) and dialysis initiation (aHR 1.78, 95% CI, 1.39-2.27); patients of Other races also had greater risk of dialysis initiation (aHR 1.98, 95% CI, 1.50-2.63). Patients in the South experienced higher unadjusted cardiovascular event rates (50.0%) but similar adjusted mortality compared with those in the Northeast (aHR 1.09, 95% CI, 0.98-1.21). Dual enrollment was associated with increased all-cause mortality (aHR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.20-1.43). In conclusion, renal artery stenting rates continued to decline in recent years, and contemporary recipients constitute an older, comorbid population with substantial cardiovascular risk. Outcomes differed markedly by race, socioeconomic status, and geography, highlighting the need for improved risk stratification and prospective evaluation of stenting in high-risk cohorts.

AIMS: Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) are being established in hospitals worldwide to address the increasing complexity in acute PE management. To identify recent trends in PERT decisions regarding advanced treatment of acute severe PE.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data from the prospective multicentre PERT™ Consortium registry (years 2018-2024), focusing on catheter-directed treatment (CDT) and including systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). An age-, sex-, and PE risk-matched population from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used for comparison. Among 11 436 patients enrolled at 51 sites (median age, 65 years; 13.7% high-risk and 62.5% intermediate-risk PE), 2639 (23.1%) underwent CDT. Of those, 140 (5.3%) underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis without ultrasound, 851 (32.2%) ultrasound-assisted catheter thrombolysis, and 1534 (58.1%) mechanical thrombectomy/aspiration. Systemic thrombolysis was used in 5.6%, surgical embolectomy in 1.1%, and ECMO in 1.6% of all patients. Trends of CDT increased over time (+0.36% quarterly by linear regression; P = 0.002), with increase in mechanical thrombectomy (+0.83%; P < 0.001) and decrease in catheter-directed thrombolysis (-0.4%; P = 0.001). Matching 10 883 patients from the PERT™ Consortium registry to the NIS population, we found a 22% (95% CI, 21-23%) standardized mean difference in CDT use, 1.3% (0.6-2.0%) lower in-hospital mortality, and 0.75 (0.2-1.3) fewer days of hospital stay among PERT™ Consortium registry patients.

CONCLUSION: In a national quality assurance database of patients with PE included in the PERT registry, the use of catheter-directed treatment increased over time. Compared with a nationwide NIS sample, these patients had lower in-hospital mortality and shorter hospital length of stay.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced atherosclerosis represents an underestimated clinical entity.

CASE SUMMARY: We report on 2 cases of patients with upper-limb ischemia due to subclavian artery lesions. Both patients had radiation therapy due to cancer more than 15 years before symptom onset and no other signs of atherosclerosis. Angiography and intravascular ultrasound were performed in both cases, and lesions were treated with angioplasty and stent placement in the first patient, whereas intravascular lithotripsy was necessary in the second patient due to severe calcification and balloon underexpansion.

DISCUSSION & TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Intravascular ultrasound helps to accurately assess lesion characteristics, size the balloon and stent devices, and judge the effectiveness of the endovascular therapy. Since radiotherapy is linked to accelerated atherosclerosis, such patients may benefit from clinical and imaging surveillance by duplex ultrasound.

Carotid artery revascularization plays an important role in stroke prevention among patients with carotid stenosis. While carotid endarterectomy has been the mainstay of revascularization in those with moderate to severe stenosis, the evolution of carotid artery stenting and the recent expansion of Medicare coverage have impacted utilization trends and guideline recommendations. We aim to review currently available data on revascularization techniques, discuss important factors influencing treatment decisions, and explore future directions of carotid stenosis management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides a practical, evidence-based summary of the physiology, major trial data and clinical role of renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS: The cornerstone of hypertension therapy remains anti-hypertensive medications although this strategy has significant limitations with poor rates of blood pressure control for most patients. Renal denervation was designed to bypass concerns about medication adherence and provide an "always-on" treatment. Recent trial data and meta-analyses are presented demonstrating a modest, although heterogeneous, response to renal denervation which led to the treatment's recent FDA approval. Improvements in catheter design and renal artery treatment strategy may underlie the improved clinical response to denervation in more recent trials.

SUMMARY: Hypertension centers involving multi-disciplinary care teams are equipped to provide patients with advanced diagnostic testing for secondary hypertension, comprehensive non-invasive management strategies and invasive renal denervation to address hypertension. Early referral for patients with uncontrolled hypertension can provide patients with nuanced conservative and interventional options which have the potential to improve hypertension related morbidity and mortality. Future studies are needed to identify which patients are most likely to respond to renal denervation.