Publications by Year: 2024

2024

Russo, M., Liu, C., Liu, Y., Mahar, S., Rozental, T. D., & Harper, C. M. (2024). Evaluating Male Patients’ Understanding of Osteoporosis Evaluation and Treatment Following a Distal Radius Fracture.. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 49(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.07.006 (Original work published 2024)

PURPOSE: Current estimates suggest that 1-2 million men in the United States have osteoporosis, yet the majority of osteoporosis literature focuses on postmenopausal women. Our aim was to understand men's awareness and knowledge of osteoporosis and its treatment.

METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 male patients >50 years old who sustained a low-energy distal radius fracture. The goal was to ascertain patients' knowledge of osteoporosis, its management, and experience discussing osteoporosis with their primary care physicians (PCP).

RESULTS: Participants had little knowledge of osteoporosis or its treatment. Many participants regarded osteoporosis as a women's disease. Most participants expressed concern regarding receiving a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Several patients stated that they believe osteoporosis may have contributed to their fracture. Families, friends, or mass media served as the primary information source for participants, but few had good self-reported understanding of the disease itself. The majority of participants reported never having discussed osteoporosis with their PCPs although almost half had received a dual x-ray absorptiometry scan. Participants expressed general interest in being tested/screened and generally were willing to undergo treatment despite the perception that medication has serious side effects. One patient expressed concern that treatment side effects could be worse than having osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION: Critical knowledge gaps exist regarding osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in at-risk male patients. Specifically, most patients were unaware they could be osteoporotic because of the perception of osteoporosis as a women's disease. Most patients had never discussed osteoporosis with their PCP.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Male patients remain relatively unaware of osteoporosis as a disease entity. Opportunity exists for prevention of future fragility fractures by improving communication between patients and physicians regarding osteoporosis screening in men following low-energy distal radius fractures.

Kelly, S. P., Ramkumar, D. B., Crawford, B., Lozano-Calderon, S. A., Gebhardt, M. C., & Anderson, M. E. (2024). Management of limb length discrepancy after bone sarcoma resection about the knee in the skeletally immature.. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics. Part B, 33(5), 497-502. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001124 (Original work published 2024)

Patients with bone sarcomas increasingly choose limb salvage. This can lead to issues with limb length discrepancy (LLD) for the skeletally immature. We synthesize management options into an algorithm and report our results. Patients with bone sarcomas involving any location from the femoral diaphysis to the tibial diaphysis 12 years or younger were reviewed. Our clinical pathway prescribed patients with metadiaphyseal lesions to intercalary allograft reconstruction, epiphyseal lesions and less than 5 cm expected LLD to osteoarticular allograft and patients with more than 5 cm expected LLD to extendable prosthesis. Twenty patients met inclusion criteria: 11 with osteoarticular allografts, 5 with extendable prostheses and 4 with intercalary allografts; median age 11.5 years; median follow-up 8.2 years; and final median LLD 1.6 cm. Five patients had contralateral epiphysiodesis, two patients underwent contralateral femoral shortening and a median of 6 (range 4-8) lengthenings were performed for extendable prostheses. Four patients had residual LLD over 3 cm. There were 13 revisions in 8 patients and 2 amputations. Limb-salvage in paediatric bone sarcoma of the knee can be managed with multiple techniques producing satisfactory results in regards to LLD. Careful pre-operative planning and shared decision making is a requisite given the high rate of secondary procedures for both LLD and reconstructive failures. Level of evidence: Level III Retrospective Comparative Study.

Hresko, A. M., Pickrell, B. B., & Harper, C. M. (2024). Necrotizing Sweet Syndrome of the Hand and Forearm in the Immediate Postoperative Period: Case Report.. Hand (New York, N.Y.), 19(7), NP1-NP7. https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231207978 (Original work published 2024)

Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) is a feared and potentially morbid postoperative complication requiring prompt surgical intervention. Cutaneous conditions that mimic NSTI have been reported and rarely occur in the postoperative period. Sweet syndrome, also known as acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is a dermatologic condition characterized by fever, neutrophil-predominant leukocytosis, and painful skin lesions. Necrotizing Sweet syndrome (NSS) is an aggressive variant that causes a clinical appearance of localized skin necrosis and histologic evidence of necrotic foci extending to the deep aspects of the soft tissues and involving fascia and/or skeletal muscle. Necrotizing Sweet syndrome can be easily mistaken for NSTI. Contrary to infection, Sweet syndrome and NSS are worsened by surgical intervention due to the phenomenon of pathergy and readily respond to corticosteroid treatment. We present the case of a 54-year-old woman who developed NSS following an uncomplicated fasciectomy for Dupuytren disease.

Rozental, T. D., & Watkins, I. T. (2024). Principles and Evaluation of Bony Unions.. Hand Clinics, 40(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2023.06.001 (Original work published 2024)

Nonunion is a common and costly problem. Unfortunately, there is no widely agreed upon and standardized definition for nonunion. The evaluation of bony union should start with a thorough history and physical examination. The clinician should consider patient-dependent as well as patient-independent characteristics that may influence the rate of healing and evaluate the patient for physical examination findings suggestive of bony union and infection. Radiographs and clinical examination can help confirm a diagnosis of union. When the diagnosis is in doubt, however, advanced imaging modalities as well as laboratory studies can help a surgeon determine when further intervention is necessary.

Karaismailoglu, B., Nassour, N., Duggan, J., Peiffer, M., Ghandour, S., Bejarano-Pineda, L., Ashkani-Esfahani, S., & Miller, C. P. (2024). Effect of sequential burr passes on osteotomy magnitude and calcaneal morphology in minimally invasive Zadek osteotomy.. Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official Journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 30(2), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2023.10.009 (Original work published 2024)

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of each burr pass on degree of correction, gap size and calcaneal morphology in MIS Zadek osteotomy.

METHODS: MIS Zadek osteotomy was performed on ten cadaveric specimens using a 3.1 mm Shannon burr. After each burr pass, the osteotomy gap was manually closed, and the subsequent burr passes were carried out with the foot held in dorsiflexion, which was repeated five times. Lateral X-rays were taken before and after each burr pass. Two independent reviewers measured the dorsal calcaneal length after each burr passage, as well as changes in several calcaneal parameters including X/Y ratio, Fowler Philip angle, and Böhler angle.

RESULTS: The average decrease in dorsal calcaneal cortical length with each burr pass was as follows: 2.6 ± 0.9 mm at the 1st pass, 2.4 ± 1 mm at the 2nd pass, 2 ± 1 mm at the 3rd pass, 1.6 ± 1 mm at the 4th pass, and 1.4 ± 0.7 mm at the 5th pass. The Fowler Philip and Böhler angles consistently decreased while the X/Y ratio consistently increased following each consecutive burr pass. Interobserver reliability analysis demonstrated good agreement for all parameters.

CONCLUSION: The results revealed the trends of length and anatomical changes in the calcaneus with each burr pass. On average, a dorsal wedge resection of 10 mm was achieved after 5 burr passes. This data can aid surgeons in determining the optimal number of burr passes required for a particular amount of resection, ensuring the attainment of the desired patient-specific surgical outcome.

Karczewski, D., Gonzalez, M. R., Bedi, A., Newman, E., Raskin, K., Anderson, M. E., & Lozano-Calderon, S. A. (2024). Dual Mobility for Oncological Hip Reconstruction: Significantly Reduced Dislocation Rates at 5 years.. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 32(4), e184-e192. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00608 (Original work published 2024)

BACKGROUND: Although dual mobility total hip arthroplasty has become increasingly common in recent years, limited remains known on dual mobility in surgical oncology. This university-based investigation compared dislocation and revision rates of DMs, conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA), and hemiarthroplasties (HAs) for oncological hip reconstruction.

METHODS: An institutional tumor registry was used to identify 221 patients undergoing 45 DMs, 67 conventional THAs, and 109 HAs, performed for 17 primary hip tumors and 204 hip metastases between 2010 and 2020. The median age at surgery was 65 years, and 52% were female. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves and log-rank tests were done to compare dislocation and revision rates among all 221 patients, after a one-to-one propensity match, based on age, sex, tumor type (metastasis, primary tumor), and tumor localization (femur, acetabulum).

RESULTS: The 5-year survivorship free of dislocation was 98% in DMs, 66% in conventional THAs ( P = 0.03; all P values compared with DMs), and 97% among HAs ( P = 0.48). The 5-year survivorship free of revision was 69% in DMs, 62% in conventional THAs ( P = 0.68), and 92% in HAs ( P = 0.06). After propensity matching, the 5-year survivorship free of dislocation was 42% in 45 conventional THAs ( P = 0.027; compared with all 45 DMs) and 89% in 16 matched HAs ( P = 0.19; compared with 16 DMs with femoral involvement only). The 5-year survivorship free of revision was 40% in matched conventional THAs ( P = 0.91) and 100% in matched HAs ( P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS: DMs showed markedly lower rates of dislocation than conventional THAs, with overall revision rates remaining comparable among different designs. DMs should be considered the option of choice for oncological hip reconstruction if compared with conventional THAs. HAs are a feasible alternative when encountering femoral disease involvement only.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Van Rysselberghe, N. L., Seltzer, R., Lawson, T. A., Kuether, J., White, P., Grisdela, P., Daniell, H., Amirhekmat, A., Merchan, N., Seaver, T., Samineni, A., Saiz, A., Ngo, D., Dorman, C., Epner, E., Svetgoff, R., Terle, M., Lee, M., Campbell, S., … Bishop, J. A. (2024). Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating for Extreme Distal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 38(2), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002730 (Original work published 2024)

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after retrograde intramedullary nailing (rIMN) versus locked plating (LP) of "extreme distal" periprosthetic femur fractures, defined as those that contact or extend distal to the anterior flange.

DESIGN: Retrospective review.

SETTING: Eight academic level I trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures at or distal to the anterior flange (OTA/AO 33B-C[VB1]) treated with rIMN or LP.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was reoperation to promote healing or to treat infection (reoperation for elective removal of symptomatic hardware was excluded from this analysis). Secondary outcomes included nonunion, delayed union, fixation failure, infection, overall reoperation rate, distal femoral alignment, and ambulatory status at final follow-up. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with rIMN or LP.

RESULTS: Seventy-one patients treated with rIMN and 224 patients treated with LP were included. The rIMN group had fewer points of fixation in the distal segment (rIMN: 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. LP: 6.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001) and more patients who were allowed to weight-bear as tolerated immediately postoperatively (rIMN: 45%; LP: 9%, P < 0.01). Reoperation to promote union and/or treat infection was 8% in the rIMN group and 16% in the LP group ( P = 0.122). There were no significant differences in nonunion ( P > 0.999), delayed union ( P = 0.079), fixation failure ( P > 0.999), infection ( P = 0.084), or overall reoperation rate ( P > 0.999). Significantly more patients in the rIMN group were ambulatory without assistive devices at final follow-up (rIMN: 35%, LP: 18%, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS: rIMN of extreme distal periprosthetic femur fractures has similar complication rates compared with LP, with a possible advantage of earlier return to weight-bearing. Surgeons can consider this treatment strategy in all fractures with stable implants and amenable prosthesis geometry, even extreme distal fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Khak, M., Shariyate, M. J., Villarreal-Espinosa, J. B., Kheir, N., Momenzadeh, K., McNichol, M., Appleton, P., Wixted, J. J., Rodriguez, E. K., & Nazarian, A. (2024). Antibiotic prophylaxis following low-velocity gunshot fractures: an updated review.. International Orthopaedics, 48(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06052-w (Original work published 2024)

PURPOSE: Low-velocity gunshot fractures (LVGFs) are a common type of gunshot-induced trauma with the potential for complications such as infection and osteomyelitis. The effectiveness of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs remains uncertain, leading to ongoing debate about the appropriate treatment. In this review, we evaluate recent updates on the current understanding of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs, how previous studies have investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs, and the current state of institutional policies and protocols for treating LVGFs with antibiotics.

METHODS: We conducted a review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs after the last review in 2013. Due to the lack of quantitative clinical trial studies, we employed a narrative synthesis approach to analyze and present the findings from the included primary studies. We categorized the outcomes based on the anatomical location of the LVGFs.

RESULTS: After evaluating 67 publications with the necessary qualifications out of 578 abstracts, 17 articles were included. The sample size of the studies ranged from 22 to 252 patients. The antibiotics used in the studies varied, and the follow-up period ranged from three months to ten years. The included studies investigated the use of antibiotics in treating LVGFs at various anatomic locations, including the humerus, forearm, hand and wrist, hip, femur, tibia, and foot and ankle.

CONCLUSION: Our study provides updated evidence for the use of antibiotics in LVGFs and highlights the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines. We also highlight the lack of institutional policies for treating LVGFs and the heterogeneity in treatments among institutions with established protocols. A single-dose antibiotic approach could be cost-effective for patients with non-operatively treated LVGFs. We suggest that a national or international registry for gunshot injuries, antibiotics, and infections could serve as a valuable resource for collecting and analyzing data related to these important healthcare issues.

O’Hara, N. N., O’Toole, R. , V, Frey, K. P., Castillo, R. C., Cuschieri, J., Haut, E. R., Slobogean, G. P., Firoozabadi, R., Christmas, B., Obremskey, W. T., Carlini, A. R., Gaski, G. E., Kutcher, M. E., Marvel, D., Stein, D. M., & Consortium, M. E. T. R. (2024). Risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis effects of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin in orthopedic trauma patients: A secondary analysis of the PREVENT CLOT trial.. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 96(4), 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004226 (Original work published 2024)

BACKGROUND: The PREVENT CLOT trial concluded that thromboprophylaxis with aspirin was noninferior to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing death after orthopedic trauma. However, it was unclear if these results applied to patients at highest risk of thrombosis. Therefore, we assessed if the effect of aspirin versus LMWH differed based on patients' baseline risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS: The PREVENT CLOT trial enrolled 12,211 adult patients with fractures. This secondary analysis stratified the study population into VTE risk quartiles: low (<1%) to high (>10%) using the Caprini score. We assessed stratum-specific treatment effects using the win ratio method, in which each patient assigned to aspirin was paired with each assigned to LMWH. In each pair, we compared outcomes hierarchically, starting with death, then pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and bleeding. The secondary outcome added patients' medication satisfaction as a fifth composite component.

RESULTS: In the high-risk quartile (n = 3052), 80% had femur fracture, pelvic, or acetabular fractures. Thoracic (47%) and head (37%) injuries were also common. In the low risk quartile (n = 3053), most patients had a tibia fracture (67%), 5% had a thoracic injury, and less than 1% had head or spinal injuries. Among high risk patients, thromboembolic events did not differ statistically between aspirin and LMWH (win ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.08, p = 0.42). This result was consistent in the low (win ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.90-1.47, p = 0.27), low-medium (win ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.29, p = 0.68), and medium-high risk quartiles (win ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.80-1.11, p = 0.48). When medication satisfaction was considered, favorable outcomes were 68% more likely with aspirin (win ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.60-1.77; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Thromboembolic outcomes were similar with aspirin or LMWH, even among patients at highest risk of VTE. Aspirin was favored if medication satisfaction was also considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.