Publications by Year: 2022

PURPOSE: For fractures requiring operative fixation, the "tripod technique" using headless compression screws has recently been described as a less invasive alternative to open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the tripod technique for the treatment of radial head and neck fractures.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all radial head and neck fractures treated with the tripod technique at our institution over a 10-year period. Patients with less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. Outcomes were evaluated at the latest follow-up using range of motion measurements and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire.

RESULTS: We evaluated 13 patients with a mean age of 48 years and average follow-up of 72 months (range, 21-153 months). All the patients achieved union by 12 weeks after surgery. The average postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 5.9 (range, 0-23). The mean flexion was 139°, and the mean extension was -8°. There were no major postoperative complications. Five patients had minor complications. No patients required a reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS: The tripod technique is a useful alternative to the traditional method of plate and screw fixation for unstable radial head and neck fractures.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a finite element (FE) model of the patellofemoral (PF) joint to characterize patellofemoral instability, and to highlight the effect of lateral retinacular release in combination with tibial tuberosity transfer with respect to contact pressures (CP), contact area (CA), and kinematics during knee flexion.

METHODS: A comprehensive, dynamic FE model of the knee joint was developed and validated through parametric comparison of PF kinematics, CP, and CA between FE simulations and in vitro, cadaveric experiments. Using this FE model, we characterized the effect of patellar instability, lateral retinacular release (LR), and tibial tuberosity transfer (TTT) in the setting of medial patellofemoral ligament injury during knee flexion.

RESULTS: There was a high level of agreement in CP, CA, lateral patellar displacement, anterior patellar displacement, and superior patellar displacement between the FE model and the in vitro data (P values 0.19, 0.16, 0.81, 0.10, and 0.36, respectively). Instability conditions demonstrated the greatest CP compared to all of the other conditions. During all degrees of flexion, TTT and concomitant lateral release (TTT + LR) decreased CP significantly. TTT alone shows a consistently lower CA compared to nonrelease conditions with subsequent lateral release further decreasing CA.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the FE model described reliably simulates PF kinematics and CP within 1 SD in uncomplicated cadaveric specimens. The FE model is able to show that tibial tubercle transfer in combination with lateral retinacular release markedly decreases patellofemoral CP and CA and increases lateral patellar displacement that may decrease bony stabilization of the patella within the trochlear groove and promote lateral patellar instability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The goal of surgical correction for patellar instability focuses on reestablishing normal PF kinematics. By developing an FE model that can demonstrate patient PF kinematics and the results of different surgical approaches, surgeons may tailor their treatment to the best possible outcome. Of the surgical approaches that have been described, the biomechanical effects of the combination of TTT with lateral retinacular release have not been studied. Thus, the FE analysis will help shed light on the effect of the combination of TTT with lateral retinacular release on PF kinematics.

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion (ROM), complication rates, and reoperation rates after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for proximal humeral fractures between patients treated acutely (≤30 days after injury), those treated after initial nonoperative treatment (>30 days after injury), and those treated after failed open reduction-internal fixation. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any patient-, injury-, or surgery-related factors independently associated with our response variables.

METHODS: We identified 576 patients who sustained a proximal humeral fracture treated with primary or revision shoulder arthroplasty between January 2003 and August 2018. The final cohort included 153 patients. Multivariable analysis was used to assess whether explanatory variables were associated with our response variables.

RESULTS: Initial nonoperative treatment compared with acute rTSA was associated with worse Shoulder Subjective Value (P = .04), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score (P = .03), and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index disability subscale score (P = .03). Only depression was independently associated with worse visual analog scale pain score (P = .04). There was no significant difference in postoperative ROM between the initial treatment groups. Older age was associated with decreased ROM in all planes. Additionally, ipsilateral upper-extremity injury was associated with decreased active abduction (P = .03), and cemented humeral stems were associated with decreased passive abduction (P = .03). Initial nonoperative treatment was associated with increased complication rates (odds ratio, 3.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-12.01), and male sex was associated with higher rates of reoperation (odds ratio, 3.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.51).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo initial periods of nonoperative management have worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates than those who undergo acute rTSA for proximal humeral fractures. Patients who undergo rTSA after failed open reduction-internal fixation show no difference in patient-reported outcomes compared with those who undergo acute rTSA. In addition, male patients are at higher risk of reoperation, whereas older patients are at risk of decreased ROM. Patients with preoperative depression are at risk of increased pain at 2 years after surgery.

PURPOSE: The nature and focus of hand surgery fellowships has been shown to vary. Compounding this issue is a paucity of information regarding the educational goals and desires of prospective fellows. The purpose of this study was to understand applicant motivation for pursuing a fellowship and the most important components of these fellowships.

METHODS: We performed an anonymous survey of all the candidates who applied for a hand surgery fellowship during the 2019-2020 academic year to establish general demographic information, preferences regarding fellowship size, and the importance of various educational and logistical components. We also recorded self-reported comfort level in treating pathologies encountered during a hand-focused subspecialty practice.

RESULTS: The most important motivation cited for pursuing a fellowship in hand surgery was the "complexity and variety of cases" (n = 55, 90%). The 5 most important desired components of a fellowship were the exposure to "bread and butter" hand surgery (n = 35, 57%), ability to take level 1 hand call (n = 26, 43%), exposure to complex wrist reconstruction (n = 26, 43%) or peripheral nerve surgery/transfers (n = 23, 38%), and soft tissue coverage including free flaps (n = 19, 31%). Further analysis revealed that the orthopedic surgery residents frequently rated exposure to level 1 call (n = 20, 45%) as 1 of their 3 most important characteristics, whereas the plastic/general surgery residents frequently ranked exposure to complex wrist reconstruction (n = 16, 38%) as 1 of their 3 most important characteristics. The components of a fellowship that received the fewest selections into an applicant's top 3 components were exposure to shoulder surgery (n = 1, 1.64%), education regarding practice building/billing (n = 2, 3.2%), and the ability to conduct research (n = 4, 6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS: Most applicants pursue a subspecialty training in hand surgery because of the field's variety and breadth of cases. The applicants prioritize exposure to "bread and butter" cases in conjunction with both complex soft tissue and microsurgical reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Assisting hand fellowships in understanding what is most important to prospective fellows will allow for appropriate recruitment and development of the field of hand surgery in general.

BACKGROUND:  The benefits of preoperative perforator imaging for microsurgical reconstruction have been well established in the literature.

METHODS:  An extensive literature review was performed to determine the most commonly used modalities, and their applicability, advantages and disadvantages.

RESULTS:  The review demonstrated varioius findings including decreases in operative time and cost with the use of CT angiography to identification of perforators for inclusion in flap design with hand-held Doppler ultrasound. Modalities like MR angiography offer alternatives for patients with contrast allergies or renal dysfunction while maintaining a high level of clarity and fidelity. Although the use of conventional angiography has decreased due to the availability of less invasive alternatives, it continues to serve a role in the preoperative evaluation of patients for lower extremity reconstruction. Duplex ultrasonography has been of great interest recently as an inexpensive, risk free, and extraordinarily accurate diagnostic tool. Emerging technologies such as indocyanine green fluorescence angiography and dynamic infrared thermography provide real-time information about tissue vascularity and perfusion without requiring radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION:  This article presents an in-depth review of the various imaging modalities available to reconstructive surgeons and includes hand held Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography, MR angiography, conventional angiography, duplex ultrasonography, Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography and Dynamic Infrared Thermography.

BACKGROUND: Markers of bone metabolism (MBM) play an important role in fracture evaluation, and changes have been associated with increased fracture risk. The purpose of the present study was to describe changes in MBM in premenopausal women with distal radial fractures.

METHODS: Premenopausal women with distal radial fractures (n = 34) and without fractures (controls) (n = 39) were recruited. Serum MBM in patients with distal radial fractures were obtained at the time of the initial presentation, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months. MBM included 25(OH) vitamin D, PTH, osteocalcin, P1NP, BSAP, CTX, sclerostin, DKK1, periostin, and TRAP5b. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was assessed with dual x-ray absorptiometry, and the bone material strength index (BMSi) was assessed with microindentation.

RESULTS: Most MBM reached peak levels at 6 weeks after the injury, including osteocalcin (+17.7%), sclerostin (+23.5%), and DKK1 (12.6%). Sclerostin was lower (-27.4%) and DKK1 was higher (+22.2%) at 1 year after the fracture. CTX declined below baseline levels at 6 and 12 months, whereas TRAP5b, BSAP, and periostin did not significantly change. At 12 months, sclerostin was lower (p = 0.003) and DKK1 was higher (p = 0.03) in the distal radial fracture group than in the control group. Greater fracture severity was associated with greater increases in P1NP and BSAP. aBMD and BMSi were not associated with fracture.

CONCLUSIONS: Distal radial fractures caused increases in several MBM, which typically peaked at 6 weeks after injury and gradually decreased over 6 months. Sclerostin and DKK1 remained below and above baseline at 1 year, respectively. Increasing fracture severity resulted in larger changes in MBM. aBMD and BMSi did not discriminate between patients with distal radial fractures and controls. Continued efforts to identify markers of skeletal fragility in young women are warranted to mitigate future fracture risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Gluteal augmentation with autologous fat grafting is an increasingly popular procedure. While complication rates are low, the clinical and imaging evaluation of the various complications can be challenging. We report a case of distal migration of a failed gluteal fat graft in a young female patient presenting as a soft tissue mass in the knee, mimicking a soft tissue sarcoma. Surgical resection of the migrated fat graft confirmed the diagnosis. The diagnosis was challenging as the patient was initially reluctant to disclose her surgical history due to perceived negative social stigmas related to cosmetic contouring procedures. This case highlights the imaging findings of a rare complication following autologous fat grafting for gluteal augmentation and the importance of obtaining a thorough medical history.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of periprosthetic femur fracture in the setting of total hip arthroplasty is steadily increasing. Although the traditional dogma is that loose femoral components must be revised, we propose that in a frail geriatric population, anatomic reduction and fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fracture variants can restore stem stability and provide similar outcomes as revision arthroplasty.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: Level 1 trauma center, tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: We identified 94 patients over 65 years of age with Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures sustained between 2005 and 2019.

INTERVENTION: Patients were treated by either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty (RA) with or without fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were mortality, time to full weight-bearing after surgery, intraoperative estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, reoperation, subsidence rate, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain and physical function scores.

RESULTS: A total of 75 (79.8%) ORIF and 19 (20.2%) RA patients were reviewed. One-year mortality for our cohort was 26.3%, and there was no significant difference between groups. Mean time to weight bear and surgical complication rates were similar between groups. The ORIF group had a significantly shorter time to surgery than the RA group. The RA group had greater incidence and amount of subsidence as well as estimated blood loss than the ORIF group.

CONCLUSIONS: In geriatric patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 type periprosthetic fractures with known loose stems, ORIF may offer a similarly safe method of treatment than revision arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES: The current lack of agreement regarding standardized terminology in musculoskeletal and sports ultrasound presents challenges in education, clinical practice, and research. This consensus was developed to provide a reference to improve clarity and consistency in communication.

METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened consisting of 18 members representing multiple specialty societies identified as key stakeholders in musculoskeletal and sports ultrasound. A Delphi process was used to reach consensus which was defined as group level agreement >80%.

RESULTS: Content was organized into seven general topics including: 1) General Definitions, 2) Equipment and Transducer Manipulation, 3) Anatomic and Descriptive Terminology, 4) Pathology, 5) Procedural Terminology, 6) Image Labeling, and 7) Documentation. Terms and definitions which reached consensus agreement are presented herein.

CONCLUSIONS: The historic use of multiple similar terms in the absence of precise definitions has led to confusion when conveying information between colleagues, patients, and third-party payers. This multidisciplinary expert consensus addresses multiple areas of variability in diagnostic ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-guided procedures related to musculoskeletal and sports medicine.

Historic and present-day marginalization has resulted in a high burden of disease and worse health outcomes for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities in the United States. Musculoskeletal disease is the leading cause of disability for the general population in the U.S. today. However, few have examined musculoskeletal disease burden and access to orthopaedic surgical care in the AI/AN communities. A high prevalence of hip dysplasia, arthritis, back pain, and diabetes, and a high incidence of trauma and road traffic-related mortality, suggest a disproportionately high burden of musculoskeletal pathology among the AI/AN communities and a substantial need for orthopaedic surgical services. Unfortunately, AI/AN patients face many barriers to receiving specialty care, including long travel distances and limited transportation to health facilities, inadequate staff and resources at Indian Health Service (IHS)-funded facilities, insufficient funding for referral to specialists outside of the IHS network, and sociocultural barriers that complicate health-system navigation and erode trust between patients and providers. For those who manage to access orthopaedic surgery, AI/AN patients face worse outcomes and more complications than White patients. There is an urgent need for orthopaedic surgeons to participate in improving the availability of quality orthopaedic services for AI/AN patients through training and support of local providers, volunteerism, advocating for a greater investment in the IHS Purchased/Referred Care program, expanding telemedicine capabilities, and supporting community-based participatory research activities.