Publications

PURPOSE: The tricipital, or Caplan's, lymphatic pathway has been previously identified in cadavers and described as a potential compensatory pathway for lymphatic drainage of the upper extremity, as it may drain lymphatic fluid directly to the scapular lymph nodes, avoiding the axillary lymph node groups. The aim of this study was to map the anatomy of the tricipital pathway in vivo in patients without lymphatic disease.

METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing preoperative Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography prior to axillary lymph node dissection from May 2021 through January 2022. Exclusion criteria were evidence or known history of upper extremity lymphedema or non-linear channels visualized on ICG. Demographic, oncologic, and ICG imaging data were extracted from a Lymphatic Surgery Database. The primary outcome of this study was the presence and absence of the tricipital pathway. The secondary outcome was major anatomical variations among those with a tricipital pathway.

RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent preoperative ICG lymphography in the study period. The tricipital pathway was visualized in the posterior upper arm in 90% of patients. In 63% of patients, the pathway had a functional connection to the forearm (long bundle variant) and in 27%, the pathway was isolated to the upper arm without a connection to the forearm (short bundle variant). In those with a long bundle, the contribution was predominantly from the posterior ulnar lymphosome. Anatomic destinations of the tricipital pathway included the deltotricipital groove and the medial upper arm channel, which drains to the axilla.

CONCLUSION: When present, the tricipital pathway coursed along the posterior upper arm with variability in its connections to the forearm distally, and the torso proximally. Long-term follow-up studies will help determine the significance of these anatomic variations in terms of individual risk of lymphedema after axillary nodal dissection.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has become increasingly utilized for the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). A growing body of evidence has demonstrated the long-term efficacy of ILR in reducing the rate of BCRL. While certain risk factors for BCRL are well-recognized, such as axillary lymph node dissection, regional lymph node radiation, and elevated body mass index, other potential risk factors such as age and taxane-based chemotherapeutics remain under discussion. Our experience with ILR has highlighted an additional potential risk factor for BCRL. Lymphatic anatomy, specifically compensatory lymphatic channels that bypass the axilla, may play a largely underrecognized role in determining which patients will develop BCRL after ILR. Foundational anatomic knowledge has primarily been based on cadaveric studies that predate the twentieth century. Modern approaches to lymphatic anatomical mapping using indocyanine green lymphography have helped to elucidate baseline lymphatic anatomy and compensatory channels, and certain variations within these channels may act as anatomic risk factors. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to highlight ways in which variations in lymphatic anatomy can inform the application and improve the accessibility of this procedure. As ILR continues to advance and evolve, anatomical mapping of the lymphatic system is valuable to both the patient and lymphatic microsurgeon and is a critical area of future study.

Breast lymphedema is a type of breast cancer related lymphedema that leads to significant discomfort and negative impact on body image. Conservative therapy and lymphovenous bypass have been previously described as possible treatment methods for breast lymphedema, however, a unified approach to treatment is lacking. The current report describes a case of breast lymphedema successfully treated with vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) after failed attempt at management with conservative therapy. The patient is a 48-year-old female with right-sided breast cancer who underwent breast conservation therapy in 2015 and subsequently developed pain and swelling of the right breast. The diagnosis of breast lymphedema was supported by clinical evaluation as well as MRI, lymphoscintigraphy, and lymphography. In consultation with a breast surgeon, breast lymphedema was determined not to be an indication for mastectomy. The patient was offered and underwent an omental VLNT to the right breast. A 20 cm segment of omentum with associated gastroepiploic vessels and lymph nodes was harvested, transferred to the right axilla and gastroepiploic vessels were anastomosed to the recipient thoracodorsal vessels. The patient tolerated the procedure well and there were no complications. Additional donor sites were considered, such as the groin and submental regions, but an omental flap was favored in this case because of the lower risk of donor site lymphedema. In the years following, the patient reported significant improvement in symptoms as well as objective reduction of edema on MRI. We propose the consideration of VLNT for breast lymphedema refractory to other methods of management.

This article describes the key stakeholders and process involved in developing an insurance policy in the United States to establish medical necessity criteria for lymphatic surgery procedures. Lymphedema is a chronic health issue that impacts over 1.2 million patients and is associated with lifelong health, economic, and psychosocial costs. Patients affected have been described as "medical nomads," as they often interface with multiple providers before receiving an accurate diagnosis and treatment. This underscores the lack of attention and understanding about this disease across all sectors of the medical system. Unlike nations including Sweden and the United Kingdom, which provide insurance coverage for treatment, the United States has lagged behind. As a country, we have neglected to fully recognize the consequences of inadequate treatment of lymphedema, including chronic morbidities such as loss of mobility, psychosocial sequelae, recurrent infections, and even death. Recently, the authors' lymphatic center had the unique opportunity to help develop a policy that merged their clinical experience, recently established lymphatic care center of excellence criteria, and third-party payer policy expertise. This experience spanned 1 year from June of 2018 to June of 2019. The authors identify how key partnerships helped fill evidentiary gaps that ultimately resulted in policy change.

BACKGROUND: The lateral upper arm channel is an accessory lymphatic pathway that drains the upper extremity by means of the deltopectoral groove and supraclavicular nodes, thereby bypassing the axilla. Its variable connectivity to the forearm has not been studied in vivo.

METHODS: Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography was performed preoperatively to map the superficial and functional arm lymphatics in breast cancer patients without clinical or objective evidence of lymphedema. A retrospective review was performed to extract demographic, ICG imaging, and surgical data.

RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent ICG lymphography before axillary lymph node dissection between June of 2019 and October of 2020. In 59%, the lateral upper arm lymphatic channel was contiguous with the forearm (long bundle). In 38%, the lateral upper arm lymphatic channel was present but not contiguous with the forearm (short bundle). In 3%, the lateral upper arm pathway was entirely absent. Seven patients developed at least one sign of lymphedema during postoperative surveillance, of which 71% demonstrated the short bundle variant.

CONCLUSION: Although the lateral upper arm pathway is most often present, its connections to the forearm are frequently absent (short bundle), which, in this pilot report, appears to represent a potential risk factor for the development of lymphedema.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, V.

BACKGROUND: Up to one in three patients may go on to develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) after treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has been shown in early studies to reduce the risk of BCRL, but long-term outcomes are limited because of its recent introduction and institutions' differing eligibility requirements. This study evaluated the incidence of BCRL in a cohort that underwent ILR over the long term.

METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients referred for ILR at the authors' institution from September of 2016 through September of 2020 was performed. Patients with preoperative measurements, a minimum of 6 months of follow-up data, and at least one completed lymphovenous bypass were identified. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, cancer treatment data, intraoperative management, and lymphedema incidence.

RESULTS: A total of 186 patients with unilateral node-positive breast cancer underwent axillary nodal surgery and an attempt at ILR over the study period. Ninety patients underwent successful ILR and met all eligibility criteria, with a mean patient age of 54 ± 12.1 years and median body mass index of 26.6 kg/m 2 [interquartile range (IQR), 24.0 to 30.7 kg/m 2 ]. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 14 (IQR, eight to 19). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6 to 49 months). Eighty-seven percent of patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, and among them, 97% received regional lymph node irradiation. The overall rate of lymphedema was 9% at the end of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS: With the use of strict follow-up guidelines over the long term, the authors' findings support that ILR at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is an effective procedure that reduces the risk of BCRL in a high-risk patient population.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Enhancing our understanding of lymphatic anatomy from the microscopic to the anatomical scale is essential to discern how the structure and function of the lymphatic system interacts with different tissues and organs within the body and contributes to health and disease. The knowledge of molecular aspects of the lymphatic network is fundamental to understand the mechanisms of disease progression and prevention. Recent advances in mapping components of the lymphatic system using state of the art single cell technologies, the identification of novel biomarkers, new clinical imaging efforts, and computational tools which attempt to identify connections between these diverse technologies hold the potential to catalyze new strategies to address lymphatic diseases such as lymphedema and lipedema. This manuscript summarizes current knowledge of the lymphatic system and identifies prevailing challenges and opportunities to advance the field of lymphatic research as discussed by the experts in the workshop.

Background: Methods of conservative management for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) are burdensome in terms of time, cost, and convenience. In addition, many patients are not candidates for surgical treatment. Preliminary results have demonstrated possible beneficial effects of acupuncture for patients with BCRL. In this small pilot study, we examined the safety and feasibility of an acupuncture randomized control trial (RCT) in this patient cohort, utilizing a battery of standardized clinical and patient-centered outcome measures. Methods and Results: Patients with BCRL were randomized 2:1 to the acupuncture (n = 10) or the control (n = 4) group. Patients received acupuncture to the unaffected extremity biweekly for 6 weeks. Feasibility was defined as enrollment ≥80%, completion of ≥9 of 12 acupuncture sessions per person, and ≥75% completion of three of three measurement visits. To inform a future adequately powered RCT, we describe within-group changes in patient-centered outcomes, including circumferential measurements, bioimpedance spectroscopy, perometry, cytokine levels, and patient quality of life. Adverse events were systematically tracked. Fourteen patients completed the study. Of those who received acupuncture (n = 10), 8 completed all 12 acupuncture sessions, and 2 patients completed 11 sessions. Ninety-three percent of all participants completed all three measurement visits. There was no consistent improvement in arm volumes. Inflammatory marker levels had inconclusive fluctuations among both groups. All patients receiving acupuncture demonstrated an improvement in their functional quality-of-life score. No severe adverse events occurred. Conclusions: A randomized controlled study of acupuncture for BCRL is feasible. The acupuncture intervention is acceptable in this population, without safety concerns in a small sample and warrants further investigation.

PURPOSE: Lymphedema negatively impacts patients from a psychosocial standpoint and consequently affects patient's quality of life. Debulking procedures using power-assisted liposuction (PAL) are currently deemed an effective treatment for fat-dominant lymphedema and improves anthropometric measurements as well as quality of life. However, there have been no studies specifically evaluating changes in symptoms related to lymphedema after PAL. An understanding of how symptoms change after this procedure would be valuable for preoperative counseling and to guide patient expectations.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients with extremity lymphedema who underwent PAL from January 2018 to December 2020 at a tertiary care facility. A retrospective chart review and follow-up phone survey were conducted to compare signs and symptoms related to lymphedema before and after PAL.

RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in this study. Of these, 27 patients (60%) underwent upper extremity PAL and 18 patients (40%) underwent lower extremity PAL. The mean follow-up time was 15.5±7.9 months. After PAL, patients with upper extremity lymphedema reported having resolved heaviness (44%), as well as improved achiness (79%) and swelling (78%). In patients with lower extremity lymphedema, they reported having improved all signs and symptoms, particularly swelling (78%), tightness (72%), and achiness (71%).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with fat-dominant lymphedema, PAL positively impacts patient-reported outcomes in a sustained fashion over time. Continuous surveillance of postoperative studies is required to elucidate factors independently associated with the outcomes found in our study. Moreover, further studies using a mixed method approach will help us better understand patient's expectations to achieve informed decision and adequate treatment goals.