Abstract
One of the goals of this systematic review is to provide a meta-analysis-derived mean OEF of healthy volunteers. Another aim of this study is to indicate the OEF ranges of various neurological pathologies. Potential clinical applications of OEF metrics are presented. Peer-reviewed studies reporting OEF metrics derived from computed tomography (CT)/positron emission tomography (PET) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were considered. Databases utilized included MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system was used for evaluating studies. R Studio was utilized for the meta-analysis calculations when appropriate. The GRADE framework was utilized to assess additional findings. Of 2267 potential studies, 165 met the inclusion criteria. The healthy volunteer meta-analysis included 339 subjects and found a mean OEF value of 38.87 (37.38, 40.36), with a prediction interval of 32.40-45.34. There were no statistical differences in OEF values derived from PET versus MRI. We provided a GRADE A certainty rating for the use of OEF metrics to predict stroke occurrence in patients with symptomatic carotid or cerebral vessel disease. We provided a GRADE B certainty rating for monitoring treatment response in Moyamoya disease. Use of OEF metrics in diagnosing and/or monitoring other conditions had a GRADE C certainty rating or less. OEF might have a role in diagnosing and monitoring patients with symptomatic carotid or cerebral vessel disease and Moyamoya disease. While we found insufficient evidence to support measuring OEF metrics in other patient populations, in many cases, further studies are warranted.