Publications by Year: 2014

2014

Wasfy JH, Strom JB, O’Brien C, et al. Causes of short-term readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2014;7(1):97-103. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000988

BACKGROUND: Rehospitalization within 30 days after an admission for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common, costly, and a future target for Medicare penalties. Causes of readmission after PCI are largely unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS: To illuminate the causes of PCI readmissions, patients with PCI readmitted within 30 days of discharge between 2007 and 2011 at 2 hospitals were identified, and their medical records were reviewed. Of 9288 PCIs, 9081 (97.8%) were alive at the end of the index hospitalization. Of these, 893 patients (9.8%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge and included in the analysis. Among readmitted patients, 341 patients (38.1%) were readmitted for evaluation of recurrent chest pain or other symptoms concerning for angina, whereas 59 patients (6.6%) were readmitted for staged PCI without new symptoms. Complications of PCI accounted for 60 readmissions (6.7%). For cases in which chest pain or other symptoms concerning for angina prompted the readmission, 21 patients (6.2%) met criteria for myocardial infarction, and repeat PCI was performed in 54 patients (15.8%). The majority of chest pain patients (288; 84.4%) underwent ≥1 diagnostic imaging test, most commonly coronary angiography, and only 9 (2.6%) underwent target lesion revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS: After PCI, readmissions within 30 days were seldom related to PCI complications but often for recurrent chest pain. Readmissions with recurrent chest pain infrequently met criteria for myocardial infarction but were associated with high rates of diagnostic testing.

Strom JB, Wimmer NJ, Wasfy JH, Kennedy K, Yeh RW. Association between operator procedure volume and patient outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2014;7(4):560-6. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000884

BACKGROUND: The growth of centers capable of performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has outpaced population growth despite declining incidence of myocardial infarction and prevalence of coronary artery disease, potentially increasing the proportion of operators falling below minimal yearly volume standards set by professional societies.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic literature search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for English-language articles published between 1977 and November 2012 was performed. Title and abstract review followed by full-text and references review were performed by 2 authors independently to identify studies examining the association between operator volume and outcomes in PCI. Using a standardized form, 2 authors abstracted information on study design, methods, outcomes, statistical methods, and conclusions. Studies were categorized according to methodological quality and outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed by outcome using a random-effects model. Of the 23 studies included in the analysis, 14 (61%) evaluated mortality, 7 (30%) evaluated major adverse cardiac events, and 2 (9%) evaluated angiographic success. In total, the studies evaluated 15 907 operators performing 205 214 PCIs on 1 109 103 patients at 2456 centers with a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. Eleven (48%) were considered higher quality. Studies with higher methodological quality and large sample sizes more often showed a relationship between operator volume and outcomes in PCI. Higher volume was associated with improved major adverse cardiac events at every threshold, regardless of the threshold evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and major adverse cardiac events increase as operator volumes decrease in PCI. Among studies showing a relationship, high-volume operators were defined variably, with annual PCIs ranging from >11 to >270, with no clear evidence of a threshold effect within the ranges studied.

Wasfy JH, Strom JB, Waldo SW, et al. Clinical preventability of 30-day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2014;3(5):e001290. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001290

BACKGROUND: Early readmission after PCI is an important contributor to healthcare expenditures and a target for performance measurement. The extent to which 30-day readmissions after PCI are preventable is unknown yet essential to minimizing their occurrence.

METHODS AND RESULTS: PCI patients readmitted to hospital at which PCI was performed within 30 days of discharge at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital were identified, and their medical records were independently reviewed by 2 physicians. Each reviewer used an ordinal scale (0, not; 1, possibly; 2, probably; and 3, definitely preventable) to rate clinical preventability, and a total sum score ≥2 was considered preventable. Characteristics of preventable and unpreventable readmissions were compared, and predictors of clinical preventability were assessed by using multivariate logistic regression. Of 9288 PCIs performed, 9081 (97.8%) patients survived to initial hospital discharge and 1007 (11.1%) were readmitted to the index hospital within 30 days. After excluding repeat readmissions, 893 readmissions were reviewed. Fair agreement between physician reviewers was observed (weighted κ statistic 0.44 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.49]). After aggregation of scores, 380 (42.6%) readmissions were deemed preventable and 513 (57.4%) were deemed not preventable. Common causes of preventable readmissions included staged PCI without new symptoms (14.7%), vascular/bleeding complications of PCI (10.0%), and congestive heart failure (9.7%).

CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of 30-day readmissions after PCI may have been prevented by changes in clinical decision-making. Focusing on these readmissions may reduce readmission rates.

Ozcan C, Strom JB, Newell JB, Mansour MC, Ruskin JN. Incidence and predictors of atrial fibrillation and its impact on long-term survival in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2014;16(10):1508-14. doi:10.1093/europace/euu129

AIMS: To determine the incidence and predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its impact on survival in patients with other forms of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) including atrial flutter (AFL), atrial tachycardia (AT), atrioventricular reentrant (AVRT), and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that SVA may increase risk of AF and concomitant AF may influence long-term survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients who underwent catheter ablation for SVA from 2000 to 2010 were included in this study. The patients were identified retrospectively and the vital status determined prospectively. Observed survival in the study cohort was compared with survival rates in the age- and sex-matched general population. The study group included 1573 patients (mean age 50.5 ± 18 years, 47% female) with AVNRT (38.5%), AFL (29.6%), AVRT (22.6%) and AT (9.3%). The patients were followed for a mean of 35 months (median 23 months). Atrial fibrillation was documented in 424 patients (27%) with a higher incidence in males (35 vs. 18%). Atrial fibrillation was present in 19.6% of patients before the ablation and developed in 9.07% after ablation. Atrial fibrillation commonly occurred in patients with AFL (57.5%), AT (27.4%), AVRT (13.5%), and AVNRT (9.7%). Older age, prolonged PR interval, dilated left atrium, low left ventricular ejection fraction and presence of AFL were independent predictors for concomitant AF. Long-term survival was worse in the presence of AF.

CONCLUSION: The incidence of AF is high in patients with other forms of SVA. The most common association is between AFL and AF. Long-term survival is decreased in those who have concomitant AF, although AF did not emerge as an independent predictor of mortality when adjusted for other covariates.