Publications

BACKGROUND: Multiple cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) diagnostic schemes have been published.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the association of different CS diagnostic schemes with adverse outcomes. The diagnostic schemes evaluated were 1993, 2006, and 2017 Japanese criteria and the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria.

METHODS: Data were collected from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium, an international registry of CS patients. Outcome events were any of the following: all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device placement, heart transplantation, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of outcomes with each CS diagnostic scheme.

RESULTS: A total of 587 subjects met the following criteria: 1993 Japanese (n = 310, 52.8%), 2006 Japanese (n = 312, 53.2%), 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (n = 480, 81.8%), and 2017 Japanese (n = 112, 19.1%). Patients who met the 1993 criteria were more likely to experience an event than patients who did not (n = 109 of 310, 35.2% vs n = 59 of 277, 21.3%; OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.38-2.90; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients who met the 2006 criteria were more likely to have an event than patients who did not (n = 116 of 312, 37.2% vs n = 52 of 275, 18.9%; OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.74-3.71; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant association between the occurrence of an event and whether a patient met the 2014 or the 2017 criteria (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.85-2.27; P = 0.18 or OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.97-2.33; P = 0.067, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: CS patients who met the 1993 and the 2006 criteria had higher odds of adverse clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to prospectively evaluate existing diagnostic schemes and develop new risk models for this complex disease.

To develop a suite of quality indicators (QIs) for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The Working Group comprised experts in heart rhythm management including Task Force members of the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD, members of the European Heart Rhythm Association, international experts, and a patient representative. We followed the ESC methodology for QI development, which involves (i) the identification of the key domains of care for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD by constructing a conceptual framework of care, (ii) the development of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature, (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs using a modified-Delphi method, and (iv) the evaluation of the feasibility of the developed QIs. We identified eight domains of care for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD: (i) structural framework, (ii) screening and diagnosis, (iii) risk stratification, (iv) patient education and lifestyle modification, (v) pharmacological treatment, (vi) device therapy, (vii) catheter ablation, and (viii) outcomes, which included 17 main and 4 secondary QIs across these domains. Following a standardized methodology, we developed 21 QIs for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD. The implementation of these QIs will improve the care and outcomes of patients with VA and contribute to the prevention of SCD.

PURPOSE: Due to their internal rotating magnets, conventional impeller-driven percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) yield high-frequency electrogram artifact and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when used with magnetic-based 3D electroanatomic mapping systems. The new percutaneous heart pump (PHP; Abbott, Chicago, IL) is a 14-French, 5-L/min, impeller axial-flow PVAD with a novel design that utilizes an external motor.

METHODS: We evaluated the feasibility of 3D mapping and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in vivo during PHP mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in simulated ventricular tachycardia (pacing at 300 ms) and ventricular flutter (VFL, pacing at 200 ms) and also during ventricular fibrillation (VF) in a porcine model. Anterograde (right ventricular), transseptal, retrograde, and epicardial right and left ventricular 3D mapping (EnSite/CARTO) and RFA were performed in 6 swine using high-density mapping and force-sensing RFA catheters (TactiCath/ThermoCool). Surface and intracardiac electrograms and 3D maps were analyzed for noise/interference with and without MCS using PHP in sinus rhythm and simulated VT/VFL and VF.

RESULTS: Mapping and RFA proved feasible in the presence of MCS using PHP. The mean arterial pressure in sinus rhythm was 55 ± 2 mmHg (baseline) and 84 ± 4 mmHg during MCS with PHP and well-maintained during simulated VT (73 ± 8 mmHg) and VFL (65 ± 2 mmHg) and even in VF (65 ± 5 mmHg). No electrogram noise/artifact, EMI, or 3D map distortions were observed during mapping/RFA with either of two mapping systems.

CONCLUSIONS: Endocardial and epicardial 3D mapping and RFA in the presence of PHP are feasible and offer significant MCS during simulated VT/VFL and VF. Furthermore, PHP yielded no electrogram noise/artifact, EMI, or 3D mapping distortions in conjunction with magnetic-based 3D mapping systems.

Percutaneous epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation can decrease implanted cardioverter defibrillator shocks and hospitalizations; proper patient selection and procedural technique are imperative to maximize the benefit-risk ratio. The best candidates for epicardial ventricular tachycardia will depend on history of prior ablation, type of cardiomyopathy, and specific electrocardiogram and cardiac imaging findings. Complications include hemopericardium, hemoperitoneum, coronary vessel injury, and phrenic nerve injury. Modern epicardial mapping techniques provide new understandings of the 3-dimensional nature of reentrant ventricular tachycardia circuits across cardiomyopathy etiologies. Where epicardial access is not feasible, alternative techniques to reach epicardial ventricular tachycardia sources may be necessary.

Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation rates have increased in recent decades. Venous obstruction of the subclavian, brachiocephalic, or superior vena cava veins represents an important complication of implanted leads. These forms of venous obstruction can result in significant symptoms as well as present a barrier to the implantation of additional device leads. The risk factors for the development of these complications remain poorly understood, and diagnosis relies on clinical recognition and cross-sectional imaging. Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment, and thrombus debulking, lead extraction, venoplasty, and stenting are all important therapeutic interventions. This review provides a multidisciplinary-based approach to the evaluation and management of cardiac implantable electronic device lead-associated venous obstruction.

Background: Baseline impedance, radiofrequency current, and impedance drop during radiofrequency catheter ablation are thought to predict effective lesion formation. However, quantifying the contributions of local versus remote impedances provides insights into the limitations of indices using those parameters. Methods: An in silico model of left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation was used based on human thoracic measurements and solved for (1) initial impedance (Z), (2) percentage of radiofrequency power delivered to the myocardium and blood (3) total radiofrequency current, (4) impedance drop during heating, and (5) lesion size after a 25 W−30 s ablation. Remote impedance was modeled by varying the mixing ratio between skeletal muscle and fat. Local impedance was modeled by varying insertion depth of the electrode (ID). Results: Increasing the remote impedance led to increased baseline impedance, lower system current delivery, and reduced lesion size. For ID = 0.5 mm, Z ranged from 115 to 132 Ω when fat percentage varied from 20 to 80%, resulting in a decrease in the RF current from 472 to 347 mA and a slight decrease in lesion size from 5.6 to 5.1 mm in depth, and from 9.2 to 8.0 mm in maximum width. In contrast, increasing the local impedance led to lower system current but larger lesions. For a 50% fat−muscle mixture, Z ranged from 118 to 138 Ω when ID varied from 0.3 to 1.9 mm, resulting in a decrease in the RF current from 463 to 443 mA and an increase in lesion size, from 5.2 up to 7.5 mm in depth, and from 8.4 up to 11.6 mm in maximum width. In cases of nearly identical Z but different contributions of local and remote impedance, markedly different lesions sizes were observed despite only small differences in RF current. Impedance drop better predicted lesion size (R2 > 0.93) than RF current (R2 < 0.1). Conclusions: Identical baseline impedances and observed RF currents can lead to markedly different lesion sizes with different relative contributions of local and remote impedances to the electrical circuit. These results provide mechanistic insights into the advantage of measuring local impedance and identifies potential limitations of indices incorporating baseline impedance or current to predict lesion quality.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) to guide percutaneous epicardial puncture for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A preprocedural CT was used to plan the site, angle, and depth of needle insertion during epicardial access in 10 consecutive patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. Adjacent structures (right ventricle, diaphragm, liver, colon, internal mammary artery) were visualized and the course of the needle was planned avoiding these structures. During epicardial access, a protractor was used to guide the angle of needle entry into the subxiphoid space. Postprocedural CT was performed to calculate the deviation between the planned and executed access and to assess for any collateral damage. Percutaneous epicardial access was obtained successfully in all the patients using anterior (n = 4) and inferior (n = 6) approaches. The planned site and angle of puncture was more caudal (2.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7 cm, p = .021) and acute (61.7 ± 5.8 vs. 49.0 ± 5.4°, p = .011) for an anterior approach compared to an inferior approach, respectively. Postprocedure CT revealed minimal deviation of the puncture site (5.4 ± 1.0 mm), angle (5.4 ± 1.2°), and length of needle insertion (0.5 ± 0.2 cm). With regard to the site of entry in the pericardial space, there was a deviation of 5.9 ± 1.1, 6.1 ± 1.1, and 5.8 ± 1.4 mm in the x, y, and z dimensions, respectively. In eight patients with minimal deviation between planned and executed access, there was no collateral injury to adjacent viscera or vessels. In two patients with increased deviation of angle and length of needle insertion, there was entry through the diaphragm during inferior access.

CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing pre-procedural CT planning may aid in the success and safety of percutaneous epicardial access during VT ablation.