Publications by Author: Martina D Liechti

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the current literature on lower urinary tract electrical sensory assessment (LUTESA), with regard to current perception thresholds (CPTs) and sensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and to discuss the applied methods in terms of technical aspects, confounding factors, and potential for lower urinary tract (LUT) diagnostics.

METHODS: The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Medline (PubMed), Embase and Scopus were searched on 13 October 2020. Meta-analyses were performed and methodological qualities of the included studies were defined by assessing risk of bias (RoB) as well as confounding.

RESULTS: After screening 9925 articles, 80 studies (five randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 75 non-RCTs) were included, comprising a total of 3732 patients and 692 healthy subjects (HS). Of these studies, 61 investigated CPTs exclusively and 19 reported on SEPs, with or without corresponding CPTs. The recording of LUTCPTs and SEPs was shown to represent a safe and reliable assessment of LUT afferent nerve function in HS and patients. LUTESA demonstrated significant differences in LUT sensitivity between HS and neurological patients, as well as after interventions such as pelvic surgery or drug treatments. Pooled analyses showed that several stimulation variables (e.g. stimulation frequency, location) as well as patient characteristics might affect the main outcome measures of LUTESA (CPTs, SEP latencies, peak-to-peak amplitudes, responder rate). RoB and confounding was high in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data show that CPT and SEP recordings are valuable tools to more objectively assess LUT afferent nerve function. LUTESA complements already established diagnostics such as urodynamics, allowing a more comprehensive patient evaluation. The high RoB and confounding rate was related to inconsistency and inaccuracy in reporting rather than the technique itself. LUTESA standardization and well-designed RCTs are crucial to implement LUTESA as a clinical assessment tool.

Despite the fact that a majority of patients with an injury to the spinal cord develop lower urinary tract dysfunction, only few treatment options are available currently once the dysfunction arises. Tibial nerve stimulation has been used in pilot clinical trials, with some promising results. Hence, we investigated whether the early application of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the animal model of spinal cord injured rats can prevent the development of detrusor overactivity and/or detrusor-sphincter-dyssynergia. Rats were implanted with a bladder catheter and external urethral sphincter electromyography electrodes. A dorsal over-hemisection, resulting in an incomplete spinal cord injury at the T8/9 spinal level, induced immediate bladder paralysis. One week later, the animals received daily tibial nerve or sham stimulation for 15 days. Effects of stimulation on the lower urinary tract function were assessed by urodynamic investigation. Measurements showed improvements of several key parameters of lower urinary tract function-in particular, non-voiding bladder contractions and intravesical pressure-immediately after the completion of the stimulation period in the stimulated animals. These differences extinguished one week later, however. In the dorsal horn of the lumbosacral spinal cord, a small significant increase of the density of C-fiber afferents layers I-II was found in the stimulated animals at four weeks after spinal cord injury. Tibial nerve stimulation applied acutely after spinal cord injury in rats had an immediate beneficial effect on lower urinary tract dysfunction; however, the effect was transitory and did not last over time. To achieve more sustainable, longer lasting effects, further studies are needed looking into different stimulation protocols using optimized stimulation parameters, timing, and treatment schedules.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), including neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, is one of the most frequent and devastating sequelae of spinal cord injury (SCI), as it can lead to urinary incontinence and secondary damage such as renal failure. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a promising, non-invasive neuromodulatory intervention that may prevent the emergence of the C-fibre evoked bladder reflexes that are thought to cause NDO. This paper presents the protocol for TTNS in acute SCI (TASCI), which will evaluate the efficacy of TTNS in preventing NDO. Furthermore, TASCI will provide insight into the mechanisms underlying TTNS, and the course of NLUTD development after SCI.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TASCI is a nationwide, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, conducted at all four SCI centres in Switzerland. The longitudinal design includes a baseline assessment period 5-39 days after acute SCI and follow-up assessments occurring 3, 6 and 12 months after SCI. A planned 114 participants will be randomised into verum or sham TTNS groups (1:1 ratio), stratified on study centre and lower extremity motor score. TTNS is performed for 30 min/day, 5 days/week, for 6-9 weeks starting within 40 days after SCI. The primary outcome is the occurrence of NDO jeopardising the upper urinary tract at 1 year after SCI, assessed by urodynamic investigation. Secondary outcome measures assess bladder and bowel function and symptoms, sexual function, neurological structure and function, functional independence, quality of life, as well as changes in biomarkers in the urine, blood, stool and bladder tissue. Safety of TTNS is the tertiary outcome.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: TASCI is approved by the Swiss Ethics Committee for Northwest/Central Switzerland, the Swiss Ethics Committee Vaud and the Swiss Ethics Committee Zürich (#2019-00074). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03965299.