Publications

2026

Taliaferro, Faith B, Ying Tang, Sergio Monares Ortiz, Olyvia J Jasset, Caroline Bald, Alison Araten, Calvin Fairbourn, et al. (2026) 2026. “Nasal Mucosal Immunity Is Associated With Protection Against RSV Illness in Infants.”. MedRxiv : The Preprint Server for Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.22.26366243.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis, RSV remains a leading cause of severe respiratory illness in infants. Immunity at the site of infection is potentially important yet airway mucosal immunity against RSV infection remains poorly defined.

METHODS: We collected nasal and blood samples across three pediatric cohorts: 1) children presenting to the emergency department with respiratory symptoms; 2) infants and mothers presenting to an urban hospital system across the RSV season; 3) infants born to mothers vaccinated with maternal pre-Fusion (F) vaccine. We analyzed mucosal and serologic anti-RSV antibodies and assessed for factors impacting titer magnitude and durability.

RESULTS: Specimens from 285 infants/young children and 39 mothers were analyzed. Mucosal anti-RSV antibody levels were lower in infants presenting with RSV infection compared to age-matched controls both in infants experiencing their first viral season (p = 0.0011) and older children (p < 0.0001). Higher levels of mucosal antibodies were seen in infants whose mothers received maternal pre-F vaccination, with IgG against RSV fusion protein tightly correlating between infant's serum and nasal compartments (p < 0.0001). However, mucosal anti-RSV IgG waned significantly by 6 months of age (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Higher mucosal anti-RSV antibody levels are associated with protection against RSV-related illness. Current immunoprophylactic strategies drive robust anti-RSV IgG responses in the infant mucosal and serological compartments; however, passive immunity wanes over 6 months. These results suggest that RSV immunization strategies optimizing durable mucosal immunity may protect infants from RSV-related respiratory illness.

Colarusso, Alessandro, Kathryn E Stephenson, Ai -Ris Y Collier, Frank Wegmann, Roland Zahn, Malika Aid, and Dan H Barouch. (2026) 2026. “Early Innate Immune Signatures Correlate With Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy.”. Journal of Virology, e0149426. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01494-26.

The innate immune system is rapidly activated following antigen exposure and plays a critical role in shaping the ensuing adaptive immune responses. In this study, we performed bulk RNA sequencing and proteomic profiling in a cohort of 25 rhesus macaques following Ad26.COV2.S immunization to characterize early innate correlates of vaccine immunogenicity and protection. Our results show that innate immune activation occurred as early as day 1 post-vaccination and demonstrated a systemic enrichment of antiviral interferon pathways, cytokine signaling, and activation of innate immune cell signatures. These early transcriptomic signatures correlated positively with humoral and cellular immune responses at 6 weeks following vaccination and correlated inversely with viral loads following SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Similar correlates of immunogenicity were observed in a cohort of 25 adult healthy participants vaccinated with Ad26.COV2.S. Taken together, these findings highlight the importance of early activation of the innate immune responses following Ad26.COV2.S vaccination in shaping the protective adaptive immune response.IMPORTANCEEarly innate immune responses may shape vaccine immunogenicity and protection. We evaluated responses to Ad26.COV2.S vaccination in rhesus macaques and humans and found that day 1 innate immune signatures correlated with subsequent adaptive responses. These findings suggest that early post-vaccination immune programming influences immunogenicity and protective efficacy months later.

Fiore-Gartland, Andrew, Koshlan Mayer-Blackwell, James Stray, Moni Neradilek, April Lo, Alex Hannah, Tracy Dong, et al. (2026) 2026. “Profiling of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Shedding, Antibody Neutralization, and T-Cell Receptor Repertoires in a Large, Multi-Center Cohort of Young Adults With Varied Prior Exposures.”. Frontiers in Immunology 17: 1731974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1731974.

BACKGROUND: The cellular and neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection are complex, particularly with multiple and heterogeneous exposures. We sought to understand the changes to the antibody and T-cell repertoire elicited by mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic infections in young adults, and how immune responses to prior vaccination may interact with new viral exposures in this population. Additionally, profiling both aspects of humoral and cellular immunity from a single vial of blood is experimentally challenging.

METHODS: We developed a protocol to recover T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoires from frozen blood clots, i.e., remnant material, retained after coagulation of whole blood for serum recovery and antibody analysis. The method was applied to a subset of participants in a COVID-19 vaccine trial (CoVPN 3006, n = 209 participants). We sequenced TCR repertoires and measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses from pre-exposure, post-vaccination, and post-breakthrough blood samples.

RESULTS: Clot material provided suitable genomic DNA for TCR profiling, with vaccination and infection leading to expansions in T-cell responses. Consistent with prior studies, we found that hybrid immunological exposures (vaccination after infection) lead to the greatest antibody potency and spike TCR breadth. When the order of exposure was reversed, we observed evidence of attenuated disease severity (reduced shedding duration and lower peak nasal viral load) in post-vaccination versus primary infections.

DISCUSSION: The protocols described here for recovery of TCR repertoires from remnant coagulated material will facilitate more common estimation of cellular and neutralizing antibody immune responses as potential correlates of protection in large clinical trial cohorts where peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) acquisition or analysis is otherwise infeasible.

Gianella, Sara, Adam S Lauring, Roger Paredes, Julio Croda, David Andes, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Kara W Chew, et al. (2026) 2026. “Implementation Does Not Occur in a Vacuum: Sustaining a Comprehensive and Global Vision for HIV Research.”. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 233 (5): e1085-e1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiag063.

Despite transformative advances in antiretroviral therapy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a lifelong condition driven by durable viral reservoirs, chronic immune dysfunction, and complex interactions with host biology, coinfections, and aging. While implementation science is essential to ensure that effective interventions reach populations most affected by HIV, implementation cannot succeed in isolation from continued discovery or from the political and social contexts in which care is delivered. This editorial highlights critical gaps in our understanding of sex-based immunologic differences, tissue-specific viral persistence, resistance evolution, and the long-term inflammatory and metabolic consequences of treated HIV-gaps that directly constrain the durability, equity, and scalability of prevention, treatment, and cure strategies. We further emphasize that successful translation depends on stable policy environments, sustained public investment, and trust-based partnerships with affected communities, without which even highly effective biomedical advances fail to achieve impact. Sustained investment across the full translational spectrum-from basic and mechanistic science through clinical, behavioral, and implementation research-is therefore essential. HIV research has repeatedly served as a model system driving advances across immunology, vaccinology, oncology, aging, and pandemic preparedness, underscoring its broader relevance to human infectious diseases.

Colarusso, Alessandro, Kathryn E Stephenson, Ai -Ris Y Collier, Frank Wegman, Roland Zahn, Malika Aid, and Dan H Barouch. (2026) 2026. “Early Innate Immune Signatures Correlate With Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine Durability and Protective Efficacy.”. BioRxiv : The Preprint Server for Biology. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.09.731069.

The innate immune system is rapidly activated following antigen exposure and plays a critical role in shaping the ensuing adaptive immune responses. In this study, we performed bulk RNA sequencing and proteomic profiling in a cohort of 25 rhesus macaques following Ad26.COV2.S immunization to characterize early innate correlates of vaccine immunogenicity and protection. Our results show that innate immune activation occurred as early as day 1 post-vaccination and demonstrated an systemic enrichment of antiviral interferon pathways, interleukin signaling, and innate immune cell signatures. These early transcriptomic signatures correlated positively with humoral and cellular immune responses at 6 weeks following vaccination and correlated inversely with viral loads following SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Similar correlates of immunogenicity were observed in a cohort of 25 adult healthy participants vaccinated with Ad26.COV2.S. Taken together, these findings highlight the importance of early activation of the innate immune system for Ad26.COV2.S vaccine immunogenicity and protective efficacy.

2025

Edupuganti, Srilatha, Christopher B Hurt, Kathryn E Stephenson, Yunda Huang, Carmen A Paez, Chenchen Yu, Catherine Yen, et al. (2025) 2025. “Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Neutralisation Activities of the Anti-HIV-1 Monoclonal Antibody PGT121.414.LS Administered Alone and in Combination With VRC07-523LS in Adults Without HIV in the USA (HVTN 136/HPTN 092): A First-in-Human, Open…”. The Lancet. HIV 12 (1): e13-e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00247-9.

BACKGROUND: Multiple broadly neutralising monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are in development for HIV-1 prevention. The aim of this trial was to test the PGT121.414.LS and VRC07-523LS mAbs for safety and pharmacokinetics in adults.

METHODS: In this first-in-human phase 1 trial (HVTN 136/HPTN 092), adults without HIV were enrolled at six university-affiliated clinical research sites in the USA. Part A evaluated escalating single intravenous doses or subcutaneous infusion of PGT121.414.LS, in four groups: 3 mg/kg intravenous (treatment group 1; n=3), 10 mg/kg intravenous (treatment group 2; n=4), 30 mg/kg intravenous (treatment group 3; n=3), and 5 mg/kg subcutaneous (treatment group 4; n=3). Part B evaluated repeated sequential intravenous administrations of 20 mg/kg PGT121.414.LS plus 20 mg/kg VRC07-523LS (treatment group 5; n=10) and sequential subcutaneous administrations of 5 mg/kg PGT121.414.LS plus 5 mg/kg VRC07-523LS (treatment group 6; n=10) on days 0, 112, and 224. Participants in treatment groups 1 and 2 were enrolled sequentially, with participants enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment groups 3 and 4 after a review of safety data. Participants in treatment groups 5 and 6 were randomly assigned in blocks after a review of safety data from treatment groups 1-4. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of mAbs, serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of mAbs, and serum neutralising activity, assessed in participants who received all scheduled product administrations. Serum concentrations of each mAb were measured via a multiplex assay, and neutralisation activity against multiple HIV viruses was measured via the TZM-bl assay. Serum concentrations were estimated via an open, two-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04212091) and has been completed.

FINDINGS: Between Nov 10, 2020, and Oct 5, 2021, we enrolled 33 participants without HIV: median age was 31 years (range 22-48); 19 were assigned female sex at birth and 11 were assigned male sex at birth. Three participants and four participants were sequentially assigned to treatment groups 1 and 2, respectively, and, after safety review, six participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups 3 (n=3) and 4 (n=3); after safety review, 20 participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups 5 (n=10) and 6 (n=10). Intravenous and subcutaneous infusions were safe and well tolerated, without serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. Dose escalation of PGT121.414.LS from 3 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg (intravenous) resulted in a dose-proportional increase in serum concentration of PGT121.414.LS, whether administered alone or in combination with VRC07-523LS. The estimated elimination half-life of PGT121.414.LS was 71 days (95% CI 66-75), three times that of its parental form, PGT121. The estimated subcutaneous (vs intravenous) bioavailability of PGT121.414.LS was 86·1% (95% CI 64·0-95·5). Neutralisation activities were greater in the higher-dose and dual combination intravenous groups than in the subcutaneous administration groups.

INTERPRETATION: These findings support further evaluation of PGT121.414.LS in combination with other mAbs for HIV-1 prevention.

FUNDING: US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and US National Institutes of Health.

Stephenson, Kathryn E. (2025) 2025. “Next-Generation Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccines: Clinical Data and Future Directions.”. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 39 (2): 253-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2025.02.003.

Current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have prevented millions of deaths since the beginning of the pandemic. Yet, current vaccines have critical limitations: (1) they elicit poor mucosal immune responses with reduced protection against infection and viral transmission, (2) immune responses wane quickly, and (3) new immune evasive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants continue to emerge. Next-generation vaccines aim to induce improved mucosal immunity via mucosal administration, and to elicit a greater duration and breadth of immune responses through new platforms like self-amplifying RNA. This review focuses on next-generation COVID-19 vaccines that have publicly available clinical data and are most likely to proceed in further development.

Chawana, Tariro D, Stephen R Walsh, Lynda Stranix-Chibanda, Zvavahera M Chirenje, Chenchen Yu, Lily Zhang, Kelly E Seaton, et al. (2025) 2025. “Pharmacokinetic Interaction Assessment of an HIV Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody VRC07-523LS: A Cross-Protocol Analysis of Three Phase 1 Trials in People Without HIV.”. BMC Immunology 26 (1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-025-00687-7.

VRC07-523LS is a safe and well-tolerated monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the CD4 binding site on the HIV envelope (Env) trimer. Efficacy of VRC07-523LS, in combination with mAbs targeting other HIV epitopes, will be evaluated in upcoming trials to prevent HIV acquisition in adults. However, differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of VRC07-523LS when administered alone vs. in combination with other mAbs have not been formally assessed. We performed a cross-protocol analysis of three clinical trials and included data from a total of 146 adults without HIV who received intravenous (n = 95) or subcutaneous (n = 51) VRC07-523LS, either alone ('single'; n = 100) or in combination with 1 or 2 other mAbs ('combined'; n = 46). We used an open, two-compartment population PK model to describe serum concentrations of VRC07-523LS over time, accounting for inter-individual variabilities. We compared individual-level PK parameters between the combined vs. single groups using the targeted maximum likelihood estimation method to adjust for participant characteristics. No significant differences were observed in clearance rate, inter-compartmental clearance, distribution half-life, or total VRC07-523LS exposure over time. However, for the combined group, mean central volume of distribution, peripheral volume of distribution, and elimination half-life were slightly greater, corresponding to slightly lower predicted concentrations early post-administration with high levels being maintained in both groups. These results suggest potential PK interactions between VRC07-523LS and other mAbs, but with small clinical impact in the context of HIV prevention. Our findings support coadministration of VRC07-523LS with other mAbs, and the use of the developed PK models to design future trials for HIV prevention.

Riddler, Sharon A, Zoe Moodie, Jesse Clark, Catherine Yen, Mary Allen, Briana D Furch, Huiyin Lu, et al. (2025) 2025. “High Frequency of Chronic Urticaria Following an Investigational HIV-1 BG505 MD39.3 Trimer MRNA Vaccine in a Phase 1, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial (HVTN 302).”. Annals of Internal Medicine 178 (7): 963-74. https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02701.

BACKGROUND: The mRNA platform is under investigation for many vaccines, including HIV-1 vaccines.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 3 investigational HIV-1 trimer mRNA vaccines.

DESIGN: Safety analysis of mRNA vaccination in a phase 1, randomized, open-label trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05217641).

SETTING: Ten research sites in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS: 108 volunteers aged 18 to 55 years without HIV-1.

INTERVENTION: Investigational HIV-1 BG505 MD39.3 trimer mRNA vaccines (gp140 soluble trimer, gp151 membrane-bound trimer, and gp151 CD4KO membrane-bound trimer) at doses of 100 and 250 mcg at 0, 2, and 6 months.

MEASUREMENTS: Solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions and events reported during the 12 months after the first vaccination.

RESULTS: Participants (n = 108) were randomly assigned to 6 vaccine groups. Mild to moderate local and systemic solicited events were common. Eighty participants reported 190 unsolicited adverse events (AEs); 30 were considered to be related to a study product. Most (73%) related AEs were mild, and the rest were moderate. Among related AEs, urticaria was reported by 7 of 108 participants (7% [95% CI, 3% to 13%]), 4 of whom had unresolved, intermittent urticaria at 12 months. In post hoc analyses, demographic characteristics, history of allergy or medication use, and COVID-19 were not associated with urticaria. In a comparison of participants with versus without urticaria, 100% (7 of 7; CI, 65% to 100%) versus 37% (37 of 101; CI, 28% to 46%) reported previous Moderna COVID-19 vaccination, 29% (2 of 7; CI, 8% to 64%) versus 76% (77 of 101; CI, 67% to 84%) reported previous Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, and 0% (0 of 7; CI, 0% to 35%) versus 5% (5 of 101; CI, 2% to 11%) reported no previous mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

LIMITATIONS: Lack of a placebo group, open-label study, and post hoc evaluation of urticarial risk.

CONCLUSION: Urticarial reactions associated with experimental HIV-1 mRNA vaccines were observed in this trial. Studies to investigate the mechanism and approaches to mitigate these reactions are underway to further advance HIV-1 vaccine research.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Andrews, Leah I B, Elizabeth Halloran, Kathleen M Neuzil, Lars van der Laan, Yunda Huang, Jessica Andriesen, Mayur Patel, et al. (2025) 2025. “Evaluating the Test-Negative Design for COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Using Randomized Trial Data: A Secondary Cross-Protocol Analysis of 5 Randomized Clinical Trials.”. JAMA Network Open 8 (5): e2512763. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12763.

IMPORTANCE: The test-negative design (TND) has been widely used to assess postmarketing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness but requires further evaluation for this application.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the TND reliably evaluates vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 using placebo-controlled vaccine efficacy randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary cross-protocol analysis constructed TND study datasets from study sites in 16 countries across 5 continents using the blinded phase cohorts of 5 harmonized phase 3 COVID-19 Prevention Network RCTs: COVE (Coronavirus Vaccine Efficacy and Safety), AZD1222, ENSEMBLE, PREVENT-19 (Prefusion Protein Subunit Vaccine Efficacy Novavax Trial COVID-19), and VAT00008. Participants included adults who received the intended number of doses, experienced COVID-19-like symptoms, and obtained SARS-CoV-2 testing. Start dates ranged from July 27, 2020, to October 19, 2021; data cutoff dates ranged from March 26, 2021, to March 15, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed from May 11, 2023, to February 25, 2025.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants received vaccines consisting of messenger RNA-1273 (COVE; 2 doses 28 days apart), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222; 2 doses 28 days apart), Ad26.COV2.S (ENSEMBLE; 1 dose), NVX-CoV2373 (PREVENT-19; 2 doses 21 days apart), CoV2 preS dTM-AS03 (VAT00008; D614) (2 doses 21 days apart), or CoV2 preS dTM-AS03 (D614 plus B.1.351) (VAT00008; 2 doses 21 days apart) or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were symptomatic COVID-19 according to each trial's primary efficacy definition and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using targeted maximum likelihood estimation under a semiparametric logistic regression model and ordinary logistic regression. Noncase exchangeability, a core TND assumption for unbiased estimation, was also assessed by estimating vaccine efficacy against non-COVID-19 illness.

RESULTS: Among the 12 157 participants included in the analysis, mean (SD) age was 45 (15) years, 6414 were female (53%), 5858 were vaccinated (48%), 2835 experienced primary COVID-19 (23%), and 2992 experienced Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined COVID-19 (25%). TND vaccine effectiveness estimates were concordant with RCT vaccine efficacy estimates (concordance correlation coefficient, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.58-0.96] for both outcomes). The semiparametric method had 48% smaller variance estimates than ordinary logistic regression. Noncase exchangeability was generally supported with a median vaccine efficacy against non-COVID-19 illness of 7.7% (IQR, 2.7%-16.8%) across trial cohorts and most 95% CIs including 0.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-protocol analysis, the TND provided reliable inferences on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in health care-seeking populations for multiple vaccines and symptom definitions when confounding and selection bias were absent. A machine-learning approach for robust confounding control in postmarketing TND studies was also introduced.