Publications

PURPOSE: There are limited existing data on the lymphatic anatomy of patients with primary lymphedema (LED), which is caused by aberrant development of lymphatic channels. In addition, there is a paucity of contemporary studies that use groin intranodal lymphangiography (IL) to evaluate LED anatomy. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to better delineate the disease process and anatomy of primary LED using groin IL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified common groin IL findings in a cohort of 17 primary LED patients performed between 1/1/2017 and 1/31/2022 at a single institution. These patients were clinically determined to have primary lymphedema and demonstrated associated findings on lower extremity MR and lymphoscintigraphy.

RESULTS: Ten patients (59%) demonstrated irregular lymph node morphology or a paucity of lymph nodes on the more symptomatic laterality. Eight patients (47%) demonstrated lymphovenous shunting from pre-existing anastomoses between the lymphatic and venous systems. Eight patients (47%) demonstrated passage of contrast past midline to the contralateral lymphatics. Finally, 12 patients (71%) failed to opacify the cisterna chyli and thoracic duct on their initial lymphangiograms. Delayed computed tomography of 3 patients showed eventual central lymphatic opacification up to the renal veins, but none of these patients showed central lymphatic opacification to the thorax.

CONCLUSION: This descriptive, exploratory study demonstrates common central groin IL findings in primary LED to highlight patterns interventional radiologists should identify and report when addressing primary LED.

Primary adrenal angiosarcomas are exceedingly rare with a rapidly progressive clinical course and a poor outcome. Establishing the diagnosis can be challenging, and it is complicated by the fact that there are no characteristic clinical or imaging features that are pathognomonic for angiosarcoma. Histologically, they can overlap with other more commonly encountered adrenal tumors. Herein, we present an otherwise healthy 41-year-old woman diagnosed with a primary adrenal epithelioid angiosarcoma. We aim to expand the knowledge of the sparse literature existing on primary adrenal angiosarcomas to help better understand the diagnostic features, clinical behavior, and management of these rare tumors.

The purpose of this study is to compare the subjective and objective quality and confidence between conventional angiography with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative evaluation of potential donors for living donor liver transplant. Seventeen patients undergoing preoperative donor evaluation for living donor liver transplantation that underwent angiography with CBCT and contrast-enhanced MRI for evaluation of hepatic vascular anatomy were included in the study. Four attending radiologists interpreted anonymized, randomized angiography with CBCT images and MRIs, rating the diagnostic quality and confidence of their interpretation (on a 3-point scale) for each element, as well as clinically relevant measurements. Overall, the readers rated the quality of angiography with CBCT to be higher than that of MRI (median [interquartile range] = 3 (2, 3) vs. 2 (1-3), p < 0.001) across all patients. Readers of angiography with CBCT had more confidence in their interpretations as an average of all elements evaluated than the MRI readers (3 (3) vs. 3 (2, 3), p < 0.001). When the same reader interpreted both MRI and CBCT, the right hepatic artery diameter (3.8 mm ± 0.72 mm vs. 4.5 mm ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.005) and proper hepatic artery diameter (4.43 mm ± 0.98 mm vs. 5.4 mm ± 1.05 mm, p < 0.003) were significantly different between MRI and CBCT. There was poor interrater reliability for determining segment IV arterial supply for both modalities (κ < 0.2). Angiography with CBCT provides higher subjective diagnostic quality and greater radiologist confidence than MRI. The difference in measurements between CBCT and MRI when the same reader reads both studies suggests CBCT adds additional information over MRI evaluation alone.

BACKGROUND: Routine concordance evaluation between pathology and imaging findings was introduced for CT-guided biopsies.

PURPOSE: To analyze malignancy rate in concordant, discordant, and indeterminate non-malignant results of CT-guided lung biopsies.

METHODS: Concordance between pathology results and imaging findings of consecutive patients undergoing CT-guided lung biopsy between 7/1/2016 and 9/30/2021 was assessed during routine meetings by procedural radiologists. Concordant was defined as pathology consistent with imaging findings; discordant was used when pathology could not explain imaging findings; indeterminate when pathology could explain imaging findings but there was concern for malignancy. Recommendations for discordant and indeterminate were provided. All the malignant results were concordant. Pathology of repeated biopsy, surgical sample, or follow-up was considered reference standard.

RESULTS: Consecutive 828 CT-guided lung biopsies were performed on 795 patients (median age 70 years, IQR 61-77), 423/828 (51%) women. On pathology, 224/828 (27%) were non-malignant. Among the non-malignant, radiology-pathology concordance determined 138/224 (62%) to be concordant with imaging findings, 54/224 (24%) discordant, and 32/224 (14%) indeterminate. When compared to the reference standard, 33/54 (61%) discordant results, 6/30 (20%) indeterminate, and 3/133 (2%) concordant were malignant. The prevalence of malignancy in the three groups was significantly different (p < 0.001). Time to diagnosis was significantly different between patients who reached the diagnosis with imaging follow-up (median 114 days, IQR 69-206) compared to repeat biopsy (33 days, IQR 18-133) (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION: Routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided lung biopsy correctly identifies patients at high risk for missed diagnosis of malignancy. Repeat biopsy is the fastest method to reach diagnosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A routine radiology-pathology concordance assessment identifies patients with non-malignant CT-guided lung biopsy result who are at greater risk of missed diagnosis of malignancy.

KEY POINTS: • A routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided lung biopsies classified 224 non-malignant results as concordant, discordant, or indeterminate. • The percentage of malignancy on follow-up was significantly different in concordant (2%), discordant (61%), and indeterminate (20%) (p < 0.001). • Time to definitive diagnosis was significantly shorter with repeat biopsy (33 days), compared to imaging follow-up (114 days), p = 0.01.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and safety of using computed tomography (CT) guidance for ablation of prostate cancer in the salvage setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved retrospective study of consecutive patients who presented with prostate cancer recurrence and underwent percutaneous CT-guided cryoablation was conducted between July 2020 and September 2022. A total of 18 patients met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 19 procedures were performed. Demographic details; preablation and postablation urinary, rectal, and erectile function assessment; procedure details; and preoperative and postoperative imaging findings and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were recorded.

RESULTS: The mean treated tumor size was 15.7 mm ± 6.2. Technical success was achieved in 18 of the 19 procedures (94.7%), with 1 procedure aborted due to inability to obtain a safe plane. The mean follow-up time was 10.0 months (range, 2.3-26.7 months) at the time of manuscript preparation. The mean PSA before ablation was 8.1 ng/mL ± 9.3, and postablation PSA nadir was 2.6 ng/mL ± 4.0 (P = .002). Of the 18 patients who had postoperative imaging, 16 (88.9%) had a complete response (ie, no evidence of residual disease), and 2 (11.1%) patients had residual disease. Overall, 16 (88.9%) of the 18 treated patients demonstrated a PSA and/or imaging response to ablation. Mild adverse events occurred in 4 (22%) of the 18 cases.

CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided cryoablation appears to be a technically feasible, safe option for treating locally recurrent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: After intubation, a frontal chest radiograph (CXR) is obtained to assess the endotracheal tube (ETT) position by measuring the ETT tip-to-carina distance. ETT tip location changes with neck position and can be determined by assessing the position of the mandible. As the mandible is typically not visualized on standard CXRs, we developed a new protocol where the mandible is seen on the CXR, hypothesizing that it will improve the accuracy of the ETT position assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups of intubated patients studied (February 9, 2021 to May 4, 2021): CXR taken in either standard or new protocol (visible mandible required). Two observers independently assessed the images for the neck position (neutral, flexed, and extended) based on the mandible position relative to the vertebral bodies. With the mandible absent (ie, neck position unknown), we established terms: "gray zone" (difficult to assess the ETT position adequately) and "clear zone" (confident recommendation to retract, advance, or maintain ETT position). We compared the rate of confident assessment of the ETT in the standard versus the new protocol.

RESULTS: Of 308 patients, 155 had standard CXRs and 153 had the new protocol. Interrater agreements for the distance between the ETT and the carina and mandible height based on vertebral bodies were 0.986 ( P < 0.001) and 0.955 ( P < 0.001), respectively. The mandible was visualized significantly more often ( P < 0.001) with the new protocol (92%; 141/153) than with the standard protocol (21%; 32/155). By visualizing the mandible or the presence of the ETT within the clear zone, a reader could confidently assess the ETT position more often using the new protocol (96.7% vs 51.6%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Mandible visibility on postintubation CXR is helpful for assessing the ETT position. The new protocol resulted in a significant increase in both visualizing the mandible and accurately determining ETT position on postintubation CXR.

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of a commercial tracking database on inferior vena cava filter retrievals with that of physician tracking and no tracking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2021, 532 filters were placed at a single institution and followed in 3 phases: (a) Phase 1, pretracking (January 1, 2013, to February 28, 2015); (b) Phase 2, commercial database tracking (March 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019); and (c) Phase 3, commercial database tracking with separate tracking by an interventional radiologist (July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021). Patients excluded from the commercial database due to human error served as a control group. Outcomes of commercial database entry, 2-year filter retrieval rates, dwell times, and factors contributing to retrieval candidacy were collected.

RESULTS: Two-year retrieval rates in Phases 1, 2 and 3 were 20%, 31%, and 46%, respectively (Phase 1 vs 2, P = .04; Phase 2 vs 3, P = .009). Median dwell times across Phases 1, 2, and 3 were 168 days (4-1,313 days), 140 days (3-1,988 days), and 188 days (13-734 days) (P = .33), respectively. There was no difference in retrieval rates (P = .86) and dwell times (P = .50) between patients enrolled in the database group and those enrolled in the control group. Across all phases, 48% of patients enrolled in the database were not successfully contacted, and only 6% were categorized as "likely to consult" filter retrieval. During Phase 3, 100% of patients achieved a retrieval disposition.

CONCLUSIONS: A commercial tracking database had low success rates of contacting patients and did not increase filter retrieval rates relative to those in the control group; however, physician tracking increased retrieval rates.