Publications

PURPOSE: To prospectively validate electromagnetic hand motion tracking in interventional radiology to detect differences in operator experience using simulation.

METHODS: Sheath task: Six attending interventional radiologists (experts) and 6 radiology trainees (trainees) placed a wire through a sheath and performed a "pin-pull" maneuver, while an electromagnetic motion detection system recorded the hand motion. Radial task: Eight experts and 12 trainees performed palpatory radial artery access task on a radial access simulator. The trainees repeated the task with the nondominant hand. The experts were classified by their most frequent radial artery access technique as having either palpatory, ultrasound, or overall limited experience. The time, path length, and number of movements were calculated. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the groups, and P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS: Sheath task: The experts took less time, had shorter path lengths, and used fewer movements than the trainees (11.7 seconds ± 3.3 vs 19.7 seconds ± 6.5, P < .01; 1.1 m ± 0.3 vs 1.4 m ± 0.4, P < .01; and 19.5 movements ± 8.5 vs 31.0 movements ± 8.0, P < .01, respectively). Radial task: The experts took less time, had shorter path lengths, and used fewer movements than the trainees (24.2 seconds ± 10.6 vs 33.1 seconds ± 16.9, P < .01; 2.0 m ± 0.5 vs 3.0 m ± 1.9, P < .001; and 36.5 movements ± 15.0 vs 54.5 movements ± 28.0, P < .001, respectively). The trainees had a shorter path length for their dominant hand than their nondominant hand (3.0 m ± 1.9 vs 3.5 m ± 1.9, P < .05). The expert palpatory group had a shorter path length than the ultrasound and limited experience groups (1.8 m ± 0.4 vs 2.0 m ± 0.4 and 2.3 m ± 1.2, respectively, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic hand motion tracking can differentiate between the expert and trainee operators for simulated interventional tasks.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the recalculation of lung shunt fraction (LSF) is necessary prior to next-stage or same lobe repeat radioembolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent radioembolization between February 2008 and December 2018. Eighty of 312 patients had repeat mapping angiograms and LSF calculations. A total of 160 LSF calculations were made using planar imaging (155, [97%]) and single-photon emission computed tomography (5 [3%]) technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin hepatic arterial injection imaging. The mean patient age was 61.8 years ± 12.7; 69 (86%) patients had metastatic disease and 11 (14%) had hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS: Patients had a median LSF of 5% (interquartile range [IQR] 3%-9%) with a median absolute difference of 1.25 (IQR 0.65-3.4) and a median of 76 days (IQR 42.5-120 days) between repeat LSF calculations. There was a median change in LSF of 0.2% between mapping studies (P = .11). There was no statistical significance between the repeat LSFs regardless of the arterial distribution (P = .79) or between tumor types (P = .75). No patients exceeded lung dose limits using actual or predicted prescribed dose amounts. The actual median lung dose was 2.6 Gy (IQR 1.8-4.4 Gy, maximum = 20.5) for the first radioembolization and 2.0 Gy (IQR 1.3-3.7 Gy, maximum = 10.1) for the second radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in LSF was identified between different time points and arterial distributions within the same patient undergoing repeat radioembolization. In patients who receive well under 30-Gy lung dose for the initial treatment and a 50-Gy cumulative lung dose, repeat radioembolization treatments in the same patient may not require a repeat LSF calculation.

PURPOSE: Non-contrast CT ASPECTS (NCCTasp) has an established role in determining eligibility for mechanical thrombectomy in centers without ready access to perfusion or DWI. Moreover, it has been suggested that CTA source ASPECTS (CTAasp) may be superior to NCCTasp in predicting final infarct volume (FIV). In this study, we hypothesized that CTA maximum intensity projection ASPECTS (MIPSasp) would be superior compared to both NCCTasp and CTAasp in predicting FIV as measured by DWI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 41 consecutive patients with MCA territory infarcts, NCCTasp, CTAasp and MIPSasp were visually assessed by 2 neuroradiologists. Disagreements were adjudicated by a third neuroradiologist, and the reconciled data used for all further analysis. MR-DWI was used as the standard for FIV determination. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare the area under the curve for all three CT-based methods in predicting FIV ≥70 ml.

RESULTS: MIPSasp (AUC: 0.98, CI: 0.88-1.00) were statistically better than NCCTasp (AUC: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.72-0.95; p=0.01) in predicting FIV ≥70 ml. MIPSasp were also superior to CTAasp (AUC: 0.9, CI: 0.79-.98; p˂0.05). Optimal test performance for predicting FIV ≥70 ml for MIPSasp was ≤6 (sensitivity=100%, specificity=91.4%; Youden's J=0.98).

CONCLUSION: Our preliminary study suggests that a novel CTA-MIPS derived ASPECTS better predicts large MCA territory infarcts compared to CTA source and non-contrast ASPECTS. Thus, MIPSasp may be a promising technique for future studies aimed at improving ischemic stroke treatment in centers using ASPECTS for stroke management.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to examine the impact of nodule density on recurrence and survival in female patients with lung adenocarcinoma treated by lobectomy or sublobar resection.

METHODS: In this retrospective study of female patients who underwent surgical resection for pathologic stage IA adenocarcinoma, patients with preoperative imaging were included for analysis if the consolidation-to-tumor ratio was 0.5 (solid-predominant ground-glass opacity [GGO]) to 1.0 (solid). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Risk estimates were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS: For all 357 patients sublobar resection demonstrated worse 5-year DFS compared with lobectomy (76.4% vs 67.9%, P = .05). Multivariable modeling showed worse DFS with sublobar resection (hazard ratio, 1.55; P = .06) and tumors ≥ 2 cm (hazard ratio, 2.32; P = .05). On radiologic evaluation the solid-predominant GGO group (n = 81) demonstrated a smaller solid component compared with the solid nodule group (n = 163; 1.49 cm vs. 1.84 cm, respectively; P < .001) yet comparable total size. The solid-predominant GGO group showed improved 5-year OS (90.8 vs 76.8, P = .01) and DFS (79.3 vs 67.2, P = .05) compared with the solid nodule group. Additionally the solid-predominant GGO group demonstrated equivalent OS (90.8% vs 90.8%, P = .93) and DFS (76.0% vs 81.7%, P = .60) with sublobar resection compared with lobectomy.

CONCLUSIONS: In this report of female patients with stage IA adenocarcinoma, sublobar resection was associated with worse DFS compared with lobectomy in whole-group analysis. However patients with solid-predominant GGOs demonstrated improved 5-year OS and DFS compared with patients with solid nodules with equivalent outcomes regardless of resection type.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between novel lifestyle factors on risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), define the threshold at which smoking increases RA-ILD risk, and calculate the degree to which known lifestyle and clinical factors predict RA-ILD.

METHODS: This nested case-control study matched incident RA-ILD cases to RA non-ILD controls on age, sex, RA duration, rheumatoid factor, and time from exposure assessment to RA-ILD. Exposures included education, BMI, smoking, anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, race, joint erosions, rheumatoid nodules, C-reactive protein (CRP), disease activity score, functional status, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use, and glucocorticoid use. OR for each exposure on risk of RA-ILD were obtained from logistic regression models. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated based on all lifestyle and clinical exposures.

RESULTS: We identified 84 incident RA-ILD cases and 233 matched controls. After adjustment, obesity, high-positive CRP (≥ 10 mg/L), and poor functional status (multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire [MDHAQ] ≥ 1) were associated with increased risk of RA-ILD (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.11-5.24 vs normal BMI; OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.21-5.64 vs CRP < 3 mg/L; OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.32-7.26 vs MDHAQ < 0.2). Smoking 30 pack-years or more was strongly associated with risk of RA-ILD compared to never smokers (OR 6.06, 95% CI 2.72-13.5). Together, lifestyle and clinical risk factors for RA-ILD had an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85).

CONCLUSION: Obesity, CRP, functional status, and extensive smoking may be novel risk factors for RA-ILD that may be useful for RA-ILD risk assessment and prevention. The overall ability to predict RA-ILD remains modest.

Background Tumor perfusion may inform therapeutic response and resistance in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with antiangiogenic therapy. Purpose To determine if arterial spin labeled (ASL) MRI perfusion changes are associated with tumor response and disease progression in metastatic RCC treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00749320), metastatic RCC perfusion was measured with ASL MRI before and during sunitinib or pazopanib therapy between October 2008 and March 2014. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Perfusion was compared between responders and nonresponders at baseline, at week 2, after cycle 2 (12 weeks), after cycle 4 (24 weeks), and at disease progression and compared with the ORR by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and with PFS by using the log-rank test. Results Seventeen participants received sunitinib (mean age, 59 years ± 7.0 [standard deviation]; 11 men); 11 participants received pazopanib (mean age, 63 years ± 6.6; eight men). Responders had higher baseline tumor perfusion than nonresponders (mean, 404 mL/100 g/min ± 213 vs 199 mL/100 g/min ± 136; P = .02). Perfusion decreased from baseline to week 2 (-53 mL/100 g/min ± 31; P < .001), after cycle 2 (-65 mL/100 g/min ± 25; P < .001), and after cycle 4 (-79 mL/100 g/min ± 15; P = .008). Interval reduction in perfusion at those three time points was not associated with ORR (P = .63, .29, and .27, respectively) or PFS (P = .28, .27, and .32). Perfusion increased from cycle 4 to disease progression (51% ± 11; P < .001). Conclusion Arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI may assist in identifying responders to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and may help detect early evidence of disease progression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Goh and De Vita in this issue.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if superior segmentectomy has equivalent overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) to lower lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the superior segment.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all Stage 1 lower lobectomies for superior segment lesions and superior segmentectomies at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Comparison statistics and Cox hazard modeling were performed to determine differences between groups and attempt to identify risk factors for OS, DFS, and LRFS.

RESULTS: Superior segmentectomy patients, compared with lower lobectomy patients, had more current smokers, worse forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage, radiologic emphysema scores, clinically and pathologically smaller tumors, and more occurrences of 0 lymph nodes examined. Outcomes for superior segmentectomy compared with lower lobectomy were equivalent for 5-year OS (67.0% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.70), DFS (56.9% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.59), and LRFS (87.9% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.46). Multivariable Cox modeling lacked utility due to no outcome differences.

CONCLUSIONS: In well-selected patients, superior segmentectomies can have equivalent OS, DFS, and LRFS compared with lower lobectomies of superior segment tumors for early stage lung cancer. Further data are needed to provide better risk estimates.

Primary aldosteronism is an underdiagnosed cause of hypertension. Although inadequate screening is one reason for underdiagnosis, another important contributor is that clinicians may inappropriately exclude the diagnosis when screening aldosterone concentrations fall below traditionally established thresholds. We evaluated the intraindividual variability in screening aldosterone concentrations and aldosterone-to-renin ratios, and how this variability could impact case detection, among 51 patients with confirmed primary aldosteronism who had 2 or more screening measurements of renin and aldosterone on different days. There were a total of 137 screening measurements with a mean of 3 (range 2-6) per patient. The mean intraindividual variability, expressed as coefficients of variation, was 31% for aldosterone and 45% for the aldosterone-to-renin ratio. Aldosterone concentrations ranged from 4.9 to 51 ng/dL; 49% of patients had at least one aldosterone measurement below 15 ng/dL, 29% had at least 2 aldosterone measurements below 15 ng/dL, and 29% had at least one measurement below 10 ng/dL. Individual aldosterone-to-renin ratios ranged from 8.2 to 427 ng/dL per ng/mL·hour; 57% had at least one ratio below 30 ng/dL per ng/mL·hour, 27% had at least 2 ratios below 30 ng/dL per ng/mL·hour, and 24% had at least one ratio below 20 ng/dL per ng/mL·hour. Aldosterone concentrations and aldosterone-to-renin ratios are highly variable in patients with primary aldosteronism, with many screening values falling below conventionally accepted diagnostic thresholds. The diagnostic yield for primary aldosteronism may be substantially increased by recalibrating the definition of a positive screen to include more liberal thresholds for aldosterone and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio.

BACKGROUND: Variability of aldosterone concentrations has been described in patients with primary aldosteronism.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 340 patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent adrenal venous sampling (AVS) at a tertiary referral center, 116 of whom also had a peripheral venous aldosterone measured hours before the procedure. AVS was performed by the same interventional radiologist using bilateral, simultaneous sampling, under unstimulated and then stimulated conditions, and each sample was obtained in triplicate. Main outcome measures were: (i) change in day of AVS venous aldosterone from pre-AVS to intra-AVS and (ii) variability of triplicate adrenal venous aldosterone concentrations during AVS.

RESULTS: Within an average duration of 131 minutes, 81% of patients had a decline in circulating aldosterone concentrations (relative decrease of 51% and median decrease of 7.0 ng/dl). More than a quarter (26%) of all patients had an inferior vena cava aldosterone of ≤5 ng/dl at AVS initiation. The mean coefficient of variation of triplicate adrenal aldosterone concentrations was 30% and 39%, in the left and right veins, respectively (corresponding to a percentage difference of 57% and 73%), resulting in lateralization discordance in up to 17% of patients if the lateralization index were calculated using only one unstimulated aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio rather than the average of triplicate measures.

CONCLUSIONS: Circulating aldosterone levels can reach nadirs conventionally considered incompatible with the primary aldosteronism diagnosis, and adrenal venous aldosterone concentrations exhibit acute variability that can confound AVS interpretation. A single venous aldosterone measurement lacks precision and reproducibility in primary aldosteronism.