Publications by Year: 2021

OBJECTIVES: To compare the deep infection rates after immediate versus staged open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for pilon fractures.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: Three academic Level I trauma centers.

PATIENTS: Four hundred one patients with closed OTA/AO type 43C distal tibia fractures treated with ORIF. Sixty-six percent were men, and the mean age was 45.6 years. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 1.7 (1.0-3.7) years.

INTERVENTION: Acute, primary (<24 hours) versus delayed, staged ORIF (>24 hours).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Deep infection or wound complication as defined by return to operating room for surgical irrigation and debridement.

RESULTS: Patients were grouped by time from presentation to surgery: acute ORIF (n = 99) and delayed ORIF (n = 302). Acute ORIF was more frequent in patients with OTA/AO type 43C1 fractures, low-energy mechanisms (ie, fall from standing), younger and female patients. Patients who demonstrated severe swelling (242, 80%), swelling and fracture blisters (26, 9%), swelling and ecchymosis precluding planned surgical approach (4, 1%), polytrauma requiring resuscitation (20, 6%), who were transferred from an outside facility with external fixator in place (6, 2%), who had evolving compartment syndrome (2, 1%), and who required medical clearance (2, 1%) underwent staged, delayed fixation. There were significantly more 43C1 fractures in the acute fixation group (31% vs. 7%, P < 0.001) and significantly more 43C3 fractures in the delayed group (63% vs. 37%, P < 0.001). The overall deep infection rate was 17%. Early surgery was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complication (early 12% vs. delayed 18%, P = 0.235). Multivariate analysis adjusted for timing of surgery found high-energy trauma [odds ratio (OR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-13.8], smoking (OR 2.4, CI 1.3-4.6), male sex (OR 2.1, CI 1.0-4.1), and increasing age (OR 1.02, CI 1.00-1.04, P = 0.040) to be independent predictors of deep infection. Diabetes demonstrated a nonstatistically significant increased risk (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.3, P = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the high risk of infection after the fixation of tibial plafond fractures. If early definitive fixation is considered, extreme care should be taken to carefully evaluate the soft tissue envelope and assess for other risk factors (such as age, male sex, smokers, diabetics, and those with higher-energy fracture patterns) that may predispose the patient to a postoperative soft tissue infection. Our study has shown that the judicious use of early definitive fixation in closed pilon fractures, in the appropriate patient, and with careful evaluation of the soft tissue envelope, is likely safe and does not seem to increase the risk of wound complications and deep infection in the hands of experienced fracture surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of bone mineral density (BMD) abnormalities involves dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), but few patients complete this after a fragility fracture. The assessment of BMD using Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from computed tomography (CT) scans has been correlated with DXA results in previous studies. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between shoulder CT HU and DXA scores.

METHODS: Billing databases of 3 academic institutions were queried for patients who underwent both DXA and CT scan of the upper extremity within 1 year of each other. DXA T-scores for spine, hip, and femoral neck were recorded. BMD status was defined based on composite T-scores, using the lowest T-score in the spine, hip, or proximal femur. CT scans were measured for HU over 4 slices, recorded to create a bone column, then averaged. The patients' risks of major osteoporosis-related fracture and hip fracture were calculated using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool.

RESULTS: In total, 300 patients were included. A positive correlation was found between composite T-scores and HU for glenoid and proximal humerus (0.36; 0.17). The proximal humerus HU was significantly associated with the BMD T-score for the hip (P = 0.01); the glenoid HU was significantly associated with BMD T-scores for the hip, spine, and femoral neck (P = 0.002; P = 0.001; P = 0.002). A 10-year risk of hip fracture >3% was associated with lower proximal humerus HU.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to discover significant correlations between HU at the glenoid and proximal humerus and risk factors as established by the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool scoring system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND: Adverse discharge disposition, which is discharge to a long-term nursing home or skilled nursing facility is frequent and devastating in older patients after lower-extremity orthopaedic surgery. Predicting individual patient risk allows for preventive interventions to address modifiable risk factors and helps managing expectations. Despite a variety of risk prediction tools for perioperative morbidity in older patients, there is no tool available to predict successful recovery of a patient's ability to live independently in this highly vulnerable population.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we asked: (1) What factors predict adverse discharge disposition in patients older than 60 years after lower-extremity surgery? (2) Can a prediction instrument incorporating these factors be applied to another patient population with reasonable accuracy? (3) How does the instrument compare with other predictions scores that account for frailty, comorbidities, or procedural risk alone?

METHODS: In this retrospective study at two competing New England university hospitals and Level 1 trauma centers with 673 and 1017 beds, respectively; 83% (19,961 of 24,095) of patients 60 years or older undergoing lower-extremity orthopaedic surgery were included. In all, 5% (1316 of 24,095) patients not living at home and 12% (2797 of 24,095) patients with missing data were excluded. All patients were living at home before surgery. The mean age was 72 ± 9 years, 60% (11,981 of 19,961) patients were female, 21% (4155 of 19,961) underwent fracture care, and 34% (6882 of 19,961) underwent elective joint replacements. Candidate predictors were tested in a multivariable logistic regression model for adverse discharge disposition in a development cohort of all 14,123 patients from the first hospital, and then included in a prediction instrument that was validated in all 5838 patients from the second hospital by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC).Thirty-eight percent (5360 of 14,262) of patients in the development cohort and 37% (2184 of 5910) of patients in the validation cohort had adverse discharge disposition. Score performance in predicting adverse discharge disposition was then compared with prediction scores considering frailty (modified Frailty Index-5 or mFI-5), comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index or CCI), and procedural risks (Procedural Severity Scores for Morbidity and Mortality or PSS).

RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounders like BMI, cardiac, renal and pulmonary disease, we found that the most prominent factors were age older than 90 years (10 points), hip or knee surgery (7 or 8 points), fracture management (6 points), dementia (5 points), unmarried status (3 points), federally provided insurance (2 points), and low estimated household income based on ZIP code (1 point). Higher score values indicate a higher risk of adverse discharge disposition. The score comprised 19 variables, including socioeconomic characteristics, surgical management, and comorbidities with a cutoff value of ≥ 23 points. Score performance yielded an ROC-AUC of 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.85) in the development and 0.72 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.73) in the independent validation cohort, indicating excellent and good discriminative ability. Performance of the instrument in predicting adverse discharge in the validation cohort was superior to the mFI-5, CCI, and PSS (ROC-AUC 0.72 versus 0.58, 0.57, and 0.57, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The Adverse Discharge in Older Patients after Lower Extremity Surgery (ADELES) score predicts adverse discharge disposition after lower-extremity surgery, reflecting loss of the ability to live independently. Its discriminative ability is better than instruments that consider frailty, comorbidities, or procedural risk alone. The ADELES score identifies modifiable risk factors, including general anesthesia and prolonged preoperative hospitalization, and should be used to streamline patient and family expectation management and improve shared decision making. Future studies need to evaluate the score in community hospitals and in institutions with different rates of adverse discharge disposition and lower income. A non-commercial calculator can be accessed at www.adeles-score.org.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

BACKGROUND: The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is increasing worldwide, especially in low-income countries such as Malawi. Ankle fractures are common in Malawi and may receive suboptimal treatment due to inadequate surgical capacity and limited provider knowledge of evidence-based treatment guidelines.

METHODS: This study was conducted in 3 phases. First, we assessed Malawian orthopaedic providers' understanding of anatomy, injury identification, and treatment methods. Second, we observed Malawian providers' treatment strategies for adults with ankle fractures presenting to a central hospital. These patients' radiographs underwent blinded, post hoc review by 3 U.S.-based orthopaedic surgeons and a Malawian orthopaedic surgeon, whose treatment recommendations were compared with actual treatments rendered by Malawian providers. Third, an educational course addressing knowledge deficits was implemented. We assessed post-course knowledge and introduced a standardized management protocol, specific to the Malawian context.

RESULTS: In Phase 1, deficits in injury identification, ideal treatment practices, and treatment standardization were identified. In Phase 2, 17 (35%) of 49 patients met operative criteria but did not undergo a surgical procedure, mainly because of resource limitations and provider failure to recognize unstable injuries. In Phase 3, 51 (84%) of 61 participants improved their overall performance between the pre-course and post-course assessments. Participants answered a mean of 32.4 (66%) of 49 questions correctly pre-course and 37.7 (77%) of 49 questions correctly post-course, a significant improvement of 5.2 more questions (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8 to 6.6 questions; p < 0.001) answered correctly. Providers were able to identify 1 more injury correctly of 8 injuries (mean, 1.1 questions [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.6 questions]; p < 0.001) and to identify 1 more ideal treatment of the 7 that were tested (mean, 1.0 question [95% CI, 0.5 to 1.4 questions]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Adult ankle fractures in Malawi were predominantly treated nonoperatively despite often meeting evidence-based criteria for surgery. This was due to resource limitations, knowledge deficits, and lack of treatment standardization. We demonstrated a comprehensive approach to examining the challenges of providing adequate orthopaedic care in a resource-limited setting and the successful implementation of an educational intervention to improve care delivery. This approach can be adapted for other conditions to improve orthopaedic care in low-resource settings.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined whether orthopaedic surgery, including hand surgery, is associated with patients' financial health. We sought to understand the level of financial burden and worry for patients undergoing two common hand procedures-carpal tunnel release and open reduction and internal fixation for a distal radius fracture-as well as to determine factors associated with a higher financial burden and worry.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In patients undergoing operative treatment for isolated carpal tunnel syndrome with carpal tunnel release or open reduction and internal fixation for a distal radius fracture, we used validated financial burden and worry questionnaires to ask: (1) What percentage of patients report some level of financial burden, and what is the median financial burden composite score? (2) What percentage of patients report some level of financial worry, and what percentage of patients report a high level of financial worry? (3) When accounting for other assessed factors, what patient- and condition-related factors are associated with financial burden? (4) When accounting for other assessed factors, what patient- and condition-related factors are associated with high financial worry?

METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey study, a hand and upper extremity database at a single tertiary academic medical center was reviewed for patients 18 years or older undergoing operative treatment in our hand and upper extremity division for an isolated distal radius fracture between October 2017 and October 2019. We then selected all patients undergoing carpal tunnel release during the first half of that time period (given the frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome, a 1-year period was sufficient to ensure comparable patient groups). A total of 645 patients were identified (carpal tunnel release: 60% [384 of 645 patients]; open reduction and internal fixation for a distal radius fracture: 40% [261 of 645 patients). Of the patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, 6% (24 of 384) were excluded because of associated injuries. Of the patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for a distal radius fracture, 4% (10 of 261) were excluded because of associated injuries. All remaining 611 patients were approached. Thirty-six percent (223 of 611; carpal tunnel release: 36% [128 of 360]; open reduction and internal fixation: 38% [95 of 251]) of patients ultimately completed two validated financial health surveys: the financial burden composite and financial worry questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were calculated to report the percentage of patients who had some level of financial burden and worry. Further, the median financial burden composite score was determined. The percentage of patients who reported a high level of financial worry was calculated. A forward stepwise regression model approach was used; thus, variables with p values < 0.10 in bivariate analysis were included in the final regression analyses to determine which patient- and condition-related factors were associated with financial burden or high financial worry, accounting for all other measured variables.

RESULTS: The median financial burden composite score was 0 (range 0 [lowest possible financial burden] to 6 [highest possible financial burden]), and 13% of patients (30 of 223) reported a high level of financial worry. After controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, insurance type, and self-reported race, the number of dependents (regression coefficient 0.15 [95% CI 0.008 to 0.29]; p = 0.04) was associated with higher levels of financial burden, while retired employment status (regression coefficient -1.24 [95% CI -1.88 to -0.60]; p < 0.001) was associated with lower levels of financial burden. In addition, the number of dependents (odds ratio 1.77 [95% CI 1.21 to 2.61]; p = 0.004) and unable to work or disabled employment status (OR 3.76 [95% CI 1.25 to 11.28]; p = 0.02) were associated with increased odds of high financial worry.

CONCLUSION: A notable number of patients undergoing operative hand care for two common conditions reported some degree of financial burden and worry. Patients at higher risk of financial burden and/or worry may benefit from increased resources during their hand care journey, including social work consultation and financial counselors. This is especially true given the association between number of dependents and work status on financial burden and high financial worry. However, future research is needed to determine the return on investment of this resource utilization on patient clinical outcomes, overall quality of life, and well-being.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Acute injuries to the shoulder girdle are common and frequently encountered by the practicing radiologist. The type of injury is highly dependent on the age of the patient and mechanism of trauma with injuries occurring at the site of greatest mechanical weakness. In this review, we discuss the main clinical features and key imaging findings for the most common shoulder injuries. For each injury, we also provide a section on the important features that the orthopedic surgeon needs to know in order to guide surgical versus nonsurgical management.

OBJECTIVE. Diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) for adipocytic tumors can be low because of sampling error from these often large, heterogeneous lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of image-guided CNB for various adipocytic tumors in comparison with excisional pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adipocytic tumors (n = 77) of all adult patients undergoing image-guided CNB and subsequent surgical excision of an adipocytic tumor at a tertiary referral center between 2005 and 2019 were studied. To determine concordance, we compared pathologic diagnoses based on CNB to the reference standard of pathologic diagnoses after surgical excision. Tumors were divided into three categories (benign lipomatous tumors [lipoma, lipoma variants, hibernomas], atypical lipomatous tumors [ALTs] or well-differentiated liposarcomas [WDLs], and higher grade liposarcomas [myxoid, dedifferentiated, pleomorphic]), and diagnostic accuracy was calculated for each category. RESULTS. In 73 of 77 adipocytic tumors (95%), diagnosis at CNB and diagnosis after excision were concordant. Accuracy of diagnosis was poorer for ALTs and WDLs than for the other two categories, and the difference was statistically significant (p < .002). For the 29 benign lipomatous tumors and the 27 higher-grade liposarcomas, diagnoses at CNB and after excision were concordant in all cases (100%). Seventeen of the 21 tumors (81%) diagnosed as ALTs or WDLs at CNB had a concordant diagnosis after excision; four of the 21 were upgraded (dedifferentiated liposarcoma, n = 3; myxoid liposarcoma, n = 1). CONCLUSION. CNB provides high diagnostic accuracy for adipocytic tumors, particularly for benign lipomatous tumors and higher grade liposarcomas. However, though still high at 81%, diagnostic accuracy of CNB is not as high for tumors diagnosed as ALTs or WDLs. Awareness of this limitation is important when determining management, particularly of cases of ALT or WDL for which surgery is not planned.

OBJECTIVE: The Haitian Annual Assembly of Orthopaedic Trauma (HAAOT) is an annual continuing medical education (CME) conference for Haitian orthopedists and trainees converted to a pilot virtual format in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated this virtual format's effectiveness at teaching, facilitating bilingual discussion, and encouraging cross-cultural exchange of experiences - all aimed at improving orthopedic knowledge in a low-resource country like Haiti.

DESIGN: Planned collaboratively between North American and Haitian colleagues, the conference involved 4 bilingual weekly Zoom meetings comprised of 4 to 6 prerecorded presentations and live-translated discussion. Pre- and postmeeting knowledge assessments in French (Haitian language of medical instruction) were administered weekly with results compared via 2-sample t-tests. An online postconference survey evaluated attendee satisfaction with the virtual format.

SETTING: Virtual.

PARTICIPANTS: Weekly attendance involved approximately 50 Haitian orthopedists and trainees, with 20 to 25 completing pre- and postmeeting assessments.

RESULTS: Statistically significant increases between pre/post scores were seen during 3 of 4 sessions. Session-wide significant score increases occurred for residents and attending surgeons with <10 years of experience. 85.7% of attendees reported the virtual platform exceeded expectations and 100% indicated likely or extremely likely participation in further virtual events.

CONCLUSIONS: The pilot virtual HAAOT was extremely well received with high desire for future sessions. Beyond short-term knowledge retention among attendees, nonmeasurable benefits included collaboration between orthopedists and trainees in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Haiti, and Burkina Faso. As COVID-19 spurs online learning in high-income nations, the successful low-resource context adjustments and local partnership underlying this model attest that travel restrictions need not impede delivery of virtual CME conferences in lower-income nations. Attendee learning and the decreased cost and travel requirements allude to this platform's sustainability and reproducibility in facilitating future international education and capacity building. Further studies will assess long-term retention of presented material.

Psychiatric disorders are a common cause of disability and represent an important risk factor for upper-extremity trauma. The review provides an overview of psychiatric illnesses as both contributors and sequelae of 4 major injury patterns: self-inflicted wrist lacerations, self-amputation, upper-extremity fractures, and burns. The authors develop a multidisciplinary model for upper-extremity surgeons to care for patients with psychiatric disorders, with an overview of capacity assessment, optimal psychiatric comanagement, and collaboration with allied health professionals.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of nonunion and wound complications after open, complete articular pilon fractures. Second, to study the effect that both timing of fixation and timing of flap coverage have on deep infection rates.

DESIGN: Retrospective case series.

SETTING: Three Academic Level 1 Trauma Centers.

PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-one patients with open OTA/AO type 43C distal tibia fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) between 2002 and 2018. The mean (SD) age was 46 (14) years, 70% male, with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.1 (1.3-5.0) years (minimum 1 year). There were 133 (83%) type 3A and 28 (17%) type 3B open fractures.

INTERVENTION: Fracture fixation: acute, primary (<24 hours) versus delayed, staged ORIF (>24 hours). Soft-tissue coverage: rotational or free flap.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Primary outcomes included deep infection and nonunion. Secondary outcomes included rates of soft-tissue coverage and reoperation.

RESULTS: Acute fixation (<24 hours) was performed in 36 (22%) patients; 125 (78%) underwent delayed, staged fixation. Deep infection occurred in 27% patients and was associated with men (33% vs. 16%, P = 0.029), smoking (38% vs. 23%, P = 0.047), and type 3B fractures (39% vs. 25%, P = 0.046). Acute fixation of type 3A fractures demonstrated a higher rate of infection (38% vs. 20% P = 0.036) than delayed, staged fixation. In type 3B fractures, early flap coverage (<1 week) demonstrated a lower rate of infection (18% vs. 53%, P = 0.066) and 20% (vs. 43%) with a single-staged "fix and flap" procedure (P = 0.408). Nonunion occurred in 36 (22%) and was associated with deep infection (43% vs. 15%, P < 0.001). Fifteen (42%) were septic nonunions. Twenty-nine of the 36 (81%) nonunions achieved radiographic union after median (interquartile range) 27 (20-41) weeks and median (range) 1 (1-3) revision ORIF procedures. There was no difference in the rate of secondary union between septic and aseptic nonunions (85% vs. 86%, P = 1.00). There was a high rate of secondary procedures (47%): revision ORIF (17%), irrigation and debridement (15%), and removal of implants (11%).

CONCLUSIONS: Complete articular, open pilon fractures are associated with a high rate of complications after ORIF. Early fixation carries a high risk of deep infection; however, early flap coverage for 3B fractures seems to play a protective role. We advocate for aggressive management including urgent surgical debridement and very early soft-tissue cover combined with definitive fixation during single procedure if possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.