Publications by Year: 2022

PURPOSE: Depression has been linked to inferior clinical outcomes among upper extremity patients. It often is challenging to distinguish the symptoms of depression, symptoms of injury, and the interaction between these 2 entities after a patient has been injured. We aimed to study the differences in clinical outcomes after surgical fixation of distal radius fractures between patients with and without a documented history and treatment for depression.

METHODS: All subjects with an isolated, acute distal radius fracture undergoing operative fixation in a 10-year period at a level 1 academic trauma center were screened. Baseline demographic data were collected, and psychiatric history and antidepressant use were recorded and verified with a pharmacy database. Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), range of motion, and grip strength were assessed at 12 months after surgery. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the association of depression with QuickDASH scores at 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS: A total of 211 patients were available for 1-year follow-up, 50 of whom were being treated actively for depression with medication at the time of injury and 161 were without a known diagnosis of, or treatment for, depression. Demographic and injury characteristics were similar between both groups. In a multivariable linear regression model controlling for age, sex, and a history of osteoporosis, active treatment for depression was associated with a slight mean increase in QuickDASH scores, 6.5 (1.3-11.8), 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a small increase in QuickDASH scores between subjects with a confirmed diagnoses of depression compared with all others after surgical fixation of distal radius fracture at 1-year follow-up. We suggest that a history of depression may portend worse clinical outcomes, although other factors, such as underreporting of depression may influence results.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) regulates metabolic physiology. However, nearly all mechanistic studies of BAT protein function occur in a single inbred mouse strain, which has limited the understanding of generalizable mechanisms of BAT regulation over physiology. Here, we perform deep quantitative proteomics of BAT across a cohort of 163 genetically defined diversity outbred mice, a model that parallels the genetic and phenotypic variation found in humans. We leverage this diversity to define the functional architecture of the outbred BAT proteome, comprising 10,479 proteins. We assign co-operative functions to 2,578 proteins, enabling systematic discovery of regulators of BAT. We also identify 638 proteins that correlate with protection from, or sensitivity to, at least one parameter of metabolic disease. We use these findings to uncover SFXN5, LETMD1, and ATP1A2 as modulators of BAT thermogenesis or adiposity, and provide OPABAT as a resource for understanding the conserved mechanisms of BAT regulation over metabolic physiology.

PURPOSE: To determine the degree of disuse osteopenia (DO) and factors associated with its development during treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts and radiographs of patients with DRFs treated with and without surgery at 2 health care systems. We defined DO as a >10% drop from initial to 6-week second metacarpal cortical percentage and 6-week absolute second metacarpal cortical percentage <60%. Bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate associations between treatment type, patient and fracture characteristics, and radiographic measurements with odds of developing DO. Significant associations were included in multivariable analyses, adjusting for patient and fracture characteristics.

RESULTS: Approximately 18% of 517 included patients met the criteria for development of DO (n = 93). Bivariate analysis showed that surgical treatment was associated with lower odds of developing DO, whereas advancing age was associated with increased odds. In adjusted multivariable models, only advancing age was associated with increased odds of developing DO.

CONCLUSIONS: A fairly important proportion of patients with DRF develop hand DO 6 weeks after surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The clinical relevance of this finding is uncertain and requires further investigation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Background: Management of distal radius fractures in patients over 65 is a topic of significant study, but there are variations within this group in terms of independence and activity level. This study compares the outcomes of operative distal radius fracture treatment in patients over 75 with those aged 65 to 74, to evaluate the effects of patient demand and advanced age on outcome. Methods: A retrospective review of a single-institution distal radius fracture database was performed. All patients over age 65 were evaluated for inclusion. Patient factors including activity, independence level, and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) score were recorded. Patients were selected for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) based on a discussion between the patient and the treating surgeon. Outcome measures including QuickDASH were recorded at 1-year post-injury. Patients aged 65 to 74 and 75 and over were compared to evaluate for demographic, functional, and outcome differences. Results: In all, 75 patients were included in the study. Fifty-one patients were aged 65 to 74, and 24 patients were aged over 75. The majority of patients rated themselves as "completely independent" and "active," the highest levels of each. There was no difference in QuickDASH scores between those patients who rated themselves as completely partially independent, or active versus moderately active. There was no statistically significant difference in QuickDASH or range of motion parameters at final follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that, in a group of patients with high levels of independence and activity, outcomes are similar in patients aged 65 to 74 and over 75 at 1 year following distal radius ORIF.

BACKGROUND: The majority of retained syndesmotic screws will either loosen or break once the patient resumes weight-bearing. While evidence is limited, anecdotal experience suggests that intraosseous screw breakage may be problematic for some patients due to painful bony erosion. This study seeks to identify the incidence of intraosseous screw breakage, variables that may predict intraosseous screw breakage, and whether intraosseous screw breakage is associated with higher rates of implant removal secondary to pain.

METHODS: Five hundred thirty-one patients undergoing syndesmotic stabilization were screened, of which 43 patients (with 58 screws) experiencing postoperative screw breakage met inclusion criteria. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographic data, comorbidities, time to screw breakage, location of screw breakage, and implant removal. Several radiographic parameters were evaluated for their potential to influence the site of screw breakage.

RESULTS: Intraosseous screw breakage occurred in 32 patients (74.4%). Screw breakage occurred exclusively in the tibiofibular clear space in the remaining 11 instances (25.6%). Intraosseous screw breakage was significantly associated with eventual implant removal after breakage (P = .034). Screws placed further from the tibiotalar joint were at less risk for intraosseous breakage (odds ratio 0.818, P = .002). Screws placed at a threshold height of 20 mm or greater were more likely to break in the clear space (odds ratio 12.1, P = .002).

CONCLUSION: Syndesmotic screw breakage may be more problematic than previously described. Intraosseous breakage was associated with higher rates of implant removal secondary to pain in this study. Placement of screws 20 mm or higher from the tibiotalar joint may decrease risk of intraosseous breakage.Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective study.

Background. There are no established guidelines for fixation of posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs). However, fixation of PMFs appears to be increasing with growing evidence demonstrating benefits for stability, alignment, and early functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk to anatomic structures utilizing a percutaneous technique for posterior to anterior (PA) screw fixation of PMFs. Methods. Percutaneous PA screw placement was carried out on 10 fresh frozen cadaveric ankles followed by dissection to identify soft tissue and neurovascular structures at risk. The distance from the guidewire to each anatomic structure of interest was measured. The correlation between the mean distances from the guidewire to each structure was calculated. Results. The sural nerve was directly transected in 1/10 specimens (10%) and in contact with the wire in a second specimen (10%). There was a significant correlation between the proximity of the guidewire to the apex of Volkmann's tubercle and its proximity to the sural nerve. The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle belly was perforated by the guidewire 40% of the time but was not tethered or entrapped by the screw. Conclusions. Percutaneous PA screw placement is a safe technique which can be improved with several modifications. A mini-open technique is recommended to protect the sural nerve. There may be potential for tethering of the FHL with use of a washer or large screw head. Risk to the anterior and posterior neurovascular bundles is minimal.Levels of Evidence: Level V.

BACKGROUND: Peroneal tendon pathology is common. Several factors have been implicated, including low-lying muscles and accessory tendons. Studies have reported on the presence and length measurements of these structures. This study evaluates volume measurements within the sheath using magnetic resonance images for patients with operatively treated peroneal tendon pathology and control patients without peroneal disease.

METHODS: Fifty-one patients with peroneal tendon pathology and 15 controls were included. The volumes of the peroneal sheath, peroneal tendons, peroneal muscle, and accessory peroneus tendons were measured. The distal extent of the peroneus brevis (PB) muscle was measured. Volume and length measurements were then compared.

RESULTS: The mean PB muscle length from the tip of the fibula was 5.55 ± 2.5 mm (peroneal group) and 11.79 ± 4.07 mm (control) (P = .017). The mean peroneal sheath volume was 7.06 versus 5.12 mL, respectively (P = .001). The major contributors to this increased volume was the tenosynovitis (3.58 vs 2.56 mL, respectively; P = .019), the peroneal tendons (2.17 vs 1.7 mL, P = .004), and the accessory peroneus tendon + PB muscle (1.31 vs 0.86 mL, P = .023).

CONCLUSION: The current study supports that the PB muscle belly is more distal in patients with peroneal tendon pathology. The study also demonstrates increased total volume within the peroneal sheath among the same patients. We propose that increased volume within the sheath, regardless of what structure is enlarged, is associated with peroneal tendon pathology. Further studies are needed to determine if debridement and decompression of the sheath will result in improved functional outcomes for these patients.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Case control imaging study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, international survey.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors influencing pharmacologic anticoagulation initiation after spine surgery based on the AOSpine Anticoagulation Global Survey.

METHODS: This survey was distributed to the international membership of AOSpine (n = 3805). A Likert-type scale described grade practice-specific factors on a scale from low (1) to high (5) importance, and patient-specific factors a scale from low (0) to high (3) importance. Analysis was performed to determine which factors were significant in the decision making surrounding the initiation of pharmacologic anticoagulation.

RESULTS: A total of 316 spine surgeons from 64 countries completed the survey. In terms of practice-specific factors considered to initiate treatment, expert opinion was graded the highest (mean grade ± SD = 3.2 ± 1.3), followed by fellowship training (3.2 ± 1.3). Conversely, previous studies (2.7 ± 1.2) and unspecified guidelines were considered least important (2.6 ± 1.6). Patient body mass index (2.0 ± 1.0) and postoperative mobilization (2.3 ± 1.0) were deemed most important and graded highly overall. Those who rated estimated blood loss with greater importance in anticoagulation initiation decision making were more likely to administer thromboprophylaxis at later times (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68-0.71), while those who rated drain output with greater importance were likely to administer thromboprophylaxis at earlier times (HR = 1.32-1.43).

CONCLUSION: Among our global cohort of spine surgeons, certain patient factors (ie, patient mobilization and body mass index) and practice-specific factors (ie, expert opinion and fellowship training) were considered to be most important when considering anticoagulation start times.

The COVID-19 pandemic had wide-reaching effects on healthcare delivery, including care for hip fractures, a common injury among older adults. This study characterized factors related to surgical timing and outcomes, length-of-stay, and discharge disposition among patients treated for operative hip fractures during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to historical controls. A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted from 16 March-20 May 2020 with a consecutive series of 64 operative fragility hip fracture patients at three tertiary academic medical centers. Historical controls were matched based on sex, surgical procedure, age, and comorbidities. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and time-to-surgery. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications, length-of-stay, discharge disposition, and time to obtain a COVID-19 test result. There was no difference in 30-day mortality, complication rates, length-of-stay, anesthesia type, or time-to-surgery, despite a mean time to obtain a final preoperative COVID-19 test result of 17.6 h in the study group. Notably, 23.8% of patients were discharged to home during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to 4.8% among controls (p = 0.003). On average, patients received surgical care within 48 h of arrival during the COVID-19 pandemic. More patients were discharged to home rather than a facility with no change in complications, suggesting an opportunity for increased discharge to home.

INTRODUCTION: Common anesthesia practice for hand surgery combines a preoperative regional anesthetic and intraoperative monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Despite adequate regional anesthesia, patients may receive doses of intraoperative sedatives which can result in oversedation and potentially avoidable complications. VR could prove to be a valuable tool for patients and providers by distracting the mind from processing noxious stimuli resulting in minimized sedative use and reduced risk of oversedation without negatively impacting patient satisfaction. Our hypothesis was that intraoperative VR use reduces sedative dosing during elective hand surgery without detracting from patient satisfaction as compared to a usual care control.

METHODS: Forty adults undergoing hand surgery were randomized to receive either intraoperative VR in addition to MAC, or usual MAC. Patients in both groups received preoperative regional anesthesia at provider discretion. Intraoperatively, the VR group viewed programming of their choice via a head-mounted display. The primary outcome was intraoperative propofol dose per hour (mg · hr-1). Secondary outcomes included patient reported pain and anxiety, overall satisfaction, functional outcome, and post anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS: Of the 40 enrolled patients, 34 completed the perioperative portion of the trial. VR group patients received significantly less propofol per hour than the control group (Mean (±SD): 125.3 (±296.0) vs 750.6 (±334.6) mg · hr-1, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in patient reported overall satisfaction, (0-100 scale, Median (IQR) 92 (77-100) vs 100 (100-100), VR vs control, p = 0.087). There were no significant differences between groups in PACU pain scores, perioperative opioid analgesic dose, or in postoperative functional outcome. PACU LOS was significantly decreased in the VR group (53.0 (43.0-72.0) vs 75.0 (57.5-89.0) min, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION: VR immersion during hand surgery led to significant reductions in intraoperative propofol dose and PACU LOS without negatively impacting key patient reported outcomes.