Publications

2023

Komarraju, Aparna, Eddy Zandee Van Rilland, Mark C Gebhardt, Megan E Anderson, Carrie Heincelman, and Jim S Wu. (2023) 2023. “What Is the Value of Radiology Input During a Multidisciplinary Orthopaedic Oncology Conference?”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 481 (10): 2005-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002626.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary orthopaedic oncology conferences are important in developing the treatment plan for patients with suspected orthopaedic bone and soft tissue tumors, involving physicians from several services. Past studies have shown the clinical value of these conferences; however, the impact of radiology input on the management plan and time cost for radiology to staff these conferences has not been fully studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does radiology input at multidisciplinary conference help guide clinical management and improve clinician confidence? (2) What is the time cost of radiology input for a multidisciplinary conference?

METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from October 2020 to March 2022 at a tertiary academic center with a sarcoma center. A single data questionnaire for each patient was sent to one of three treating orthopaedic oncologists with 41, 19, and 5 years of experience after radiology discussion at a weekly multidisciplinary conference. A data questionnaire was completed by the treating orthopaedic oncologist for 48% (322 of 672) of patients, which refers to the proportion of those three oncologists' patients for which survey data were captured. A musculoskeletal radiology fellow and musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiology attending physician provided radiology input at each multidisciplinary conference. The clinical plan (leave alone, follow-up imaging, follow-up clinically, recommend different imaging test, core needle biopsy, surgical excision or biopsy or fixation, or other) and change in clinical confidence before and after radiology input were documented. A second weekly data questionnaire was sent to the radiology fellow to estimate the time cost of radiology input for the multidisciplinary conference.

RESULTS: In 29% (93 of 322) of patients, there was a change in the clinical plan after radiology input. Biopsy was canceled in 30% (24 of 80) of patients for whom biopsy was initially planned, and surgical excision was canceled in 24% (17 of 72) of patients in whom surgical excision was initially planned. In 21% (68 of 322) of patients, there were unreported imaging findings that affected clinical management; 13% (43 of 322) of patients had a missed finding, and 8% (25 of 322) of patients had imaging findings that were interpreted incorrectly. For confidence in the final treatment plan, 78% (251 of 322) of patients had an increase in clinical confidence by their treating orthopaedic oncologist after the multidisciplinary conference. Radiology fellows and attendings spent a mean of 4.2 and 1.5 hours, respectively, reviewing and presenting at a multidisciplinary conference each week. The annual combined prorated time cost for the radiology attending and fellow was estimated at USD 24,310 based on national median salary data for attendings and internal salary data for fellows.

CONCLUSION: In a study taken at one tertiary-care oncology program, input from radiology attendings and fellows in the setting of a multidisciplinary conference helped to guide the final treatment plan, reduce procedures, and improve clinician confidence in the final treatment plan, at an annual time cost of USD 24,310.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multidisciplinary orthopaedic oncology conferences can lead to changes in management plans, and the time cost to the radiologists should be budgeted for by the radiology department or parent institution.

Bulman, Julie C, Muhammad Saad Malik, Will Lindquester, Matthew Hawkins, Raymond Liu, and Ammar Sarwar. (2023) 2023. “Research Consensus Panel Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Update on Cost Research in IR.”. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : JVIR 34 (7): 1115-1125.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.03.001.

PURPOSE: To systematically review cost research in interventional radiology (IR) published since the Society of Interventional Radiology Research Consensus Panel on Cost in December 2016.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective assessment of cost research in adult and pediatric IR since December 2016 to July 2022 was conducted. All cost methodologies, service lines, and IR modalities were screened. Analyses were reported in a standardized fashion to include service lines, comparators, cost variables, analytical processes, and databases used.

RESULTS: There were 62 studies published, with most from the United States (58%). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life-years, and time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analyses were performed in 50%, 48%, and 10%, respectively. The most frequently reported service line was interventional oncology (21%). No studies on venous thromboembolism, biliary, or IR endocrine therapies were found. Cost reporting was heterogeneous owing to varying cost variables, databases, time horizons, and willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. IR therapies were more cost-effective than their non-IR counterparts for treating hepatocellular carcinoma ($55,925 vs $211,286), renal tumors ($12,435 vs $19,399), benign prostatic hyperplasia ($6,464 vs $9,221), uterine fibroids ($3,772 vs $6,318), subarachnoid hemorrhage ($1,923 vs $4,343), and stroke ($551,159 vs $577,181). TDABC identified disposable costs contributing most to total IR costs: thoracic duct embolization (68%), ablation (42%), chemoembolization (30%), radioembolization (80%), and venous malformations (75%).

CONCLUSIONS: Although much of the contemporary cost-based research in IR aligned with the recommendations by the Research Consensus Panel, gaps remained in service lines, standardization of methodology, and addressing high disposable costs. Future steps include tailoring WTP thresholds to nation and health systems, cost-effective pricing for disposables, and standardizing cost sourcing methodology.

Sarwar, Ammar, Alan Bonder, Lior Hassan, Muhammad S Malik, Victor Novack, Michael Curry, and Muneeb Ahmed. (2023) 2023. “Factors Associated With Complete Pathologic Necrosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Explant Evaluation After Locoregional Therapy: A National Analysis Using the UNOS Database.”. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 220 (5): 727-35. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.22.28385.

BACKGROUND. Complete pathologic necrosis (CPN) is associated with improved survival in patients who undergo liver transplant (LT) after locoregional therapy (LRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to identify patient, HCC, and transplant center characteristics associated with rates of CPN on explant evaluation using a large national sample of patients undergoing LT after LRT for HCC measuring 3 cm or smaller. METHODS. This retrospective study used data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The study included 6265 adults (median age, 62 years; 1505 women, 4760 men) who underwent LT after a single type of LRT (either transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], thermal ablation, or transarterial radioembolization [TARE]) for HCCs measuring 3 cm or smaller at one of 118 U.S. transplant centers from April 12, 2012, to March 31, 2020. Patients were classified as having CPN if explant evaluation showed 100% necrosis of all HCCs. Associations with CPN were explored. Centers were categorized into tertiles on the basis of center-level CPN rates, and tertiles were compared. RESULTS. LRT was performed by TACE in 69.5% (4352/6265), thermal ablation in 19.4% (1217/6265), and TARE in 11.1% (696/6265) of patients. CPN rate was 18.5% (805/4352) after TACE, 35.8% (436/1217) after thermal ablation, 33.6% (234/696) after TARE, and 23.5% (1475/6265) overall. In multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, model for end-stage liver disease score, α-fetoprotein level before LRT, wait list time, number of HCCs, HCC size, and the transplant center (as a random factor), use of thermal ablation (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.86-2.57; p < .001) or TARE (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.57-2.36; p < .001), with TACE as reference, independently predicted greater likelihood of CPN. Center-level CPN rates ranged from 0.0% to 50.0%. With centers stratified by CPN rates, ablation was performed more frequently than TACE in 5.0% of centers in the first, 15.4% in the second, and 23.1% in the third tertiles (p = .07). CONCLUSION. CPN rate on explant evaluation was low. Thermal ablation or TARE, rather than TACE, was associated with higher likelihood of CPN in patient-level and center-level analyses. CLINICAL IMPACT. Findings from this large national sample support a potential role of thermal ablation or TARE for achieving CPN of HCC measuring 3 cm or smaller.

Bezuidenhout, Abraham F, Pei-Kang Wei, Deborah Burstein, Alexander Brook, Olga R Brook, Steven D Freedman, and Leo L Tsai. (2023) 2023. “Unexplained Acute Distal Pancreatitis: Association With Subsequent Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.”. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 221 (2): 196-205. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.23.28999.

BACKGROUND. Distal pancreatitis is an atypical imaging subtype of acute pancreatitis involving only the pancreatic body and tail, the head being spared. If no cause is identified, suspicion of a small imaging-occult cancer may be warranted. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of subsequently diagnosed pancreatic cancer in patients with unexplained acute distal pancreatitis and to compare this frequency to that found in patients with unexplained nondistal pancreatitis. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, that showed acute pancreatitis without identifiable explanation. Studies were classified as showing distal or nondistal acute pancreatitis on the basis of consensus. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the frequency of subsequent histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer between groups. Negative classification required 6 or more months of imaging follow-up and/or 12 or more months of clinical follow-up. Interreader agreement among seven readers of varying experience was assessed by Fleiss kappa. RESULTS. Among 215 patients with acute pancreatitis, 116 (54%) had no identifiable explanation and formed the study sample. A total of 100 of 116 (86%) patients (59 men, 41 women; mean age, 57 ± 18 [SD] years) had nondistal acute pancreatitis; 16 of 116 (14%) patients (10 men, six women; mean age, 66 ± 14 years) had distal acute pancreatitis. Among patients with nondistal pancreatitis, none were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer; 62 had sufficient follow-up (median, 2.5 years) to be classified as having negative follow-up for pancreatic cancer. Among patients with distal pancreatitis, nine were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (median interval to suspected cancer on subsequent CT, 174 days); five had sufficient follow-up (median, 3.1 years) to be classified as having negative follow-up for pancreatic cancer. The frequency of pancreatic cancer was higher (p < .001) in patients with distal pancreatitis (9/14 [64%; 95% CI, 35-87%]) than in with those with nondistal pancreatitis (0/62 [0%; 95% CI, 0-6%]). Interreader agreement on classification of distal versus nondistal pancreatitis was almost perfect (κ = 0.81). CONCLUSION. Distal pancreatitis without identifiable cause on CT is an uncommon but unique imaging subtype of acute pancreatitis that is associated with a high frequency of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. In patients with acute distal pancreatitis without identifiable cause, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy should be considered to evaluate for an underlying small cancer.

Buitrago, Daniel H, Adnan Majid, Jennifer L Wilson, Daniel Ospina-Delgado, Fayez Kheir, Abraham F Bezuidenhout, Mihir S Parikh, Alex C Chee, Diana Litmanovich, and Sidhu P Gangadharan. (2023) 2023. “Tracheobronchoplasty Yields Long-Term Anatomy, Function, and Quality of Life Improvement for Patients With Severe Excessive Central Airway Collapse.”. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 165 (2): 518-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.05.037.

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the long-term anatomic and clinical effects of tracheobronchoplasty in severe excessive central airway collapse.

METHODS: Included patients underwent tracheobronchoplasty for excessive central airway collapse (2002-2016). The cross-sectional area of main airways on dynamic airway computed tomography was measured before and after tracheobronchoplasty. Expiratory collapse was calculated as the difference between inspiratory and expiratory cross-sectional area divided by inspiratory cross-sectional area ×100. The primary outcome was improvement in the percentage of expiratory collapse in years 1, 2, and 5 post-tracheobronchoplasty. Secondary outcomes included mean response profile for the 6-minute walk test, Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Karnofsky Performance Status score, and St George Respiratory Questionnaire. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS: The cohort included 61 patients with complete radiological follow-up at years 1, 2, and 5 post-tracheobronchoplasty. A significant linear decrease in the percentage of expiratory collapsibility of the central airways after tracheobronchoplasty was present. Anatomic repair durability was preserved 5 years after tracheobronchoplasty, with decrease in percentage of expiratory airway collapse up to 40% and 30% at years 1 and 2, respectively. The St George Respiratory Questionnaire (74.7 vs 41.8%, P < .001) and Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (78 vs 47, P < .001) demonstrated significant improvement at year 5 compared with baseline. Similar results were observed in the 6-minute walk test (1079 vs 1268 ft, P < .001) and Karnofsky score (57 vs 82, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Tracheobronchoplasty has durable effects on airway anatomy, functional status, and quality of life in carefully selected patients with severe excessive central airway collapse.

Dave, Priya, Olga R Brook, Alexander Brook, Ammar Sarwar, and Bettina Siewert. (2023) 2023. “Moral Distress in Radiology: Frequency, Root Causes, and Countermeasures-Results of a National Survey.”. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 221 (2): 249-57. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.22.28968.

BACKGROUND. A major cause of burnout is moral distress: when one knows the right course of action but institutional constraints make the right course impossible to pursue. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and severity with which radiologists experience moral distress and to explore moral distress's root causes and countermeasures. METHODS. This study entailed a national survey that evaluated moral distress in radiology. The survey incorporated the validated Moral Distress Scale for Health Care Professionals, along with additional questions. After the scale was modified for applicability to radiology, respondents were asked to assess 16 clinical scenarios in terms of frequency and severity of moral distress. On May 10, 2022, the survey was sent by e-mail to 425 members of radiology practices included on a national radiology society's quality-and-safety LISTSERV. The Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals (MMD-HP) score was calculated for each respondent as a summary measure of distress across scenarios (maximum possible score, 256). RESULTS. After 12 surveys with incomplete data were excluded, the final analysis included 93 of 425 respondents (22%). A total of 91 of 93 respondents (98%) experienced at least some moral distress for at least one scenario. A total of 17 of 93 respondents (18%) had left a clinical position due to moral distress; 26 of 93 (28%) had considered leaving a clinical position due to moral distress but did not leave. The mean MMD-HP score was 73 ± 51 (SD) for those who had left, 89 ± 47 for those who had considered leaving but did not leave, and 39 ± 35 for those who had never considered leaving (p < .001). A total of 41 of 85 respondents (48%) thought that the COVID-19 pandemic had influenced their moral distress level. Across respondents, the three scenarios with highest moral distress were related to systemic causes (higher case volume than could be read safely, high case volume preventing teaching residents, and lack of administrative action or support). The countermeasure most commonly selected to alleviate moral distress was educating leadership about sources of moral distress (71%). CONCLUSION. Moral distress is prevalent in radiology, typically relates to systemic causes, and is a reported contributor to radiologists changing jobs. CLINICAL IMPACT. Urgent action by radiology practice leadership is required to address moral distress, as radiologists commonly practice in environments contradictory to their core values as physicians.

Hindman, Nicole, Stella Kang, Laure Fournier, Yulia Lakhman, Stephanie Nougaret, Caroline Reinhold, Elizabeth Sadowski, Jian Qun Huang, and Susan Ascher. (2023) 2023. “MRI Evaluation of Uterine Masses for Risk of Leiomyosarcoma: A Consensus Statement.”. Radiology 306 (2): e211658. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.211658.

Laparoscopic myomectomy, a common gynecologic operation in premenopausal women, has become heavily regulated since 2014 following the dissemination of unsuspected uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) throughout the pelvis of a physician treated for symptomatic leiomyoma. Research since that time suggests a higher prevalence than previously suspected of uterine LMS in resected masses presumed to represent leiomyoma, as high as one in 770 women (0.13%). Though rare, the dissemination of an aggressive malignant neoplasm due to noncontained electromechanical morcellation in laparoscopic myomectomy is a devastating outcome. Gynecologic surgeons' desire for an evidence-based, noninvasive evaluation for LMS is driven by a clear need to avoid such harms while maintaining the availability of minimally invasive surgery for symptomatic leiomyoma. Laparoscopic gynecologists could rely upon the distinction of higher-risk uterine masses preoperatively to plan oncologic surgery (ie, potential hysterectomy) for patients with elevated risk for LMS and, conversely, to safely offer women with no or minimal indicators of elevated risk the fertility-preserving laparoscopic myomectomy. MRI evaluation for LMS may potentially serve this purpose in symptomatic women with leiomyomas. This evidence review and consensus statement defines imaging and disease-related terms to allow more uniform and reliable interpretation and identifies the highest priorities for future research on LMS evaluation.

Maturen, Katherine E, Cheri L Canon, Joel G Fletcher, Amy K Hara, David H Kim, Jonathan B Kruskal, Frank H Miller, Erick M Remer, and Stuart G Silverman. (2023) 2023. “The Society of Abdominal Radiology at 10 years: Reflections, Status Report, and Look to the Future.”. Abdominal Radiology (New York) 48 (2): 441-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03767-z.

In 2012, the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) was formed by the merger of the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists (SGR) and the Society of Uroradiology (SUR). On the occasion of SAR's ten year anniversary, this commentary describes important changes in society structure, the growth and diversity of society membership, new educational and research initiatives, intersociety and international outreach, and plans for the future.