Publications

2024

Bulman, Julie C, Nicole H Kim, Robert S Kaplan, Sarah E Schroeppel DeBacker, Olga R Brook, and Ammar Sarwar. (2024) 2024. “True Costs of Uterine Artery Embolization: Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Interventional Radiology Over a 3-Year Period.”. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 21 (5): 721-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.01.002.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to uncover potential areas for cost savings in uterine artery embolization (UAE) using time-driven activity-based costing, the most accurate costing methodology for direct health care system costs.

METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients who underwent outpatient UAE for fibroids or adenomyosis between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Utilization times were captured from electronic health record time stamps and staff interviews using validated techniques. Capacity cost rates were estimated using institutional data and manufacturer proxy prices. Costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing for personnel, equipment, and consumables. Differences in time utilization and costs between procedures by an interventional radiology attending physician only versus an interventional radiology attending physician and trainee were additionally performed.

RESULTS: The mean total cost of UAE was $4,267 ± $1,770, the greatest contributor being consumables (51%; $2,162 ± $811), followed by personnel (33%; $1,388 ± $340) and equipment (7%; $309 ± $96). Embolic agents accounted for the greatest proportion of consumable costs, accounting for 51% ($1,273 ± $789), followed by vascular devices (15%; $630 ± $143). The cost of embolic agents was highly variable, driven mainly by the number of vials (range 1-19) of tris-acryl gelatin particles used. Interventional radiology attending physician only cases had significantly lower personnel costs ($1,091 versus $1,425, P = .007) and equipment costs ($268 versus $317, P = .007) compared with interventional radiology attending physician and trainee cases, although there was no significant difference in mean overall costs ($3,640 versus $4,386; P = .061).

CONCLUSIONS: Consumables accounted for the majority of total cost of UAE, driven by the cost of embolic agents and vascular devices.

Ikram, Asad, Ria Sharma, Magdy Selim, Geunwon Kim-Sun, Tamkin Shahraki, Ajith J Thomas, Aristotelis Filippidis, et al. (2024) 2024. “McTFI QSM MRI ABC/2 Intracranial Hemorrhage to Noncontrast Head CT Volume Measurement Equivalence.”. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 456: 122859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2023.122859.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) volume assessment is an important part of patient management and is routinely obtained by non-contrast head CT (NCHCT) using the validated ABC/2 measurement method. Because conventional MRI imaging sequences demonstrate variability in ICH appearance, volumetric analyses for MRI bleed volume in a standardized manner using ABC/2 is not possible. The recently introduced multiecho-complex total field inversion quantitative susceptibility mapping (mcTFI QSM) MRI technique, which maps brain tissue susceptibility to both depict brain tissue structures and quantify tissue susceptibility, may provide a viable alternative. In this study we evaluated mcTFI QSM ABC/2 ICH volume assessment relative to NCHCT.

METHODS: Patients with ICH who had undergone NCHCT and MRI brain scans within 48 h were recruited for this retrospective study. The ABC/2 method was applied to estimate the bleed volume for both NCHCT and MRI by a CAQ-certified neuroradiologist with 10 years of experience and a trained laboratory assistant. Results were analyzed via Bland-Altman (B-A) and linear regression.

RESULTS: 54 patients (27 females) who had undergone NCHCT and MRI within 48 h (<24 h., n = 31, 24-48 h, n = 10) were enrolled. mcTFI QSM ICH volume measurement method showed a positive correlation (99.5%) compared to NCHCT. B-A plot comparing ABC/2 ICH volume on NCHCT and mcTFI MRI done for patients within 24 h demonstrates a bias of -0.09%.

CONCLUSIONS: ICH volume calculation using ABC/2 on mcTFI QSM showed a high correlation with NCHCT measurement. These results suggest mcTFI QSM is a promising MRI method for ABC/2 for bleed volume measurement.

Doyle, Tracy J, Pierre-Antoine Juge, Anna L Peljto, Seoyeon Lee, Avram D Walts, Anthony Joseph Esposito, Sergio Poli, et al. (2024) 2024. “Short Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Telomere Length in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Interstitial Lung Disease.”. Thorax 79 (2): 182-85. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2023-220022.

Shortened telomere lengths (TLs) can be caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms and loss-of-function mutations in telomere-related genes (TRG), as well as ageing and lifestyle factors such as smoking. Our objective was to determine if shortened TL is associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is the largest study to demonstrate and replicate that shortened peripheral blood leukocytes-TL is associated with ILD in patients with RA compared with RA without ILD in a multinational cohort, and short PBL-TL was associated with baseline disease severity in RA-ILD as measured by forced vital capacity percent predicted.

Pezeshkian, Fatemehsadat, Miles McAllister, Anupama Singh, Hailey Theeuwen, Mohammad Abdallat, Paula Ugalde Figueroa, Ritu R Gill, Anthony W Kim, and Michael T Jaklitsch. (2024) 2024. “What’s New in Thoracic Oncology.”. Journal of Surgical Oncology 129 (1): 128-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27535.

Many changes have occurred in the field of thoracic surgery over the last several years. In this review, we will discuss new diagnostic techniques for lung cancer, innovations in surgery, and major updates on latest treatment options including immunotherapy. All these have significantly started to change our approach toward the management of lung cancer and have great potential to improve the lives of our patients afflicted with this disease.

Ramalingam, Vijay, Spencer Degerstedt, Marwan Moussa, Leo L Tsai, David Einstein, and Muneeb Ahmed. (2024) 2024. “Percutaneous CT-Guided Cryoablation for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Technical Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness.”. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : JVIR 35 (1): 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.09.029.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and safety of using computed tomography (CT) guidance for ablation of prostate cancer in the salvage setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved retrospective study of consecutive patients who presented with prostate cancer recurrence and underwent percutaneous CT-guided cryoablation was conducted between July 2020 and September 2022. A total of 18 patients met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 19 procedures were performed. Demographic details; preablation and postablation urinary, rectal, and erectile function assessment; procedure details; and preoperative and postoperative imaging findings and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were recorded.

RESULTS: The mean treated tumor size was 15.7 mm ± 6.2. Technical success was achieved in 18 of the 19 procedures (94.7%), with 1 procedure aborted due to inability to obtain a safe plane. The mean follow-up time was 10.0 months (range, 2.3-26.7 months) at the time of manuscript preparation. The mean PSA before ablation was 8.1 ng/mL ± 9.3, and postablation PSA nadir was 2.6 ng/mL ± 4.0 (P = .002). Of the 18 patients who had postoperative imaging, 16 (88.9%) had a complete response (ie, no evidence of residual disease), and 2 (11.1%) patients had residual disease. Overall, 16 (88.9%) of the 18 treated patients demonstrated a PSA and/or imaging response to ablation. Mild adverse events occurred in 4 (22%) of the 18 cases.

CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided cryoablation appears to be a technically feasible, safe option for treating locally recurrent prostate cancer.

Azour, Lea, Jonathan G Goldin, and Jonathan B Kruskal. (2024) 2024. “Radiologist and Radiology Practice Wellbeing: A Report of the 2023 ARRS Wellness Summit.”. Academic Radiology 31 (1): 250-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.025.

In April 2023, the first American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) Wellness Summit was held in Honolulu, Hawaii. The Summit was a communal call to action bringing together professionals from the field of radiology to critically review our current state of wellness and reimagine the role of radiology and radiologists to further wellbeing. The in-person and virtual Summit was available free-of-cost to all meeting registrants and included 12 sessions with 44 invited moderators and panelists. The Summit aimed to move beyond simply rehashing the repeated issues and offering theoretical solutions, and instead focus on intentional practice evolution, identifying implementable strategies so that we as a field can start to walk our wellness talk. Here, we first summarize the thematic discussions from the 2023 ARRS Wellness Summit, and second, share several strategic action items that emerged.

Liubaskas, Rokas, Ronald L Eisenberg, Nihara L Chakrala, Aurelija Liubauske, Yuval Liberman, Achikam Oren-Grinberg, Daniela M Tridente, and Diana E Litmanovich. (2024) 2024. “New Imaging Protocol to Assess Endotracheal Tube Placement: A Case-Control Study.”. Journal of Thoracic Imaging 39 (1): W13-W18. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000754.

PURPOSE: After intubation, a frontal chest radiograph (CXR) is obtained to assess the endotracheal tube (ETT) position by measuring the ETT tip-to-carina distance. ETT tip location changes with neck position and can be determined by assessing the position of the mandible. As the mandible is typically not visualized on standard CXRs, we developed a new protocol where the mandible is seen on the CXR, hypothesizing that it will improve the accuracy of the ETT position assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups of intubated patients studied (February 9, 2021 to May 4, 2021): CXR taken in either standard or new protocol (visible mandible required). Two observers independently assessed the images for the neck position (neutral, flexed, and extended) based on the mandible position relative to the vertebral bodies. With the mandible absent (ie, neck position unknown), we established terms: "gray zone" (difficult to assess the ETT position adequately) and "clear zone" (confident recommendation to retract, advance, or maintain ETT position). We compared the rate of confident assessment of the ETT in the standard versus the new protocol.

RESULTS: Of 308 patients, 155 had standard CXRs and 153 had the new protocol. Interrater agreements for the distance between the ETT and the carina and mandible height based on vertebral bodies were 0.986 ( P < 0.001) and 0.955 ( P < 0.001), respectively. The mandible was visualized significantly more often ( P < 0.001) with the new protocol (92%; 141/153) than with the standard protocol (21%; 32/155). By visualizing the mandible or the presence of the ETT within the clear zone, a reader could confidently assess the ETT position more often using the new protocol (96.7% vs 51.6%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Mandible visibility on postintubation CXR is helpful for assessing the ETT position. The new protocol resulted in a significant increase in both visualizing the mandible and accurately determining ETT position on postintubation CXR.

Malik, Saad, Michael W Subrize, Jiangda Ou, Michael P Curry, Neehar D Parikh, Victor Novack, Jeffrey L Weinstein, Muneeb Ahmed, and Ammar Sarwar. (2024) 2024. “Association Between Patient Experience Scores and Low Utilization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment in the United States: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Analysis (SEER-CAHPS).”. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : JVIR 35 (1): 102-112.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.09.001.

PURPOSE: To study the experiences of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) contributing to treatment discrepancy in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from National Cancer Institute (NCI), Medicare (2002-2015) beneficiaries with HCC who completed a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey were included. Six CAHPS items (3 global scores: global care rating [GCR], primary doctor rating [PDR], and specialist rating [SR]; 3 composite scores: getting needed care [GNC], getting care quickly [GCQ], and doctor communication [DC]) assessed patient experience. Covariates assessed between treated and nontreated groups included patient, disease, hospital, and CAHPS items.

RESULTS: Among 548 patients with HCC, 211 (39%) received treatment and 337 (61%) did not receive treatment. Forty-two percent (GCR), 29% (PDR), 30% (SR), 36% (GNC), 78% (GCQ), and 35% (DC) of patients reported less-than-excellent experiences on the respective CAHPS items. Chronic liver disease (CLD) was present in 52% and liver decompensation (LD) in 60%. A minority of the hospitals were NCI-designated cancer centers (47%), transplant centers (27%), and referral centers (9%). On univariable analysis, patients with at least a high school degree (odds ratio [OR], 1.9), admittance to a ≥400-bed hospital (OR, 2.7), CLD (OR, 3.0), or LD (OR, 1.7) were more likely to receive treatment, whereas older patients (≥75 years) (OR, 0.5) were less likely to receive treatment. On multivariable, patients with CLD (OR, 6.8) and an excellent experience in GNC with a specialist (OR, 10.6) were more likely to receive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: HCC treatment discrepancy may be associated with patient-related factors, such as lack of specialist care (GNC), and disease-related factors, such as absence of underlying CLD.

2023

Siewert, Bettina, Olga R Brook, and Jonathan B Kruskal. (2023) 2023. “Peer Learning in Abdominal Radiology: Iterative Process Improvements over a 20-Year Experience.”. Abdominal Radiology (New York). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04118-2.

PURPOSE: After a slow and challenging transition period, peer learning and improvement (PLI) is now being more widely adopted by practices as an option for continuous personal and practice performance improvement. In addition to gaps that exist in the understanding of what PLI is and how it should be practiced, wide variation exists in how the process is implemented, administered, how outcomes are measured, and what strategies are employed to engage radiologists. This report aims to describe lessons learned from our 20-year experience with the design, implementation, and continuous improvements of a PLI program in a large academic program.

METHODS: Since initial implementation in 2004, an oversight team prospectively documented iterative process improvements and data submission trends in our PLI process. Process data included strategies for engaging radiologists in the PLI process (fostering case submission, PLI meeting participation), steps for achieving regulatory compliance, and template content for facilitating the value and impact of PLI meetings (case analysis, review of contributing factors, identification of improvement opportunities).

RESULTS: Submission trends, submitted case content, and improvement opportunities varied by clinical section. Process improvements that fostered engagement included closing the loop with participants, expanding criteria for case submission beyond interpretive disagreements (e.g., great pickups, near misses), minimizing impacts to workflow, and using evidence-based templates for case and contributor categorization, bias analysis, and identification of improvement opportunities.

CONCLUSION: Implementing an effective PLI program requires sustained communication, education, and continuous process improvement. While PLI can certainly lead to process and individual performance improvement, the program requires trained champions, designated time, effort, resources, education, and patience to be effectively implemented.